I like digitalcoin, it is one of the few coins I feel I can trust my money with, just don't buy when it's high. All time low now, i've been picking up some more.
There's a good post on the subreddit with a list of services you can contact:
http://www.reddit.com/r/digitalcoin/comments/20g9hz/want_to_help_dgc_grow_contact_these_services_and/that's a great place to start; the more places people see DGC being supported the better. Contact those services!!
Also BCX you're a one trick pony, please stop trolling these threads. You've had evidence presented against you in your other troll threads but you refuse to even consider changing your opinion, probably because you lost money through poor trading. It makes no difference if the 560k DGC was stolen or if he is lying and sold it himself, it was still dumped at the price of .0001 which hardly moved the market, and if anything made the current price more believable. Go away, nobody needs you.
It definitely makes a difference if the developer of an exchange engages in shady actions like claiming his coins were stolen and selling them for $30,000 USD while at the same time soliciting funds from investors. I'm sure those investors probably didn't realize their capital made it possible for Baritus to sell his coins.
~BCX~
> I'm sure those investors probably didn't realize their capital made it possible for Baritus to sell his coins
as a lurker of the IRC channel that does not seem to be the case to me. Hardly anyone is complaining but you.
the logic you're using is the same logic the government uses to pry into people's personal lives. we saw a 500k+ dump *after* the price fell from .0003; combined with the fact almost every other altcoin at the time fell at the same rate it seems ridiculous to blame the developer. he would've had more to gain by simply stealing everyones money. but he didn't, as it turns out it's pretty damn hard to run a 100% secure exchange (vircurex is now insolvent apparently) so he did the RESPONSIBLE thing and shut it down after realizing the area of attack was too wide, and
returned everyones money. DGC is still being developed, and all things considered I really don't understand why you've got such a hardon over this, it seems simple enough to me.
If investors lost money in DGC buying in solely on the basis of cryptoave while ignoring entire market movements.. well, what do you want? Either hold onto your DGC if you think it's going somewhere or dump it and cut your losses, that's how things go. At this current moment we're at a fairly established bottom.