Author

Topic: Should this sig be allowed with the mixer ban? (Read 179 times)

copper member
Activity: 1330
Merit: 899
🖤😏
January 15, 2024, 07:10:29 AM
#9
to be contradicting yourself continuously.

First you say that you wouldn't accept a good offer for signature campaign when you were working for one and you already had the tags and then that the troling of the signature is a way of protesting something you agreed to, the mixer ban. Since this is not the exception, but something quite common with you, I would seriously consider going to get my head checked.

This is your mindset, seeing $ and BTC every where, of course I only had 3 tags from 2018, but right after I joined a sig campaign through invitation from Royse, suddenly I became a troll, liar, scammer, and for what? For a few bucks. And for what reason? Trolling according to taggers.

That seems convenient, besides, I am against the ban, because it's a """""BITCOIN""""" service, and yes, I won't join a campaign now, because it reflects badly on the service paying for the ad. How is that contradictory?

You keep saying "troll", but can you show me one convincing instance "before" I get tagged to justify any of the tags? You can't because there is none. So now all you have is basically after I received the tags.

@FatFork, what would be the agenda in your opinion? If I say don't bully people because karma will whoop your asses, do you think that's a hidden agenda? Don't you believe when people collectively ignore injustice, they can all get away from the consequences or we would all pay the price for it?

I'm used to it for people to always find a recent behaviour to justify their wrong doings from the past.

I'v gotta admit, there are 2 crazy "trolls" in this forum, one of them is nuts trying to prevent the next 5 watnots, the other one is me risking his life to prevent any unauthorized access to people's coins.

What a gullible person am I, really? Sharing my findings to at least half a million jackpot publicly, and having people attacking me to stop me from having a few hundred bucks.

And that is the definition of "idiot", good thing now I realized my own stupidity before it's too late.
legendary
Activity: 1568
Merit: 2581
Top Crypto Casino
You know, I was just thinking we maybe playing right into this guy's hands.  Feeding his ego, making him the center of attention - basically giving him exactly what he wants as an attention-seeking troll.  Clearly he's got an agenda and time to kill, but we'd be wise not to take his bait. 

but rest assured, anyone who has tagged me ever since I came back in 2022, will pay for it one way or another.

Way I see it, dude wants a stage and an audience.  So I say we stop shinin' the spotlight his way.  Starve him of the reaction he's fishin' for and he'll likely move on to other pastures.  Ain't no one got time for that nonsense anyhow.
global moderator
Activity: 3794
Merit: 2615
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
It's a joke. The "mixer" doesn't exist. I really hope we're not going to be banning jokes now.
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 2013
Oh yeah? you would hire me? Guess what? even if someone offers me a good deal, I won't accept it because I think my tags would look bad on their service if I wear their sig ad, but I am not that idiot to actually include a mixer link in my sig. This is just my opposition protest against the ban, even though after a few days after the ban announcement, I fell in line to support the administration's decision, however what I did was a click bait in a trollish way. 😉

I would seriously consider visiting a psychologist or psychiatrist because it is one thing to be funny and another to be contradicting yourself continuously.

First you say that you wouldn't accept a good offer for signature campaign when you were working for one and you already had the tags and then that the troling of the signature is a way of protesting something you agreed to, the mixer ban. Since this is not the exception, but something quite common with you, I would seriously consider going to get my head checked.
legendary
Activity: 3584
Merit: 4420
Yeah bro! What should be allowed exactly? A click bait to a scam ICO run by US government or what? Why don't you question the existence of jambojet with more than 4 mixers  combined under a shell company?


I invite everyone to read my latest post on that topic, exciting news. 🤑


If I remember correctly, you said on rep board that if you ignore me, I'd fade away, how is that going? Looks like I'm just gaining more visibility.

Edit: meep meep! Fixed it, how do you like it boss? Lol
I don't mind some trolling from certain people. You post some funny stuff now and then, it's the morons like the jvan guy that annoy me. This wasn't a dig at you period, although you probably shouldn't try to work around the rules and see how far you can push the mods. You're probably 1 of the only trolls i'd consider hiring in a sig campaign as I feel people actually read some of the shit you post.
legendary
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1018
I don't know about mixers in the signature but I am sure Howey ICO is allowed.

[ANN][ICO]HoweyCoins: the only BitcoinTalk-endorsed ICO - GUARANTEED PROFIT

It is not a guaranteed profitable ICO as its text shows, it is only a big education ICO to teach newbies about risk of ICOs. It was posted by theymos and an educational resource years ago when ICOs appear everywhere in cryptocurrency.
legendary
Activity: 3584
Merit: 4420

While it may or may not fall under the same category as other banned companies, should this be allowed?
Jump to: