Author

Topic: Smoking gun: Fauci states COVID PCR test has fatal flaw... (Read 132 times)

legendary
Activity: 4690
Merit: 1276

^^^ However, as Ammon Bundy has shown us over the last 4 years, the 12-person jury overrules the American government. Nowadays, check the news. His militia-like organization is treated with kinda kid-gloves, even when the authorities are firm with him.

The whole Bundy clan are willing actors in a series of state authorize psychological operations starting with the 'Bundy Ranch' charade which saw the million in back grazing fees forgiven.  The only the Ammon showed was how the government lets their actors and operatives off the hook, or at least one of the ways.  This one does not necessitate a new identity a-la Sheep-dip McVeigh

https://www.corbettreport.com/episode-305-the-secret-life-of-timothy-mcveigh/
https://www.corbettreport.com/episode-278-meet-lee-harvey-oswald-sheep-dipped-patsy/

legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
Fauci is wrong. The PCR test doesn't have any fatal flaw, if it is used for what it was made. It wasn't made to diagnose cases of Covid. So the flaw is in the administrator of the test, or his/her boss.

its made to diagnose covid. its not made to diagnose what stage of the covid infection someone is via just one test
its not made to diagnose how sicksomeone will get in the future

EG if a persons has 2 tests and first is 30 and second is in the 20's. then you can calculate the person is at the start of infection not the end.. you cant learn that from one test
if a person has 2 tests and first is in the 20's and second is in the 30's then you can calculate the person is at the end of the infection..you cant learn that from one test

also the covid test indicates the covid infection. not the immune response. so without other information like blood tests to see immunity count. you cant calculate how the person is responding to the infection

doctors do not just take a single covid test and then say 'intubate him and be prepared to write covid on death certificate'
doctors actually run many test scans and diagnoses and treat the symptoms and note down the symptoms and can show a clear line from first test/symptom. to final test/symptom. and the result of if they were discharged or died.

the death certificate is based on symptom progression and tests/scans/diagnoses. its not as simple as your unresearched mind thinks

please stop getting your opinions from your male massause. his white coat is a costume not a uniform


There are loads of professional people out there, including the PCR inventor, who disagree with you about PCR being used to diagnose.

Why is it that many/most people who the PCR says have Covid, really aren't sick at all?

How do they distinguish Covid in the PCR from something else in the PCR that multiplied just as fast as Covid? After all, there are many different things that are swabbed. None of them are isolated. They all go into the test and are "fed" by the cycling system.

If the tested person is asymptomatic, even though he tests positive in a big way, why would they write up a death certificate for him?

You simply are using circular referencing. We swab Covid to determine that it is Covid in the PCR. Once we have determined that it is Covid in the PCR, then we know that it was Covid we swabbed.

Cool
full member
Activity: 226
Merit: 102
Yes, saw that documentary about Faucci and covid. It is clear that his hands are not clear into all this situation. The role is big and also the payment. It is the moment of glory for him. I bet in next 50 years if somehow someone would investigate all this situation objectively, there would be more doctors in prison than in lab.
legendary
Activity: 4410
Merit: 4766
Fauci is wrong. The PCR test doesn't have any fatal flaw, if it is used for what it was made. It wasn't made to diagnose cases of Covid. So the flaw is in the administrator of the test, or his/her boss.

its made to diagnose covid. its not made to diagnose what stage of the covid infection someone is via just one test
its not made to diagnose how sicksomeone will get in the future

EG if a persons has 2 tests and first is 30 and second is in the 20's. then you can calculate the person is at the start of infection not the end.. you cant learn that from one test
if a person has 2 tests and first is in the 20's and second is in the 30's then you can calculate the person is at the end of the infection..you cant learn that from one test

also the covid test indicates the covid infection. not the immune response. so without other information like blood tests to see immunity count. you cant calculate how the person is responding to the infection

doctors do not just take a single covid test and then say 'intubate him and be prepared to write covid on death certificate'
doctors actually run many test scans and diagnoses and treat the symptoms and note down the symptoms and can show a clear line from first test/symptom. to final test/symptom. and the result of if they were discharged or died.

the death certificate is based on symptom progression and tests/scans/diagnoses. its not as simple as your unresearched mind thinks

please stop getting your opinions from your male massause. his white coat is a costume not a uniform
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
Fauci is wrong. The PCR test doesn't have any fatal flaw, if it is used for what it was made. It wasn't made to diagnose cases of Covid. So the flaw is in the administrator of the test, or his/her boss.

Cool
legendary
Activity: 4410
Merit: 4766
washington. london and vatican are not countries, they are independant capitals legally above the normal laws of their surrounding country.

this is done so when the low level government form partnerships with other countries. new partnership laws apply to the country but cannot be applied to the government(constitution)
its why even in the EU the EU couldnt force UK to use the euro

its why the UN could not step in to remove trump or make new laws that change the constitution. but they can change laws in regards to trade tarriffs and passports, immigration policies and other common laws

its actually done to prevent foreign countries from taking over the 3 capitals
legendary
Activity: 4410
Merit: 4766
Remember that a unicorn was a creation by man to lead wild horse into captivity and slavery.

unicorns coulda just got fat, so we call them rhino's now
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1277
anglophone elite [...] Bilderberg and Davos. If you don't believe this

Wealth and power go hand-in-hand, and always have. I'm not disputing that there are a lot of powerful people behind the scenes, people who are effectively unaccountable and who have huge influence over national and international policy.

Instead, I'm taking aim firstly at the idea that the same governments who demonstrate relentless and serial incompetence and lurch from crisis to crisis are somehow able to effectively manage an immense and secret global conspiracy, and then secondly at the idea that the people who already have all the wealth and power have anything to gain from such a sinister and clandestine endeavour.

You don't need vaccine microchips to control and mentally subjugate the population. Newspapers and TV channels do this perfectly well already.
You don't need to forcibly reduce global population when population growth is falling to near-zero anyway,
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
^^^ However, as Ammon Bundy has shown us over the last 4 years, the 12-person jury overrules the American government. Nowadays, check the news. His militia-like organization is treated with kinda kid-gloves, even when the authorities are firm with him.

Cool
legendary
Activity: 2814
Merit: 2472
https://JetCash.com
Washington is now an independent country that rules America. The same applied to The City of London and the UK, and the EU and parts of Europe. Those 3 countries are coordinated through a dominant anglophone elite that meets publicly in conferences such as Bilderberg and Davos. If you don't believe this, then watch out for the references to the "build back better" initiative in the unicorn politicians speeches.

Remember that a unicorn was a creation by man to lead wild horse into captivity and slavery.
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1277
Now that Biden seems to have won, they are trying to slowly reduce Covid cases.
Fauci funded the Wuhan laboratory that developed the Covid virus.

I generally try to rebut these assertions using facts and logic, but let's try a different angle.

Think about all the things that governments try to do quite openly, and consider how inept and incompetent they are, how prone to factionalism, infighting, money-grabbing and self-advancement, how the ostensible aim of any project is in fact a much lower priority than filling their wallets and massaging their egos, and how almost any new endeavour comes in late and over-budget, if it ever comes in at all. Consider how difficult it is for them to keep anything a secret, when there's always someone on the inside who is willing to leak the story to news outlets for a few $$$.

This all happens within countries, and when they are doing things openly. Now extend this by thinking about how national governments interact with one another, and how the factionalism and mistrust grows even more.

This is what the world is like. This is what people in power are like. You see it every day.


Now you ask us to believe that these governments are capable of working together, with what must be thousands of people, in secret, without fighting, without leaking the story, without anyone noticing, and on top of this actually achieving what they'd set out to do, which is... what? The whole purpose of the clandestine endeavour is to cement the power and wealth of those who already have all of the power and wealth? The aim is to get what they already have anyway? It doesn't make sense. And at this point you may as well throw in the 5G masts, the Illuminati, the cure-all-bleach-drinking, the secret labs, the chem trails, the vaccine mind-control and all the rest... because it doesn't make the underlying premise any more absurd than it already is.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
^^^ Now if only somebody could tell what he was looking at in the PCR test.

Cool
legendary
Activity: 4410
Merit: 4766
its not a fatal flaw
its a known fact. the more cycle needed = less virus.
after the threshold of 35 there is no point cycling more

its you idiots that think lab techs cycle infinitely

the reality is if it comes up positive with only 15 cycles then the viral load is super high
the more you cycle means less virus.
and around 35+ has always been the cut off point

no one cares about people with a 37 or a 40. its such an insignificant amount of viral load that the transmission and symptom risk is near 0. so its meaningless. you not even considered as infected by that point
legendary
Activity: 2814
Merit: 2472
https://JetCash.com
Thank you for posting that - it's something I've been saying for a year or so. I was attacked here for the opinion as well.

Another comment of mine is that Fauci funded the Wuhan laboratory that developed the Covid virus.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
Now that Biden seems to have won, they are trying to slowly reduce Covid cases.


Smoking gun: Fauci states COVID PCR test has fatal flaw; confession from the "beloved"



This article is part of my current series on the COVID PCR test [1]. These articles prove that the test is fatally flawed, gives rise to hugely inflated and false case numbers, which in turn lead to the unnecessary and brutal lockdowns.

I'm hoping readers will spread this information far and wide.

OK, here we go. Smoking gun. Jackpot.

Right from the horse's mouth. Right from the man we're told is the number-one COVID expert in the nation. What Fauci says is golden truth.

Well, how about THIS?

July 16, 2020, podcast, "This Week In Virology" [2]: Tony Fauci makes a point of saying the PCR COVID test is useless and misleading when the test is run at "35 cycles or higher." A positive result, indicating infection, cannot be accepted or believed.

Here, in techno-speak, is an excerpt from Fauci's key quote (starting at the 3m50s mark) [2]: "…If you get [perform the test at] a cycle threshold of 35 or more…the chances of it being replication-competent [aka accurate] are miniscule…you almost never can culture virus [detect a true positive result] from a 37 threshold cycle…even 36…"

Each "cycle" of the test is a quantum leap in amplification and magnification of the test specimen taken from the patient.

Too many cycles, and the test will turn up all sorts of irrelevant material that will be wrongly interpreted as relevant.

That's called a false positive.


Cool
Jump to: