Topic: Site for monitoring SegWit adoption? (Read 169 times)

A new alternative to segwit.party popped up called https://segwit.space/ (I think it's from the Samurai wallet ppl)

mining pool BTCC were biggest advocates of segwit from the very day it was thought up. thy even decieved the network by their mandatory activation and jjoined the ranks of blockstream to get it activated.. but today, they still fear putting their coin rwards from mining onto segwit addresses
(funny right)
https://blockchain.info/block/00000000000000000021865b070933943fb8b5959678542998bb99d5721b4e3b
notice coin reward -> 13TET...  not bc1q...
2 years of advocating and propaganda that segwit is the best thing for bitcoin.. and they refuse to use it themselves..

well, i still very low. I don't remenber, but when will coinbase will pass to segwit? it can really help segwit adoption!

gotta laugh
"A transaction that spends one or more SegWit outputs is considered a SegWit-transaction. "

so a TX of
in
1addressR4nd0m
1addressR4nd0m
1addressR4nd0m
bc1qrand0maddr355
out
1addressR4nd0m


where only 25% of 'spend' are segwit.. they class as a full segwit tx (facepalm)

what there needs to be is stats of how many UTXO are using bc1q addresses.. that would show true 'adoption'
not the stupid biased in favour of segwit indntification that site uses
in most cases the single bc1q address of these biased tx's only include a bc1q address not because a user is paying another user from funds they intentionally wanted to use segwit with. but the "change" address has defaulted to created a segwit change address (by default rather than user intentionally chosen) thus users are kind of duped into gtting their change back as segwit. thus this stat is not adoption rate(choice).. but fostering rate(not intentional choice but default result)

..
the segwit stats of that site. is biased stats like they do in saudi arabia
legalising female drivers. but knowing most saudi males dont want thir wives driving, stats realistically are low. so what they do is employee femail public bus drivers. and so every bus passenger is then classed as a communter with a female driver to bump the stats. yea not one femal per bus(journey) but 1 female per passenger. thus a bus of 10 passengers would be 10 communtes with a female driver. not 1 communte

again whats needed is a UTXO breakdown of legacy vs segwit utxo

Just what I was looking for, thanks!

I cannot find a good site (or any site) that tracks the rate of SegWit adoption. Anyone know of one?