Topic: stake.com and Casino.guru coverup. (Read 577 times)

dvdx how come your code is not now working.


please send the code here again

if your mother sleeps with whole village you can’t deny the fact she is whore. this is how much you are in denial about stake.com .

stake.com is cheat .
i have proved it in my previous post and i say it now and will always say that

Let me guess, he's from casinoguru because he pointed out your wrongs and mistakes? Because, apparently, anyone that's against you in this case, are working for casinoguru. But sure, why not? I'll take the bait. So what if he's from CG? It doesn't change the fact that your arguments are wrong and Stake didn't cheat you.

compare both the iterations dydx is from CG

They are not adding codes by themselves, if I have to guess [because I am not Stake's staff], Stake has two log system, the short and the long version. Each betID were recorded with either of the version randomly. May I remind and point it out to you, again, that the log --be it long or short-- doesn't change the outcome, the field are still on the same one determined on the beginning of the bet session.

And the casino didn't delete betID, they archieved them.

an automated system won’t add codes on themselves and a manipulated system will add codes to prove its manipulated in the back end,
a fair casino wont delete bets

No, I am saying that if you got both betID from stake, then they have two kind of bet log system, the short and the long version, it is not their system acting up by adding lines or anything, it's just two type of log, the short and the long, and it doesn't really matter.

As I said, the log can add the whole text of The Silmarillion into their lines and it still doesn't change the outcome: where the field containing bomb were placed.


that is me watering down the log to align with your depth of knowledge, just like you wanted it. You kept insisting on complicating something that's actually a non-issue, arguing that it's something that should raise concern where it doesn't. So there it is, the "short version" of the log. If you still can't grasp it, the difference between the two logs is exactly like what I show you up there, the short one simply shows elements that's essential and removing things that's not really important, such as the rest of the fields after hitting a bomb.

bro if you continue to spit on everyone, you won't be getting help here. Do you talk to people like this in real life as well? I am really curious.
On to the topic, If you are so sure and can back up your claims why don't you object to the court? If you could prove such a claim; stake.com will be bankrupt, every player should get their deposits back. This claim you are making is a billion dollar claim tbh.

you are saying stale.com system just acted up and added those lines by themselves, their automated system where which they delete the bets.

what rubbish and edited iteration you are sending do you have my archive file , that you edited and send me the bet iteration, just to prove your stake coverup propoganda.

For the public record, this is why I asked what outcome will explaining the betID brings us, because you simply can't accept there is nothing wrong with the betID, so you started looking for nonexistent issues to drag things around. Let me make it easier to you with another color-coded explanation


it suits you better now?

The thing is, the length of the betID doesn't really matter, you hit a field containing bomb right on what the log said, at field number 3. They can add the whole text of Silmarillion on the log and it doesn't change the outcome and the truth: you hit a field containing bomb as what's been generated prior to the game being played, bomb triggered, game ended, end of story.

If you can't understand this, I'm not sure how else anybody can help you.

is this post about stake.com scamming or you4 value education ??

I don't know what's true or false here, but you should use some respect when you speak with support or anyone at anytime!
I can guarantee you that the one you speaking with have nothing to do with what  you say have happen to you.
I never understand people like you that feel they need to act like an asshole on the internet for any reason.
Show some respect next time and I promise that you will feel better in your soul at the same time.







OP's english is as good as your own English. So your post sounds kinda stupid.....
The difference is that he speaks about things you don't understand, so instead of demand him to speak like a kid, stop being a kid. Just a idea! 

unlike iteration , if the game was over why did it register extra ninces as multiplier


"field":3,"payoutMultiplier":0},{"field":4,"payoutMultiplier":0},{"field":9,"payoutMultiplier":0},{"field":7,"payoutMultiplier":0},{"field":11,"payoutMultiplier":0},{"field":12,"payoutMultiplier":0},{"field":14,"payoutMultiplier":0},{"field":24,"payoutMultiplier":0},{"field":17,"payoutMultiplier":0},{"field":16,"payoutMultiplier":0},{"field":15,"payoutMultiplier":0},{"field":21,"payoutMultiplier":0},{"field":22,"payoutMultiplier":0},{"field":20,"payoutMultiplier":0}



and if you can see in interaction 1 there was no multiplier or lines registered after the bomb.


the system is rigged to manioulate , hence they archive the bets.
citing excuse of storage.
why did they stopped the api , coz in api we could have getch() function details on our computer .
this is the reason they have stopped api , so that they can manipulate internally



https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/breaking-shuffle-based-provably-fair-implementations-can-cheat-players-proof-1494470

simple thing compare it with the first iteration
 if the bomb triggered the loss, why didn’t the first iteration had the excessive multiplier.

how can a iteration format be different for a same game same odds.
why do stake.com need to archive the bet in a hurry.


all this thing is gameplay manipulatiin and you are barking on the explanation


the iteration are something whic are automatic stored , why there is such a huge difference between the iteration.


why did casino guru lied that provablyfair.me doesnt being to stake.com
why did casino guru lied about the 480 million dollar lawsuit filed on stake current owners.

You can't seriously implying that you haven't thoroughly read dvdx1995's replies to your post? The explanation about the difference betID has been addressed numerous times. And so far, as history shows, it's you who deviate from questionings on your previous threads which I won't even bother repeating as you'll just turned your ear deaf again.

So let's try this again and let people judge your character. Below is the bet details for that betID. Let me color-code the rounds


As you can see, the mines are indeed triggered by one of the field said in the earlier part of the ID, at field 3 [marked in red], thus when you clicked field number 3, you lose the game. The rest of the field [marked in gray] were there not because they were "mines", they're there to show that the game was over when you hit field 3 and all the field after it were lost, thus had 0 payout multiplier.

So, in other words, your gameflow was like this:

[Bombs were on field 3 and 7]

Field 23: win
Field 18: win
Field 13: win
Field 5: win
Field 6: win
Field 0: win
Field 1: win
Field 2: win
Field 3: bomb, lose, game over

The rest of the fields irrelevant because they were there just for reference that the field prior to them hit a bomb, thus all of them were now "voided" and gave 0 winning multiplier.

Let me know if you still can't understand it, I'll add another color-coded explanation to make it simpler and easier to understand.


I did what, now?

don’t be in denial dvdx provided me with calculation, i am talking about the bet which stake.com deletes in the system and archives it . the iteration doesn’t read as correct. how can mines of 2 have 13 mines in a game.

you are being stubborn denying the facts which stake.com records at back end.


if say something to you. you will try to deviate from off topic questioning my crediblity. whereas you are the one who applys for loan do not payemnt to or are late on payments on it.

And again, I asked, what outcome will explaining this betID brings us? Tons of people already tried to explain to you in a very great length [and many range of varying patience], you simply refused to understand and see it as it is because it's not the answer you want. Will you even try to read with open mindedness if I try explaining this betID on point 3?

add illegal operations in Turkey as well. Stake has mirror sites for Turkey which shows how much fraud they are.

simple english

stake is fraud.
manipultes the bet in the backend
deletes only few of the bets to which they can change the result.
ops in slovakia and australia. where as online casino are banned in australia.
registered in curcao , where there is only non existent authority of gambling.
provablyfair.me which is endorses by stake as third party is their umbrella company.
son of a convict fraudster runs this company and endorses it .



any questions

 reveal nonces 1001-2000 , play a simulation of the result without knowing the actual result.
calculate probablity of winning from 1-1000
you will come to know the difference.
they will say bullshit about rtp.


for two mines and revealing two mines
before revealing seeds winning probablity is 0.69 approx on two mines for two tiles
once you reveal the seed and simulate the winning for next 1000 nonces the probablity changes to 0.9234,
above stats from user experience .
set considered 0-2000, actual data may vary based on client seed and server seed

my god, your english is a absolute mess and nobody will read through all this.

get to the point and explain it as simply as possible so everybody can understand it

how come bet of 2 mines show and describe the iteration having 13 mines .
check point 3 and iteration 2

And to what outcome will it bring us? dvdx1995 had spent a lot of effort explaining everything to you, including those question you asked, and you still managed to shrug it off as Stake's fault... and CG's.

well we’ll whose here.
do me a favour compare both the iterations under point .
then say provablyfair.me and stake.com and seperate entities and then say stake.com do not have. a 400 million lawsuit against them
then claim casino.guru findings are true
right , this is what you have been doing right
holydarkness is in your mind.

still none you explained how on archive bet of 2 mines i can open 12 bombs playing manually

As you can see from the very long and detailed exchange of posts above, the problem is OP being too stubborn. He insisted on things that he assumed to be correct and forced perspective based on what he believe, no matter how many people tried to explain to him and the length they took to help him understood his situation. Everybody that come to his case started nicely and politely, tried to explain what exactly happened, and then OP... well...


Here's the popcorn, there's the seats, feel free to join the rest of us and enjoy the show.

I know you are from Casinoguru.com . seem you went on length to lie about relation between provablyfair.me and stake.com .lied to me about 400 million dollar law suit against stake.com freeman vs stake


if it was in my control , i won’t let casino archive the bet. but unfortunately it’s stake scam policy to archive the bets and the back end automatically registers the bet.
stake archive those bets randomly or by practice of fooling people. i found the iteration registered in the back end for mines 2 placed as 11 . then i am the problem here ??

even 3 support agent revelaed that the mines registered for one of the bets were 11 , when orignally placed for 2 l

so basically casinoguru just took information from me and therby just to damage control the reputation of stake.com


============================================================================

Do. not trust casino,guru they collude with casino and lie and provide false information to customers

https://casino.guru/stake-casino-player-alleges-bet-manipulation-at-stake-com

provided them with all proof , they fail to investigate the back end of the casino which is linked to the same umbrella comoany. they are liars.

Yes and what is the point about my account, i opened exatyly because i wanted to explain you how this system works , how you can verify each of the bet, i even provided for you OPEN SOURCE CODE which everyone can see and verify if it returns correct results .. just wanted to be helpfull .. however, you are like a parrot repeating the same thing over and over again.

Please read once again my comments on this topic and i hope you will understand WHY ARCHIVE BETS DOES NOT PROVE FAIRNESS ..
HOW ARCHIVE CAN PROVE FAIRNESS IF YOU DONT KNOW SERVER SEED ??
THEY ARCHIVE BETS DAILY AND I DO NOT FIND ANY INFORMATION ABOUT UNHASHED SERVER SEED SO IF THAT ARICHVE IN YOUR OPINION PROVIDE A FAIRNESS HOW YOU CAN CALCULATE IT WITHOUT SERVER SEED ??

Last comment on that. Wish you to have a good day.

 and moreover you are saying the archive bets data is not usually provably fair.

what bullshit you are saying man.

looks like your profile was created only to comment on this bet,post 28th sept.

go ahead and compare iteration in point 3 of the post. how can i open 13 bombs on mines games of 2 bombs.

Alright, so even though the facts and arguments presented to you, as well as the solutions on how you can verify each game fairness, don't seem to convince you, you still remain stubborn and believe you know best. Despite zero evidence of any manipulation, you insist that black is white..

I provided you with all the possibilities and data you need to verify each bet, also those which you have in your archive of bets and compare it with what the function calculating the occurrence of mines (sorted from 1 to 24 mines) returns... and you haven't provided any specific bet where manipulation is evident... Nevertheless, I wish you a good day and good luck. As I mentioned before, and as other users have confirmed in your previous topics, there doesn't appear to be any manipulation of bets here.
From my side, that's all.

looks like you sign up on bitcointalk.org only this post. just kidding.
see the fairness can be manioulated by stake it’s happening .
hence the archive results are different.
if they can manioulate the archive results which means they are purposely deleting the bets .
anyways your php script was helpful , but stake.com is manipulating the bets that’s for sure
and casino.guru is covering them by spreading all lies about the website.

The byteGenerator function generates a sequence of numbers based on the given inputs: serverSeed, clientSeed, nonce, and cursor. This function is based on the HMAC-SHA256 algorithm, which is widely used to generate cryptographically secure hashes. There is no obvious connection to Benford's law here, since this law deals with the distribution of the first digits of numeric data, while this function generates a sequence of bytes based on inputs.



Stake give you the results of each of the round played as the game is ended (win or lose)
Told you that you can either verify the results by the graphic image of the bet, or inspecting your network tab in the browser to see the outcomes...
there is no any time for manipulation in the back end, also if they would manipulate the result you would clearly see it while verifying the bets with the function i provided to you.



I assume as the amount of bets which they handle every day it may be some delays to generate the file for each of the user and it's unique bets ...
Im not behind the stake so i don't know how this process work in their backend to generate this file, but I i'm 101% sure that the file which they genereting to "provide" your bets does not prove the bet fairness....
It is just only to show you the bets which you can't see in your bet history as they limit the history to maximum of 40 last bets...

You can create this archive of your bets by your self registering each of your bet places and the outcome by yourself... then rotate your seed to verify the outcome and if you will find any game that have differend results with your own archive then we may assume something is mainpulated.. but since that point you have not proved that they manipulated anything.

Your acusation to them is that the iteration is different and some bets are missing in the bet archive file which you can download, but i will repeat this for x time, IT DOES NOT MATTER , as the FAIRNESS OF EACH BET is not based of that what you have in their "archive" but by the factors that i already mentioned to you at least 3 times.

dvdx



again Benford law can be applied and is much effective with binary data.
you have pulled the program i appreciate it.
but your claims about archive data is absolutely wrong.
archive data you must know how to read.


there is manipualation in the back end of stake.com
hence the automated data which is archive in the back end won’t have such different iteration.

Will try to explain this to you one more time like to 5 year old.


Let's assume i go to mines and wanted to play mine game with 3 mines

At the beggining i known HASHED SERVER SEED , MY SECRET AND NONCE

Lets say it's

HASHED SERVER SEED = 'e7f3006651ac9fa2252cb6db7de2cfa50e8fb9ff479fd16afd45e9f5fa52c24b';
MY SECRET = 'J8ziLyE0L5';
NONCE = 1;

I Started to open mines at position
1st Click "field" : 0,
2nd Click "field" : 6,
3rd Click "field": 12,
4th Click "field": 18,
5th Click "field": 24,
6th Click "field": 21,
7th Click "field": 17,

On the 7th Click i busted as mine was uncovered/clicked.

Now i want to verify if actually MINE WAS AT THAT POSITION at that game with NONCE 1.

So i have rotated the seed to get the output for SERVER SEED , stake output for that string in
SERVER SEED UNHASHED = '8935bff6600c9ebb504505757ca881131e5f4a2766e8b0debd687100be6e17c4';

Okay move on now to verify the outcome of the mines for that particular game

For that instance I've used the code which i wrote yesterday to verify the mine bet

Output of my code (link for you to verify https://onlinephp.io/c/b9616 )



Okay so i know that i have played with 3 mines that particular game

It means in my game mines positions are

0 = 13 (1st mine position field)
1 = 17 (2nd mine position field)
2 = 5 (3rd mine position field)

Okay it clearly shows a mine at position field 17 which i uncovered and busted (as explained above)

NOW ASSUME BY SOME REASON STAKE PUT THAT BET TO THE ARCHIVE WITH THE REST OF THE FIELD WHICH I DID NOT OPENED/CLICKED

SO IN MY LOGS I SEE


Does that log format affect anyhow the result of the game ?

NO IT DID NOT

1st .
1. Mines position -> IN THE LOG MINES ARE IN THE SAME ORDER AS IN MY CODE OUTPUT (AFTER VERIFICATION OF BET)

2. ORDER OF FIELDS OPENED IS EXACTLY THE SAME AS MY MANUALL CLICKS TILL I BUSTED ON FIELD 17

the EXTRA DATA FOR OPENED FIELDS DOEST NOT AFFECT ANYTHING AS AT THAT POINT I ALREADY LOST THAT GAME ( WHEN CLICKED MINE AT FIELD 17)

So it means even if for some reason the output for fields opened have some EXTRA additional fields which were not clicked, BUT the ORDER OF that which we clicked is OK, it means there is no any manipulation.

I don't know how STAKE store the logs for best, but if the ORDER OF THE FIELDS OPENED TILL BUST IS EQUAL TO ACTUALLY CLICKED FIELDS IN GAME AND MINES POSITIONS IS IN THE SAME ORDER
IT MEAN THE RESULT IS FAIR.

ok i am just putting my point. no hard love mate

My friend the problem is not the OP's topic, it's his narrative. No one came out and said no this this this you are wrong. Stake and CG are father and child companies. I have and had every proof and stake didn't even bother to give an answer because they don't need to. They have a fan base of spastic people who don't even know how to earn a living, won from crypto; childs. I hate that no one blames stake but only players; this is how payroll works i believe.(I'm not talking about you.)

so the fact of stake.com manipulating the bet at back end is nothing and me asking casini money is something different. get your facts straight instead of acknowledging  that stake.coma nd CG lied upfrontly by provablyfair.me being third party verifier and lying about the case . also unable to compare manipulated iteration it comes down to me asking money frim casino.


i am platinium 3 member , they are at fault they must pay. also if you go to their community you will find iut people saying stakeoriginals is a scam , and i prove it through the iterations , then there is a problem for you.

dvdx



i am at certainity that hiw the games of mines work. but can you proof read the difference between the first and the ssecond iteration also explain me why is it two iterations are so much having difference.
and also how come second iteration has 2 mines , in it . so how come so many tiles opened for bombs it clearly specifies over there.
also https://onlinephp.io/ can you migrate the program here ans give us a link , so that i can verify if its working or not

This statement of yours contradicts on the screenshot you provided and as @holydarkness pointed out to you. You are clearly asking them for money in exchange for burying this fabricated story that you created.

This lie post of yours clearly shown what’s your real intention for escalating this case. Now you are accusing casino guru colluding with Stake just because they review your case not in favor to you.

Mmm...hhmmm...


Where exactly did I say what you said I said? Kindly re-read.

The post is about showing proof [as that's how this board operates] of you asking for a sum of money the first time they granted your wish to talk with their supervisor, while, on CG and many other occasions, you insisted that you were just asking to either bring the manager or pay you.

So, yeah, not a rumor.


No, the problem here is you being too stubborn to see that you made mistake and misunderstand things. Many, way too many people tried to help contributing to this case, allocating their time to inform you what exactly happened, how to verify bets, etc. and yet you still insist to stick to what you believe, despite all of the facts.

so you accept the fact there is something to bury for the, , hence you sre quoting this point to me , bringing in guilt. CG lied to me about provablyfair. CG lied about the lawsuit of 580 $ by cristopher freeman on stake.com so basically they were trying to coverup for stake.com.
the problem with some people and CG they dont investigate they just specualte.
and when talked abut basics, they go in loops . in point 3 iteration 2 there were 2 iteration for the archives mines game.
the first ine had 2 mines and game ended when i clicked the bomb.
in second iteration it shiws 2 mines and i opened more than 11 bombs, hows that even possible on a mines game of 2 bombs.

clearly its manipualting hence they archive the bets. but still clearly some people and CG fail the basic common sense just to compare the iteration.

holydarkness. i welcome all your question, but it should be only post releated and infact the topiccof concern should be stake.com registering the bets in backend with manipulated odds , a part from that concern you will bring all the stupidest concern , then you should be thinking of qualitative reasoning skill adpat this in your life style.


FYI , those two iterations were picked up CG and stake.com when i send them the archive file. i am just explaning how two iteration of same odds of a mine game are different. if you cant compare the difference between the two iteration let me know

that email was sent. it was not fabricated mate.

Are you talking about Interpol-GPT mail 😂

I haven't read all of the texts you gave on your opening post, but I've know this thread will eventually come when CG close your topic with a verdict not favoring you.



Above is the image that supposed to be your reference for the "$1,000,000 allegation. Then I'll just quietly drop this screenshot of your video here, showing you ask to bury the case

.

Shall we also talk about how you fabricated an email from interpol regarding stake? And weren't you a lawyer? Couldn't they get their license revoked for falsifying evidence? Or were the laywer statement is also just a... means to threaten them?

how do you want me to explain you this.
stake.com deletes the bet id in daily basis and therby stores them in a archive file in a text format if you play regularly citing issues related to storage these dynamic bets are translated into single iteration code and stored in the system. you can check under transactions > betarchive download the text.

this is something which is automated system, and the iteration in the system registered gives a different explanation to that. please read the Point number 3 from above , where i compared and explain the two iteration.
the first iteration gives the correct response, while the second iteration shows the odds of 2 mines , clearly have entry if having more than 2 odds.

under point 2 , 3 agent from chat support informed me about the odds registered in backend for a game i played with 2 mines registered as 11. from here i got to know the system how they manipulate.

they are deleting the bets , and citing is due to storage place they are archviving bets.

if you go under transactions > bet archive you will find daily 40 percent of your bets archive if you playing regularly.
archiving means removing the existense of the bet and archiving them in text format.
like this i found out itertion two different registered in the same for same odds.

i had submitted a chunk load of files to CG to infestigate but then kater i realised that they are working for casino.

i never asked compensation as 1 million, you read english and check the screenshot. i asked either to bring supervisor on chat or give me a million dollar.


however my deposit loss claim till date is 30,000,000 INR.

Am I reading this correctly, are you asking for 1 million $  compensation for a 0.25 Trx bet ?

I have read it all, I don't understand more than half of the things you said, you should be talking with a more clear language to the forum so that we understand, your post have the same lyrical as messaging a kid. You should change that. Secondly, I also believe CG works for stake.com . They ran my case to downhill where I was %100 right with proof. I don't believe CG is an honest source on cases against stake. Good luck on your mission, however I see you got no supporters here, maybe it's time to stop swearing at people and change your tone? Who knows, maybe you will get more help. I don't even understand why are you disputing?

The Man is Back!🎉

Hello there.

I was watching your topic about the accusation of stake.. but im not sure where do you find the evidence they cheater.

Iterations for mine bets which you provided differes as it depends if mines are opened one by one or automatically (multiple field at once)

I have prepared some php code which you can use to verify outcome of the mine games with tool that stake provide.
You can use some online php compilers example https://www.w3schools.com/php/phptryit.asp?filename=tryphp_compiler


For the exaple my outcome is the same as in stake web page.

As you were reading and commenting on my previous post, few of them even accused me asking the casino $1,000,000 .00 . All of the pm paid users by the casino little didnt know that i asked them either supervisor or 1,000,000.00 as stake support was not responding to my chats properly, as 3 of the agents on chat gave me he information of bet which i placed with 2 mines as 11 mines. ( later on stake.com deleted the chat citing on it was editorial error ) .



1. 1,000,000$ allegation


First thing first , I asked the casino to bring the supervisor online or pay me $1,000,000.00 as few of the agents were just revolving the chat ticket in themselves and informed me they cannot transfer it to supervisor. they are basically parrots citing example of few of the complaints given by other people.

http://[url=https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.talkimg.com%2Fimages%2F2023%2F07%2F29%2FQ5G13.png&t=654&c=CaxYQ9GaR9wR2w]https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.talkimg.com%2Fimages%2F2023%2F07%2F29%2FQ5G13.png&t=654&c=CaxYQ9GaR9wR2w[/url]
https://drive.google.com/file/d/12ACNupL6oKhtFJumN0DHA9LRRZWvCDLU/view?usp=drivesdk

you can see here , what i have written and what i have asked. so especially stake.com touts top spreading rumor.



2. support agent informing true odds placed in background.


when i aseked 3 support agents and supervisors including for bet id 167247337064 , they all stated thet the bets were placed with 11 mines, while i recorded and have a screenshot of the bet with 2 mines.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Tno2UEOj1XTLQkeQaD8BuKyU36gID7LF/view?usp=drivesdk

this contains the original bet which i placed

and below is the screenshot if the support agent informing the bet was placed with 11 mines

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JwEGLHbeNldv2iAradCjjI94bR-HmHqv/view?usp=drivesdk

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ec3WV4xaN90LqvaYKAuUTIeunO7z2RF6/view?usp=drivesdk
. from this day i came to know that the backedn the bets are regustered as irregular odds. and even thiugh if the bets are archived i made a mandate for huge losses and small losses i will try to pull out the file








3. for deleted or archive bets, two different iterations.

 In a casino , you have a unique bet id and especially for games mines is bet id later your hashed seed and the nonce remains the same. stake.com deletes the bet in the system and archive the dynamic format to a simple text format, so in my enquiry i gave casino guru two entry of hashes ( actually i send them the file , both the iteration of the bets were picked up casino.guru and stake.com ) .

Here casino guru, didnt picked up the format but in order to deceive its readers gave an example out in public of my max winning on multiplier in order to cover up for stake.com


the question of iterations were as follows






a. Comparision of two iteration

iteration 1:
{"id":"4199e11e-8861-4b8f-9b43-97ad560cd766","iid":"house:167247337064","type":"casino","scope":"house","userId":"c3299987-21b5-49ef-bb2b-92a8512912b1","betCasino":{"id":"4199e11e-8861-4b8f-9b43-97ad560cd766","active":false,"userId":"c3299987-21b5-49ef-bb2b-92a8512912b1","gameId":"f65ec3b7-705d-42e1-9050 d9ea6fd032b3","currency":"trx","value":0.0000165150794972,"expectedAmount":0.0000020809,"amount":0.00020809,"payoutMultiplier":0,"payout":0,"mobile":false,"serverSeedId":"c7ae0581-091f-4b85-ac5a-9e8e15c5f7b1","clientSeedId":"fc7c4338-e91f-4c13-9cdf-e4475593d7c9","nonce":544,"stateMines":{"_mines":[11,0],"rounds":[{"field":24,"payoutMultiplier":1.076086956521739},{"field":3,"payoutMultiplier":1.1739130434782608},{"field":10,"payoutMultiplier":1.2857142857142859},{"field":9,"payoutMultiplier":1.4142857142857147},{"field":11,"payoutMultiplier":0}],"minesCount":2},"updatedAt":1688820636227,"createdAt":1688820636227}}


its for Betid : 167247337064 currency is trx , nonce 544, this bet was archived before reveal of the seeds , hence all the hashes are encrypted , it is games if 2 mines at position 11 and 0 . i clicked first on tile 24 , then 3, then 10, then 9 , then 11, game over as i clicked on the bomb.


iteration 2:

"id":"827819c9-5d9b-4579-a88c-befc0fa54e99","ip":"XXX.YYY.ZZZ.AAA","iid":"house:167250384449","type":"casino","nonce":602,"value":0.0000132,"active":false,"amount":0.0000132,"gameId":"f65ec3b7-705d-42e1-9050-d9ea6fd032b3","mobile":false,"payout":0,"userId":"c3299987-21b5-49ef-bb2b-92a8512912b1","currency":"usdc","gameName":"mines","createdAt":1688821605532,"updatedAt":1688821605532,"clientSeed":"O1zKuEp8081boobs","stateMines":{"_mines":[3,7],"rounds":[{"field":23,"payoutMultiplier":1.076086956521739},{"field":18,"payoutMultiplier":1.1739130434782608},{"field":13,"payoutMultiplier":1.2857142857142858},{"field":5,"payoutMultiplier":1.4142857142857146},{"field":6,"payoutMultiplier":1.5631578947368425},{"field":0,"payoutMultiplier":1.7368421052631584},{"field":1,"payoutMultiplier":1.941176470588236},{"field":2,"payoutMultiplier":2.1838235294117654},{"field":3,"payoutMultiplier":0},{"field":4,"payoutMultiplier":0},{"field":9,"payoutMultiplier":0},{"field":7,"payoutMultiplier":0},{"field":11,"payoutMultiplier":0},{"field":12,"payoutMultiplier":0},{"field":14,"payoutMultiplier":0},{"field":24,"payoutMultiplier":0},{"field":17,"payoutMultiplier":0},{"field":16,"payoutMultiplier":0},{"field":15,"payoutMultiplier":0},{"field":21,"payoutMultiplier":0},{"field":22,"payoutMultiplier":0},{"field":20,"payoutMultiplier":0}],"minesCount":2},"clientSeedId":"fc7c4338-e91f-4c13-9cdf-e4475593d7c9","serverSeedId":"c7ae0581-091f-4b85-ac5a-9e8e15c5f7b1","expectedAmount":1.3200000000000002e-7,"serverSeedHash":"aff867a8be94f30f5bd66c7bbf0fa7a85e1c10b187c22fddb93b5efe807cc4e7","payoutMultiplier":0},



over here for betid :  167250384449 having nonce 602  played with usdc on two mines 3 and 7 . tiles which i opened were
23,18,13,5,6,0,1,2,3 ( practically over ) but still the bet registered on other field would have given me losses.


if any one had played mines you would come to know that when you opennthe bomb your game is over and unlike in iteration 1 all the unopened tiles shows that they were having odds more than 2.

so hence iteration 2 , the odds were manipulated where it specified mines as 2.

4. casino.guru dillegence and posting

i posted all the details on casino.guru.  At first stake.com wanted me contact them on [email protected] , from till date i have not gotten a response from them regarding this issue. they cited me to use provablyfair.me to verify the bets. now those whi dont know provablyfair.me is subsidary of stake.com . stake.com owns this website, proof would be given down.if yiu gi ti mebit.io you will come to know the details. when i asked them to inquire regarding the bet archives iteration . they have asked me to send them whole archive file via email which i have send.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1scG-11MOboCjOgFxhxpsLWoJqsgg7M2a/view?usp=drivesdk
- and casino.guru still claims that i have not send them any information, which is absolutely lies and lame and trying to coverup.

5. when casino.guru was starting to focus on all the wrong this i confronted them regarding their review via email. [/size]


https://drive.google.com/file/d/1KjyXgG3R0ia53K_yDR9LW1ev5Lhdi9ds/view?usp=drivesdk

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xBPwwEKJ-kXyv0SX-sfCpiybzo80jRPR/view?usp=drivesdk


coincidentally the very first screenshot link consist of a screenshot of trustpilot and evidentally and out of behaviour pattern they did the same with which they did with eric whoses screenshot i had send.


nothing as coincidence , just a cover up to earn business and payout using affiliates commission.



i gave them all the proof , but they send me things via email , we have resolved more than 8000 complaints.

6. Casino guru being the exofficio spokeperson for the casino . [/size]


when the casino tried stop responding and askd the ticket to be clocsed, despite me asking them to compare the iteration registered of the deleted the bet
Matej from Casino.guru stated that [email protected] responds to them in 34 minutes.


while i send them screenshot and attched on casino.guru website. its been more than 20 days they never reply via email .


7 .things got worse , when casino guru asked me to use a third party verification tool.[/u] [/size]

when i insisted the mediators CG to compare the iterations and explain , again they started bullshitting business and trying to deceive readers by throwing more extra information and creating a gimmick to shiw that casino is geniune and trying to oinch in few extra topic. out of frustration Matej from CG told me to use third party verification of bets provablyfair.me


i let him provablyfair.me is a tool developed by people who are running the website .
stake.com ceo and mebit founders are the same person. infact stake.com whole support team is employed on payroll of mebit.

if you go to mebit.io you can see their details.so basically provablyfair.me belongs to stake.com and cannot be trusted as there is an api which shows you the result.


https://drive.google.com/file/d/1GlB-4-XxNNvS1FwBRmO9DGYt9LZYtEv2/view?usp=drivesdk

8. There cannot be any proper verifcation of Mines , as the result you are seeing its totally manipulated.

If you check on stake.com under calculation of mines you will find just a single paragraph written(check the screenshot).

https://drive.google.com/file/d/15Z7SyS-VPjnoWGgHflUhoDEB7hqRE9_6


you can check just few lines no code.if there was transperancy, they would provided opensource verfier in angular js so that each n very could be verified properly.But they wont Because you dont make billions without cheating millions of people. [/u] [/size]

9. At this statement , i was 100 percent confident as stake.com and casino.guru is colluding. [/u]

After the fact, Matej from casino was not ready to compare the iteration and give me explanation. he was not ready to accept the fact provablyfair.me belongs to stake.com and is not a third party verification tool.

when i informed him , that stake.com former partner has filed a law suit against the current partners of stake.com l he was in denial is not accepting the fact. by this I came to know these online casino have affiliate policy regarding their affiliate earning by casino.guru .


Casino.guru acts as reputation repair PR FIRM , who gets money through affilaites to cover ul such things from the casino. they are basically a marketing and PR fim.

below the document attched with media link of freeman vs stake.com


https://casetext.com/case/freeman-v-stakecom-1#:~:text=Freeman%27s%20Complaint%2Dwhich%20reads%20not,than%20a%20billion%20dollars%2C%20and%2C


of all the lies casino.guru had told me this is the best of lies , as by this I conculde that bith the companies are colluding to generate revenue and scam people [/size] [/b][/u]



Conclusion and some of the facts from posting on casino.guru about stake.com mines manipulation [/u]


1.stake.com is a cheat website registered in Curcao and operating from Australia and support running from Slovakia . Alone promoting the Gambling in Australia it has tend to broke how many laws , i am not even aware of.



2. stake.com cofounder edward craven father is convicted felon in 1992 australian stock market scam and its a family business of scamming money from people since 1992 , when edward was inside his father. you can google it. As its true. You cant make Billions, without scamming a few millions of people.


 
3.so called endorsed third party verification website provablyfair.me belongs to ceo of stake.com . if you can go to mebit.io you would come to know the details about it.Hence all the result you are viewing its totally manipulated and they have open in a new website with old domain name in krder to verify the bets. no open source verifcation as of in


 
4. No calculation is given out for mines in thier Result generation system , hence it impossible for any third party website to verify it. A part from that they have disabled their api where you coukd have stored many bets in the system.
 


5. stake.com a scamming company bsed in Curcao where there is no proper gambling authority.

 
6. Casino.guru is basically affiliate through money making company which charges the casino to basically handle the damage and the PR , thus by maintaining the casino reputation and getting comission on behalf of that.


 7. By compairing the iteration on Point 3 itself you can verify that bets registered in the casino is diiferent as bets played in the system.




If any questions , are there regarding the conculsion , you can let me know . But touts of stake.com , and casino.guru would not be entertained.
enough of lying deceiving stake.com and casino.guru.



Donation link:

Bitcoin:
BTC
3FWVjyadavXYFFVk84tAzfVJvHGzAPPRET
[BEP20]
0xD839A45Eb55fEdC2951B1A4AeF573b58360ee79D


Ethereum:
[ERC20]
0x78a9bB018Aa8E5D24E43afb7394FDd342364Adad
[BEP20]
0xD839A45Eb55fEdC2951B1A4AeF573b58360ee79D


TRON :
[Trc20]
TSg3zFyhTX3BMQiaYki9FcgWR3z26qLktK

USDT:
[Trc20]
TSg3zFyhTX3BMQiaYki9FcgWR3z26qLktK
[BEP20]
0xD839A45Eb55fEdC2951B1A4AeF573b58360ee79D
[SOLANA]
udGPBEhaBNpbDnmwU55RaMW8UqXCkMQGrCQRBhYgwMW
[ERC20]
0x78a9bB018Aa8E5D24E43afb7394FDd342364Adad