So what do you think the Western union story today will really mean for bitcoin?

jbreher

legendary

Activity: 3038

Merit: 1660

lose: unfind ... loose: untight

Quote

Ripple issues a virtual currency known as Ripples, of which it holds a 25 percent slice.

I thought OpenCoin held on to half of all Ripples? Was I wrong from the beginning, or did this change while I wasn't looking?

Quote

... and the software has recently been open sourced, ...

Another change that happened while I wasn't looking. Maybe a time to take a fresh look at Ripple?

brand_new

newbie

Activity: 18

Merit: 0

Not sure why this thread was revived, but if anyone wants a more current article that isn't behind a paywall, look here: http://www.businessweek.com/news/2013-10-07/ripple-takes-on-western-union-with-deal-to-grow-digital-payments

Gabi

legendary

Activity: 1148

Merit: 1008

If you want to walk on water, get out of the boat

Quote

The problem appears to be the company's expectations for 2014 costs to comply with increased legal and regulatory requirements in countries where it does business. Here is what Western Union had to say about these costs:

While the Company has increased its investments in compliance considerably in recent years, significant additional investment in 2014 is now anticipated in light of the current environment and our internal reviews of the increasingly complex and demanding global regulatory requirements. … Western Union expects its compliance related expenses to increase from approximately 2.5% of revenue in 2013 to a range of approximately 3.5% to 4.5% of revenue in 2014, based on preliminary reviews of the programs

Ouch

That is why bitcoin is so much better

wachtwoord

legendary

Activity: 2324

Merit: 1125

Quote from: cypherdoc on October 30, 2013, 11:18:02 AM

Quote from: wachtwoord on October 30, 2013, 10:50:17 AM

Ouch: http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=wu&ql=1

I'm still up significantly on WU but what a weird stock. Look at thew graph, the have rather steep slopes upward followed by enormous cliffs. Just like today

A bit weird as they already announced the price reductions (compressing margins extremely to force MoneyGram out of business) and after that the stock went up a lot.

it's a scam.

What exactly?

cypherdoc

legendary

Activity: 1764

Merit: 1002

Quote from: wachtwoord on October 30, 2013, 10:50:17 AM

Ouch: http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=wu&ql=1

I'm still up significantly on WU but what a weird stock. Look at thew graph, the have rather steep slopes upward followed by enormous cliffs. Just like today

A bit weird as they already announced the price reductions (compressing margins extremely to force MoneyGram out of business) and after that the stock went up a lot.

it's a scam.

wachtwoord

legendary

Activity: 2324

Merit: 1125

Ouch: http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=wu&ql=1

I'm still up significantly on WU but what a weird stock. Look at thew graph, the have rather steep slopes upward followed by enormous cliffs. Just like today

A bit weird as they already announced the price reductions (compressing margins extremely to force MoneyGram out of business) and after that the stock went up a lot.

superduh

hero member

Activity: 602

Merit: 500

http://www.foxbusiness.com/news/2013/04/18/bitcoin-buzz-draws-western-union-moneygram/

Rincewind

newbie

Activity: 56

Merit: 0

Quote from: ?? on ??

Problem is with the current volatility you have to be insane to think a fiat currency exchange will take BTC... if i need to send $50 to someone, i don't want it to be worth some lesser amount when it gets to them.

You're joining two separate things here. Volatility at an exchange != volatility in a proprietary system. If we both agree 1 BTC = 100 USD, then if I input 100 USD, you get 100 USD as output if the exchange rate is 'locked in' at the time of transaction. As far the blockchain is concerned, it's just 1 BTC, so the cash equivilent value at Mt Gox is inconsequential.

redbeans2012

hero member

Activity: 887

Merit: 1000

Quote from: ArticMine on April 03, 2013, 01:18:51 AM

Quote from: ShaTwo on April 03, 2013, 12:47:28 AM

They have a lot of troubles to accept payment over the internet, they accept Bitcoin on westernunion.com and pay cash at any location, that could be a win-win for Bitcoin and WU.

+1 Yes this is huge and a natural application for Western Union. Let us keep in mind that this is a company with a very long history of reinventing itself in order to remain relevant. They were originally in the telegraph business in the mid 19th century.

Western Union was a prime contractor in the Automatic Digital Network (AUTODIN) program. AUTODIN, a military application for communication, was first developed in the 1960s and became the precursor to the modern Internet in the 1990s. The Defense Message System (DMS) replaced AUTODIN in 2000.

Shocked

ArticMine

legendary

Activity: 2282

Merit: 1050

Monero Core Team

Quote from: ShaTwo on April 03, 2013, 12:47:28 AM

They have a lot of troubles to accept payment over the internet, they accept Bitcoin on westernunion.com and pay cash at any location, that could be a win-win for Bitcoin and WU.

+1 Yes this is huge and a natural application for Western Union. Let us keep in mind that this is a company with a very long history of reinventing itself in order to remain relevant. They were originally in the telegraph business in the mid 19th century.

dissipate

sr. member

Activity: 288

Merit: 251

Quote from: Lethn on April 03, 2013, 12:47:08 AM

I've seen it posted around here but I think this is more of an optimistic hint than anything genuine so I wouldn't pay it too much attention. It could be a good thing but considering that Western Union is an established and long lived bank I don't know if it would be because the paranoid anarchist in me tells me they'd almost certainly try and find a way to spy on your transactions, not that they could in Bitcoin but certainly if you were to transfer paper money to them, I expect if they did ever do it there would be all sorts of restrictions and verification processes they'd force you to go through before you could move any money.

Huh? Western Union complies with KYC and AML laws, so they are already spying on your transactions. Western Union is not going to be an anonymous Bitcoin exchange, but neither is MtGox or any of the other online Bitcoin exchanges (except for small sums of money).

ShaTwo

member

Activity: 94

Merit: 10

They have a lot of troubles to accept payment over the internet, they accept Bitcoin on westernunion.com and pay cash at any location, that could be a win-win for Bitcoin and WU.

Lethn

legendary

Activity: 1540

Merit: 1000

I've seen it posted around here but I think this is more of an optimistic hint than anything genuine so I wouldn't pay it too much attention. It could be a good thing but considering that Western Union is an established and long lived bank I don't know if it would be because the paranoid anarchist in me tells me they'd almost certainly try and find a way to spy on your transactions, not that they could in Bitcoin but certainly if you were to transfer paper money to them, I expect if they did ever do it there would be all sorts of restrictions and verification processes they'd force you to go through before you could move any money.

dissipate

sr. member

Activity: 288

Merit: 251

It seems to me that Western Union sees the writing on the wall. They are going to become obsolete but not because of Bitcoin but because of other technologies in the payment industry. Companies that are in dire straits will make bold moves to reinvigorate their brand and keep the company afloat. Therefore, I am not surprised at all that they are considering adding Bitcoin based services.

wopwop

sr. member

Activity: 252

Merit: 250

It was a joke

notig

sr. member

Activity: 294

Merit: 250

http://mobile.blogs.wsj.com/cio/2013/04/01/western-union-eyes-digital-currency-services/

""westen unions well established compliance programs would be considered a competitive advantage in digital currencies because it's a trusted brand"

do you think this will basically mean that it will be easier for someone who has bitcoins to convert them to cash? Instead of going to local bitcoins they will just go to western union? do you think the bitcoins that are used to convert into cash will need to be sent on the other end from a western union controlled place? or from anywhere?

do you think western union is seriously considering incorporating bitcoin somehow? I don't really understand what this article really means for bitcoin.

Topic: So what do you think the Western union story today will really mean for bitcoin? (Read 2236 times)