Major concern:
Your risk parameters don't seem to exist, or a very lax at that. It seems that you're just asking to gamble with other people's money, and make what you're currently making off that. But if you lose their BTC, then you don't lose. So you mentioned you'll cover other people's BTC with your own funds - have you any proof these funds exist? If so, provide them. And if you do - why not use a PAMM Account?
Considering that I never actually stated my account value, your assessment of my risk management is not possible.
I can tell from talking to you that you really do not understand the intricacies of trading derivatives, but are doing your best to investopedia your way into a discussion that you are ill-equipped to have.
I do in fact lose if I mess up with BTC contributed to this opportunity because I would still be liable to repay the original investor as agreed. Whether I win big or lose, I'll be on the hook to pay the fixed amount...so you are concerning yourself with things you both do not understand and things that are not relevant to the arrangement between the investor and this opportunity.
Does a bank tell you specifically what it does with the money you keep in a "money market" account or even a checking account? They may provide some vague overview, but they are only required to keep 10% of your deposit on hand as cash. Where do you think that other 90% is going? Did you sleep through 2008-2009?
I am doing this offer MY way. If you don't like it, do not participate. It's as simple as that.
Concerns with relation to the numbers:
So, you're asking for up to 1,500 BTC (=~US$675,000) saying you will repay US$857,250 (assuming 1=US$450).
No, that is the maximum that I would accept and that would be documented here in this thread so I couldn't accept 5,000 and then say I only have 500 so far. The minimum individual contribution is 5 BTC, which is high enough to prevent me from having to track hundreds of desposits while being low enough to make the opportunity available to more people.
You say you risk around 20% of your principal on each position
(side note: this is insane for any real trader, especially if you're inter and not intra as you say. Normal position sizes are 0.2-1%, and perhaps if you're feeling lucky up to 5%). And you give a positional value of $32,000 for one trade. So your total capital is $160,000 - that's what the maths says, based off of your figures.
Uhh, no sir. Once again you reveal that you don't actually know what you're talking about but did some googling and suddenly believe yourself to be an expert on investing.
I stated that 20% is the limit of a single position, not the minimum or even the average positional value.
There is no such thing as "normal" position sizes. The individual investor and trader decides what to risk within their level of tolerance and within their trading strategy.
I did not state my total account value and so therefore you are making baseless assumptions out of ignorance. Like I said, 20% is the limit not the norm...and I did explain that recent trade was an outlier.
But just the other day you say you got $182,000, around 2/7 of what you want. So now have $342,000, about 50% of what you originally wanted. On this VXX position: You would have had 15 minutes to open this position on that day, to say your algorithm 'nailed' it is well...
Wow, you are really dense aren't you? You are inventing a lot of nonsense that has nothing to do with anything. I do not want or need any BTC. I have plenty of my own money, but I am a capitalist and entrepreneur. If I can multiply my account while providing value to others, why not?
It's really that simple.
My algorithm helps me choose entry and exit points. The final decision is mine; it does not automatically buy or sell anything. For a guy who thinks he's investing in "binary options", you sure have a lot to say about a topic you know very little about.
Returning to your normal trades, you gave a figure of $35k of a recent normal position and say you do about 6 trades a month, i.e. c.$210,000/mo.
(This would mean after three months you would have almost all of your requested amount, and not have anything to repay. That after such a short time you would have the money anyway either shows you've not been doing this for long: bad news; or your figures are not real: bad news.)
Uhh...no. Now you're getting stupid and to the point of being little more than a petulant troll. Your simplistic calculation of 6 x 35 does not include losses, drawdown, taxes, fees, commissions and fixed expenses like the data feeds I have to pay for. It also does not factor in the value of my time - and for someone like you, I don't expect you to value time but I do and I value it highly.
I don't know where you got the idea that I was going to stop trading my own money and ONLY trade money I get from BTC deposits. Did I say that? Show me where.
The gains and losses I realize with my own money is IRRELEVANT to the arrangement being offered here, because here the offer is a guaranteed percentage repaid over a fixed period of time. CERTAINTY COSTS MONEY.
So it is obvious that I would limit the money I take to what I can collateralize on my own just as a stock brokerage follows similar limitations on how much of a stock can be bought on margin.
I've shown quite clearly that I know what I'm talking about. You've shown nothing other than faux skepticism...as in you are attempting to fabricate claims about my integrity with no logical or sound basis.
Even if we add just one prior month to what, according to you own figures, you would have on hand $552k. Now, I'm happy for you to say that's too much - but by doing so you would have to change some of the figures you've already given. And if you're fiddling figures from the off, it does not bode well.
Uh, no. This makes zero sense. What does not bode well is for you to keep talking, as you're going to dig yourself in so deep that the only way out is if some unicorn comes by and throws a rope down to you.
Further side note: You mentioned the 10% of profits you keep would be about 100% of what you currently make. I can't even being to make those figures work with any of the numbers you've given.
That's because, as you've demonstrated in this post, you are terrible at math and seem to be a product of the US public school system.
Also, binary options do exist - they are an exotic option. I am referring to the world outside of the US. But also: Butterfly and iron condor are limited risk neutral trading strategies, not an instrument.
*FACEPALM*
No binary options don't exist. They are claimed to exist, which is why people who know nothing about actual investing or trading think they're a thing.
I'm glad you looked up butterfly spread on google - good job, kid. Now you know a definition but you still do not understand them.
In short: from where I'm sitting your numbers do not add up. I am happy for you to send me your trading statements in order to prove me wrong, I would love to be wrong I assure you.
Then you must be feeling the love because you've done a good job of being wrong.
In short: if you are not comfortable with the terms as outlined in my original post, this is not for you.