Topic: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals (Read 4602 times)

but what about your mother in law, now she'll be single forever

My sides.

There are wide rumors they hump goats! Gonna google this.. HAHHA http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=dd8_1365441487&comments=1 DRONE FUN. Forward to 1 minute. Fucking drones disgust me more than the act he just commited tbh.
Constructive post :DD

you racist cunt

you just said islamic people have sex with animals

Congrats.

this is obvious anti-islam law, sweden so untolerance !

Wait can someone explain to me the backstory of how it got legalized then made illegal again?

I knew Sweden was really sexually liberal but I never knew it wasn't illegal to have sex with animals in the first place lol.

Bold part: I'm swedish and I have never heard of this. Born 89 so if it was before that I can't tell you wether or not it's true.

Even if the animal likes it? People will be put away if they are caught, but those chances are slim. I hope girls who puts peanut butter on their pussy to get a good time (yes that's beasitality too!) gets jailed. How fun that would be

EDIT: beegatewood you should google BSDM pain olympics, animal sex as far from the worst things people do

I posted that in OP but it got legalized at the same time homosex got legal. I dno, maybe the politicians here likes to fuck their pets?

no man, it's unfair that gay sex is legal and bestiality isn't
if you have one you should have the other one too or have neither

That's horrible people should be put away in jail if they are fucking animals thats disgusting.

Hey don't knock it until you tried it 

oh cmon, do people really do that?

How did it became legal in the 1st place?

or there will be more tourists coming to Sweden just because it's an all female country

If the current set of anti-male rules and regulations are allowed to continue... then there won't be many males left in Sweden. Once that happens, the females will...... do illegal things.

Who can blame them? I'm pretty sure they have a higher percentage of hot girls to hang out with compared to most countries

Finally, a relevant use for one of my favorite GIFs

Nords lose virginity faster than anyone else in the world. In Iceland, the AVERAGE age for first time having sex is 15-16 (~16 elsewhere in Nordic countries). In the West, it's generally ~18 years, and ~22 years in the East.

Maybe they're low on body heat, have poor school attendance enforcement, they're trying to correct a labor shortage, or rotting fish just really kicks their hormones into overdrive, but they seem to hump everything, everyone, everywhere. Can't guarantee the authenticity of this statement, but I believe Sweden actually made "hump day" a weekly holiday where everyone's excused from work and school to hump each other.

"Re: Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals"
 
until now it was legal??? I dont understud that....

what the hell....

perverts will be sad with this news 

wtf

Sweden makes it illegal to have sex with animals...wew

I feel like I should definitely be a millionaire just for getting that reference.

haha 

Well that would mean it would have to become illegal to have sex with your wife, having a sexless marriage requires no laws or lawyers ya know. And I think you didn't get the joke!

Lol, we are like the top 10 most depressed people on the earth.

It was legal previously ?
That explains with Swedish people are so happy.

If you have to divorce whenever you stop having sex with your wife, the courts would be overloaded....

Who mentioned if -everyone- were to stop eat meat?
Last time I checked there were a few more people eating meat than those raping animals

Bold part translates into: I don't have any more arguments, I'm beaten but I won't admit it.

lol @ apsvinet
what I meant was..oh well, does not matter, you seem to be willing to argue this particular issue to an interesting degree.
Basically, while I do not find this fetish particularly arousing , I see it less black and white than the retards behind the law seem to do. The same kind of people who have criminalised paying for sex and who want to criminalise paying for sex outside of Sweden.
People in power who are fucking clueless. A majority of politicians in this wonderful country we seem to share.
 
And I do know people who are into it. Being , for me, a kinda weird thing to do, I was intrigued by it all and had several conversations with those people. Can't claim anything but a vague understanding of underlying desires and an understanding that is, as many other things in life, a rather complex subject. Something this law pays no heed to. Again, to make sure you get it - I don't defend them or their lifestyle, they can all die a horrible death tomorrow for all I care , really.
But I sure don't want my tax money pay the cops investigating them, pay for the court costs, pay for the their prison meals. And I guess I don't want to support a law that criminalises what I have seen - a strange but rather harmless fetish.

Seeing that a law was passed because animals don't have a voice, I, too, want to now give another sexual device a voice to protect them from the perils of (insert, no pun intended, list of perils here).



Please support me by donating to B.U.D.A.P. (Blow Up Dolls Against Perils) and S.T.A.P. (Sexual Toys Against Perils).

Just as with pedophilia, bestiality isn't going to go away, it's just going to stay on the hush-hush.  Only thing the Swedes accomplished is the luxury of paying tens of thousands (in USD anyhow) yearly to care for those prisoners.  Illegal, legal, it makes no difference; if people want to do it, they will, as we've seen with every single law passed since the birth of the republic, and nobody who wants to have sex with animals takes their interests so lightly that a fine or a couple years in jail is going to stop them; they're simply not going to let you know about it.

A child can someday speak of what happened; there's some chance of discovery even if the pedophile takes every precaution.  An animal cannot, making the act simple to hide, assuming Sweden doesn't plan on going full-retard Orwellian state to ensure nobody's doing unapproved acts within their homes.

Furthermore, this is entirely between the man who owns the animal property, and the man who makes love to them (without consent, I presume, or we otherwise will have to argue whether animals are people and, if they aren't, whether it should also be illegal to have sex with computers or dildos that someone has permission to have sex with); not only does the man who owns the animals does not get compensation for this act, but the cost of the individual's actions who violated the animals is now being paid for not by he who committed the crime, but by everyone else who pays for his visit to jail.  Under this system, you are paying for the crime someone else committed.

Silly bluepillers and their emotion-fueled politics; their logo should be a foot with a bullet hole in it.

That argument is about as retarded as you. IF everyone were to stop the meat production the demand would seize to exist and the misstreatment of animals this way would as well. No demand, no supply! I learned that when I was 7 or 8.
EDIT: I am ashamed we're from the same country. You are a disgrace to our country and indeed to humanity alltogether with your retarded arguments. I stand by my previous statement, troll and I am now going to put you on ignore... Waste of time arguing with people who's sole purpose here is to; you guessed it waste time.

Not really digusting but very retarded by our dear politicians. A law is just a rule, the act however is disgusting.
And! Keep in mind that we are also animals, and that we have different races with different intelligence (this was proven during the 60's and 70's and a lot of research was done about it, but lately it's been wiped out everyone's memories it seems. That's also something one can think about

You make an interesting argument. However the animals going to slaughter wouldn't even have been born if it wasn't for meat consumption - that being said it's sad that those animals raised for food are very badly misstreated in a lot of countries, it's only because we are used to eating meat that raising animals to be killed (sometimes they aren't even allowed to move at all to keep their meat tender). In a case like that I'd say that animal sex is less cruel, but because we as a society has grown so used to this way of eating we don't think about it. If the debate was turned around and animal sex somewhat accepted in our world, in comparison to breeding calves without allowing them to move I think most people would argue that's way worse. And who knows how much psychological damage a cow takes from having a machine suck it's milk out of it every day?

Note to self: MakeBelieve is a critterphobe. It wouldn't surprise me to later learnt that he doesn't own a coffee table either. Open your damn mind, or at least Make Believe that Mt Gox is operating on the up-and-up, speaking of fat, furry, lovable critters (with blue balls).

Not eating meat won't stop the meat production.
Not using animals for sex will stop the use of animals for sex.

While I find that disgusting, I don't see why I should be concerned in how other people conduct themselves. It's not something that hurts me and most likely it's not something that in most cases hurts the animal.

Not anymore than eating meat does, anyway. '


Just think of all the sick cows, all together, with huge cysts full of pus and on the other end of a spectrum a girl who just likes getting banged by dogs.

I am compelled to interfere only on the first case because I don't want to eat low quality meat. The second part doesn't bother me in the least. To be perfectly honest I don't even like the idea of pets that much in the first place.

*Gets roflstomped by arguments*
*Puts words and false statements in someone elses mouth*
*Calls them troll*

)))))))))))))))))))

You post short non constructive posts that repeats the same stuff you've already said. We know you think it's disgusting and that people who think rape is ok should die. I call troll..

It was legal to have sex with animals? thats disgusting.

Oh no! I will can´t make sex with Merkel?

Damn that's this years holiday spoiled then 

"Say it ain't so, Gustav."

+1, was looking forward to this

Remember reading a while ago about something that you could call a dog bordello - it could however just be made up as much of our news stories has shown to be pure lies by our big medias.. And they wonder why they lose readers.

http://www.expressen.se/nyheter/expressen-avslojar/har-erbjuds-expressens-reporter-att-ha-sex-med-en-hund/ to your scandinavians who wants to see the scoop or pretend scoop - fun stuff anyway.

Aaah shit, now i can scrap my annual trip to Sweden

why?

if homosexuality is legal so should bestiality be..

Raping children is wrong yes. If the child "raped" you and you wanted it (lets pretend you were a woman) would it be wrong then? Maybe the word fetish was wrong but you know what I mean. What do you think about pedos watching 5 year olds getting banged in Thailand? Are they just as bad? Are the worse if they pay for it (sponsor them)? There will always be a demand for it since it has been around for thousands of years and as long as there is a demand there will be a supply wether we like it or not. Same goes for doggy porn, or BSDM pain olympics (google it, I dare you to watch the whole thing).
As for you and the other guy, that's very relative and depends on what the outcome is. If the outcome is that a father of 2 gets sued for $200k for downloading ONE movie (example, but the numbers were extremly high in one case) while the rest 99.9% goes unpunished WITH the exception that the tax money gets wasted on nothing (so you could make the argument that everybody who works gets punished for the stupid downloading law (yeah it's stupid now that years has passed and we've seen the outcome of this - millions of tax payers money wasted on Pontén and his... gang? Guess they have it pretty good. That law would be better off gone, people would be richer and do the same things we do anyway, didn't some guy once say if a law would make XX % of the inhabitants into criminals it shouldn't be passed? Well there you have a great example of that (I know it has nothing to do with doggysex being forbidden, but it proves that some laws are stupid even if they in theory should be there).

No consent? If it jumps the woman and start banging her isn't that the dogs way of giving consent? It's your back that's turned against the wall, not mine. Nobody has said that animal abuse should be legal? There is a different between abuse and use (NOTE that I still dont think it should be legal as it is very backwards but it's a law that will have absolutley no effect whatsoever, except the pervs who go out and sex other peoples horses, but that's illegal today as well I think..).

Even tho I haven't slept for 48 hours you seem more confused than me.

Depiction of animal-human sex should be illegal, as part of the law against animal abuse.
However showing animals having sex in context of a nature show or whatever has always been ok and should be.

Depiction of sex with animals (as children pornography) would have to be outlawed too. No more national Geographic Channel for Sweden then.

How about your cat or dog walking in on you and GF, is that also a sexual violation of your pets rights?

We had this debate in my country some years back about if sex with animals should be outlawed. What came out of it was a lot of  right wing politicians stating that government should not interfere with peoples sexual preferences, and then becoming immensely embarrassed, when the journalist as the next question asked if they could come up with any examples...

You are in fact right, it is hard to come back responding to a bunch of letters mashed together that makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.
The quote about his flawed logic was in fact not an actual quote which you may have guessed, but if you look up his original response you'll find that reasoning after quoting me saying "then again why would it be legal".
It's one thing to have a fetish for something, abusing children and animals is another.
I don't mind that people are sexually attracted to either babies or animals, but if they abuse them sexually that is a problem.
'They can rarely help it' is a really bad excuse and wouldn't hold up in court if caught abusing someone.
"As me and some other guy" - The 'other guy' responded to one of -my- posts agreeing with -me-, somehow you're implying he is right and I am wrong?
My ground statement was that the law won't in fact change anything, but that being said I think it's right to actually make that law.
Even if the animal itself doesn't take any harm, it has no possibility to show consent to the act. Isn't that classified as rape? You pretty much got your back against the wall here.
And I did not call anyone a freak based on their 'fetish', but rather on the fact that he/she/they happens to think animal abuse should be legal.

You might have confused yourself a little too much fantasizing about dogs humping women.

People who say that kind of bullshit are just revealing what kind of homophobic, ignorant and hateful morons they are so they're not worth even paying attention to.

You are the one with flawed logic. "durr there shouldn't be laws just because people think it's wrong???" - when did either of us say that?. Also you are mixing me up with the guy you originally quoted but guess your pig eyes are too lazy to read who's posting what. Sure we don't know about wether the dog take psychological damage from having an awesome time, but the odds are against it.

I am the OP btw who said it was about time and explained that it was removed at the same time homolaws were removed. I dont really give a shit if it's legal or not, as me and some other guy stated earlier this will be like torrenting... It's not like you take your dog out on the town square and let it bang you for all to see? The risk you run of getting caught is if you make a movie of it and show your face, which is a bit darwin-ish.
Also calling someone freak for having a fetish is wrong, people are born drawn to animals just as people are drawn to same sex or to kids - sure it's not the most tasteful things around but the people who have them can rarely help it. I am sure you have no fetish mr perfect

I'd like to see you come back from this, look at the letters piggy.

EDIT: And since you wanted the mod to delete his post you are also against free speach. Shame on you. Crawl back into your mothers basement and watch your loliporn (C WUT I DID THAR)?

The law against pedophilia was an example to prove my
point against his logic sounding something like this "durr
there shouldn't be laws against something just because
people think it's wrong".
Every coin has 2 sides? Sure, I'm sure there are people
enjoying sexual relations with animals that take no harm
from it, and if you think that should be legal, feel free to
petition it.
You might get support from some of society's other outcasts.

Also, who is to judge if the animal took damage? You can't 'measure' psychological damage per say ( yes, this also applies to animals ), and even if there is no visible impact or wounds, would you just assume the animal took no damage?

But once again, please do make a public petition about it, and see for yourself if anyone is willing to support you.



Freak.

Sweden and neighboring states should be monitored closely for any species hopping viruses.

As much as we care for animals, most really don't like us at all and the 1348–50 European black-plague was a biological statement from the animal kingdom.

Haha, no idea actually I think our batshit retarded politicians just made braindead decisions as per usual.

I read his post as it should be fine as long as the animal doesn't take damage, considering he uses the words "mount a woman". Every coin has 2 sides you know. And you are putting word in his mouth like nothing I've ever seen before. What does children has to do with anything?

That "if you allow gays to marry, what next, animals and humans" et cetera BS.

Wait what, why are you defending sex with animals even if it wouldn't count as abuse?
Sickening, disgusting and plain wrong are my own words that represent my own view of the matter.
So what you're basically saying is "If you ban sex with animals you might as well ban sex between 2 men"?
How about the abuse of children? Should that also be legal, because after all, hey, it's just "someone who
thought it was wrong" that had made a law against it.

Hope mods delete your post, it's fucking distasteful to be honest.

Pretty much this.

So disgusting, sickening and plain wrong should be illegal ? By who's definition ? Someone might find two guys fucking each other just as disgusting, sickening and plain wrong as a woman fucking with a dog.
Also, I suspect not every animal sex act is animal abuse, probably a world of difference between using a hamster as a fleshlight and having a dog mount some girl.
Basically a bullshit law by bullshit "politicians" who got nothing else to do.

Exactly my point. Make a law against something people will never get caught for - it won't change a thing.
Make a law against something like robbery where you it's a matter of a public act - less robberies are committed.

It's an excellent example the law against downloading. People won't get caught - people don't stop downloading.

I don't understand what you mean by slippery slope BS come from.

Yup, it's like when they outlawed illegal downloading. Like 90% between the ages  13-50 still download illegally because the chances of getting caught are sooo slim. They have made a few examples taking down 3-4 hard working people or so with insane fine amounts. And they have spent millions and millions on anti piracy bureaucracy... Shit's so corrupt..

I personally don't think the law will change anything, those who didn't
have sex with animals ( the majority, the normal people ) will still not
 have sex with animals, and the people who used to will most likely continue.
It's nothing you do in public anyways I would guess, and if you're molesting
your dog in your home a law won't change that.
Then again why would it be legal, it's disgusting, sickening, and plain wrong.

Is that where the slippery slope bullshit came from?

Not that I know off, it is really rare. The animal protection thingy has gained 227 reports in 35 years.. So the law didn't really matter much either.

Yeah, been thinking about this myself - I've been to the weird site of the internet and the vid I saw the dog didn't really seem to suffer from it... On the other hand it could have been pumped with  sexual enchancement drugs, who knows. But if it isn't drugged I see no harm, however it's pretty backwards to have it legalized either way.

Have you ever met someone IRL who likes to make love to animals? O_O I have never men someone like that... I think there are not many people like that.

What if the animal is doing the humping?
What if an unsuspecting drunk person is getting rammed from behind by man's best friend?
 

I always thought of them as strange, now I have more proof for that...hehe

Thats just some next level shit.

Hahhahaha, that made my evening!

/thread

Bahahahha, thats great.  Made me laugh while at work, good job.

Just sprayed my tea on my screen LOL.

Guess I'll have to divorce my wife then 

About time one might think, the law against it was removed during the 80's IIRC, at the same time homosexuality became legal.

Having sex with animals will become illegal in Sweden the first of April. Today it's only illegal if the animal takes damage from it in any way. The penatly will be fine or prison up to 2 years (which in Sweden usually is 1 year with good behaviour).