Did you try to raise these concerns in the official thread? That's the best way to really get them addressed, I think.
That's like, directly in their announcement thread will be better and maybe you will get an awareness from them. but I can understand about his some point in his thread, decent it needs a lot of revamping? 
Topic: Some thoughts on DECENT ICO so far.. (Read 796 times)
Did you try to raise these concerns in the official thread? That's the best way to really get them addressed, I think.
Quote
2. The team - the founders are not technical guys,
This is a big thing for projects in the cryptosphere. The founders should at least have one guy who is technical and knows what he is doing and talking about. He should also have the passion to create and engineer new things to make the world better. If Decent's founders is comprised of only businessmen then we can assume this is started to make profit as their mission. What will happen if they do not make that profit? We all know that most ICO's fail.
what is decent still selling ico
i think decent is end ico selling until 10 september 2016
same with promote signature campaign decent selling end date 10 september 2016
i think decent is end ico selling until 10 september 2016
same with promote signature campaign decent selling end date 10 september 2016
And remove this from announcements
how do I move it to the DECENT thread?
And remove this from announcements
how do I move it to the DECENT thread?
And remove this from announcements
decent..
I tried to post it there actually
Maybe add Decent to the header otherwise it is quite confusing on the first read just to make it clear. I tried to post it there actually
Which ICO you talking about?
Hi all
first of all - I invested a small amount in the project and wanted to share some thoughts/concerns I have:
1. the newsletter did not reach all participants on time regarding the ICO, and looking at the bitcoins invested, the first few hours was HEAVY invested - i think the first one was 200BC and other similar sums
I read the glitches part - sounds more like an excuses. What will be when the real technical challenges will take place? Handling newsletter and simple API/website with 2FA is not the most complicated thing out there
2. The team - the founders are not technical guys, meaning a lot of devs will need to be hired and paid. Not sure what the founders will do in the next few months. Who is gonna be paid from ICO money and how much?
Not to offend, but going over the team info from the website, it sounded a bit forced: "...helping to organize events...", "supporting the community"... nothing actual that I could see
Besides Marián Hvizdoš few words I couldn't see much more. Also - he says it CAN become this and that, he is the escrow of the project... donno, kinda fishy to me
3. Some technical impressions so far:
a. ICO portal (after login) - looks clumsy to say the least.
b. No google authentication, which is MUST for every ICO and other platform that respect itself ( I participated in few ICOs - all had google auth).
This one time code-to-email looong line looks bad, the menu to chose from (only 1 option) looks almost amateur
c. Need to login again if u want to see updated info.. no refresh??
d. Things just DONT work: Contact us form in the official website generates error in white letters over gray background - really hard to read it.
Where are the email addresses?? support@decent... Why just a web form? what happens if it doesn't work? what are the alternative ways to contact you exactly?
Do you really expect us to visit you there? Who is there anyway??
I know it is the beginning of the ICO, BUT it does't matter - coding is coding and the above points show me little dev skills or "let's publish it fast, doesn't matter how it looks like"
4. Coins distribution - definitely not my cup of tea - why ppl get less if they join during the ICO? It is acceptable not to get any bonus, but the fixed price should be the same - total cons issued/total funds
And no, cutting the bonus after X weeks is NOT the same as giving different price per token - 10% less every week??
5. Seems like the team is flying around the globe lately - from far east to USA, Bahamas?!!? Why Bahamas - is it a strategic place to be during the first week of your ICO?
New offices in Shanghai.. So, if your center is located in the far east - what r u doing in the Bahamas? Who is funding the flights/hotels/drinks? Is it the ICO money perhaps?
have some more, but that is a good start
Waiting for your thoughts
first of all - I invested a small amount in the project and wanted to share some thoughts/concerns I have:
1. the newsletter did not reach all participants on time regarding the ICO, and looking at the bitcoins invested, the first few hours was HEAVY invested - i think the first one was 200BC and other similar sums
I read the glitches part - sounds more like an excuses. What will be when the real technical challenges will take place? Handling newsletter and simple API/website with 2FA is not the most complicated thing out there
2. The team - the founders are not technical guys, meaning a lot of devs will need to be hired and paid. Not sure what the founders will do in the next few months. Who is gonna be paid from ICO money and how much?
Not to offend, but going over the team info from the website, it sounded a bit forced: "...helping to organize events...", "supporting the community"... nothing actual that I could see
Besides Marián Hvizdoš few words I couldn't see much more. Also - he says it CAN become this and that, he is the escrow of the project... donno, kinda fishy to me
3. Some technical impressions so far:
a. ICO portal (after login) - looks clumsy to say the least.
b. No google authentication, which is MUST for every ICO and other platform that respect itself ( I participated in few ICOs - all had google auth).
This one time code-to-email looong line looks bad, the menu to chose from (only 1 option) looks almost amateur
c. Need to login again if u want to see updated info.. no refresh??
d. Things just DONT work: Contact us form in the official website generates error in white letters over gray background - really hard to read it.
Where are the email addresses?? support@decent... Why just a web form? what happens if it doesn't work? what are the alternative ways to contact you exactly?
Do you really expect us to visit you there? Who is there anyway??
I know it is the beginning of the ICO, BUT it does't matter - coding is coding and the above points show me little dev skills or "let's publish it fast, doesn't matter how it looks like"
4. Coins distribution - definitely not my cup of tea - why ppl get less if they join during the ICO? It is acceptable not to get any bonus, but the fixed price should be the same - total cons issued/total funds
And no, cutting the bonus after X weeks is NOT the same as giving different price per token - 10% less every week??
5. Seems like the team is flying around the globe lately - from far east to USA, Bahamas?!!? Why Bahamas - is it a strategic place to be during the first week of your ICO?
New offices in Shanghai.. So, if your center is located in the far east - what r u doing in the Bahamas? Who is funding the flights/hotels/drinks? Is it the ICO money perhaps?
have some more, but that is a good start
Waiting for your thoughts
Jump to: