Author

Topic: Texas Bitcoin Mining Startup With $200 Million To Steal China’s Crypto Crown (Read 356 times)

legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 6403
Blackjack.fun
It will be very hard for a mining farm located in the United States to compete directly against a similar setup located in China.

Why?
It's always the same damn thing, China, China, China, and no arguments
How are other miners managing to stay alive outside China, how are people in this forum keep on mining outside China?

Stop looking at average electricity prices, nothing can be more wrong than judging the whole US from this point.
You can't compare NYC residential rates to business rates in Texas! You can't compare them even to the same state.

One example:
In NYC residential electricity costs are 20c/kwh.
In Plattsburgh (Clinton County, New York) you get 2.7 cents per kilowatt!!!!!!!

Why do you think people are starting a business there, just to spite China?
No, when you have to pour millions in something you do a little research first, you think of it longterm!
Is the electricity price in US goona skyrocket? Nothing like that insight, the consumption is already through the rooftop, it makes zero sense for it to double. Will it do it in China? Yeah, definitely, the average Chinese electric energy consumption is 3 times lower than the US.
It will definitely grow and there is no way in hell they will manage to triple the production in that short time.
It's one thing to go from 3TW to 10TW and a totally different beast to go from 10 to 33.

~ I don’t think  ~

Obviously you don't!
legendary
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1427
It will be very hard for a mining farm located in the United States to compete directly against a similar setup located in China.

Hard but not impossible. In fact, it makes a lot of sense to locate your mining farm very close to for example an aluminum smelting facility, which generally tends to purchase a lot of power in bulk where quite a significant percentage of that goes to waste because it's not being used. How about allowing miners to benefit from that at a super low rate?

It doesn't only help the facility make money while they aren't running their regular smelting process, but also helps the miners because they get to reap the fruits of a very low power rate.
sr. member
Activity: 994
Merit: 252
They were probably hoping that the Chinese government is going to close down the mining farms located in that country. But that looks doubtful now, especially after the recent comments on Blockchain technology by Xi Jinping. It will be very hard for a mining farm located in the United States to compete directly against a similar setup located in China.
   China has great economy and I don’t think so there is any other country that is as much widely spread on international market as China. Though this is authentic news that China wants to launch its own crypto currency but it would be really hard for them to stop their people from using bitcoin. They cannot regulate bitcoin so people have many ways of using bitcoin without governmental permission.
sr. member
Activity: 1988
Merit: 453
They were probably hoping that the Chinese government is going to close down the mining farms located in that country. But that looks doubtful now, especially after the recent comments on Blockchain technology by Xi Jinping. It will be very hard for a mining farm located in the United States to compete directly against a similar setup located in China.
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 6403
Blackjack.fun
that would mean they could buy literally 47 THOUSAND antminer S17 pro which gives about 50 th per rig which means they would have 2,349,624 TH

How can you multiply 47 000 and 50 and end up with 2,349,624 ?
Really curious wow you did this!  Grin

That would be like 3% of all hash rates all by itself. That's huge.

Nope, it's not, it's just 3%. And 3% is negligible, the proof being that even you rounded up the number by that much.
Sidenote, if we would make the math for the T17 we would get 4exahash and if they would be buying s9 they would get 5.3.
The last difficulty adjustment showed around ~ 4.8 exa deployed in just two weeks, so...

They might be big, they might have the largest farm but at the way things are developing right now, I doubt that by the time they will finish they will have more than 2% of the global hash rate.
Don't forget that they plan on building their own chips and let's see how long the queue is down over at TSMC.



legendary
Activity: 3318
Merit: 1128
I still can't believe it is "200 million dollars". I mean can anyone of us really understand how big that is? Sure, there are billionaires in the world but they are not lining up to make a bitcoin farm. A bitcoin farm at 200 million dollars will be crazy.

I wanted to make some calculations but I couldn't find how much the land and the building and all other stuff would cost. So, just to give 100 million dollars to the mining equipment (which I doubt will be like, anything other than mining equipment couldn't possibly cost 100 million but just in case) that would mean they could buy literally 47 THOUSAND antminer S17 pro which gives about 50 th per rig which means they would have 2,349,624 TH which if I am not wrong means 2.35 EXA hash, yes you heard it right, it is bigger than TH combined, not only that it is bigger than peta hash which is the one higher form, so its TWO higher forms. It is 2.35 EXA hash. That would be like 3% of all hash rates all by itself. That's huge.
sr. member
Activity: 756
Merit: 251
It will take time to build such massive mining plantation, I'm wondering when it will be fully operating, although layer1 startup set up in late 2018. Their plans seem promising with its own power sub-station to utilize solar and wind energy, ASIC chips, and liquid-cooled mining containers.

Of course, such a massive project  and really needs a huge power to run the operation. $200 million dollar investment is magnanimous and glad to see  there is someone that can rival China. Its good that btc miner is scattered much better around the globe,so that when is damaged being ravaged by disaster we have still a backup from other country.

I am not thinking so much of disasters. It is expected that a multi-million project will consider those possibilities even in their plans. And it is not really bothersome. What bothers me is that if the largest mining farm is operating in china it is always subject to the unpredictable and whimsical government they have there. There is the possibility that they will be ordered to shut down abruptly. This will badly affect the operation of the network. And it is simply due to what the chinese totalitarian government feels like doing.
hero member
Activity: 1414
Merit: 505
Backed.Finance
It will take time to build such massive mining plantation, I'm wondering when it will be fully operating, although layer1 startup set up in late 2018. Their plans seem promising with its own power sub-station to utilize solar and wind energy, ASIC chips, and liquid-cooled mining containers.

Of course, such a massive project  and really needs a huge power to run the operation. $200 million dollar investment is magnanimous and glad to see  there is someone that can rival China. Its good that btc miner is scattered much better around the globe,so that when is damaged being ravaged by disaster we have still a backup from other country.
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 6403
Blackjack.fun
I think Texas has the highest amount of solar panels in the USA, so basing the mining operation in Texas is a big start to sustainable bitcoin mining.

Not even close:
https://www.seia.org/states-map

Texas
Quote
National Ranking: 6th
Solar Installed (MW): 3,028.61
Percentage of State's Electricity from Solar: 0.99%.
Comparing to the nr1
Quote
California
Solar Installed (MW): 25,772.78
Percentage of State's Electricity from Solar: 18.74%

And no, Texas is the biggest state by electricity production and it comes from good old oil and gas
https://www.eia.gov/state/?sid=TX#tabs-4


hero member
Activity: 1890
Merit: 831
[url]https://www.scmp.com/tech/policy/article/3005334/china-home-worlds-biggest-cryptocurrency-mining-farms-now-wants-ban[url/]

This post is from 2017

[url]https://www.coindesk.com/chinese-region-to-shut-down-illegal-bitcoin-miners-by-september[url/]

This post I from 2018

http:// [url]https://techcrunch.com/2019/04/09/china-considers-ban-crypto-mining/[url/]

This post is from 2019 ..

Just wanted to make a point here .
The Chinese government itself is trying to ban Mining but the people won't listen you could say and they could do nothing about it .

Texas is amazing since with so much resistance from the government since 3 years people might actually try something and migrate to Texas.
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1088
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
I was hoping to see something in that article talking about them using solely sustainable energy. I see that they're using wind and solar power, would have been nice to see a commitment to them using a % percentage minimum of renewables. I think it's a pretty big problem how much fossil fuels a lot of these large mining operations use up, if we want to stop Bitcoin from having insane negative externalizes we really need to get on top of that (and to be fair, even in China where regulation is quite poor, a good proportion of energy used by mining ops there is renewable).

Good to see that the hashing power of the network will be coming less centralized in China, though.

I think Texas has the highest amount of solar panels in the USA, so basing the mining operation in Texas is a big start to sustainable bitcoin mining.
legendary
Activity: 2562
Merit: 1441
It's a huge environmental issue, fossil fuels are slowly killing our planet and a lot of the problem comes down to companies using only fossil fuels to power their companies.


Fossil fuels aren't the main cause of climate change. Trees function as natural carbon sinks. An acre of rainforest will absorb and sequester (store) many metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions during its lifetime. Between 50% and 80% of the world's natural rainforests have been cut down and replaced by homes, malls, factories and otherwise urban development that does nothing to absorb or store the emissions of the rainforests they replace.

A good analogy for climate change would be a spaceship with plant life acting as CO2 scrubbers and O2 generators. If half of the plants died due to illness, the ship would lose 50% of its capacity to scrub CO2 from the air. That is the precedent we're currently witnessing in climate change.

Planting more trees to absorb greenhouse gases via afforestation and making a better effort to address issues relating to desertification are the policies to pursue if addressing climate change is our goal. Raising carbon taxes to reduce emissions is a lost cause. Emissions were never the issue to begin with.


It's going to be pretty hard for mining operations to power themselves of solely renewable energy sources, but it's good to see them at least try to do something about it - better then nothing I guess.


It should be mentioned: there are no new power plants being constructed to power bitcoin mining ops(with the exception of Peter Thiel's mining venture in texas anyways).

Miners don't really add emissions to the planet's carbon footprint. There are no new power plants being built to support them.

They tap existing infrastructure housing surplus sources of electricity. The most affordable of which is normally hydroelectric or renewable. This is one reason many mining ops are located in remote and sparsely populated areas where existing surpluses of energy not currently utilized can be found. Not that miners are particularly green or environmentally conscious. Its simply the most natural, expedient and cost effective solution.

Bitcoin miners spend incredible amounts of capital on electricity. This outflow often goes to green power companies & contributes towards funding an expansion of renewable sources of power. Mining is one of the largest sectors throwing massive amounts of money at furthering investment in environmenally friendly power.
hero member
Activity: 1330
Merit: 569
While this is laudable because its coming at a time where the decentralization is needed but with the purpose of dethroning China for me, is a not ideal business model to go with. The market is a large and fertile one where whether you are in China or Yugoslavia even in Africa, the moment you can afford it, then you are to enter the market. No one is stopping you from doing your thing so far its done within the dictates of running a decent business.

What this Company is doing for me would be better situated in an African country because the US that its looking at is a developed economy where the building of a power substation would have little or no impact on its immediate environment but in Africa, even the impact of the substation alone would be felt miles away. But again, displacing China and concentrating the mining gadgets in one location might even expose the entire infrastructure to influences beyond the controls of the business promoters which might even force them out of business.
hero member
Activity: 1036
Merit: 514
It will take time to build such massive mining plantation, I'm wondering when it will be fully operating, although layer1 startup set up in late 2018. Their plans seem promising with its own power sub-station to utilize solar and wind energy, ASIC chips, and liquid-cooled mining containers.
legendary
Activity: 2912
Merit: 6403
Blackjack.fun
I don't know how this is going to work. For starters, the price of mining rigs in Texas is at least 50% higher than those in China.


Read the article a little more carefully:
And more worryingly, the average electricity price is around $0.09 per KWh, which is almost 200% higher than what they have in China. I don't understand how they can compete against the Chinese miners under current circumstances.

Average means nothing.
The average price per Kwh in New York (state) is 18 cents (residential) but just 6 cents industrial:
https://www.eia.gov/electricity/monthly/epm_table_grapher.php?t=epmt_5_6_a

Don't compare averages, nobody is mining with the average, be it by country, state or county

because China has become the largest mining company

Please bump this topic when it will become a country again.

Back on topic:

Quote
In the longer term, the company plans to use its mining facilities as a base layer for a larger cryptocurrency enterprise that will include financial services

I really don't get this and all my instincts are pointing to something really really bad about their plans.
hero member
Activity: 1764
Merit: 584
So, this is what Thiel was busy with after he left California?

I don't know how this is going to work. For starters, the price of mining rigs in Texas is at least 50% higher than those in China. And more worryingly, the average electricity price is around $0.09 per KWh, which is almost 200% higher than what they have in China. I don't understand how they can compete against the Chinese miners under current circumstances.

Maybe it's more about preparing for the time that the Chinese government completely stops the operations of mines? The government has mentioned last April iird that they want to phase out mining operations. They haven't given any deadlines and we don't know if they are bluffing but if they do push through, it will be chaotic if it was not done gradually.

Maybe Thiel expect the project in Texas to be operational by then?

Just noticed that Peter Thiel is involved. It's not just surprising but encouraging as well for the Bitcoin users. That said, we still haven't heard much about the proposed closure of the mining farms in China. As far as I know, all the giant mining farms are still operating without any issue in that country and as per the latest data, more than 80% of the hashpower is still generated in mainland China. And given the size of the mining farms there, I really doubt whether this proposed mining farm in Texas can offer any sort of competition. Perhaps Thiel is expecting the price of Bitcoin to go up drastically after the block reward halving (which is less than 12 months away).

That's another possibility. Businesses are about profits anyway. Even if the operation cost of the Texas mine is larger than that in China, if they can recoup all that should the price hike, then it's worth the effort.
hero member
Activity: 952
Merit: 513
I was hoping to see something in that article talking about them using solely sustainable energy. I see that they're using wind and solar power, would have been nice to see a commitment to them using a % percentage minimum of renewables. I think it's a pretty big problem how much fossil fuels a lot of these large mining operations use up, if we want to stop Bitcoin from having insane negative externalizes we really need to get on top of that (and to be fair, even in China where regulation is quite poor, a good proportion of energy used by mining ops there is renewable).

Good to see that the hashing power of the network will be coming less centralized in China, though.
It's a huge environmental issue, fossil fuels are slowly killing our planet and a lot of the problem comes down to companies using only fossil fuels to power their companies.

It's going to be pretty hard for mining operations to power themselves of solely renewable energy sources, but it's good to see them at least try to do something about it - better then nothing I guess.

Texas has no competition against China to be honest, they are already way too big and rich with their operations and the US isn't just powerful enough.
hero member
Activity: 2464
Merit: 550
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
I think the Texas state will not easily defeat the mining industry of China because China has become the largest mining company, and you should know that currently mining companies are not easy because the total supply of bitcoin is already very limited it will make it difficult to get bitcoin, mining it will be increasingly difficult to do.
sr. member
Activity: 994
Merit: 260
North America is a good place to install wind power generators. With renewable electricity, mining can be very profitable. I think these guys will eventually become world leaders in mining, because in China with this type of activity constantly happen some incidents. It feels like the Chinese government wants to completely ban mining in their country.
legendary
Activity: 3346
Merit: 1352
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
So, this is what Thiel was busy with after he left California?

I don't know how this is going to work. For starters, the price of mining rigs in Texas is at least 50% higher than those in China. And more worryingly, the average electricity price is around $0.09 per KWh, which is almost 200% higher than what they have in China. I don't understand how they can compete against the Chinese miners under current circumstances.

Maybe it's more about preparing for the time that the Chinese government completely stops the operations of mines? The government has mentioned last April iird that they want to phase out mining operations. They haven't given any deadlines and we don't know if they are bluffing but if they do push through, it will be chaotic if it was not done gradually.

Maybe Thiel expect the project in Texas to be operational by then?

Just noticed that Peter Thiel is involved. It's not just surprising but encouraging as well for the Bitcoin users. That said, we still haven't heard much about the proposed closure of the mining farms in China. As far as I know, all the giant mining farms are still operating without any issue in that country and as per the latest data, more than 80% of the hashpower is still generated in mainland China. And given the size of the mining farms there, I really doubt whether this proposed mining farm in Texas can offer any sort of competition. Perhaps Thiel is expecting the price of Bitcoin to go up drastically after the block reward halving (which is less than 12 months away).
legendary
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1521
Quote
On Tuesday, San Francisco-based Layer1 announced it has raised $50 million from billionaire Peter Thiel and others to move forward with its plan, which includes running its own power sub-station and purchasing solar and wind energy produced on the plains of West Texas.
Quote
Liegl says Layer1 aspires to be the biggest Bitcoin miner in the world by controlling all aspects of the process—from chip manufacturing to electricity production to cooling. In the longer term, the company plans to use its mining facilities as a base layer for a larger cryptocurrency enterprise that will include financial services.

I'm always skeptical when I hear about mining infrastructure visions like this, especially with regard to stateside ASIC manufacturing. However, Peter Thiel is a shrewd investor, which bodes well, and controlling the process from top to bottom should obviously yield much better margins than current business models. I'm interested to see how this pans out.
legendary
Activity: 3122
Merit: 1102
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
This is actually a good development and a win win for crypto in these trying times. But seriously, mining us kinda cheaper in China than Texas with regards to cost of power. Unless they plan sourcing theur own power via sustainable energy, but that would also cust alot more to set-up things. Hopefully, they have a clear pathway for this, I would love to see this project succeed.

renewable resources are really expensive at the start but few months of operations and you will get the roi, and afterwards, its free!
i hope they are considering renewable energy to integrate in their operations. they have the money to spend anyway. and they are also helping the environment for such initiatives.
time to transfer the mining crown to others!
sr. member
Activity: 1190
Merit: 256
This is actually a good development and a win win for crypto in these trying times. But seriously, mining us kinda cheaper in China than Texas with regards to cost of power. Unless they plan sourcing theur own power via sustainable energy, but that would also cust alot more to set-up things. Hopefully, they have a clear pathway for this, I would love to see this project succeed.
sr. member
Activity: 1190
Merit: 306
I think it's a pretty big problem how much fossil fuels a lot of these large mining operations use up, if we want to stop Bitcoin from having insane negative externalizes we really need to get on top of that (and to be fair, even in China where regulation is quite poor, a good proportion of energy used by mining ops there is renewable).
Yes, but this *is* Texas we're talking about here and if you aren't from the states, then you should realize that many millionaires were made in that state by the oil drilling business.  I'm not disagreeing with you about the importance of using clean energy, just pointing out a sliver of history.

Good to see that the hashing power of the network will be coming less centralized in China, though.
Agree fully.  I have never mined bitcoin and don't pay much attention to which country has what percentage of hashing power, but I am well aware that China is huge as regards mining.  Being from the states it's nice to see an operation like this being started.  I'm also not surprised that Peter Thiel is doing his thing as a venture capitalist, and his involvement lends a lot of credibility to the project.  He is not a man to throw money at something he thinks is going to lose.

I don't know how this is going to work. For starters, the price of mining rigs in Texas is at least 50% higher than those in China. And more worryingly, the average electricity price is around $0.09 per KWh, which is almost 200% higher than what they have in China. I don't understand how they can compete against the Chinese miners under current circumstances.
They'll figure it out.  I'm almost certain they've crunched the numbers and figured out how profitable it is.  All that math is done up front before any announcement is made.
hero member
Activity: 1764
Merit: 584
So, this is what Thiel was busy with after he left California?

I don't know how this is going to work. For starters, the price of mining rigs in Texas is at least 50% higher than those in China. And more worryingly, the average electricity price is around $0.09 per KWh, which is almost 200% higher than what they have in China. I don't understand how they can compete against the Chinese miners under current circumstances.

Maybe it's more about preparing for the time that the Chinese government completely stops the operations of mines? The government has mentioned last April iird that they want to phase out mining operations. They haven't given any deadlines and we don't know if they are bluffing but if they do push through, it will be chaotic if it was not done gradually.

Maybe Thiel expect the project in Texas to be operational by then?
legendary
Activity: 3542
Merit: 1352
Cashback 15%
When you have the likes of Peter Thiel on-bord a cryptocurrency startup, at first it would feel weird knowing that the guy co-founded PayPal, a service which bitcoin dared to combat for the last few years Cheesy Texas’ conditions for a mining farm seemed to be not that ideal, although if Layer1 managed to create an excellent design for their farms then they’re in to fight head-to-head against China’s largest farms. Similar to like Avalon did before the Chinese took over the scene, I just wish that Layer1 would come up with their own line of miners so as to better the competition and improve the tech yet again for everyone.
sr. member
Activity: 1988
Merit: 453
I don't know how this is going to work. For starters, the price of mining rigs in Texas is at least 50% higher than those in China. And more worryingly, the average electricity price is around $0.09 per KWh, which is almost 200% higher than what they have in China. I don't understand how they can compete against the Chinese miners under current circumstances.
sr. member
Activity: 1008
Merit: 355


I have a good level of interest with this development because I am concerned that China is the dominant single leader when it comes to Bitcoin mining (ironically its government does not like Bitcoin, in the first place) which is not good if we have to talk about decentralization of power and influence. Good to see that Layer1 is coming up with this ambitious and grand plan of becoming a big player in the Bitcoin mining industry with the hope of reducing the leadership of China.

At the same time, its plan to be using renewable and green power is quite admirable. In case they will open up the project for crowdfunding, I would certainly be supporting this one. However, the bottom line here, just like any other business, is profitability and sustainability. Let's see how they can make it a very competitive platform that can hopefully rival that of China.

Go go go Layer1...we are all behind you all the way!
sr. member
Activity: 756
Merit: 251
200 million dollars used in what way is the most important part. If you include the energy required and the solar panels and wind turbines and everything that is not bitcoin related to make it feasible and then spend a lot less on machines it would be different, sure it would still be a HUGE mining operation, that is not even a question but with money like this they could have literally created and manufactured their own ASIC machines if they wanted to and that would have resulted with not a bad business plan neither.

In the end there will be one rival for the Chinese mining operations if they can achieve it and the more decentralized we get on mining the better, I hope there will be a lot more people getting into mining because we need to stop Chinese monopoly on btc mining.

It is really time to shut down on china. This country is unlike other open-minded and developed countries. This communits country likes to monopolize and control everything and the very moment they feel that they are already superior than others, they would then use it to bully them and let them follow its will.

Mining should be widespread so that the operation of the network is not at the mercy of one nation or company alone. This is one way of reducing the risk.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 1165
www.Crypto.Games: Multiple coins, multiple games
200 million dollars used in what way is the most important part. If you include the energy required and the solar panels and wind turbines and everything that is not bitcoin related to make it feasible and then spend a lot less on machines it would be different, sure it would still be a HUGE mining operation, that is not even a question but with money like this they could have literally created and manufactured their own ASIC machines if they wanted to and that would have resulted with not a bad business plan neither.

In the end there will be one rival for the Chinese mining operations if they can achieve it and the more decentralized we get on mining the better, I hope there will be a lot more people getting into mining because we need to stop Chinese monopoly on btc mining.
hero member
Activity: 2702
Merit: 672
I don't request loans~
I just hope they are able to reduce the dominance of china in the mining industry of Bitcoin. And I'd take their perspective on the chups to be on s bottleneck to be true. The market is pretty much saturated already since most big companies have mining powers close to each other and even if there are differences with the quality, they're almost close to negligble. Quality is done, it is time for quantity to lead the way
legendary
Activity: 2562
Merit: 1441
I was hoping to see something in that article talking about them using solely sustainable energy. I see that they're using wind and solar power, would have been nice to see a commitment to them using a % percentage minimum of renewables. I think it's a pretty big problem how much fossil fuels a lot of these large mining operations use up, if we want to stop Bitcoin from having insane negative externalizes we really need to get on top of that (and to be fair, even in China where regulation is quite poor, a good proportion of energy used by mining ops there is renewable).


AFAIK hydro electric power being cheaper than coal, oil, natural gas and assorted fossil fuel based options make it the most popular option. Many mining operations in china are located near dams/rivers. Cost effectiveness makes a surplus of energy generated through hydroelectric plants the most attractive option, making most mining ops relatively clean, despite lack of regulation or environmental awareness.

There are bitcoin miners who utilize coal but it is not the #1 preferred energy source of choice due to it being more expensive and dirty than power sources with smaller carbon footprints. In cases where coal is utilized its usually due to state and regulating bodies heavily subsidizing it, or offering tax breaks in exchange for creating jobs and stimulating local economies.

Bitcoin mining being very mobile and limited only by need for internet connection makes it easy for miners to setup operations in areas with cheap, clean, untapped surpluses of energy. There are normally no new power plants being constructed to power bitcoin miners. They're typically harnessing power from existing plants that is already being generated which tends to negate negative environmental effects.
legendary
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1118
I was hoping to see something in that article talking about them using solely sustainable energy. I see that they're using wind and solar power, would have been nice to see a commitment to them using a % percentage minimum of renewables. I think it's a pretty big problem how much fossil fuels a lot of these large mining operations use up, if we want to stop Bitcoin from having insane negative externalizes we really need to get on top of that (and to be fair, even in China where regulation is quite poor, a good proportion of energy used by mining ops there is renewable).

Good to see that the hashing power of the network will be coming less centralized in China, though.
legendary
Activity: 2562
Merit: 1441
Quote
When it comes to producing Bitcoin, China is the pre-eminent power in the world. The People's Republic boasts the largest mining companies, and dominates the manufacture of chips and other equipment used to mine Bitcoin. A U.S. startup wants to change all that with a bold plan to make Texas the global hub of Bitcoin mining.

On Tuesday, San Francisco-based Layer1 announced it has raised $50 million from billionaire Peter Thiel and others to move forward with its plan, which includes running its own power sub-station and purchasing solar and wind energy produced on the plains of West Texas.

According to co-founder Alex Liegl, Layer1's facility will consist of dozens of acres that lie 150 miles west of Midland, Texas—"literally in the middle of nowhere"—and will rely on a proprietary new technology for cooling the chips used to mine Bitcoin.

Bitcoin mining, which consumes large amounts of electricity, typically takes place in colder areas where it is easier to prevent equipment from overheating. Layer1, however, believes its cooling technology will make Texas a viable location despite the heat. The state also offers additional benefits in the form of light regulation and cheap power.


One Bitcoin is currently worth around $8,300—well off its all time high of nearly $20,000 in late 2017 but still much higher than 2016 when it traded as low as $300. Under Bitcoin's mining system, miners compete to win an award distributed every ten minutes or so. Currently, the reward is 12.5 Bitcoins—a figure that will halve to 6.25 next May.

Liegl says Layer1 aspires to be the biggest Bitcoin miner in the world by controlling all aspects of the process—from chip manufacturing to electricity production to cooling. In the longer term, the company plans to use its mining facilities as a base layer for a larger cryptocurrency enterprise that will include financial services.

Layer1 launched in late 2018, with Liegl then describing it as an "activist fund for cryptocurrencies" that would invest in protocols, including a privacy focused project called Grin. At the time, the startup did not disclose mining aspirations, and raised a modest $2.1 million from Thiel, Digital Currency Group and the late investor Jeffrey Tarrant.

"From an ideological perspective, for Bitcoin to grow into its multi-trillion potential, it needs a U.S. company to lead," says Liegl. "This ideology resonates with Peter [Thiel] and our other investors."

Despite Layer1's large ambitions, its backers—which also include Shasta Ventures and undisclosed wealthy cryptocurrency owners—are keeping a decidedly low-profile for the new investment, which gives Layer1 a valuation of $200 million. Thiel and other investors declined to be interviewed for this story.

Crypto mining in recent years has been a ferociously competitive business, but Layer 1 believes changes in the industry have provided an opening to wrest market power from China.

A new Bitcoin mining strategy

In the early years of Bitcoin, from 2009 to roughly 2013, it was viable to mine the cryptocurrency by using a home laptop, like Liegl did when he got his start mining Bitcoin in his Stanford University dorm room. The mining process involves solving random math problems that determine who will build the next block on Bitcoin's blockchain—a tamper-proof ledger of transactions. The first to solve the math problem also receives a reward in the form of Bitcoins.

As the cryptocurrency caught on and prices soared, however, companies began designing special computers optimized to mine Bitcoin. This in turn led miners to join crypto mining pools—combining their computing power in order to share the proceeds whenever a member receives a Bitcoin reward.

China has dominated the Bitcoin mining industry—estimates say it accounts for around 60% of production—in large part because its government has provided miners with cheap access to electricity. The leading company has been Beijing-based Bitmain, which runs two massive mining pools and is also the leading seller of the specialized chips now needed to mine Bitcoin.

But Bitmain has stumbled in recent months. While the company's 33-year-old CEO boasted in mid-2018 of grand plans to use artificial intelligence to further dominate the mining world, Bitmain has since suffered large losses and had to lay off half of its staff of 3,000.


Bitmain's troubles weren't the only factor revealing an opening in Bitcoin mining for Layer1. Liegl says the dynamic of mining has shifted. He thinks buying the latest custom chips previously gave miners an edge, but now the tech has become commoditized.

"From 2012-2019, it was mining 1.0 and a function of (capital expenditure) and who can get the newest chip first," Liegl says. "Now, we're in 2.0, where (operating expenses) matter most."

Under this thesis, Layer1 believes its plans to develop "full-stack" operations in West Texas will let it capture market share—in part because it won't be vulnerable to third party suppliers raising prices when the price of Bitcoin goes up.

An industry in flux

In moving into West Texas, Layer1 may have to tread cautiously given that the region has been burned by the cryptocurrency industry in the past. In July, Wired magazine ran a feature article describing how Bitmain promised the town of Rockland, Texas hundreds of good jobs operating mining pools, but then abruptly pulled out, despite a concerted good-will campaign by local officials.

Liegl, who says his colleagues at Layer1 include veterans of Apple, Google, and Goldman Sachs, plans to proceed much differently. He says the company will be respectful of government officials, and local sensibilities.

If Layer1 can successfully become a major force in the mining world, the company's presence could shake up the geo-politics of Bitcoin. In recent years, there have been fears that China's dominance could lead miners in that country to collude in order to manipulate records on the blockchain that records all Bitcoin transactions. If American companies can make major inroads into mining, Liegl says, Bitcoin will become more decentralized—a key tenet for the cryptocurrency's supporters.

Layer1 isn't the only North American company to plan a big move into crypto mining. Canada-based Blockstream, a consultancy with ties to many Bitcoin insiders, revealed it is building massive data centers for Bitcoin mining in the province of Quebec and in Adel, Georgia.

"There's definitely an opportunity to take away market share from some of the other firms," says Samson Mow, Blockstream's chief strategy officer. "(Specialized chips) have started to reach their limits in terms of efficiency, so the playing field will continue to level off."



https://fortune.com/2019/10/15/what-is-bitcoin-mining-layer1-peter-thiel-crypto-investment/


....


This details start ups in america and canada launching initiatives to reduce china's global mining dominance.

The texas start up, aspiring to be the largest in the world, is funded $50 million by Peter Thiel with $150 additional million from shasta ventures and bitcoin whales who would prefer to remain anonymous. They plan to control every aspect of their mining operation ranging from power generation, to chip fabrication and anounced proprietary cooling technology they believe will give them advantages over other miners.

Canadian based blockstream is mentioned in the last 2 paragraphs of the article. They're said to be constructing massive data centers in quebec and georgia devoted towards bitcoin mining. I guess we'll see more information for that revealed later.

Both mining operations seem to believe ASICs and semiconductor chips have become commoditized enough to level the playing field between mining competitors. Whether via limits in fabrication process of technology they seem to think most of the advantages inherent in that area have been exhausted. Interesting take.
Jump to: