Topic: Should we ban nuclear weapons? (Read 302 times)
Other Countries won't pay attention to a bahrough any means other than military force, soft power only works when we are the main supplier for the country we aren't for the entire world. It would be taken as a sign of weakness to others nations and provoke those who wish to destroy America
No doubt nuclear weapons should be banned. The very idea of having weapons capable of total destruction as a deterrent is absurd. When we speak about nuclear weapons, we usually mean the USA and Russia - if one begins nuclear war, the second will respond in the same manner. The governments of these two countries aren't that stupid to actually do it, but the very possibility is extremely scary.
The scariest part is that the world has already been on the verge of the nuclear war - remember The Cuban Missile Crisis? Nothing can prevent it from happening again if they won't ban NW.
The scariest part is that the world has already been on the verge of the nuclear war - remember The Cuban Missile Crisis? Nothing can prevent it from happening again if they won't ban NW.
It can not be possible since each country can`t trust anyone else. If you get rid of nuclear weapon and your enemy don`t — gg
God gave earth as a gift to us . Deadly weapons like nuke will destroy the earth's life and habitat. We need to use technology in a way which benefit us and all the life in the earth. So I disagree in using nuke or such type weapon.
And It is no doubt nuclear weapons require a large amount of money. There are better alternatives to spend that money. It could be used to give better lives for civilians in terms of housing, health and education.
What can you say about this?
I really appreciate your thinking, yes we want peace. And It is no doubt nuclear weapons require a large amount of money. There are better alternatives to spend that money. It could be used to give better lives for civilians in terms of housing, health and education.
What can you say about this?
God gave earth as a gift to us . Deadly weapons like nuke will destroy the earth's life and habitat. We need to use technology in a way which benefit us and all the life in the earth. So I disagree in using nuke or such type weapon.
And It is no doubt nuclear weapons require a large amount of money. There are better alternatives to spend that money. It could be used to give better lives for civilians in terms of housing, health and education.
What can you say about this?
I agree with you, weapons of mass destruction as nukes should completely be shut down and instead focus on something which can improve lives not destroy it. And It is no doubt nuclear weapons require a large amount of money. There are better alternatives to spend that money. It could be used to give better lives for civilians in terms of housing, health and education.
What can you say about this?
It could be also viewed as a "peacemaker" weapon because no one want a conflict with nations armed with nuclear weapons.
If it is possible to ban all nuclear weapons all over the world.
We should not ban it because we can use it in some good purposes like when there is an asteroid that is going to hit earth, we can use it to eliminate it before it crash us to pieces.
Am Think Earth Need Nuclear Weapon. People Need This and People Made it. This can Help the World in The Future or End of Mankind May be.
I want the next generation to see how wonderful and beautiful earth was so I definitely agree that nuclear weapon should be ban.It is indeed a destroyer of mother earth.
ICBM and nuclear weapons are a thing of the past.
When you can just drop tungsten rods from space...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinetic_bombardment
When you can just drop tungsten rods from space...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinetic_bombardment
its just stupid that these were even created
Yes I agree.Nuclear weapon should be ban.First it is extremely harmful.Second it is a waste of money. Peace on Earth that's what everybody wants.
Yes we should
I think nuclear weapons are beneficial to the world. The major reason a Third World War is not started is that some of the countries have nuclear weapons. If a war start, all the world will be destroyed. Presence of nuclear weapons reduce the chances of declaring a war, which is beneficial to the overall system.
They should be banned from all over the world. Stop Wars, Peace Forever!
I was watching Youtube one day when bored and came across a video that changed the way I think about a lot of things. If you want an eye opener, you should search for "Nuclear bombs don't exist" on YT. Whether it's true or not is up to you to decide obviously, but just some of the facts alone that can be presented really make one think about how far and advanced the duping of humans goes...
God gave earth as a gift to us . Deadly weapons like nuke will destroy the earth's life and habitat. We need to use technology in a way which benefit us and all the life in the earth. So I disagree in using nuke or such type weapon.
And It is no doubt nuclear weapons require a large amount of money. There are better alternatives to spend that money. It could be used to give better lives for civilians in terms of housing, health and education.
What can you say about this?
And It is no doubt nuclear weapons require a large amount of money. There are better alternatives to spend that money. It could be used to give better lives for civilians in terms of housing, health and education.
What can you say about this?
Nuclear weapons and energy are fake. This is a video of the guy who used to work on the reactors. He eats uranium in the video and swam and drank the spent fuel.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rMqHTbXm3rs
Before nuclear weapons keep you up at night make sure you actually believe they are real. You have only been told it's real.
God gave earth as a gift to us . Deadly weapons like nuke will destroy the earth's life and habitat. We need to use technology in a way which benefit us and all the life in the earth. So I disagree in using nuke or such type weapon.
And It is no doubt nuclear weapons require a large amount of money. There are better alternatives to spend that money. It could be used to give better lives for civilians in terms of housing, health and education.
What can you say about this?
And It is no doubt nuclear weapons require a large amount of money. There are better alternatives to spend that money. It could be used to give better lives for civilians in terms of housing, health and education.
What can you say about this?
I agree with you that a deadly weapon like nuclear is not supposed to be created by God, it has created this earth so beautiful with the sea, forest and beautiful blue sky, why do humans want to destroy it?
I hope that such weapons in the future will no longer exist so that our children and grandchildren will live in peace.
The fact that they are to most dangerous weapon is what keeps world in peace right now. They are not build to being used but to make other countries respect you.
shouldn't, nuclear weapons is powerful. We need nuclear to nuke bad country.
Kalau menurut saya sangat harus.karna dengan menggunakan macam itu akan menimbulkan kerusakan dahsyat
In a perfect world yes, but politics of the world pretty much makes that impossible. How could you possible get everyone to agree/comply?
No, USA need to keep it to maintenance the peace of our world.
Please shed more light on your reasoning. I am really interested to hear you views in details.
Why do you say that? Does world peace lie in the hands of the USA?
And who gave it the mandate that it should be the main player in maintaining world peace?
Does this mean that the UN and other well recognized institutions are somewhat irrelevant in their mandate if world peace sorely depends on the USA?
it's the right when we should and we have to ban nuclear weapons but can we ?? the government can accept the listen instead of talking about country protect stuff ?.I don't think so.
You right, it seems impossible to ban nuclear weapons but we have to do something because i think someday nuclear will explore it.
it's the right when we should and we have to ban nuclear weapons but can we ?? the government can accept the listen instead of talking about country protect stuff ?.I don't think so.
Yes, you need, cause the nearest war can be the last war of the hole world!
Yes, sure. Nuclear weapons should be banned. But, alas, it may never happen because of world politics.
As we know that nuclear is a very dangerous weapon so it should not be necessary.
For the todays state it will be real disaster when any war happens
No, USA need to keep it to maintenance the peace of our world.
That is a good think to do to save mankind because if a war happen using nuclear weapons that will be a disaster
They should be banned ..they pose untold threat to human existence. ....nuclear weapon is the greatest threat to humanity
Would say yes, but how are we going to accomplish that and maintain that situation. The knowledge of how-to built them will not disappear...
On top of that, how will anybody enforce this ban, without having a power imbalance, which makes banning them redundant all together (e.g. Country A threatening Country B not to make nukes or they will be nuked...?)
On top of that, how will anybody enforce this ban, without having a power imbalance, which makes banning them redundant all together (e.g. Country A threatening Country B not to make nukes or they will be nuked...?)
God gave earth as a gift to us . Deadly weapons like nuke will destroy the earth's life and habitat. We need to use technology in a way which benefit us and all the life in the earth. So I disagree in using nuke or such type weapon.
And It is no doubt nuclear weapons require a large amount of money. There are better alternatives to spend that money. It could be used to give better lives for civilians in terms of housing, health and education.
What can you say about this?
And It is no doubt nuclear weapons require a large amount of money. There are better alternatives to spend that money. It could be used to give better lives for civilians in terms of housing, health and education.
What can you say about this?
Unfortunately NW is not like a forum's thread to be banned easily.
They are trying http://www.icanw.org/
I wish they weren't invented in the first place. They pose too much threat to humanity.
Yes we should because it is too much dangerous to posses or to use by any country in the world and no good can come out of it at the end
God gave earth as a gift to us . Deadly weapons like nuke will destroy the earth's life and habitat. We need to use technology in a way which benefit us and all the life in the earth. So I disagree in using nuke or such type weapon.
And It is no doubt nuclear weapons require a large amount of money. There are better alternatives to spend that money. It could be used to give better lives for civilians in terms of housing, health and education.
What can you say about this?
I completely share your opinion. Nuclear energy should be used for peaceful purposes. All countries of the world should abandon nuclear weapons. Now humanity has reached such a level of development that the global challenge to security is not even the use of weapons, but the very fact of its availability. The Manhattan project was a very big mistake. History proves that people very often use the achievements of technical progress not to benefit the civilian population, but to the detriment. The Chernobyl disaster proves that people do not know how to use nuclear energy for peaceful purposes too. And It is no doubt nuclear weapons require a large amount of money. There are better alternatives to spend that money. It could be used to give better lives for civilians in terms of housing, health and education.
What can you say about this?
God gave earth as a gift to us . Deadly weapons like nuke will destroy the earth's life and habitat. We need to use technology in a way which benefit us and all the life in the earth. So I disagree in using nuke or such type weapon.
And It is no doubt nuclear weapons require a large amount of money. There are better alternatives to spend that money. It could be used to give better lives for civilians in terms of housing, health and education.
What can you say about this?
And It is no doubt nuclear weapons require a large amount of money. There are better alternatives to spend that money. It could be used to give better lives for civilians in terms of housing, health and education.
What can you say about this?
Jump to: