Should we hava a Nxt Clone? | Bitcointalksearch.org

FrictionlessCoin

legendary

Activity: 868

Merit: 1000

Cryptotalk.org - Get paid for every post!

Quote from: extee on January 24, 2014, 06:32:55 AM

although i believe in more fair and equal distribution, it is not specifically a Nxt issue but a wider problem .
and if you can make a coin which is more widely distributed from the start and technologically superior to what we have. go for that.
giving coins to miners , or botnets or sockpuppets is not necessarily more fair than giving them to investors.
so the distribution model requires very careful consideration.

Agree with you that it is a wider problem with crypto currencies.

KingGoon

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 10

yes some healthy competition is always good Cool

extee

full member

Activity: 171

Merit: 100

Nxt after 2 months is already more evenly distributed than bitcoin/litecoin/peercoin are .

although i believe in more fair and equal distribution, it is not specifically a Nxt issue but a wider problem .
and if you can make a coin which is more widely distributed from the start and technologically superior to what we have. go for that.
giving coins to miners , or botnets or sockpuppets is not necessarily more fair than giving them to investors.
so the distribution model requires very careful consideration.

FrictionlessCoin

legendary

Activity: 868

Merit: 1000

Cryptotalk.org - Get paid for every post!

We are creating an improvement of the Nxt coin.

However it has occurred to us that people may be interested in a straight clone of Nxt but with a different and much fairer distribution.

The initial Nxt distribution looked like this:

The big 170 million block is claimed to be used for the 'unclaimed' original stakeholders and was re-distributed after release.

The question then is this, should a straight up clone of Nxt be created?

Topic: Should we hava a Nxt Clone? (Read 1268 times)