your citation has nothing to do with sybil attack nor bitcoin
Swan Bitcoin has absolutely no business being used as a citation for the Cantillon effect. what are you talking about?
And you also explained the Cantillon effect wrong like they did?
Whats going on franky!?
https://github.com/jalToorey/IdealMoney/wiki/On-Cantillon-and-the-Szabonian-Deconstruction-of-the-Cantillon-Effect
i said
the YOUR citation in this topic(the wikipedia link and quote) has nothing to do with sybil or bitcoin (this topic)
as for the swan website. it just reads as the same BS tricks you do of name spamming
in swans case its cantillion.. in your case its nash
both of you miss the point of actually understanding the underlying economics of things you both quote
swans case is he could simply say fiat is inflation. bitcoin is deflation and not need to name spam X-effect or reverse-X-effect
much like you misunderstand many bitcoin economic stuff but just want to throw in some Nashisms