The imposition of any restrictions based on ranks "newbie account (or below Full Member accounts)" will be easily surpassed by the purchase of higher-rank accounts or payment to some one "this will increase the value of old account and then topics that want to recover it." [Remember no restrictions will be imposed on scam or negative trust.]
If you're talking about ordering and reviving "BUMPING" topics in altcoin ANN section, this has been discussed here ------> Ideas for topic ordering in altcoin announcements?.
Topic: [Suggestion] Should the forum have new rule on campaign (Read 137 times)
I think anyone can still promote the project in this forum even though he has long left the forum, according to the rules and does not violate the existing forum rules: Topic: Unofficial list of (official) Bitcointalk.org rules, guidelines, FAQ
No one escapes against fraud in the campaign, all of them can be punished, Newbie or Legendary.
If it is proven there is definitely a reward. (Red).
Rules:
For me not, the existing rules are quite boring and annoying for project managers.
But all have their own ideas, democracy.
Quote
Generally, it is bad for the forum if those teams freely used the forum as place for them to spam and scam, without punishments.
No one escapes against fraud in the campaign, all of them can be punished, Newbie or Legendary.
If it is proven there is definitely a reward. (Red).
Rules:
For me not, the existing rules are quite boring and annoying for project managers.
But all have their own ideas, democracy.
Honestly, I have not joined the forum for too long, so I don't have too much experience with the forum. Firstly, forgive me please, if I say something incorrect.
I thought about it since yesterday, that what if old projects, that have their main head developer (whom started those projects' ANN threads years ago) actually left the forum for years. Then, years later, those projects still use the forum as the place to promote their projects with Newbie accounts.
It's always bad if projects are still been active, not dead, but their head developers are not active in the forum (or totally left the forum). And, their promotions run by newbie accounts, then what happen if those promotions end as scam ones?
Generally, it is bad for the forum if those teams freely used the forum as place for them to spam and scam, without punishments.
How about the new rule like this:
# New Rule:
Project that run promotions with newbie account (or below Full Member accounts), whilst head developer (the first account used to create the project's first ANN thread left the forum, and inactive in the forum) will be rejected, and bounty thread will be disabled/ deleted to trashcan. Something more like account of head developer will be nuked.
- The minimum inactive period should be considered.
- Another thing might occur: What if projects have different ANN topics (for swaps, rebrands, etc.): Solutions might be nuked all OPs.
Do you agree with this?
I thought about it since yesterday, that what if old projects, that have their main head developer (whom started those projects' ANN threads years ago) actually left the forum for years. Then, years later, those projects still use the forum as the place to promote their projects with Newbie accounts.
It's always bad if projects are still been active, not dead, but their head developers are not active in the forum (or totally left the forum). And, their promotions run by newbie accounts, then what happen if those promotions end as scam ones?
Generally, it is bad for the forum if those teams freely used the forum as place for them to spam and scam, without punishments.
How about the new rule like this:
# New Rule:
Project that run promotions with newbie account (or below Full Member accounts), whilst head developer (the first account used to create the project's first ANN thread left the forum, and inactive in the forum) will be rejected, and bounty thread will be disabled/ deleted to trashcan. Something more like account of head developer will be nuked.
- The minimum inactive period should be considered.
- Another thing might occur: What if projects have different ANN topics (for swaps, rebrands, etc.): Solutions might be nuked all OPs.
Do you agree with this?
Jump to: