<…>
I’ve taken a look at those 4K Hero Members on the
Merit Dashboard , to see where they are now on the Ranking-up pipeline. The data is as follows:
segment segment_activity segment_merit nUsers
0. Being considered for Legendary [>100%] [>100%] 79
1. Could have ranked up to Legendary, lacking Merit [>100%] [40%..60%) 489
1. Could have ranked up to Legendary, lacking Merit [>100%] [60%..80%) 26
1. Could have ranked up to Legendary, lacking Merit [>100%] [80%..100%) 5
3. Soon may rank up to Legendary [80%..100%) [80%..100%) 2
4. Not enough activity nor Merit to rank up to Legendary [60%..80%) [40%..60%) 167
4. Not enough activity nor Merit to rank up to Legendary [60%..80%) [60%..80%) 2
4. Not enough activity nor Merit to rank up to Legendary [60%..80%) [80%..100%) 2
4. Not enough activity nor Merit to rank up to Legendary [80%..100%) [40%..60%) 349
4. Not enough activity nor Merit to rank up to Legendary [80%..100%) [60%..80%) 8
That is to say:
- Out of the 4k Heroes, 1.129 have earned at least 1 sMerit (which leaves nearly ¾ out of the picture for now – mind you, as seen on
The real activity of bitcointalk.org + full stats, out of the 4K Heroes, only 2.581 had posted this year (as of beginning of October 2018), so roughly, out of those that do post, around 44% have received at least 1 sMerit.
- 79 Have the minimum activity and merit threshold, and require the algorithm to kick-in. 78 of them has de 1K merit airdropped, and only @TMan started at 500 merits and has since gained 669 additional ones.
- 520 meet the minimum activity threshold, but not the merit one. Infact, only 5 out of those 520 Heroes are near the merit requirement (@Bill Gator, @BTCforJoe,@Hhampuz, @LeGaulois and @marlboroza).
- 2 more are nearly there, but lack a bit of activity and merit: @HCP and @romanornr.
- 528 meet neither the activity minimum not the merit threshold, most of them being very far off on the merit count.
