In my opinion, it's okay if they were taken to EU and better than US.
That's a bad idea, IMO. The Europeans are already dealing with huge refugee inflows from Syria and the Mediterranean. The refugee camps are overflowing, and every day, thousands of refugees are arriving in Italy, Spain and Greece. Why can't the United States share a small part of the burden?
Thats why I said europe has been a good place to refugee, since thousand of them is living now there with the provision of they have skill to get a job. I think US government maybe doesn't mind to sharing for refugee, but I guess US people, it would be difficult to accept them since one of their ethnic group has ruined the country with terror bomb in Boston. It just will be another discrimination for Chechens.
As some one from the US, I can say with a fair bit of confidence most people have no idea the Tsarnaev brothers were Chechen. Even if they did, I am not sure that the attack in Boston would be the main reason most people in the US would resist allowing mass immigration here from there. I would think the first thing on their minds would be the long standing conflict with Russia, and how much bloodshed there has been between the 2 groups, and the potential of it overflowing here.
Additionally our economy is suffering and there are already lots of difficulty for many people finding employment, and taxes are already very high. More immigrants would be more of a financial burden and also less availability for employment. Also the USA is absorbing a very large Latino population from Mexico and South America already. Tolerance for the additional financial burden would be one of the main issues.
In my opinion this lax immigration policy is a strategy being undertaken all over the world by various governments in a bid to promote socialism and divide people amongst themselves in the resulting crime and chaos that comes along with the immigration. After all if there is chaos, of course people will beg the government for help and grow even more dependent on it.