If Bitcoin was like getting close to a peak sure it'd be a terrible play by them, but I don't think anyone is remotely worried about this market cycle coming to a close anytime soon.
The point I was making about Microstrategy has nothing at all to do with whether their position will profit. I think it will. What I'm talking about is their sentiment, and what it might say about broader market sentiment.
When traders leverage long, it generally means they expect very high returns in a very short period of time. In line with the maximum pain theory, we often see high margin long levels, high premiums on futures contracts, high funding rates for long swaps, and other signs of greedy sentiment before bearish market reversals. That's all I'm talking about. I just take it as one more indication of greed, when considering other things like long/short data, forum and social media sentiment, etc.
In the context of a bull market, high levels of greed go hand in hand with severe volatility that repeatedly punishes top buyers and leveraged longs. Doesn't mean the bull market is ending anytime soon, but it's something to keep in mind when attempting to trade this market. The type of downside volatility I'm thinking of: January 2017, March 2017, June 2017, September 2017.....
Yeah.
Yes, they will need to sell BTC to service the debt. If the market were to move against them, that's a recipe for a long squeeze.
You're only thinking about this from the perspective of a BTC mega bull who thinks the price can't go down. Let's be neutral about that for a moment. This is about sentiment analysis, not predicting where the market will go.
When everyone expects the price to rise, the market is greedy. When everyone is scared the market will drop, the market is fearful. And that's all I'm talking about: is Microstrategy leveraging long a sign of greed or fear?