Topic: SexyCam.red - A potentially scam project running a fake signature campaign (Read 314 times)

If the payments have been processed, even though the rates are low, people won't care and will keep promoting.

I think I worked for another campaign before that proved to be not so legit, yet everything "looked good" at the beginning. They paid in Bitcoin, but never paid with their own tokens. To be fair I think it happened plenty of times before on this forum, so people are supposed to know about the risk by now (well hopefully).

You are the one who is retarted. Satoshi never ran a project where he would promise people to work for him and in return he would reward them. You need to be a little logical about what you say. You cannot compare a so called project with Bitcoin and their teams as well.

Being anonymous doesn't means scammer,but most of the projects have useing this strategy to convince people and scam lot of money so don't get over confident because not everyone can be a satishi.

Don't be retarded, can you tell me who Satoshi is?

Let's not talk about anything. I would just like to know something about the team behind this project. Some names, LinkedIn accounts or any proof that they really exist and this project is legit.

There were some projects years ago that also did a signature campaign and paying BTC to its participants but still turned scam after all the things they did.
But lets not quickly judge this project. Maybe you guys who joined the campaign can ask who are the people behind this project first. That is is they don't mind revealing

Seems they have paid the signature, we can find the transaction here:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/155LPUwLOZCPcX62XPdysPEdWgNwnpzcMs5JP6xblZQY/edit#gid=1134809742

The Signature campaign seems to be legit, for the project is your call.

I never said this project is not a scam, need a deeper investigation.
Only said this seems not to be a fake signature like https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.48162102 or https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.48743419.
In 3 days will know if the manager will scam users.

For the project team, I have no clue and it's a red flag, also in the whitepaper we have no info about them https://www.sexycam.red/whitepaper/whitepaper.pdf

If the project is really legit and they are not planning to scam anyone, then why the hell is there no information about the team on their website? 

Update: it seems a legit signature run by admin of the channel, here the latest screenshot (around 1 hour ago).



1st week will end in 4 days, they have a short starter week, we will soon see if they will pay or not.

Yes the payment is very low but you don't need to join this campaign.

Can be a real signature, I've joined discord, I will have more information soon. I can read only for now the main channel.

The project might be a scam or not but no one would be able to identify the project as a scam base on your provided information. Better try to collect more info to mark the project as a scam (if the project is really scam).

A so called teamless project called SexyCam has recently started a signature campaign in the forum in order to promote their project and earn some money through a public presale that they are planning to launch in January, 2019. The project is so clearly a scam and a person would know it by simply opening their website which clearly shows that the project is totally fake and is just an structure made to scam people out of their money. They didn't even bother to represent a fake team for their project to make their project look at least a bit less suspicious.

The signature campaign they are running has a self-moderated thread, offers very low rates per week, and their signatures are obviously made by themselves because they are totally not good looking. When I posted in their signature thread after seeing their signatures, they deleted my post. Below is what I wrote which they deleted:



And, to fool the members even more, the manager has added a wallet address along with a signed message and a signature claiming that the funds to be paid are held in that address.  
How does it make any sense if the manager himself, who is not trusted by the community, posts a signed message from an address that he himself holds and says, "Don't worry, the funds are available in this address that I hold. So I won't scam you guys."