Another way is by offering a bounty campaign to send the message across to the crypto community, I am sure quality projects do get interest and signups as a result of targetted campaigns. So if these projects are real they should definitely keep the project alive using different marketing strategies as posted above.
That is true and could be a solution for the projects.
I am trying to start a solution for the investors and those looking to avoid most teams lacking real designers and coder and only having a hype behind them.
If we had a very active thread here on this forum where very knowledgeable members or developers reviewed projects and debated their real value it would help investors avoid the 99% scams that will never produce anything viable.
I will try to locate very talented developers that have so far been working away producing credible and useful projects that most people have no knowledge of.
It would be great if others could do the same. We could try to attract verified tech experts to give their opinions and even invite the dev teams here to debate and compare.
It is not about just pumping our own chosen projects. As highly credible projects that are really there to test are revealed we can decide to invest in those or not.
One thing we will aim to do is weed out the garbage and only select those that really have the best talents driving them.
The projects we list can be really examined and evaluated.
Does anyone else have any highly credible devs to suggest that have really stood out and have projects ready to test and examine?