Here's there latest contradiction:
https://archive.is/btk3M
This is completely wrong. Just because you don't like someone that does not mean that they aren't going to properly contribute to a thread that you've started (it could take off and be a big thread). I disagree with this suggestion. It would not be a ignore function anymore, but rather censoring/blocking one.
I don't understand what the problem is with a combination of ignore and self moderated threads? You can control what posts are allowed and you would not see the posts of ignored users (thus can delete without reading). I always thought that it was sufficient.
I don't understand what the problem is with a combination of ignore and self moderated threads? You can control what posts are allowed and you would not see the posts of ignored users (thus can delete without reading). I always thought that it was sufficient.
Okay, so you have a problem with censoring and blocking, but you don't have a problem with self moderating which is an option that deletes people's posts in someone's thread? Deleting a person's posts is censoring, Lauda.
I take staff members enforcing the rules properly very seriously.