Topic: Steel fist in a white glove. (Read 331 times)

These games between countries with nuclear missiles are childish and can be very dangerous. It is like people forget, that there are nuclear weapons, since the second world war, and that no one can win a battle against a country with a nuclear arsenal, you can only choose to die with them and the rest of the world.

Steel fist not fit in kid glove. Kid glove rip. Steel fist become visible. Then use steel fist.

"Our policy should be the policy of a steel fist in a kid glove," the deputy prime minister in charge of the defense industry said. "It must repel enemies to partners, partners - to neutrals, allies - directly to friends." "No one should doubt that there should be a steel fist under the glove, ready to attack the aggressor or a group of aggressors if they want to attack Russia," the deputy prime minister said addressing the participants of the congress.

The US President Donald trump has demonstrated a willingness to talk with Russia from a position of strength, but it is ready to give Russian President Vladimir Putin to "save face" in the surrender. Ease violations by Putin causes growing irritation in the West. Actions trump led to the fact that irritation translated into real action. A direct strike on the airbase, despite the announcement of Russia that the Kremlin did not expect. This is a translation of the conversation to another plane and tone. If we can't negotiate in good, we agree on the language of force. It was not expected for Putin. Putin must respond to the kick trump at the air base in Syria. But how? To shoot down American missiles can't. Putin will have to respond asymmetrically, in the security Council will require independent investigation into gimatecan and at the same time will block it. Americans work on a "steel fist in a white glove". Hit, now go to Moscow. The arrival Tillerson is a sign of respect, because come one who is more interested. Tillerson pays a visit, demonstrating the flexibility and softness. How to "merge" the Assad regime, having issued it as a "victory" of Putin? Putin is important symbolically to answer US and to build the image of a winner. It is acceptable for the United States. But by and large, Americans fail the Kremlin to a situation where strategic decisions will take them, and the problem of design rests on Putin. I think the us won't even have to bring the case to eliminate Assad. Let and directs the Alawite part of the country, but not anymore because all of Syria is not a country al-Assad. Putin may be leading to Syria ships, but the West understands this game and is not afraid