Author

Topic: The best investment: Get drunk (Read 1084 times)

sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
October 04, 2011, 05:41:40 PM
#8
And yes, brand matters you philistines.

mmm...Hendrick's....

that's the classy shit, holmes. i want to slap anyone I see drinking bombay.
sr. member
Activity: 305
Merit: 250
Trust but confirm!
October 04, 2011, 05:37:36 PM
#7
Thin Lizzy says it clearly, Whiskey in the Jar Smiley

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TehFZ38kt6o

cheers!
sr. member
Activity: 321
Merit: 250
Firstbits: 1gyzhw
August 14, 2011, 07:41:10 PM
#6
A wise man once said...

Quote from: Bertrand Russell
One of the commonest things to do with savings is to lend them to some Government. In view of the fact that the bulk of the public expenditure of most civilized Governments consists in payment for past wars or preparation for future wars, the man who lends his money to a Government is in the same position as the bad men in Shakespeare who hire murderers. The net result of the man's economical habits is to increase the armed forces of the State to which he lends his savings. Obviously it would be better if he spent the money, even if he spent it in drink or gambling.

The man who invests his savings in a concern that goes bankrupt is therefore injuring others as well as himself. If he spent his money, say, in giving parties for his friends, they (we may hope) would get pleasure, and so would all those upon whom he spent money, such as the butcher, the baker, and the bootlegger. But if he spends it (let us say) upon laying down rails for surface card in some place where surface cars turn out not to be wanted, he has diverted a mass of labor into channels where it gives pleasure to no one. Nevertheless, when he becomes poor through failure of his investment he will be regarded as a victim of undeserved misfortune, whereas the gay spendthrift, who has spent his money philanthropically, will be despised as a fool and a frivolous person.
legendary
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1002
August 14, 2011, 06:43:06 PM
#5
If back in 2007 you bough 1000 € of Royal Bank of Scotland's shares, you would be holding now 29 €
If back in 2007 you bough 1000 € of Fortis' (NL) shares, you would be holding now 39 €

Now... if back in 2007 you bough 1000 € of red wine and drink it meanwhile, you would be able to sell the empty bottles now for 46 €.  Grin

Is that you talking? Or is it the wine? Cheesy
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
I never hashed for this...
August 14, 2011, 06:30:40 PM
#4


+




ratio of 1:1 or 2:3

And yes, brand matters you philistines.
sr. member
Activity: 305
Merit: 250
Trust but confirm!
August 14, 2011, 06:07:24 PM
#3
I think on a day to day basis, getting hammered is a good investment.  It's a safe bet, and you'll never be disappointed with the results.
This made me laught Smiley as its so true Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
www.bitcointrading.com
August 14, 2011, 06:03:08 PM
#2
I think on a day to day basis, getting hammered is a good investment.  It's a safe bet, and you'll never be disappointed with the results.
legendary
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1000
August 12, 2011, 10:21:24 PM
#1
If back in 2007 you bough 1000 € of Royal Bank of Scotland's shares, you would be holding now 29 €
If back in 2007 you bough 1000 € of Fortis' (NL) shares, you would be holding now 39 €

Now... if back in 2007 you bough 1000 € of red wine and drink it meanwhile, you would be able to sell the empty bottles now for 46 €.  Grin
Jump to: