Topic: TaaS ICO and Bounty Scam (Read 6494 times)

at least Taas give $100K, take a look in boscoin bounty https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.19292721 they only give 10% of the whole bounty  (The complete bounty pool is 5,521,873BOS and bos team gave only 600k) what a jock 

I can see that many people put a label "scam" to any ico just because the ico guys don't move faster.
I do not get my bounties next day after the ico close...  "it is scam!"
The coins are not listed in any exchange second day after the ico close ... "It is scam!"

I have invested in TaaS and got all my coins. TaaS is not a scam.
For more proves about this you can find in icorating website: http://icorating.com/project/48/TaaS/report

They have found another way to scam users.
They are paying less than required. And saying it to be a totaling mistake.

Reference: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.19464309

You can also see there are more such mistakes like that in case of 'ether19' . His total comes out to be 132.45+20.71+59+42.01+10 = 264.17
but he is getting only 224.73 Taas according to final sheet

There may be more victims that may not even have noticed how they got scammed.

Archived pages-
Final total- http://archive.is/sARoF

Second batch has been paid. Third batch will have to wait till 12 June.

Their transactions were slow as they put in very less transaction fees.

Till now i didn't received a penny from taas,however they were online today.And for letting you know,only 25% bounty was paid out about more than a week ago.since then they just keep saying a random time for the 2nd batch of distribution,but they never send them till this moment of writing.Bloody scammer and unprofessional.

You don't understand that statement yourself. What that statement means:
If you have sold 5 000 000 tokens, the total 2% is 100 000 and you pay out 100k.
If you have sold 2 500 000 tokens, the total 2% is 50000 and you still pay out 100k (due to the latter part of the statement).
If you have sold 10 000 000 tokens, the total 2% is 200 000 (which is bigger than the 100k minimum) and you pay out 200k.

---

What you are referring to is, "not more than 100k". This would mean that they should pay 2% with a maximum cap of 100k. The way that it was written means that they will pay out a minimum of 100k regardless of how much 2% is. If the 2% is higher than the minimum, then they'd pay according to that number.

Do people here not understand this:


So 2% or $100,000, whichever one. This was what they stated, they also said the bounty can be increased but there was no announcement about that.

It's written right there in the agreement you guys got yourself into, how have they broken that agreement at all? 100,000 TAAS has been released. Like they said.

I think bounty rewards should only be payable to people who buy in on ICO's, you end up with all these bitter sad people who certainly didn't earn their bounty money and do more harm than good.

If bounty hunters keep acting like this then don't be surprised when there's no work ever again for you.

People like you are the ones in need while there are cases like this one, nice job @lauda
hope in the future will not be a problem like this Taas project 

Was just going to post pretty much this. People who have not been paid, please make a post here, we will create a list.

My neg tag remains until EVERYONE has been paid.

I have given them enough time to sort their incompetence. They have done nothing to mitigate the damages caused by this, nor have shown any remorse for misleading the community. This leads me to believe that this was done on purpose, thus they have effectively scammed the community.

---

Negative rating has been left to the TaaS account. I am not sure what the relation between the starter of the thread and the TaaS team is. Depending on that, I may tag him/her as well.

Do any other DT members want to PM me with any action, if any, that should be taken here? They (TaaS) have paid the bounties, but I still feel they didn't stick to their word on the amount. I am good leaving this if others agree the same. Thanks.

I really hate the bounty hunters. 

Finally , it is 100.000 Taas only.

Why did they set gas price to so low? just curious. They are trying to save some pennies. 

We be patient, for now.


We are hoping they do the right thing here. If they don't, then we will look at the situation further. For now, as above, patience.

---

Their refusal to make a statement in this thread is annoying me though, not gonna lie.

So whats next then?

They will be paying 100.000 bounties soon. Maybe the campaign manager is busy somewhere else so he is taking so much time to update the bonty payments sheet.

It means no negative feedback if they pay 10.000 taas?

I am just waiting for the final result of this accusation and what will be the result of action from the DT. But i really expected something from Taas team, till now bounty is not distributed even 19th was the date.

Zepher is correct. We as DT have to be mindful of the decisions we make. If we just go blindly handing out tags, other people can be greatly affected. If i hand out tags here its gonna be to all involved, Taas team and the manager.

I'm trying to give the Taas team a reasonable amount of time to respond or pay before i get involved. It's not a matter of I'm afraid my rating does not matter

The main problem here is this, and I am guessing this is the reason ratings have not been left yet by either Lauda or yahoo. The same applies with me:

We are scared that by doing so, the investors (and bounty hunters etc) end up hurt as a result. This is not just a simple case of "tag and move along". I don't wish for anyone who has money in this project to be affected by decisions we as DT members make.

As for the assumption bit, saying they made a deal without posting a shred of evidence to support that claim is a little foolish. Hopefully my response above will help you understand why no ratings have as yet been left

Take it easy

What's wrong with this my assumption?
Yahoo and Lauda isn't giving negative rating because they don't care about their rating. Isn't it a silly excuse?

Earlier Lauda said that they will give negative rating . after those strange replies Lauda got from them, he didn't give negative trust to them.

You're still blaming the wrong people.

So it is obvious that they do know how the trust system here operates, appreciate the info there BTW.

But as yahoo has already mentioned, they really don't seem to give a shit.

I'll give them 24hrs to respond here, or pay out the bounties. If they don't, I will leave a rating, whether they care or not.


Assumptions like that make you look like an idiot btw.

Taas team also did fool you. Dont you think that it is possible that they are just pretending to not know about trust on bitcointalk and not caring about it. As someone stated here they even dont know who is Lauda. Doesnt it seem strange.
I' ll give another reason for that. According to the campaign manager , this page has been written by Taas only - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/taas-token-as-service-signature-and-avatar-personal-text-campaign-1804549
Now see what they write there,

Now what do you think?

LMAO you're funny. Noone has made a deal. Taas team doesn't care if tagged or not. They done made their money. This mess is partially your guys faults and the campaign managers fault. The manager should've made the taas team escrow some money or coins to ensure some sort of payment and none of you should have joined a bounty campaign without being assured there was a payment secured.

Stop accusing others of misdeeds when it is not their faults.

I had subscribed to their newsletter. If they increase I will get some dollars extra.

So where are Lauda and other legendary member. They too didn't fulfill their promise. They didn't tag taas. Maybe they have made a deal with taas.

Hello friend..this will be well maintained if 1 side is good, maybe you don't know much about this forum so easy you say like that.
The essence of the matter is clear, no smoke without fire, no effect without cause..is real!
People here are not for gifts but to get the rights they have done for the TaaS development team

Everyone in this thread is a fraud, saying how you "worked so hard" to earn your bounty now you are all screaming scam like autistic retards despite zero evidence of being a scam.

They are paying out $100k to people who changed their signatures on a forum. I think you all deserve far less and hopefully they dont pay anyone in this thread, you have devoted 100x more effort into slandering Taas than actually promoting it.

Go get a real job and earn some real money you peasants.

Hopefully Taas pays attention to this thread and removes everyone here from Bounties

What a scammy move... up to 2%.... an NOWHERE THEY WROTE that BTT will get only 100k ALWAYS so why they even have given such nuber like 2%...
This is insane and immature. Some people want pay off bill from others peoples pocket. THIS IS BIG RED FLAG for all investors.
If they screw people like that today they will screw people later. Actions speaks LOUDER THAN words - they are GREEDY people and will screw investors in future probably : )
If they will act like it suppose to be and fair maybe i will change mind.

anyway dont forget guys that taas team is all Ukrainian people ......

2% of the coin will be distributed to the entire bounty program, it must be split equally, so their current interpretations are not appropriate, this should be resolved before they make the payment, but They refused.

Lauda, ​​I always trust you, so I hope you can make them change their mind and make a full payment.

They didn't guarantee Polo or Bittrex listing.
Don't use those red letters.

And about 2% and all, they are safe since they only wrote "minimum 100,000" and "can be increased"

Since the ico is over and they have already collected lots of funds,I doubt they would care for any neg trust given to their accounts here anymore.
Time community must do something to prevent something like this happening again in future.

.
I think you might not be informed about bounty programmes of other ico going on. That's the way they work. Only a few distribute on decided dates.
Some even pay months later than the decided dates and I'm talking about legit projects. For example Chronobank paid 2-3 months after ICO end (initial plan was 1 week bounty distribution one week after ico ends).

Though there are some that follow the schedules and maintain good communication with investors.

I have been away for the last day and was hoping to come back to find this resolved. Guess that hasn't happened.

So the bounty payments (100k/2%/w/e) were supposed to be paid on the 18th, and have yet to be paid. This is starting to scream SCAM.

To the devs: I know you are refusing to post here, but that really isn't doing you any good. To not realise how the trust system works here will also be to your detriment.
I suggest that you pay out what is owed to get this over with. It's quite easy really - pay, and this all goes away. Don't pay - and you are putting your whole development on the line when it comes to its' reputation for keeping to its' word. Your call.

Of course that he/she has the right to do this as long as what is presented is valid. The validity of something is entirely dislocated from the person who is presenting it. At least, that is how it should be if you were to follow the principles of logic.

Indeed. Maybe it would be better to wait till they pay out the existing bounties and then tag them.

---

What do you think @Zepher?

Maybe you're right, however, it has nothing to do with this topic. But, a scammer has no right to denounce others.

I am quite disappointed with it. I thought they would give the most satisfactory explanation. No explanation.

Useless ad hominem. It is completely irrelevant who made this argument/thread and it does not affect its validity in any way.

How did you come up with those numbers? The thread certainly does not say that it needs to be cut off at 100k, it says quite the opposite.]

---

Here's the PM(s) that they've sent me. I had to explain what negative ratings were and they just completely dismissed the accusation without even spending a minute trying to explain why.

Am I the only one thinks that this conversation is basically a one guy talking to himself?  

Oh. Was wondering if they paid up in the end.
Anyway, does jamal manage the other bounties as well or just the signature campaign?
Cause if it's just the sig campaign then it's 100k for the sigs and the remaining 60k goes to the rest.

This thread can only benefit bounty hunters.

Why wouldn't they pay bounties because of this? Only reason could be if they are big scam (unlikely). And if they were completely scam then taas tokens would not have any value.

As they told me, they would be making a blog post soon to answer all this. Though, I don't think they will increase the bounty. Or they may partially increase. Like we were supposed to get +60% they may pay +30%. Because it was surely a mistake on their part.

As of now i don't think any bounties have been paid and this thread may have cost everyone who participated. Hope that is not the case.

You are right. I'm leaving this now. My such activities may even affect lauda action on this. So leaving and hope for best.

Minorman Is the best person I have seen. He should be given some extra bounty for it.

You make me laugh when I read everything here, the action of a despicable man, it is you. A scamer trying to denounce their campaign. Unbelievable, you are a villain, you pretend to be kind and condemn others while you are always looking for way to cheat others. I think you are not worthy to continue here and denounce anyone else.
Shabby!

You should stop here, lauda has accepted to learn about this issue, I believe he will give the best answer for all of you, do not use provocative words here, the accusation Your too vulgar. Please wait patiently.

1. Never abused . just raising voice
2. Sorry. But I never said that
3. Never tried to steal. You can ask jamal. Just after I sent that pm I sent another pm saying sorry.
4. I have only two accounts on Bitcointalk. This one and another from which I participated Facebook twitter and signature campaign.

I had more sensible posts from my real account than yours. Even I had more posts then you. And I have more total activity than you. So I'm much more experienced than you.

Cannot disclose my identity. Risk of losing bounty.

And it was clear that jamal would remove anyone saying against him and it happened when I used your name.

This is no way a joke now




1.First, you try to abuse the TAAS project.
2.Then you pull me in and say I abuse the project
3.Then you try to steal my bounty and give your details
4.You use another account to do the same.

Why dont you come up with your real account which you used in TAAS bounty?

Minorman is right. I'm not him. I used his name.

 Please don't take any action against Minorman. He was always playing with the rules.

Sorry minorman for this.

Jamal, I have no association with Minor man. I am someone else you don't even know.

Dear Jamal,

If you check your PM on 10th of May,I sent my bounty details and today I see this guy is sending the bounty details from his id and using my name and trying to get my bounty..

Scam Exposer,I believe this guy is a fraud and trying to take away my bounty by sending my details to you and his ETH address..

How do you trust someone and accuse my name here?

Also added to that this user has created 2 accounts with name on the date 18th of May(Signature Bounty distribution date)

 Scam Exposey(https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/scam-exposey-1005384)
 Scam Exposer (https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/scam-exposer-1005138)


Now I believe Scam Exposey will try to send another bounty participants details to jamal to claim their bounty..like he did to me with his another id Scam Exposer

Definitely deserves a negative on all his accounts.

so delay means scam to you? do you actually understand what scam means?

SCAM!! bounty should have been distributed since 18 and now they are not responsing scam team.. No fucking words of honor

Did they guarantee you 2% anywhere? In every store when you read up to 50% price reduction .. do you go into the store and everything has 50%?

Also they guaranteed a minimum of 100k .. did they go below that?

Did you read their bounty post?
They haven't mentioned that there would be any secret bounties or giveaways in conferences.

If you think like that, I'll open an ICO one day and write in bounties,
"Up to 50% of the tokens are reserved for bounties. There will only be a Social media bounty"
And in the end I'll distribute only 1% of tokens in bounty. And I'll say the other tokens are given to my family members and friends who promoted our project.

seriously this thread looks pretty bad for TAAS but why? the reason is every bounty hunter is spreading bad words in this thread because they want more TAAS .. however i'ts pretty clear that they said minimum 100k and UP TO 2% .. however ppl don't relaise that bitcointalk isnt the only platform a project can do bounties on .. do you really think bitcointalk represents the whole crypto community?!

also think about that when you guys spread bad infos and "scam" around the price will result in a decrease which means your bounty has less worth ..

also only becasue they do not answer to each of your OMG SCAM EXPLAIN posts that doesn't mean that they are hiding .. but since they are a big enterprise already backed by millions they cannot just answer fast they have to properly think about their statement and try to explain everything clear .. would you really be happy with a 1 sentece answer? so give them time

Yeah. Scam is a big word. It can consist of many things- completely scam (fake project) , partially scam (doing something wrong or changing terms that would harm investors/supporters).

Please advice a better title.

Scam is a big word guys, you cannot just use this word for everything you don't like. This is definitely not a scam, it's more like a miscommunication.

The rejected ones will not get paid in any way.

Why is it strange? If you get a job in some company and at the end of month they pay 50% less salary, wouldn't you call them scam.
Analogous situation: even if the salary of job would have been lower, people would have applied for that job.

Now what do you think?

A scam accusation for not getting the peecent of money supposed to be promised is strange and perhaps unprecedented.
Even if they had promised 10k, people would still have participated.I think some signature participants are making issue because they got rejected or some greed got better off them

This so called scam exposer just sent me a PM:


LOL. He is Minorman https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/minorman-44387





I didn't informed here, because according to the owner that was normal and nothing changed. according to them they are still paying 2% of investment as bounties. but for bitcointalk bounties  only 100K Tokens.

Infact, I've informed everyone who asked me in PM in telegram.


Edit:
and here is today's log of my conversation with Dimitri.

http://imgur.com/a/YNcd4

Now why would they be refusing to post here..  Is it maybe because they have been caught out and there now lies a massive discrepancy of 60,000 coins that will not be paid out to bounties..

To the dev/s: You better make this right, and fast. Or you'll be getting a tag from me as well, not just Lauda. As for not wanting to post in the thread, that just shows that you are trying to hide from this. Things don't work that way. Burying your head in the sand won't make this go away.


I see your point of view. I will wait for further updates here before I take any action.


Precisely. This was stated in black and white, and now its suddenly "just 100k". You cannot go and change your terms after the fact. Stick to what you originally promised and agreed to, or pay the consequences, one of which you are already witnessing with this thread.

I feel more need of Cofound ICO mentoring. Lots of projects have great vision but lack ICO experience.  Exactly the case with Taas.

What Taskie was a scam according to you?Is abondoning a project halfway for some technical or personal reasons a scam to you particularly when they didn't collect a single penny?The even sought Yahoo's service to act as escrow.
I do not know about egaas and it is too early to say Ethbits is a scam.

Lose - lose (opposite of win-win ) situation for all bounty hunters

If you have failed to inform your participants of said change, you are also partially to blame. I don't see any "false accusation".

They are refusing to post here. They have PM'd me, but their PM's aren't exactly useful.

Letting such shady behavior slip harms the whole ecosystem by setting a bad precedence. It is perfectly clear that, as per what was written in the thread, they were to pay 2% of the sold tokens (with a 100k minimum) for said bounties. I'm utmost confident that almost all, if not all, participants of said bounties have participated with this number in mind.

You don't have a time to reply on this since all of our allegation is true..

You better stop managing those scam coins so that you can't compromised the money of the other people.

I will put Negative Reference on you so that people will have a doubt to join on your scam and shady campaigns.

From slack pm,They won't understand anything.

Even negative trust would harm Taas investors not their team. I leave it to Lauda if he wants to give negative trust or not.

Please Taas team update the community about this accusation. Trust is everything in crypto and bounty are serious matter in this world.

Folks, indicate this under the threads below, please:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/taas-tokenized-closed-end-fund-1775766

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/taas-token-as-service-signature-and-avatar-personal-text-campaign-1804549

It must have been like that GIF. They went to conferences and distributed Taas to all those who listened to Dimitri. I mean, how can they use Taas in conferences.

@Lauda a negative trust may hello build pressure. They will soon post a blog explaining the meaning of 'up to 2%' and 'how there were some hidden bounties there'

a big lol for you.

where you see me working and supporting scammers? read the history first. every ICO which turned into scam while I was managing that, I got scammed too not only you or other users.
even some time I paid bounty participants from my own wallet,

don't say that Only I work with scam project. every campaign manager got attached with one or more scam projects at some point. they do not intentionally support and work for scam projects. but they actually don't know the reality.



PS: I don't have time to reply false accusation from those but-heart who got denied or blacklisted from bounties due to their own rule breaking and now creating newbie accounts and start spread shit.

They encourage us to promote more in order to get more investment, so that bounty hunters can get more bounty, but they decreased it now.

How many participants in signature campaign and how much is the share for 1 person in dollar value?
Egaas-Taas, electronic government as a service and token as a service, totally not similar with different team and managers. Next ICO will be ice cream as a service and people will participate I'm sure of it.
They scammed with egaas as well.

jamalaezaz is only washing hands here so that he will not be sued for his illegal activies for helping those ICO scammers.. Try To read his past ICO campaign guys it ended on misarable ways..

jamal might be a part of any of those scam coins so better DT should act nicely for this so that they can stop jamal promoting another scam coins in future..



Little funny mate  

Just had conversation with Dimitri on slack.

He said , he doesn't know Lauda  

And said,



They won't be giving away a penny more than 100 k taas. They are trying to save that 15 % of ICO money.

https://image.ibb.co/gMTWfk/20170518_171550.jpg

Have I become so famous that accounts are being created similar to my username. Ha ha Scam Exposey

Those two descriptions are completely opposite. "Up to 100 000" and "not less 100 000" are on two opposite sides. This seems like a sneaky deception worthy of a negative rating.

Jamalz as campaign manager never updated the participants, from the beginning until the end of ICO,, "Always say at the end of ICO will be calculated"
In his calculations were not clear, it should be campaign manager as an intermediary between Dev and participants
Please give a warning to avoid cases like this

jamalaezaz is helping scam ICO's and he do helping them just for the sake of his own greed.... See this scam coins wanna be he's been dealing with..

Taskie= https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/taskie-tskfreelanceblogingmicrojobsrevenue-sharing-new-ico-soon-1738600 another scam coin that he's been manage and no further mo clarification on what happen to this project and they are telling that they will restart december i doubt that they will comeback since theirs no update on their trade anymore and people might forgot on what jamal owes to their bounty campaigns participants and ICO investors.


Egaas= https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/annegaaspemerintahan-elektronik-sebagai-sebuah-layanan-1607764 No Clear Info on when it will be added on exchangers and devs already gone without adding it on certain exchange so what will happen to its investor? Egaas is useless and can't be sold while devs for this coin is now currently happy for the funds they accumulate for their ICO and feel sorry for those who invested on them.

And now ETHbits= https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.18819623 let see on how things would go for this coin since they are already successfull on their ICO and as i see this coin is scam.

and currently he runs more campaign who might be scam same as other coin he handled

So Do you think jamalaezaz doesn't have any sin to be sue with?

He's helping scammers so he can be called scammer aswell

maybe it is the best time to stop him scattering and helping scam shitcoins here.

hi all.. i just want to clarify and explaining as i know all about TaaS project.
for the first, i am not the TaaS team, i just want to help make post official TaaS thread. (since account TaaS is newbie, can't post the image, and cant wait post the thread for 1 month later -- rank up from newbie to jr. member)

old thread : https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-ico-taas-token-as-a-service-closed-end-fund-1774501
new thread : https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/taas-tokenized-closed-end-fund-1775766

basically, i'm just indonesia translator. like jamalaezaz, he just bounty manager.

1. how much minimum cap for running project?
TaaS fund not have minimum cap.

2. maximum cap?
total supply 101.0000.000 - of course $101M or 9000 btc (include bonus investment and for bounty)

about reward bounty (bounty pool) its already clear information on main thread (2nd post) and bounty thread.

A total 2%, but not less 100,000 (equal of 100,000$), of the TaaS Tokens sold during ICO are reserved for the whole Bounty Program (the Bounty Pool can be increased if we cross the limited target )

read : "IF"

LIMITED = Maximum cap $101.000.000 or 9000 BTC. but at the end of ICO, TaaS fund just raised $8M.

also its already expalined on whitepaper. see below..



http://taas.fund/media/whitepaper.pdf

read : "UP TO"

so..

The Bounty Pool Divided as Below:
1: Facebook Bounty: 10K Taas Tokens
2: Twitter Bounty: 10K Taas Tokens
3: Email/Website Subscriber Bounty: 5K Taas
4: Signature Campaign 30K Taas
5: Blog Article and Media: 20K Taas
6: Translation Bounty: 20K Taas
7: Slack Joining Bounty: 5K Taas

reference :
main thread (2nd post) : https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.17711771
Taas: Token-as-a-Service Bounty Campaign : https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/taas-token-as-service-bounty-thread-support-us-and-earn-reward-1792938
TaaS: Token As Service Signature and Avatar, Personal Text Campaign : https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/taas-token-as-service-signature-and-avatar-personal-text-campaign-1804549

also its was clearly from screenshot jamalaezaz above..
and also i dont know if taas have more reward bounty for press, news promotion, etc.

---

today its the date for starting distribution reward bounty.
how to claim reward bounty? please read this : https://medium.com/@jamalaezaz/submit-your-address-for-taas-bounty-payment-ca7360835b98

note : dont use address exchange !!

---

about this transaction issue : https://etherscan.io/tx/0xa101cbfbf7555d3ba3c16765f3c8bb0cf1b46b439b92bc1eedb1b631caa38f61
maybe this transaction is one of the process audit and burning TaaS token.
but i dont know, you can ask to TaaS team or partner ambisafe : https://www.ambisafe.co
TaaS team use ambisafe service for creat TaaS token.

---

FINAL TOTAL SUPPLY is 8,146,000.779398 TAAS ($8,044,745.99)
https://etherscan.io/token/TAAS

---

yeah, we still need clarify and respond from TaaS team about this problem.

waiting............

Here are the accounts-

Official account- https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/taas-925117

Account used to post ANN of Taas- https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/kamvreto-516369 (not a team member according to him)

Unless the screenshot is fake, then Jamal isn't at fault here. He is merely incompetent for letting the team do this and not informing everyone affected by it on time (unless I've missed such a post?).

---

From what I understood, the plan was to use 2% of the sold tokens for the bounties with a minimum of 100 000 tokens (regardless of how much was sold). After the 2% ended up being more than 100k, the team suddenly changed this number by cutting it down to a fixed 100k. I see these "other expenses" only as some excuse. If someone compiles a list of accounts owned by TaaS team, I'll probably tag them all until this is made just.

In case  you missed the part that the people who participated in the bounty campaign worked and gave effort in advertising, writing blogs and spreading words about TaaS, I don't know if you can call it free money. They put effort and time in it and they deserve to be paid accordingly to what they had promised.
They also stated that they will be paying more in an instance where they will get more than the target which they have did.

[/quote]

So many peasants here.

Stop complaining about not getting enough free money.

If you're not an investor just shut up and fuck off.

I will follow this article and wait for results, I do not want to accuse anyone, open an investigation, we need the most accurate results.

The Taas team should have known better that external affairs relating to advertisement are a different topic when the reach the forum and are not connected to the ended bounty project.Besides even the campaign manager did not know about this and press and conference can never be a bounty

Let them come clean and just own up to their obligation!

Why would you take a coward post seriously? Ignore..

I think there is some mis communication.As Taas said bounty included other promotional methods also and not only bitcointalk forum campaign.Maybe they were running a similar signature or promotional campaign on other forums.I would love to see how Taas explain things.Also today is the day of bounty distribution lets see if they do as they promised

Do not forget  for TAAS team  is normal for them cheating people

Yes I had already did that. Soon after his comment here, I had removed his name from top. And quoted his message at bottom.

TAAS team  are dishonest i have been warning you many times!

Stop complain with Jamal , hi did his work and hi will get paid like other for his bounty, the problem is the TAAS team not Jamal!

I'm talking about this 15%

https://preview.ibb.co/byxkqk/20170518_142721.jpg
bbcode image link

https://ibb.co/iYBZi5">https://preview.ibb.co/byxkqk/20170518_142721.jpg" alt="20170518_142721" border="0">
bbcode">https://imgbb.com/'>bbcode image link

It was UP to 2%? 100k That's are minimum **LOL** even their said for "Bounty pool can be increased".
If they say for "conferences and news promotion" why no such statement before?

---

Their say conferences and news promotion  
Lemme  guessing for :

15% of the profits the fund makes, not the ICO

They are giving excuse of spending taas allocated for bounty in conferences and news promotion.
Wasn't it supposed to be out of the 15% of the ICO investments that are allocated to development, operations , PR (written in their Bitcointalk thread and whitepaper)

Just as his accusation, they wrote on their bounty thread, they would pay 2% of the total or at least 100K for the signature campaign, however, as we see, they refuse to fully implement. And they only pay the lowest number they give. Lauda, I know you're a trust people, I hope you can help me with this problem. Thanks!

ok we understand you. bytheway today bounty distribution day. can you do today or delay ? what is say dimitri about that ? is he told you : dont distribution bountys ?

I do not have control to any funds and tokens.. I am just their manager, and My job is to manage bounties not make payouts. so please don't include me any scam. which I am not.

But want to clarify my position so here is the truth:
"I've already asked Dimitri the co-founder of TaaS about that, after end of ICO, I've asked him  and tried to remind that the bounty pool should be 2% as of the bounty payment term (the terms was written by himself) but he said only 100K will be paid for bitcointalk bounties, because 2% was fixed for all bounties not only bitcointalk bounties (conferences and news promotion) . now I don't know what kind of conferences are part of bounties.  and where they've (or they want to) spent other part of bounty funds."

here is the log:

https://imgur.com/a/DUuXG

(You can see the date)


The final word is : if incase TaaS owners trying to scam users, I am not part of them, nor I am supporting them, I already tried to remind and explain them.. and I've just sent him a message now. and will try to bother him even more, that's all I can do, hope they'll clarify this.
Even I myself didn't got paid yet for my management work.

Thank You.

If the initial agreement was 2% of the total, which equals around to ~160k (as per the number sold) and now he (or they) suddenly reduce it to 100k, then they indeed did effectively scam you.

---

I'll see whether they will respond to this accusation soon. If not, I'll tag.

This scam accusation is about TaaS bounties and also some suspicious activities by them.

They promised to pay 2% in bounties-

After this, we are waiting for response from Taas team.

Please add more things if you think I missed any. I'll too add more in future.