I can't say for sure that it isn't a scam cause I don't know the devs, but I see absolutely no point to think it is one.
Everybody had the same chance to take part in the ICO.
only few took the risk.
that alone doesn't make it a scam.
there are many overbought ICOs that sell near or even below the ICO price when they hit the exchanges.
but the situation is different here cause of the ridiculously low ICO outcome.
with the huge potential of the project in mind no ICO Investor would be so stupid to give away his coins near ICO prices.
would you have done it? I don't think so.
You are not defending it with factual evidence.
Like i said if a group intentionally makes their ico look like a scam to ensure a very narrow initial distribution that is their issue. Even if it is not intentional and you end up with a crazy narrow initial distribution you can not ensure nor prevent collusion and market making.
It is a simple fact.
You have made it wide open for a scam.
This is a trustless environment you are trying to create you cant start off making it open to such manipulation and collusion.
You cant have these same people deleting factual statements from their thread either.
that's different from "SCAM confirmed".
I'm curious where you get the number of 6 investors from. please point me to the source.
btw the ICO is about 9 months ago. the distribution doesn't look bad today imo https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xspec/#!rich
the team had choosen to stay anonymous what makes sense to me for a privacy related coin.
this can be a sign for a scam but it's definitely no proof or would you say bitcoin is a scam cause satoshi didn't reveal his identity.
Come on please be sensible you have been here long enough not to ask these questions.
Firstly a rich list - even a noob know that means NOTHING at all. Any whales can break their loot into lots of smaller wallets. Even posting that as part of your argument reveals you are not being genuine else you have learned zero since being here which in either case makes any further points you make redundant.
This is the problem. With a narrow initial distribution you can never know what happens after that point. That's why it can now never be trustless. You can't go from needing trust to trustless. Needing trust is like having faith. There is only ever need of it if there is a point of unknown or ignorance as to what is going on. Once you have this point of ignorance or point of being able to prove trustlessness it is then broken forever.
You need to start trustless.
Asking for proof of 100% scam on an unregulated ico behind the iron curtain of anonymity is a joke. You have all the pointers there to suggest it then that is all you will ever get. The devs would have be determined themselves to prove it was a scam for it to be revealed as one 100%.
Possibility of scam is enough to need trust.
High probability of scam is enough to avoid it.
This is looking exactly like the 2nd option.
The lies for deleting the comments are my biggest worry with this project but of course no project with such narrow initial distribution can really be taken seriously as a decentralised trustless project.
I merely said that the initial distribution is their biggest issue and they start deleting this saying i was requoting too much. I repost without the requoting they deleted it again. They were lying about their reason for deletion.
Once you see it is one of the most accommodating coins for scamming and they are now the same people moderating and lying for the reason of moderation you start to see how it looks....
That last sentence (as is the rest of my post) is correct refute any part of it if you can.
NARROW INITIAL DISTRIBUTION = NOT TRUSTLESS - HIGH PROBABLITY AND VERY OPEN TO MANIPULATION AND SCAMMING. simple as that.
this needs to be dealt with in all projects but not many are as narrow as this one. Find me 10 others that are as narrow in the entire alt coin world. Actually find me 5. If you can find me 3 that are as narrow I will be shocked. When you are talking top 5 open to manipulation projects in the entire crypto world you start to see the concern.