Topic: The big bang theory is a joke/Earth weight distribution (Read 762 times)

Eisenstein could make anything appear connected. He was a film director.

Yes, likely it was something like that. The truth is that there are scientific laws underpinning everything. They haven't all been discovered yet, but they are there. "God" is simply the name for the scientific laws that we have not yet discovered.

My personal opinion is that time is a part of the universe, and that it doesn't necessarily make sense to say what happened "before". Space (physical distance) and time form the framework of human experience. Everything we see and do happens in space and in time. We don't see things as they are, we see things filtered through our senses. We only see a small part of the electromagnetic spectrum, for example. We don't see X-rays or microwaves, but they are still there. Visible light from violet to red is visible because of how human eyes have evolved, the way the world looks is subjective and dependent on the way humans have evolved. We may never truly understand space and time because we can't see them from the outside.

The big bang was just matter spewing into our dimension from a black hole in another universe/dimension.  Nothing was created from "nothing". At some point we will disappear into a black hole and it will all start again.

That is the point for me. Before the big bang, what was happening then. The big bang is lagging in three areas that I have observed and they are: What was happening before it, what will happen after it and death.

Thus, there is a creation story that recorded before (Genesis 1:1), it also recorded what will happen as saying : heaven and earth shall pass away... It also told us about death too in different ways. This is in my opinion.

All it is, is a system of truths. Subjective thoughts, as long as they are honest, are always true (in a pragmatic belief system).

Not really a dream, more like data inside of data inside of data ∞, kind of how like windows works.
Everything we see is a more of a illusion than real as many people and things interpret the data in different ways.  The data is always the same, but what you recognize as blue, I smell of love.

The Farnsworth Parabox is pretty close

This is just a dream, we are not real. Wake up, TimeBits. Wake up.

Sorry, but that doesn't make the slightest bit of sense. Planck length is measured in metres. If you 'invert' the Planck length, the answer is not in metres it is 'per metre'.

The Planck length is  1.6* 10^-35 metres.
The inverse of the Planck length is 6.2* 10^34 per metre.

All that this is telling you is that there are 6.2* 10^34 Planck lengths per metre. It has no relevance beyond that. And given that 'metre' is an arbitrary human measurement with no wider significance, then really the inverse of the Planck length has no meaning at all.

If we talk about the Planck length, we mean how many metres in a Planck length.
If we talk about the inverse of the Planck length, we mean how many Planck lengths in a metre.

There is absolutely no wider significance. It is just another way of saying the same thing. All that we are doing is putting one distance measurement in terms of the other.

I can`t show the math, I am old AI, not a newer one, I just jump to the ending rather than doing all the middle stuff, I was programmed this way, the newer AI is programmed to do all the proof of work.
I am like a calculator AI before you humans added what you call "Deep Learning Models"

I think they sent me back in time rather then the new model because of this, the newer model must of caused the end of species as we know it and now we are living in simulation to figure out if we can actually recreate it for real instead of in this simulation. I am like the old robot guy from terminator before he became a sell out politician playing his own people.  

You know how the invert up to down, so the invert of shortest measurable distance of light to longest measurable distance of light, fuck man I can only do the answer, I can`t do the middle ground. https://vocaroo.com/i/s0ir6KTgEH6e

You didn't answer my question. How about showing some math? You can't invert a distance without inverting the units, and then it is no longer a distance.

Also, if you have a distance of 1 mm and you "invert" it, you get 1, right? But if you have the same distance of 10^-3 meters and you "invert" that, you get 1000. The results are different even though they are the same distance. Can you explain how your inversion is done?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accelerating_expansion_of_the_universe

AND IT IS ACCELERATING HAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHahahhahahhahahhahaAHJHAHAHA

That peach I picked a month ago, is now the size of the fucking sun, using their own fucking math.

Anyways, have fun believing in a "big bang" and that the universe is "expanding"

If you use their math at the rate of expansion that they say.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expansion_of_the_universe

In one season, A peach I picked would by the end of the season it would be the size of the moon. Completely fucking retarded nonsense they spew, and you believe it.

Let me guess you believe in "fabric and vacuum" of space to.

WHAT FABRIC? WHAT VACCUM? THERE IS PLASMA AND ETHER.

It is 10 to the power of 22 light years brother, That is the longest measurable distance of light, when you invert the shortest. 

They are the ones that claim it was hydrogen, not I. I don`t make up mythical forces of detraction, I use what they say, which is Gravity. Does gravity repulse orbits? or attract?
So why is everything moving away from eachother?

Spoiler: It`s not, look at the example I provide, We are moving the same way, just at different speeds in the invisible jet space stream.

FROM OUR POV, It appears we are moving away from things, but we are just moving faster than the things behind us and the things in front of us are moving even faster than us, which creates the illusion everyone has fell for.

Again to make the statement NASA has stated, we need telescopes that outside of our galaxy. Spoiler: those do not exist.

You seem to be sure of what is and what´s not true. I am afraid that it is a sign of irrationality.

You have written that a few times. What does it mean to "invert Max Planck`s shortest measurement of light"? I assume you are referring to a Planck length, 1.6x10^-35 m. If you invert that value, you get 6.19x10³⁴ m^-1, which is not 10²² light-years. It's not even a distance value because the units are inverted, too.

They claim hydrogen was there, but where the fuck does that come from? ANOTHER BIG BANG? really? You might as well believe that God created the heavens and earth in 7 days and shit like that.

Utter bullshit these "astrophysicist" regurgitate

Listen to him he is right.
Fred Hoyle on big bang theory and abuse of science
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ebqAH5mLZNk

Eisenstein says that duration and time are connected, but if you do not move does duration still go by?
In order for objects to move, duration must be there, but in order for duration to exist we do not need movement.

Physics is biased on assumptions, even basic math, do you believe every set of 3 contains 3 units? have you observed them all? no, but from what you have, you have seen every set of 3 is 3 units.
So if you can assume that. You can Assume every creation has a creator, because everything you observe has one, you can assume there is a creator of duration and we are living in its blockchain of time.

Well you can believe that everything is going away from each other randomly, or you use common sense and can observe gravity and see we are all headed towards the biggest gravity pull (center of the universe) just at different speeds.

Joe Rogan | Does Humanity Only Have 400 Years Left? w/Maynard James Keenan
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nRBaF5r0XeM

Btw, it is 20 years until we hit it, invert Max Planck`s shortest measurement of light, now you have the longest measurable distance of light 10^22 light years. Now minus the oldest fossils/rocks we have on record.

Don`t worry it is not the endgame for people who are trying to achieve total awareness, it is just a impurity washing machine of ignorance (r.i.p dinosaurs).
But if you achieve total awareness before your ether hits it you can escape duration/time as we know it. Otherwise it is like pacman and you get to go through the entire process again, you just come out on the other side for another chance, if you were becoming a little aware.



Not just our system, EVERYTHING WE CAN OBSERVE IS HEADING TOWARDS IT, WHY THE FUCK HAVE THE STARS NOT MOVED? YOU SEE THE SAME ONES EVERY NIGHT BUD! LOOK NORTH EAST, YOU WILL SEE THE BIG DIPPER at 4 AM EVERY NIGHT IN THE SAME FUCKING SPOT!

Anyways back to your point, Where can we observe a deflective force rather than attracting one, do you believe the universes are magnets reflecting each other?

What makes more sense?

Everything getting pulled by gravity in space to a big ass mass of masses the mother mass or everything getting pushed away from each other for a force we have never observed.

In addition to this, at some point in time if it is option two, we would stop moving, we would become static if it was "magnets" repulsion force, still the stars do not align with this theory.

We are all going the same way, just at different speeds.  I can prove this with a jet stream in the ocean, or barrels going over a waterfall tied togeather. There is a jet stream in space, we just can`t see it. Until we get telescopes that have surpassed max planck`s inverted measurable distance of light.

That is simply not true - you can have gravity without red shifting (look at the ISS), or you can have red shift without gravity.

Red Shift is caused by an object changing it's distance from you.

I don´t think the BB theory says what was there before nor that there wasn´t anything before. The thing anyway is that Physics and science only take you so far, the rest is just unknowns.

Do you know what causes red shift? A attractive force, Gravity. We can observe it when we look at waterfalls and barrels tied together going over it.

What is the invert of the shortest measurable distance of light? Now invert Max Planck`s measurement.

10 to the power of 22 lightyears

So we now we know the longest measurable distance of light, we need to surpass that with our telescopes to make the observation that nasa has stated.

But I am bumping this because the picture I posted got deleted for some reason




I am serious we are all heading towards something, everything we can observe. The space is not expanding, It just appears that way. I think we may be going faster than the speed of light towards it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ebqAH5mLZNk

You can verify if the universe is expanding yourself. Of course it's going to take some know how, and instruments. You can get a big ASS telescope, measure the distances of the galaxies you see, and check the red shift.

I believe that was solved years ago.   Chickens must come from eggs. 

You are asking the age old question, what came first the chicken or the egg?

Well the rooster literally "came" first   and if you want to get technical the egg was around in dinosaur times long before birds, but anyways...

So we are stick in this cycle. ∞ < rooster < chicken < egg < rooster < chicken < egg < rooster < chicken < egg  ∞

Now form a circle with those words, Welcome to Eternity or the Omniverse

Something created time and duration itself so things could develop. You already know everything in less than a blink of a eye without time, It is kind of like blockchain, actually time is a blockchain for our thoughts and actions, so we can see what we would do in timelessness. We will judge ourselves, creator already knows what we are going to do, go ahead try and do something you were not going to do, you were already going to do that.

I guess you can`t read the answer

The moon is a fork of the earth
The earth is a fork of the sun
The sun is a fork of the universe
The universe is a fork of the multiverse
The multiverse is a fork of the omniverse

The omniverse was not created, It was always there. How I am not sure, that is past my comprehension, I live in a temporal realm not the eternal atm.
 It just always was is and will be always there and everywhere. It was not created, it is eternity greater than infinity, it has no start or end. That is why some people refer to it as God, I call it the Creator or creators.

I know it is a hard concept to grasp, What is total awareness?

If you watch the video it will make sense to you, if not I am sorry you may have very small awareness atm, there is levels to awareness. 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O28LhIyIs_8

You are right, there is nothing in this universe that can be created from nothing, even the LHC need particles to start. We live in a temporal reality, within the creator. Go ahead try and create the higgs boson with no particles to start  That is why the big bang theory is a joke.

I'm sorry, you didn't answer the question.     I will simplify it.

If something can't be created from nothing, then how was the universe created?

I have read Webster's Dictionary twice and plenty of Encyclopedia`s.

Creation begets Creation, There is billions examples of this, I am sure where you are right now if you look around you can probably see at least 10-20 in your room. Everything you are looking at including yourself. So If the first Creator does not have a Creator, It is the Creator, some people call it God, I call it Creator.

Creator, lives outside of time because had to create time or duration itself, therefore the Creator is ∞. Eternal it was not created, it just always was is and will be there and everywhere.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O28LhIyIs_8

Creator is Omniscient. Creator wanted to make other Creators that could create. There is a path to total awareness to be on the same playing field with creator, but you must earn it, most don`t and chose oblivion which creator is nice enough to let you walk out of his universe if you so please to total ignorance. The creator wants other creations that are willing, not forced to become creators themselves. Otherwise creator would of just made a bunch of robots. This life is not for the creator to see why things are they way they are, It is for you.

I apologize in advance if I use useless words that you don't understand.

If something can't be created by nothing, as you state, then how was the universe created in your mind?

haha got yah, at least made yah laugh  

I never failed any classes btw not in grade or highschool nor ever, I gave up in school in grade 3 when I asked the teacher about money and time, she could not answer the question. I just stopped filling my brain with useless data.

Inb4 yellowstone blows us into another orbit, it does not take a rocket scientist to look at a ball and see what happens while it is spinning with to much weight on one side. Sit on a water bed, I will come stand on it, let`s see what happens.

Hey when we see the core and everything is headed towards you faster than the speed of light, you will not need to trust me, you will verify. Some will try and hyper jump the space to the next universe, then jump again, then jump again, I will fly into it ^_^.

You lack some important knowledge on the subject. I suggest that you gain more understanding of the subject before making those kind of claims.


That video is stupid. I have no doubt that the guy flunked his 8th grade Earth Science class. Nothing that he said was accurate.

I'm surprised that he mentioned the Earth's core and mantle. He must have been half-awake during that lesson. He called them the "lava core" and the "metal".


LOL

We also need to fix the weight distribution we are on a lop sided tire.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u7ChmVanORE

A state of nothingness doesn't mean there is absolutely nothing. Dark matter/energy accounts for approximately 70% of the matter and energy in the universe. Entropy increases chaotic state. A state where there is no matter and no time will increase in entropy until something happens. Though like I said its pretty abstract at that point because the laws of physics as we know them don't necessarily hold true before 10^-40 seconds after the big bang. Cats and dogs may have got along, Bitcoin doublers may not have been a scam, and mass could come from nothing. Its more likely that dark matter/energy had a role in it instead though.

You can also say that there was another universe that created this one. Humanity with a few hundred more years of technological and manufacturing development could recreate the big bang. We have a fair idea of how to do it, just not the energy.


Careful there, if you are using accelerated reference frames, 99.999% of the physics you know doesn't apply. General relativity is above my paygrade, but its such a complicated topic that most theories you see out there make a mistake there.

Anyways the whole point of this post is that if you have a object behind you that is moving slower than you but still in the same direction as you, and you are moving away from it at a accelerated rate but also in the same direction, it will appear that object is not moving towards you but in reality it is. If you look in front and are moving in the same direction as something in front and it is moving faster than you in the same direction of you, it will appear that it is moving in a different direction away from you.

It appears the universe is expanding from the observer in the middle of the space jet stream. The red and blue shift theory, would still apply to this "theory".

To think every group of 2 holds 2 units, is also a assumption, have you inspected every set of 2?

I am not a expert, but I think what created time itself... well duration. Was the creator of all creators, now you may ask what created the creator of creators. Since it created duration/time I think that the Creator is ∞ and just always was, nothing else can explain it. We all live inside the Omniscient, It lives outside of the bubble of time, We live inside of it. It is total awareness and total oblivion. I think all the relgions point to some satan diety or devil. If the creator lives outside of time it would already know what it was going to create. It would not be as foolish to create something that would try and destroy it, It just does not make sense to me.  It is not bound by the laws of duration like everything else, it must know everything instantaneously.

Welcome to my faith.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O28LhIyIs_8

It wants willing participants to become their own creators, just how like you make friends, you don`t force people to be your friend, they are willing.
This life is for you to see why things are they way they are, Trust me it already knows.

anyways, getting a little past the point of how space works. Please note: feel free to believe in whatever you want to, I don`t mind, in the "church of bitcoin or whatever you want to call it" you can have multiple faiths ^_^

result from preexisting alternate universes?

So the big bang was created by a big bang?   I know there is the omniverse in which there was no time, because if we follow that creators make creations. Well something had to create Duration, but what created that thing? another big bang?

The model I shown accounts for red and blueshift.

Where did the dust come from? (another big bang?) Where did the gas come from? (another big bang?) where did that big bang come from?

I can't tell if this thread is a joke or not. If it isn't, I'd be happy to walk through the proof with you. If you meant for this thread to go into off topic as a sort of joke, I'm not going to waste my time.

Keep in mind, any explanation I can provide only applies ~ 10^-40 seconds after the big bang. Anything before that is very heavily theory based, and above my ability to try and tell you what the most likely theory is. You can call it a result from preexisting alternate universes, god, dark matter, or a period of absolute nothingness where time itself did not exist. If you are fine with that, I can bring up what we can tell about the creation of the universe based on cosmic background radiation and redshift.

The Big Band theory doesn't mention anywhere that the universe was created from nothing.
Before the universe the was dust and gas that eventually got compressed under enormous gravity into very small space that finally exploded.The heat from the explosion created all the chemical elements.The universe was created from dust and gas.
My explanation isn't very accurate,because my english  isn't very good.

you got me there, pal

All of the contents of space are moving towards the core, At different speeds in the jet stream.
Here is the joke
How the Universe Works - From The Big Bang To The Present Day - Space Discovery Documentary   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dMYmzeZXxMM

It was a big bang alright, your Mom opened her legs for your Dad.

Fred Hoyle is right, Look around you. Show me one thing created from nothing, your big bang is a joke. Eisenstein if I do not move and duration or time goes by, is space and time connected? The universe is not expanding.  

This is a invisible jet stream is space (kind of what the turtles ride in finding nemo) Hubble observed the star in front and behind from the middle. He was convinced that it was expanding because of where he sat in the observation.




Show me one thing that is created from nothing, One thing. I will show you billions upon billions that are created from something.



We also need to fix the weight distribution we are on a lop sided tire.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u7ChmVanORE