Topic: The Case of the sinning Saint (Read 396 times)

Because its the Indian section. bhai moderator toh hai nahi, koi bhi aake kuchh bhi bak raha hai. - I mean, since we have no moderator, any tom dick and harry is coming here and posting shit and getting away with it.



I deleted 1 post because @33bitcoin called you gay. I wasn't going to let this thread go to shits like most of your shitposts.  Nothing between you and me is personal and I am not letting some douchebag come here and call someone gay or any other form of insults.

wow.. tldr to the rest of your message but a really good job in understanding the title of a thread that clearly states "How Indian Govt. cheated the whole nation (NewsFlash)" - I don't understand how you are actually expecting anyone to assume that you just saw "newsflash" and jumped in to say copy paste an unrelated topic article without a single word written by yourself.

Seriously, are you dumb? or pretending to be? I don't understand. And I don't want to. Stop what you're doing and put an end to this drama of yours saying that I am here to defame you.


Looks like we have another cherry picker here!

Listen, I don't care about which campaign you stay in or you don't. If your shitposts disturb the experience of any average user and especially for a nobody like me, then I will raise my voice.

I don't understand why your local French moderator keeps meriting you and how you amassed all that merit when you are clearly incapable of understanding a simple sentence.

I've said enough, I've made my case. You had your chance to respond. Now, this thread is going to be locked. You sir, you can go back to earning merits. If I find you shitposting again, I will create another thread and I will tag you. What happens after that, that'll no longer be my concern.

I like the news and I'm happy to read them when other members post them. And I don't think, but maybe I'm wrong it's forbidden or a bad practice to post them. It's the first time I read that. On the most commented thread, the Wall Obverser thread, most of posts are news and are merited by renowned members so I think you're wrong or I missed something.

I don't know why people's should go another sub-board for increase post count instead of posting own sub-board. It's really a worst idea that a user just use copy paste full post or most of part  and use reference link. Look like they are using reference link for avoid ban. We should use small quote from anywhere just for reference instead of full quote. I think if a user did same like on multiple thread, then likely moderators would temp ban.

Why not just use the links with your own post ? It's not really necessary copy paste and use reference link. Why not write your own article and add more link for reference?

What are you seeking Legendster???
You want to hijack me from this campaign, that's your goal?

You first defamed me by accusing me of "plagiarized post" for a simple news while my post had a link, a title in bold, a clear journalistic style and last but not least was posted in a thread called "(Newsflash)".
And because I defended myself against your ignominious defamation, you're now digging to try to find the most borderline post you can find to punish me???
If you were an honest member, you'd have already apologized for your first defamation. If you were an honest member you'd have talked to me before viciously attacking me on the Cloudbet thread.

I came to the Indian board for the Cloudbet campaign, because it's the goal of this campaign to post in the local sections(Philippines, Indian, Russian & French).
But as you can see in your own post you welcomed me by attacking me and saying I "should stick to my french communities" because I"do not understand the Indian mentality" (in bold) which is highly agressive for a newcomer who doesn't know the members of a section. (And I think it's against the rules because everybody can go everywhere here and doesn't belong to only one community)

So I didn't try to comment anymore on the threads but to only post few interesting news about India when I found them.
I've only posted 9 posts in total in the Indian section in 10days, and earned 2 merits from 2 Indian members for them. So you can't say I've spammed "your" board.
Moreover Hhampuz can check that I didn't need to post in the Indian section to rich the maximum paid posts of the campaign. I easily reached it with my posts in the french section.

Now you are accusing me with this post you found by digging in my history and you are saying this post which didn't pose a problem to anyone until now, is bad because we could think it has been written by myself and is not an article despite the link... but Who could think that?
Everybody talks english in the indian section and on bitcointalk in general.
Which honest guy can think from the very first sentence  "According to the official, the draft bill named “Banning Cryptocurrencies and Regulation of Official Digital Currencies Bill 2019” is currently being discussed by several ministers from a number of government divisions." is a creation of a member and not the quote of the link below which is Cointelegraph??  

I obviously forgot to put this title in bold, maybe a mishandling on my part on my tablet, I don't know. I'm sorry for that, but is it so serious?
The sentence is above the text, and the journalistic style is obvious, and again nobody can think a post talking about "A committee formed of — but not limited to — the Department of Economic Affairs (DEA), the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT), the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC), along with the Investor Education and Protection Fund Authority (IEPFA)" is not a quote from a newspaper. I didn't mix a single comment of mine, this is just the main quotes of the article.
So I don't think an honest man can pretend I tried to fool people.

Furthermore if it was a malicious act on my part, don't you think I'd have deleted or edited it since your vicious accusation of yesterday?  
As I said to you yesterday, I got 21merits from 10 different people this week, so I don't need to do this kind of fat and malicious things to fill some quotas or whatever reason.  

Edit: BTW why your thread is in self moderated mode?   And why a post had already been deleted by you? WOW! Is it a trap?


 

I don't like the way people are stealing entire articles (robbing the original author of a web hit) and justifying it by adding a link to the source.

The accepted method is to copy the first few sentences, and that is it.

But maybe that doesn't qualify them for the signature campaign?

In my opinion, whilst putting the article text in a [ quote ] block would, in my opinion, be the "best" way to go about quoting articles... Putting the link to the article makes it fairly obvious what the source of the article actually is.

It isn't like the user is attempting to hide or obscure the source of the text, or pass it off as their own work (a critical component of plagiarism).

So, personally, I wouldn't call this a case of plagiarism at all... more "poor posting style". Having said that, simply quoting an article with no critical thought, discussion or "added value" could possibly be classified as "shitposting"... Even the OP in that thread is doing the same thing...

Read again. I explicitly mentioned he's a Frenchman. In case you don't know what that means - He's from France. I am from India. Please don't refer to us as "that Indian" or that guy as "that French guy" that's not a nice way to address someone.

based on what Ive seen in the meta, he will be perm banned.  Seen people perm banned for a couple lines of plagiarized content.  That indian probably needs that campaign to survive, oh well, gg.

I just hope he doesn't get banned or whatever. That'd be sad. I know how helpful these sig camp incomes can be. It's kept me afloat at times. I don't want to see someone lose their income because of something stupid they said.

Thank you for this thread legendster. After looking more closely at it a decision has to be made sooner rather than later, unfortunately.

About a day or two ago, I ran into this French gentleman who jumped into the Indian section - because his signature campaign encourages posts in local boards.

Now don't get me wrong, there is nothing wrong with that campaign requirement, but to find someone who's jumping in the local boards in the middle of a thread and post something that is completely unrelated is a little bit annoying, to say the least.

As a result, I posted a warning on his campaign thread so the CM can take a look. Here's a sc of my post below.



To which his reply was this :


As you guys can see, he's been posting somewhat off-topic replies in the Indian thread and obviously, copy-pasting stuff. He thinks I was out to defame him, honestly, I don't have time to track such shit. It was just something that came up when I was browsing the thread myself. He didn't exist for me before these couple of days and I am sure the feeling is mutual.

And then I ran into another one of his posts, take a look :



Compare that with this



Word-for-word copy paste, no quotation to show it is actually sourced from the main site.

The only part of his post where he does use quote marks - to indicate that he is copying from somewhere, is a quoted statement itself that the article pulled from CryptoKanoon twitter handle.

---

Here's my question,

Am I wrong here to point out that this guy is jumping in a thread with off-topic copy paste jargon just so his posts look big and mighty at first glance but in reality they're not adding any value to the discussion that's going on, disrupting it with something entirely off topic?
I mean come on! We're discussing how the Indian govt is cheating its people and out comes Mr Saint with a post about some blockchain certification course?

And then he goes on to compare my "merit" in the last 120 days vs his and how he was "merited" more number of times than I was?
I've never been in the merit game and I've voluntarily given away merit in the past through merit giveaway campaigns. Why would I go out of my way to "defame" him? And frankly, that pissed me off a bit.

If any mod sees what Mr Saint here is doing is in clear violation of the copy-paste rule of the forum, please don't ban him. Just clarify to him that what he's doing is wrong and I am not out here on a Saint-hunt.

Also, if I am wrong, do let me know. I would modify my posting behaviour as well. Just put the link to an article and copy paste in everything from there.


And finally, to answer Mr Saint on this quuestion :

That's right. I am no-one.