Author

Topic: The 7950 Megahash thread (Read 27640 times)

hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
November 25, 2013, 03:26:24 PM
#81
Hey there, i have some problems

i do also have the 7950 but when i use cgminer it says "no devices detected" can anybody help me Sad

If you're trying to mine bitcoin with a GPU right now, my advice is to simply stop and spend the money you would have on the extra electricity on simply purchasing Bitcoin directly.  Unless you get free electricity and don't mind the extra wear and tear on your GPU and computer in general, it's not worth bothering.  You will get very little out of GPU mining now.

he is probably mining ltc Wink
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
November 25, 2013, 03:25:59 PM
#80
Hey there, i have some problems

i do also have the 7950 but when i use cgminer it says "no devices detected" can anybody help me Sad

make sure you dont have -disable gpu in the command line Wink
sr. member
Activity: 240
Merit: 250
November 24, 2013, 08:47:55 PM
#79
Hey there, i have some problems

i do also have the 7950 but when i use cgminer it says "no devices detected" can anybody help me Sad

If you're trying to mine bitcoin with a GPU right now, my advice is to simply stop and spend the money you would have on the extra electricity on simply purchasing Bitcoin directly.  Unless you get free electricity and don't mind the extra wear and tear on your GPU and computer in general, it's not worth bothering.  You will get very little out of GPU mining now.
legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001
Okey Dokey Lokey
November 23, 2013, 10:42:35 PM
#78
Hey there, i have some problems

i do also have the 7950 but when i use cgminer it says "no devices detected" can anybody help me Sad
Have you tried running the AMD driver cleanup utility and then installing the latest drivers?
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
November 23, 2013, 05:23:09 PM
#77
Hey there, i have some problems

i do also have the 7950 but when i use cgminer it says "no devices detected" can anybody help me Sad
newbie
Activity: 34
Merit: 0
June 20, 2013, 02:06:39 PM
#76
I would just do away with the case entirely

Would love to but I live in a small apartment so the box is in my living room. Tiny hands, paws, not-so-small hands, etc would find their way in. Now, if I lived in a house with a basement I'd have crate miners with a box fan and some custom cardboard ducting....
zvs
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1000
https://web.archive.org/web/*/nogleg.com
June 20, 2013, 01:56:39 PM
#75
I would just do away with the case entirely
newbie
Activity: 34
Merit: 0
June 20, 2013, 09:57:00 AM
#74
I know this is an old thread but I've managed to get my hands on 4 different models of 7950 and found that they vary widely in what settings they'll take even within the same maufacturer.  I track all settings in a spreadsheet: core, memory, intensity, MH/s (or KH/s for scrypt) and fan speed and temp.  Tune each card until you squeeze out that last bit of performance then drop each setting back a notch to keep the card from burning out.  The best results I've seen so far run from 580MH/s to 640MH/s.

Don't underestimate the importance of cooling, by the way.  In a generic case my cards ran 20C hotter than in a Coolermaster HAF with big fans. On a whim I put a small Vornado on top of a Coolermaster XB which dropped the two cards in there another 5C.

Windows and Linux seem to perform about the same with the same settings but Windows draws up to 20W more power when idle and 40 when doing housekeeping since it revs up the HDD and CPU.

If anyone's interested in my specific cards and settings let me know.  All of my benchmarking has been done by hand so far but I'm working on a script to do that for me.  PM or post if you want a copy once it's finished.   It'll be BASH so meant for Linux but it should work on cygwin and since it's using cgminer's API you could run it on Linux or Mac and point it at a Windows box.
member
Activity: 74
Merit: 10
January 02, 2013, 05:10:18 PM
#73
That's your rate on a 1040Mhz core clock!?!?  I get 480Mh/s on 925Mhz using --intensity 5 as my only switch.  I'm on the same OS/driver/SDK version as you are as well.  Something is very wrong with your setup.  Are you sure you're operating at 1040Mhz core (and it's stable)?

You might reduce thrashing by using a larger workload switch.
newbie
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
November 22, 2012, 02:35:25 AM
#72
I'm doing 500mh/s with core @950mhz. I can go higher clock but the increase in power is not worth the extra hash. If you are using cgminer try this flags -w 384 -g 8 -I 11. I went from  470mh/s using 4 threads to 500 using 8 threads. Let me know if you try this and see increase in speed.

legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001
Okey Dokey Lokey
November 19, 2012, 03:48:55 PM
#71
was building gaming systems when i started on them, so didnt go for the cheap crap Smiley
since my flat mate moved out im using 1 as dedicated and the other as semi dedicated, turn on / off 1 card when gaming Smiley

My single GPU gaming rig (the one that we've been doing all this tweaking on) never has it's gpu turned off, Not even for gaming, I just drop the intensity
I love bitcoins.

thougt about trying that, but playing fps games like bf3 and black ops 2 framerate is everything Smiley
Just drop the intensity, 54fps on BF3 here, Yes i have AA on~
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
November 16, 2012, 02:36:55 PM
#70
was building gaming systems when i started on them, so didnt go for the cheap crap Smiley
since my flat mate moved out im using 1 as dedicated and the other as semi dedicated, turn on / off 1 card when gaming Smiley

My single GPU gaming rig (the one that we've been doing all this tweaking on) never has it's gpu turned off, Not even for gaming, I just drop the intensity
I love bitcoins.

thougt about trying that, but playing fps games like bf3 and black ops 2 framerate is everything Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001
Okey Dokey Lokey
November 16, 2012, 12:15:33 PM
#69
was building gaming systems when i started on them, so didnt go for the cheap crap Smiley
since my flat mate moved out im using 1 as dedicated and the other as semi dedicated, turn on / off 1 card when gaming Smiley

My single GPU gaming rig (the one that we've been doing all this tweaking on) never has it's gpu turned off, Not even for gaming, I just drop the intensity
I love bitcoins.
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
November 15, 2012, 07:32:02 PM
#68
was building gaming systems when i started on them, so didnt go for the cheap crap Smiley
since my flat mate moved out im using 1 as dedicated and the other as semi dedicated, turn on / off 1 card when gaming Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001
Okey Dokey Lokey
November 15, 2012, 07:10:53 PM
#67
Ah, A Corsair. One of the best PSU brands around
legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001
Okey Dokey Lokey
November 15, 2012, 04:46:48 PM
#65
Freaky lucky sob, Or I have dirty power coming from my supply, Or some Shat like that.
What PSU do you have?
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
November 15, 2012, 04:37:51 PM
#64
What the crap! Thats so gorgeous! What brand do you have? mines an XFX ghost, What should i do? Just tough it out? Void the warrenty with new thermal paste? Send the card back for somereason and try to get a new one?

rofl Smiley
i dont know why my card works with so low voltage, both my machines are identical with 2x xfx 7950 black edition single fan.
and on both machines, the card with the monitor hooked up too it, uses .995v as stock. the other 2 cards are same voltage as yours, but them i run at higher clocks so i dont care.

theres nothing wrong with your card so the manufacturer will prob not send you a new one, and im not going to tell you to void your warranty.
thats up too you Tongue

12.11 beta are a bit glitchy when i play games.
or watch youtube etc while mining.
and the drivers dont have anything to do with the voltage, has been like that since i got them.

ps: my cards are still stock, havent changed the paste or anything, but i am looking for a "cheap" watercooling system for my cards tho.
legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001
Okey Dokey Lokey
November 15, 2012, 04:29:08 PM
#63
What the crap! Thats so gorgeous! What brand do you have? mines an XFX ghost, What should i do? Just tough it out? Void the warrenty with new thermal paste? Send the card back for somereason and try to get a new one?

I wonder if 12.11 has anything to do with it...
On that topic, Why isnt your 12.11 all glitchy and artifactfy. Your 12.11 looks like its running just fine... I had to rollback off of it to 12.8 because of how Garbled it made my screen when i mined
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
November 15, 2012, 04:10:26 PM
#62



my current config, and as you can see, its pretty damn doable with .995v Tongue
legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001
Okey Dokey Lokey
November 15, 2012, 03:44:32 PM
#61

i understand 1.093v is stock voltage, but lowering the memory means you will require less voltage aswell.
meaning you should be able to undervolt the card, wich will then generate less heat Smiley
like all oc`ing its just trying it out and see what works for you.

if your using firefox you could check out this thread. or just switch to chrome Tongue
http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2200742

if your not using firefox i got no idea about the spike Smiley

I've never heard or seen that bug before
IE all my life, Tried the other broweser every now and again, IE ftw.

I get to 1080 with dropped memory (685) and 1.093v, But poking around the desktop causes the gpu to lockup..
I doubt my gpu would be stable at 1.050, Core 1100, That just sounds crazy, And even 1030core with 1.050v sounds nuts.
K, Sooo, 1.056v= core 1034, mem 685 and poking the desktop crashes the gpu
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
November 15, 2012, 01:36:07 PM
#60

with the voltage you set there i would up the clock to 1150 atleast. or turn the voltage down to 1050.

you can always re-apply some thermal paste, its easy and cheap, and in most cases you will get lower temps since they tend to overdo it at the factory and use shit paste.
ps: and remember that even if a gpu is the same model and make, they are all different and they might not respond to the same oc abilities.

tweak away my friend Smiley
*nods about gpu differances and tweaking is special and doesnt want to void the warrenty so early in the cards lifetime*
1.050v? My stock voltage of 1.093v gets me to 1060, And 1.106v gets me to 1100


Also, Could you look at the image i posted and tell me whats up with the voltage spike? Is that just an error?


i understand 1.093v is stock voltage, but lowering the memory means you will require less voltage aswell.
meaning you should be able to undervolt the card, wich will then generate less heat Smiley
like all oc`ing its just trying it out and see what works for you.

if your using firefox you could check out this thread. or just switch to chrome Tongue
http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2200742

if your not using firefox i got no idea about the spike Smiley




legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001
Okey Dokey Lokey
November 15, 2012, 12:06:37 PM
#59

with the voltage you set there i would up the clock to 1150 atleast. or turn the voltage down to 1050.

you can always re-apply some thermal paste, its easy and cheap, and in most cases you will get lower temps since they tend to overdo it at the factory and use shit paste.
ps: and remember that even if a gpu is the same model and make, they are all different and they might not respond to the same oc abilities.

tweak away my friend Smiley
*nods about gpu differances and tweaking is special and doesnt want to void the warrenty so early in the cards lifetime*
1.050v? My stock voltage of 1.093v gets me to 1060, And 1.106v gets me to 1100


Also, Could you look at the image i posted and tell me whats up with the voltage spike? Is that just an error?
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
November 13, 2012, 04:08:09 PM
#58
you can safely run your voltage up to 1.25. max on your card is 1.3...
not sure whats up with the stock voltage tho, my main card wich the screen is hooked up too i get 0.995 as stock, the others i get 1.093 aswell. but the one with stock 0.995 i can run at 1080/685, any higher clocks and i have to up the voltage.

with the voltage you set there i would up the clock to 1150 atleast. or turn the voltage down to 1050.
keep in mind that turning down you memory, lowers the voltage usage. (and heat)

81c isnt a problem at all, this summer my cards went up to 94c, when it passes 100c it will just shut down.
if you open your case and set a table fan up to blow streight in too your pc you can drop the temps down quite a bit.

you can always re-apply some thermal paste, its easy and cheap, and in most cases you will get lower temps since they tend to overdo it at the factory and use shit paste.

ps: and remember that even if a gpu is the same model and make, they are all different and they might not respond to the same oc abilities.

tweak away my friend Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001
Okey Dokey Lokey
November 13, 2012, 10:22:06 AM
#57
Spooky voltage spike.... Wtf...
legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001
Okey Dokey Lokey
November 13, 2012, 09:01:30 AM
#56
Hey ckolivas! glad to see you stop in here!.

Guys anyone think I might have damaged my card? I was running my card at 1.118v 1100core 800mem for about a week happily with the fans at 80% and the temperature at a Stable 80°c (peaking at 81° in the evening, dropping to 79° at night)

But now it likes to crash at those values Sad I've checked for dust etc, Cleared it out incase it was temperature related.
I have a singlefan XFX 7950 ghost

what kind of crash?
hard stall?
driver crash?
bsod? (if so what error are you getting?)
what drivers are you on?
your settings dont look too off other then you are slitely high on the voltage, and temps are good.

try setting your voltage down, you can run stock 0.995v at 1060-1080 core on most cards. try setting it to 1.050v at 1100 core
do some tests with gputool and check for artifacts

My cards' stock is 1.093v....

Yeah i REALLY misread how much you guys are upping your voltages by, I seriously coulda Blown my card. Running at 1.131? Fucck thaat I was running that for a little while...
I just ran overnight with 1100core 1.112v and it turns out that ran overnight, But upon using the computer for a little bit at the clocks of 1100c 720m the "amd graphi-blah-stop resonding"
My card reaches 1060core stock without crashing. I've set my fans so that the temperature never peaks over 81°c ... But is that too hot? My 6990 was running at 89° for a Long time
I really hope i havent hurt my card, I think i may have indirectly done something to it's thermal paste tho Sad

hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
November 13, 2012, 08:00:43 AM
#55
Hey ckolivas! glad to see you stop in here!.

Guys anyone think I might have damaged my card? I was running my card at 1.118v 1100core 800mem for about a week happily with the fans at 80% and the temperature at a Stable 80°c (peaking at 81° in the evening, dropping to 79° at night)

But now it likes to crash at those values Sad I've checked for dust etc, Cleared it out incase it was temperature related.
I have a singlefan XFX 7950 ghost

what kind of crash?
hard stall?
driver crash?
bsod? (if so what error are you getting?)
what drivers are you on?
your settings dont look too off other then you are slitely high on the voltage, and temps are good.

try setting your voltage down, you can run stock 0.995v at 1060-1080 core on most cards. try setting it to 1.050v at 1100 core
do some tests with gputool and check for artifacts
legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001
Okey Dokey Lokey
November 13, 2012, 02:47:47 AM
#54
Hey ckolivas! glad to see you stop in here!.

Guys anyone think I might have damaged my card? I was running my card at 1.118v 1100core 800mem for about a week happily with the fans at 80% and the temperature at a Stable 80°c (peaking at 81° in the evening, dropping to 79° at night)

But now it likes to crash at those values Sad I've checked for dust etc, Cleared it out incase it was temperature related.
I have a singlefan XFX 7950 ghost
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
November 12, 2012, 07:32:39 PM
#53
just set a new (personal) record with my 7950`s Smiley

1245/685 @ 1.185v 664mh/s @ 79c (single fan cards in a closed case still)
running CGMiner with "--shaders 1792 --intensity 10 -k poclbm -v 1 -w 64"
and using 12.11 beta drivers

 Grin
By the way,
Code:
--shaders 1792
does nothing unless you're mining litecoin.
Code:
-k poclbm -v 1 -w 64
also does nothing because they're the defaults in cgminer for that hardware. So the only thing you need to set is an intensity. Intensities above 9 on windows tend to increase CPU usage.

tbh i got no clue about the settings, as you just pointed out Smiley
just going with what ive read up on here on the forums hehe.

but it seems to be working atleast, highest mh/s ive seen anyone report so far on 7950 Smiley
only thing ive been trying to perfect is the oc
-ck
legendary
Activity: 4088
Merit: 1631
Ruu \o/
November 12, 2012, 07:26:17 PM
#52
just set a new (personal) record with my 7950`s Smiley

1245/685 @ 1.185v 664mh/s @ 79c (single fan cards in a closed case still)
running CGMiner with "--shaders 1792 --intensity 10 -k poclbm -v 1 -w 64"
and using 12.11 beta drivers

 Grin
By the way,
Code:
--shaders 1792
does nothing unless you're mining litecoin.
Code:
-k poclbm -v 1 -w 64
also does nothing because they're the defaults in cgminer for that hardware. So the only thing you need to set is an intensity. Intensities above 9 on windows tend to increase CPU usage.
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
November 12, 2012, 07:17:38 PM
#51
just set a new (personal) record with my 7950`s Smiley

1245/685 @ 1.185v 664mh/s @ 79c (single fan cards in a closed case still)
running CGMiner with "--shaders 1792 --intensity 10 -k poclbm -v 1 -w 64"
and using 12.11 beta drivers

 Grin
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
November 01, 2012, 12:20:41 PM
#50
none of the 79xx cards are locked in memory so to speak, just takes some tweaking to do it, like afterburner...

i havent worked much with linux yet so im not sure what you should use there, but a quick google search should point it out to you pretty easy. Smiley

im still working on installing cgminer on my raspberry pi (wheezy) and my pentium 4 (ubuntu) for my asics... good thing i got some time til they come lol. Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001
Okey Dokey Lokey
November 01, 2012, 09:07:20 AM
#49
change out the bottom part of afterburner.cfg with:


[ATIADLHAL]
UnofficialOverclockingEULA   = I confirm that I am aware of unofficial overclocking limitations and fully understand that MSI will not provide me any support on it
UnofficialOverclockingMode   = 2
AccessibilityCheckingPeriod   = 0
UnifiedMemoryUsageMonitoring   = 1

Or don't use afterburner at all and just use the built in memory/gpu clock adjustments with CGMiner.

oh Afterburner, well I use ubuntu...

and with CGMiner it is NOT possible to go lower... (only 150 below engine)

But its only with 7950... my 5770 no problem

Some 7950's are weird and have a crappy "qwirky" bios, Disallowing memory clock reductions through common methods, I think it has something to do with the card bios writer trying to make sure that the ULPS works

What Brand of 7950 do you have? My XFX works great
sr. member
Activity: 1077
Merit: 250
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
November 01, 2012, 07:35:41 AM
#48
change out the bottom part of afterburner.cfg with:


[ATIADLHAL]
UnofficialOverclockingEULA   = I confirm that I am aware of unofficial overclocking limitations and fully understand that MSI will not provide me any support on it
UnofficialOverclockingMode   = 2
AccessibilityCheckingPeriod   = 0
UnifiedMemoryUsageMonitoring   = 1

Or don't use afterburner at all and just use the built in memory/gpu clock adjustments with CGMiner.

oh Afterburner, well I use ubuntu...

and with CGMiner it is NOT possible to go lower... (only 150 below engine)

But its only with 7950... my 5770 no problem
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
October 23, 2012, 07:44:04 PM
#47
change out the bottom part of afterburner.cfg with:


[ATIADLHAL]
UnofficialOverclockingEULA   = I confirm that I am aware of unofficial overclocking limitations and fully understand that MSI will not provide me any support on it
UnofficialOverclockingMode   = 2
AccessibilityCheckingPeriod   = 0
UnifiedMemoryUsageMonitoring   = 1

Or don't use afterburner at all and just use the built in memory/gpu clock adjustments with CGMiner.

using the built in fetures in cgminer is all fine and dandy if you allready know what clocks to use on your cards yes.
but to find a stable clock i would recomend using AB and stress testing the gpu...
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
October 23, 2012, 07:24:47 PM
#46
change out the bottom part of afterburner.cfg with:


[ATIADLHAL]
UnofficialOverclockingEULA   = I confirm that I am aware of unofficial overclocking limitations and fully understand that MSI will not provide me any support on it
UnofficialOverclockingMode   = 2
AccessibilityCheckingPeriod   = 0
UnifiedMemoryUsageMonitoring   = 1

Or don't use afterburner at all and just use the built in memory/gpu clock adjustments with CGMiner.
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
October 23, 2012, 11:27:13 AM
#45
change out the bottom part of afterburner.cfg with:


[ATIADLHAL]
UnofficialOverclockingEULA   = I confirm that I am aware of unofficial overclocking limitations and fully understand that MSI will not provide me any support on it
UnofficialOverclockingMode   = 2
AccessibilityCheckingPeriod   = 0
UnifiedMemoryUsageMonitoring   = 1
sr. member
Activity: 1077
Merit: 250
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
October 23, 2012, 11:24:24 AM
#44
how do you lower your memory? With my two (different) 7950 - it is locked. I can only go 150mhz below engine....
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
October 21, 2012, 08:54:07 AM
#43
try setting your clocks at 1175/685 with voltage at 1150.

"cgminer -o server -u username -p password --shaders 1792 --intensity 14 --worksize 256 -v 1"

im getting ~638mh on my 7950`s @ 80c in a closed case... (downclocked the one i have the monitor hooked up to cause it seems to run a bit hotter, 1075/685 @ stock voltage getting 550mh)

Woaaaaah I Really dont think my (stock 900) 7950 is gonna reach 1175, I also dont want to kill my card...
I updated my drivers to cat 12.8 from 12.6 and gained 40mh/s


as long as you have descent cooling it shouldnt be a problem, atm i got the single fan xfx 7950 black edition cards, ive been able to run them stable at 1200/685 but it got too hot for my taste as i dont have risers etc.

ive seen tests on youtube where they run these cards at 1200/1500 @1.25v getting over 10k scores in 3dmark etc with air cooling. but thats with 1 card in the case, so they wont get as hot as with multi card gpu "farms"

if it wasnt for asics id be getting watercooling for the cards and running them all at 1200/685 atleast Tongue

edit:
im running the 12.9 beta drivers atm if that helps.. when i switched from 12.3 (i think it was) to 12.8 the temps spiked up ~10c.... 12.9 seem to fix that issue
legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001
Okey Dokey Lokey
October 21, 2012, 08:44:00 AM
#42
try setting your clocks at 1175/685 with voltage at 1150.

"cgminer -o server -u username -p password --shaders 1792 --intensity 14 --worksize 256 -v 1"

im getting ~638mh on my 7950`s @ 80c in a closed case... (downclocked the one i have the monitor hooked up to cause it seems to run a bit hotter, 1075/685 @ stock voltage getting 550mh)

Woaaaaah I Really dont think my (stock 900) 7950 is gonna reach 1175, I also dont want to kill my card...
I updated my drivers to cat 12.8 from 12.6 and gained 40mh/s
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
October 21, 2012, 08:02:58 AM
#41
try setting your clocks at 1175/685 with voltage at 1150.

"cgminer -o server -u username -p password --shaders 1792 --intensity 14 --worksize 256 -v 1"

im getting ~638mh on my 7950`s @ 80c in a closed case... (downclocked the one i have the monitor hooked up to cause it seems to run a bit hotter, 1075/685 @ stock voltage getting 550mh)
sr. member
Activity: 240
Merit: 250
September 29, 2012, 08:07:50 AM
#40
I'm running 2x 7950s

BFGminer... the only parameter I feed it other than pool info is -i 9,9

with core of 1075, voltage of 1135 and memory at 625 I'm getting 560 mhash each.

This is on a 2700k on a Z77x-ud5h motherboard while mining litecoin on the cpu.

That sounds about right.
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
September 28, 2012, 04:29:08 PM
#39
I'm running 2x 7950s

BFGminer... the only parameter I feed it other than pool info is -i 9,9

with core of 1075, voltage of 1135 and memory at 625 I'm getting 560 mhash each.

This is on a 2700k on a Z77x-ud5h motherboard while mining litecoin on the cpu.
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
September 10, 2012, 04:13:31 PM
#38
try using diablo miner, im currently running 2 rigs with "DiabloMiner-Windows -o yourpoolhere -u username -p password -r 8337 -v 1 -w 256"

at 1100/675 and 1050/675 im getting 1150mh on each rig (2 cards in each)... could clock higher but using closed cases so temps get a bit high...
legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001
Okey Dokey Lokey
August 24, 2012, 10:37:53 AM
#37
I of 7 and 9 gave me similar results, but 13 gave me +10MH/s.
Seems to have worked... Sortof... It's really bouncy.. dropping 5 below and going 10 above..

Shame how i have to be clocked at 1080 to get the meager 511mhash/s
Why the hell is nitrox hitting 54x+ with a 1080 core clock... Im trying to use all the same settings that he's using..


Check your CPU usage. Anything 10 or higher, and I get 100% cpu bug.
16%cpu usage at I 13, on a 6core 3.8ghz cpu, with the affinity set to two cores

Yep that's 100% on one core. Mine was 33% on a tri-core AMD, so that'd be 100% on one core.

So whats with nitrox getting 54xmh/s....
I can mine at 1080 stabily, but i only get 515mh/s
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
August 23, 2012, 09:02:05 PM
#36
I of 7 and 9 gave me similar results, but 13 gave me +10MH/s.
Seems to have worked... Sortof... It's really bouncy.. dropping 5 below and going 10 above..

Shame how i have to be clocked at 1080 to get the meager 511mhash/s
Why the hell is nitrox hitting 54x+ with a 1080 core clock... Im trying to use all the same settings that he's using..


Check your CPU usage. Anything 10 or higher, and I get 100% cpu bug.
16%cpu usage at I 13, on a 6core 3.8ghz cpu, with the affinity set to two cores

Yep that's 100% on one core. Mine was 33% on a tri-core AMD, so that'd be 100% on one core.
legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001
Okey Dokey Lokey
August 23, 2012, 08:10:30 PM
#35
I of 7 and 9 gave me similar results, but 13 gave me +10MH/s.
Seems to have worked... Sortof... It's really bouncy.. dropping 5 below and going 10 above..

Shame how i have to be clocked at 1080 to get the meager 511mhash/s
Why the hell is nitrox hitting 54x+ with a 1080 core clock... Im trying to use all the same settings that he's using..


Check your CPU usage. Anything 10 or higher, and I get 100% cpu bug.
16%cpu usage at I 13, on a 6core 3.8ghz cpu, with the affinity set to two cores
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
August 23, 2012, 05:26:10 PM
#34
I of 7 and 9 gave me similar results, but 13 gave me +10MH/s.
Seems to have worked... Sortof... It's really bouncy.. dropping 5 below and going 10 above..

Shame how i have to be clocked at 1080 to get the meager 511mhash/s
Why the hell is nitrox hitting 54x+ with a 1080 core clock... Im trying to use all the same settings that he's using..


Check your CPU usage. Anything 10 or higher, and I get 100% cpu bug.
legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001
Okey Dokey Lokey
August 23, 2012, 08:54:12 AM
#33
I of 7 and 9 gave me similar results, but 13 gave me +10MH/s.
Seems to have worked... Sortof... It's really bouncy.. dropping 5 below and going 10 above..

Shame how i have to be clocked at 1080 to get the meager 511mhash/s
Why the hell is nitrox hitting 54x+ with a 1080 core clock... Im trying to use all the same settings that he's using..
member
Activity: 136
Merit: 10
tester
August 23, 2012, 01:41:26 AM
#32
i run my two HD7950 with .bat that content:
Code:
title MINING
cd cgminer
del *.bin
for /F "tokens=1-2 delims=: " %%l in ('time /t') do set hhmm=%%l.%%m
TIMEOUT /T 10

cgminer.exe 2>../log/logfile_%date%_%hhmm%.txt -k diablo -o http://pool.ABCPool.co:8332 -u XXXXX -p XX -g 1 -v 1 -w 256 -I 10 --auto-gpu --auto-fan --gpu-dyninterval 5 --gpu-powertune 10,10 --gpu-engine 500-1065,500-1170 --gpu-memclock 915,1020 --temp-target 65 --gpu-fan 42-85
i use logs for detailed monitoring
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
August 22, 2012, 09:59:31 PM
#31
I of 7 and 9 gave me similar results, but 13 gave me +10MH/s.
legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001
Okey Dokey Lokey
August 22, 2012, 09:44:03 PM
#30
Well just trying to throw it out there. This thread has me playing with everything I can to get the most MH/s.
woo hoo!

impressive. is that mineral oil immersed or what?
Acutually, Shappires latest line of cooling is really good.
My XFX is running at core 1080, Mem 800, Fan 73%[4100RPM] Temp 78°C room ambient temp is 27°C
Inside a cheap $60 Xion case with 4case fans, 1PSU fan, 1 GPU fan, 1PciSlot CoolerFan for the GPU, One CPU LCU Radiator cooling fan
Now with Intensity 7 and 9 giving same results, I am mining at 510Mh/s
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
Portland Bitcoin Group Organizer
August 22, 2012, 09:36:50 PM
#29
impressive. is that mineral oil immersed or what?
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
August 22, 2012, 09:34:46 PM
#28
Well just trying to throw it out there. This thread has me playing with everything I can to get the most MH/s.
legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001
Okey Dokey Lokey
August 22, 2012, 09:28:56 PM
#27
Like I said before, I"m using a 7970, not a 7950, but I dropped the "-v 2" arg out, and I got +20MH/s. Try letting CGMiner decide what vectors are best.
v 1 seems to work the best, Bringing my memclock upto 1ghz gave me an extra 10mh/s
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
August 22, 2012, 08:46:07 PM
#26
Like I said before, I"m using a 7970, not a 7950, but I dropped the "-v 2" arg out, and I got +20MH/s. Try letting CGMiner decide what vectors are best.
legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001
Okey Dokey Lokey
August 22, 2012, 08:26:00 PM
#25
i run two HD 7950
they are different revision but that i run them



I hope I was helpful.

It would be helpful if you stated your settings, so far i see intensity CG miner 2.7, And diablo kernal, Im using those
Like holy hell, Your (according to that chart) hitting 547mh/s with a core of 1070
What is the "powertune" 15?

Fwiw im using this card http://www.newegg.ca/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814150601
sr. member
Activity: 240
Merit: 250
August 22, 2012, 07:49:44 PM
#24
I don't have a cooling problem (card stays below 90c, it's a single-fan model), though your temps in the mid-60s are very impressive.  Having essentially an open-air case helps in that regard Smiley  I built my PC for silence and as long as I stay within acceptable ranges, I'm not too concerned about the temperature.  When I'm not mining, you can't tell my computer is on Grin
member
Activity: 136
Merit: 10
tester
August 22, 2012, 03:33:43 PM
#23
What sort of cooling are you using in your case/GPUs?  Those temps are crazy low.

send me pictures of your case, will help you to optimize cooling.
GPUs is
http://www.sapphiretech.com/presentation/product/?cid=1&gid=3&sgid=1157&pid=1450&psn=&lid=1&leg=0

two are the same, I buy them in 7 days difference, and they are different revision
member
Activity: 136
Merit: 10
tester
August 22, 2012, 03:26:24 PM
#22
I forgot to mention I use CGMINER 2.7.0 with kernel DIABLO   Grin
member
Activity: 136
Merit: 10
tester
August 22, 2012, 03:24:41 PM
#21
mode by my own Smiley

www.shareimage.org/images/85k1ikroyxudomlgen5.jpg
www.shareimage.org/images/uxeu2lqv3sueaa92ld53.jpg
www.shareimage.org/images/vpom3gi38anc83b6ie7.jpg

and this is summer addon Smiley

www.shareimage.org/images/fn410etlca8ijabgdoqz.jpg

now the room is 28C, outside 27C - 23:21
day outside is 41C, room is 34C - 12:00

I can't wait to come winter to overclock a little be more Smiley
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
August 22, 2012, 02:03:58 PM
#20
i run two HD 7950
they are different revision but that i run them



I hope I was helpful.

Stupid Trend Micro. I can't see the pic until I leave work.
sr. member
Activity: 240
Merit: 250
August 22, 2012, 01:59:57 PM
#19
i run two HD 7950
they are different revision but that i run them



I hope I was helpful.

What sort of cooling are you using in your case/GPUs?  Those temps are crazy low.
member
Activity: 136
Merit: 10
tester
August 22, 2012, 01:28:13 PM
#18
i run two HD 7950
they are different revision but that i run them



I hope I was helpful.
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
August 22, 2012, 11:48:39 AM
#17
Can you post either your full command line arguments, or your config file? Don't need any pool info, just the GPU settings.
legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001
Okey Dokey Lokey
August 22, 2012, 11:43:55 AM
#16
Does anyone else have any insights as to why im missing 20mh/s? It's not like im looking for that "Maximum efficency" I just want to see my card it 500.01MH/s
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
August 21, 2012, 11:17:55 PM
#15
hey crazyates d'you have a coin address that i can kick you a tip at?

1De7KzFiYRHUVJCuy7Ap89xYbu2Z4q1F63 Thanks!
legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001
Okey Dokey Lokey
August 21, 2012, 10:45:49 PM
#14
hey crazyates d'you have a coin address that i can kick you a tip at?
legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001
Okey Dokey Lokey
August 21, 2012, 12:53:08 PM
#13
Yeah, Going from 4 to 5 gives me 150mh/s lol.
Gonna try DiakGCN Gives me 450mh/s
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
August 21, 2012, 12:51:57 PM
#12
Try using Diablo kernel instead of Poclbm.  Change the intensity to 7, worksize to 256, and vectors to 1.  That should yield the greatest results.

You can change the settings by press S → W → ENTER.  That will great a configuration file so you won't need to re-enter the same settings as before.


Set it to these settings, Now im getting 490mh/s

Try changing your I from 7 -> 9.
LOTS of rejects

Really?! That's pretty odd.
I agree, But setting it to -8 drops the hashrate by 2mh/sec so... It Kinda makes sense?

Setting I to -8 or 8? There's a big difference  Wink
8, I went back, A set it to 9, Turns out that the last time i didthat, At the same time the pool switched blocks, LOL.
I 9=488-491mh/s
I 7=488-490mh/s

Ok I was just curious. Sometimes I can get upwards of a 10MH/s bump going from 6 -> 9.
legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001
Okey Dokey Lokey
August 21, 2012, 12:49:55 PM
#11
Try using Diablo kernel instead of Poclbm.  Change the intensity to 7, worksize to 256, and vectors to 1.  That should yield the greatest results.

You can change the settings by press S → W → ENTER.  That will great a configuration file so you won't need to re-enter the same settings as before.


Set it to these settings, Now im getting 490mh/s

Try changing your I from 7 -> 9.
LOTS of rejects

Really?! That's pretty odd.
I agree, But setting it to -8 drops the hashrate by 2mh/sec so... It Kinda makes sense?

Setting I to -8 or 8? There's a big difference  Wink
8, I went back, A set it to 9, Turns out that the last time i didthat, At the same time the pool switched blocks, LOL.
I 9=487-491.3mh/s
I 7=486.8-493mh/s
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
August 21, 2012, 12:39:32 PM
#10
Try using Diablo kernel instead of Poclbm.  Change the intensity to 7, worksize to 256, and vectors to 1.  That should yield the greatest results.

You can change the settings by press S → W → ENTER.  That will great a configuration file so you won't need to re-enter the same settings as before.


Set it to these settings, Now im getting 490mh/s

Try changing your I from 7 -> 9.
LOTS of rejects

Really?! That's pretty odd.
I agree, But setting it to -8 drops the hashrate by 2mh/sec so... It Kinda makes sense?

Setting I to -8 or 8? There's a big difference  Wink
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
August 21, 2012, 12:32:55 PM
#9
Try using Diablo kernel instead of Poclbm.  Change the intensity to 7, worksize to 256, and vectors to 1.  That should yield the greatest results.

You can change the settings by press S → W → ENTER.  That will great a configuration file so you won't need to re-enter the same settings as before.


Set it to these settings, Now im getting 490mh/s

Try changing your I from 7 -> 9.
LOTS of rejects

Really?! That's pretty odd.
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
August 21, 2012, 12:26:36 PM
#8
Try using Diablo kernel instead of Poclbm.  Change the intensity to 7, worksize to 256, and vectors to 1.  That should yield the greatest results.

You can change the settings by press S → W → ENTER.  That will great a configuration file so you won't need to re-enter the same settings as before.


Set it to these settings, Now im getting 490mh/s

Try changing your I from 7 -> 9.
legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001
Okey Dokey Lokey
August 21, 2012, 12:22:27 PM
#7
Try using Diablo kernel instead of Poclbm.  Change the intensity to 7, worksize to 256, and vectors to 1.  That should yield the greatest results.

You can change the settings by press S → W → ENTER.  That will great a configuration file so you won't need to re-enter the same settings as before.


Set it to these settings, Now im getting 490mh/s
legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001
Okey Dokey Lokey
August 21, 2012, 12:17:49 PM
#6
That's your rate on a 1040Mhz core clock!?!?  I get 480Mh/s on 925Mhz using --intensity 5 as my only switch.  I'm on the same OS/driver/SDK version as you are as well.  Something is very wrong with your setup.  Are you sure you're operating at 1040Mhz core (and it's stable)?
Hellyeah it's stable, It's stable at 1080.

I've flipped around the kernals, getting/loosing 10mh/sec
Phatk seems to do the best, Im gonna retry diablo, Since i think it'd be the best
sr. member
Activity: 303
Merit: 250
August 21, 2012, 12:11:53 PM
#5
Try using Diablo kernel instead of Poclbm.  Change the intensity to 7, worksize to 256, and vectors to 1.  That should yield the greatest results.

You can change the settings by press S → W → ENTER.  That will great a configuration file so you won't need to re-enter the same settings as before.

sr. member
Activity: 240
Merit: 250
August 21, 2012, 12:11:46 PM
#4
That's your rate on a 1040Mhz core clock!?!?  I get 480Mh/s on 925Mhz using --intensity 5 as my only switch.  I'm on the same OS/driver/SDK version as you are as well.  Something is very wrong with your setup.  Are you sure you're operating at 1040Mhz core (and it's stable)?
legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001
Okey Dokey Lokey
August 21, 2012, 12:06:48 PM
#3
That does sound a little low, but not drastically. What OS/driver/SDK? Try switching kernels? CGMiner also has diabo, phatk, and diakgcn, all of which should be decent. On my 7970 I use "-v 2 -w 256 -I 9 -k diakgcn" and it works great (Win7x64SP1, 12.8, 2.7 here).

@1040MHz you should be getting close to 520MH/s.
LOL, I forgot all the important info!
64bitwin7 12.8, 2.7
How do i tell CGMiner to use a differant kernal? Whats the command line arg?
I think inside the config i can set it to a differant kernal... Im going to poke around..
THANKS!, Im pretty sure it's the kernel,
legendary
Activity: 952
Merit: 1000
August 21, 2012, 11:53:43 AM
#2
That does sound a little low, but not drastically. What OS/driver/SDK? Try switching kernels? CGMiner also has diabo, phatk, and diakgcn, all of which should be decent. On my 7970 I use "-v 2 -w 256 -I 9 -k diakgcn" and it works great (Win7x64SP1, 12.8, 2.7 here).

@1040MHz you should be getting close to 520MH/s.
legendary
Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001
Okey Dokey Lokey
August 21, 2012, 11:42:29 AM
#1
So what am i doing wrong? Core 1040 mem 700
I've flipped around with the intensity obviously, Im running CGMiner 2.7.0
Im getting 468mh/s, And yet on https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Mining_hardware_comparison I see a guy hitting 512mh/s with a 1ghz core, Using Poclbm
When i run poclbm i get 475mh/s
Why isnt CGminer being as godly as it used to be? Do i seriously have to switch back to a different miner just to increse performance? I love CGMiner!

EDIT-I've followed some advice written below, And got the hashrate upto 493

Edit- Upgraded to Catalyst 12.8 from 12.6 and now im at 550mh/s at Core 1050
Edit3
Im using CGminer 2.9.7 now, With Diablo Kernal, Vectors 1, w256, Intensity 7 (using intensity 11 gives 6 more mh/s, but the lags not worth it)
576MH/s
Jump to: