Do you want to make bitcointalk escrow service or public bitcoin service?
if your site service for the forum it is easy, you need to deposit some Bitcoins for trusted member(s), and then centrally manage the site.
If any problem occurs, the member can open a report in scam board and the trusted member(s) will release extra escrow amount.
It will make the fees less and the process automatic.
Bitmixcoin.io did the same thing on this forum. They put 5 bitcoin into escrow with our user - zazarb. Once they gained some trust, they redeemed their escrowed 5 bitcoin and then scammed people, one person was scammed with 16 bitcoin. So, I wouldn't call that a good model.
I see, so basically i will be opening a website and not doing escrow on bitcointalk.
I will try to see how to secure the funds in case of a hack, so all users can be refunded.
Thanks for the advice.
The website is ready, i am just looking for a partner to build the infrastructure for it (DevOps/networking).
Suggestions are based on need, so what do you need exactly from an escrow service?
I wouldn't suggest anyone to use your service especially when you use the word "I" everywhere (that means you are doing alone) and you are also looking for partners this way. It makes me believe that in your idea you want to make a website that will generate profit automatically while you'll just draw design, code it and that's all. Business doesn't happen that way. Why to trust a person who doesn't know anything about the business he enters.
Apologies for using 'I', but that's true. I am working on it alone so far but i got everything done.
That is not a drawn design, it is coded and ready for production already.
You can notice the Django toolbar, which is for testing purposes.
~images~
The images you've attached are too big in resolution size, that's why the forum cannot preview it. Better compress or just upload it with a lesser resolution as having it shown is already enough proof that you are in the development stage of your platform. Furthermore, I have seen that you said in your landing page that you are the
"Most secure and trusted service", which I somehow disagree as you were just starting. Better erase the word "most" as it attracts more with your honesty.
I may also add 2FA for releasing the escrow, although it is user-less, but i will find a solution for that.
2FA that would require on client side?? I guess you must better disclose first your identity before making them do it. As I was saying, it is better to have initiative in being kind and transparent to your possible clients. Would they send you their identity if you can't show yours?
Will do that.
As for revealing my identity, will do that when i register the company at least, i am so far focusing on the development and deployment of the platform.
Bitmixcoin.io did the same thing on this forum. They put 5 bitcoin into escrow with our user - zazarb. Once they gained some trust, they redeemed their escrowed 5 bitcoin and then scammed people, one person was scammed with 16 bitcoin. So, I wouldn't call that a good model.
I don't think the OP is bright enough to copy a scam. He claims his site will not require registration, and he claims he will figure out dispute resolution with no registration.
This is not a pre-planned scam using a known method like a ponzi. This is just an idiot who doesn't understand how other idiots scam.
FYI, there is no registration on the website so far, and i am working on bringing more security to it.
And everyone can open a dispute without the need to register, just with their transaction UUID.
Not willing to scam or take anyone's crypto, and my identity will be revealed soon.
I must correct you on that, but a user-less platform means that it does not require any registration, so opening transactions is just straightforward.
I haven't seen the phrase "user-less" used before. It sounds like a platform without users. You could just say it doesn't require registration if that's what it means.
Many developers use the phrase user-less for a website that doesn't require registration, but i will stick with no registration required from now on if that satisfies you.
[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]
