Topic: The Consecutive Betting Strategy: Unlocking Massive Potential from Small Bets (Read 298 times)

Mathematics cannot be beaten. The mathematical theory of probability is what underlies all gambling.

At the same time, the founders of bookmakers and online casinos, of course, know the basics of the mathematical theory of probability.

Therefore, formal game strategies, as a rule, are ineffective in practice. A player using such game strategies, in the long run, will certainly lose all his bets. In sports betting, your competitive advantage will not be some "magic" game strategy, but a good understanding of the mechanics of the game process.

If you have access to exclusive information about certain sports competitions, about players, about coaches, about the peculiarities of their interaction, then you have a chance to win.

Consecutive winning in gambling can be possible and impossible as far as bettors decisions on bets are unpredictably decisive a base on luck to win.

I have read numerous articles and had also followed steamers up with their claimed winning strategies but all had been of no better chances than what a common predictors like you and I are.

So I am not going to waste my energy giving this claim another trial because if it really works, you OP would had been ont top of the world richest by adopting this strategy. So I don't know why you are spreading unverified information to us here.

I thought that this post was a scam. Why is this post still on the forum?
OP, if this "system" is really working, congratulations. You have found the "unlimited money making machine/system/strategy". Now go ahead and make millions out this so called "system". I'm sure that the crypto casino, that is going to be exploited will go bankrupt in no time.
By the end of this super-long screenshot I see something about tampermonkey scripts. It reminded me of an old G2A scam involving the victims using a tampermonky script in their browser. "Unlocking massive potential from small bets"? Yeah, right...

I tried the strategy with Limbo using an 8.14x multiplier and a 271% increase on a win. My betting size was $0.01, and I ended up losing around $2.50. The best streak I achieved was three wins in a row—there’s no way I could reach six. I’d rather buy a lottery ticket with better odds and bigger win.

To be honest, I have not tested this game strategy in practice. At the same time, I am quite skeptical about its effectiveness.

In my opinion, there can be no guaranteed winning strategies in gambling based on luck. Any online casino is a commercial organization. The main goal of any commercial organization is to make a profit.

Accordingly, online casinos will never organize gambling, understanding that there are strategies that guarantee a player a constant win. The founders of online casinos are well aware of the basics of the mathematical theory of probability. They are also good businessmen and strive to make a profit, not losses.

In order to win in any game, you need a competitive advantage. The game strategy described above, in my opinion, is not a competitive advantage that can guarantee a player a win in the long term.

Small consistent bets are great, but let's not forget about the house edge, which will definitely show up in most cases. When you report a fantastic win, it can confuse and confuse naive people. But everyone knows about winnings, and a huge number of losers are silent about their losses. This strategy has a right to exist, like all similar strategies, but we should collect more complete honest statistics not only about winners, but also about losers. I would suggest stopping playing after a big win.

I think its important for us to know when to start and how to use a match combination for the bet we are going for, this will make us achieve what we intends for, in terms of managing our fund, the risk as well as the match combinations for the beauty of what we want to have from gambling, also for me, i see it a more accurate decision that we use a low budget on gambling at the initial stage before we continue to grow and expand in it, this will taught us on how to manage what we have effectively, because the risk would have been reduced as well to the barest minimum.

There are lots of strategies invented out there with price selling on the market; they actually do some analysis on any casino games and create a strategy saved in PDF and sell it to the market just like this.
But what I see is that the author or the creator of the strategy already made a profit by selling it, because if the author is actually making money from this strategy, why would he share it to public?
I do not believe the strategy will work. If he shares this with anyone, I am sure casino owners or developers will counter this strategy if they discover it works.

Like others said, games like Limbo are pure luck-based; anyone can make their own analysis to study and make strategy, but still, this kind of game always depends on your luck.
Anyway, why not try the strategy since OP said you can start with $1, which is just a small amount, and make it to $5,000 (we will never know if this make money without trying it)? Or you start with a "4-cent bet into $36,000".
It won't hurt your finances to try this strategy with such a small amount of capital.

The Consecutive Betting Strategy: Unlocking Massive Potential from Small Bets

God I have never seen something like this I mean that is WOW  i really meant it. I mean I never knew that there are some people do something like this study the art of gambling haha or at least make profit from gamble it just like a thesis in university.

So it is possible to create money from this

I would still like to see the images a little clearer. You can reach out to me on telegram so I can see some screenshots that are clearer. I won't download anything, but should be easy enough to screenshot images. @yahoo62278 on telegram when you see this.

Been messing with the x4 increase 222% and about break even with it. Tried on regular dice and seems better than limbo far as hitting goes.

I think some of you are misinterpreting the intent of this post. Nowhere did I claim this was some foolproof, unbeatable strategy—because let’s be real, no such thing exists in gambling. I simply shared a PDF that breaks down an approach that has led to some insane wins in the past, including a 4-cent to $36k run that I personally witnessed.

Yes, we all know the house always has the edge, and yes, variance will always play a role. But that doesn’t mean you can’t explore different ways to approach the game. The whole point of this thread was just to discuss an interesting method that has worked in certain scenarios—not to say it will work every time or that it defies the laws of probability. But what I’m getting from some of your replies is—why even discuss different strategies if the outcome is always a loss? That mindset seems a bit dismissive.

If you don’t find it useful or interesting, that’s totally fine. But shutting it down entirely, as if no one has ever benefited from these types of approaches, just seems close-minded. At the end of the day, every gambler is looking for an edge, even if it’s just maximizing opportunities when variance is in their favor. That’s all this is about.

And for Goated, I’m just running the ANN thread here. If you have any questions, feel free to reach out there.

I stopped reading in the middle of the post, but as far as I read, it all depends on luck. No matter what. Yes, it's likely to win but as others mentioned above it's not assured and luck has a crucial role. So, these strategies are good only if luck smiles. If not...

I lost in the middle of reading but I don't see any strategy there as far as I read, it's all just based on the assumptions when everything goes right but that's not how the gambling works and if it's there any pattern at all on our bets then the betting will become obsolete in these years. I said this multiple times but anyway marking it again, the previous results of your bets are completely irrelevant for your future bets, each and every bet holds the same probability/randomness of the user win.

I don’t think it’s a good marketing strategy to promote a so-called winning method to gamblers as some might be delusional enough to believe it’s real. Instead, promotions should focus on things like bonuses and, more importantly, ensuring that deposits and withdrawals are processed instantly. I think that’s what gamblers care about the most.

The only casino games where you can win against the house is Blackjack, but you need to use card counting. However, if they catch you, they will ask you to leave.

In Roulette, it is possible to win against the house, but only if the wheel has a flaw or is miscalibrated, causing it to favor certain sections more frequently.

In Baccarat, you can only gain an advantage if you can spot patterns on the back of the cards and recognize whether they are high or low (edge-sorting). However, this is not considered a legitimate strategy.

Games like Limbo and Dice, which have a built-in house edge, offer no strategy or way to beat them. You are essentially playing against an algorithm that is designed to win in the long run.

If anyone claims they can consistently beat a casino game in the long run, they wouldn’t be here talking to you. Instead, they would be making huge profits rather than convice you of a so-called winning strategy.

Some gamblers though do not seem to count their profit over the long run. They like to only consider how much they earn per match or per round. Depending on how much was the initial bet.
Well, you really can’t avoide house edge anyway. It’s called house edge for a reason. No matter how much you play, house always wins.

Automated Features can ruin whatever is your game strategy . I know that the more you stake on lower odds consecutively, the higher your chance of winning. Which boasts your moral to double your stake. But you can't be certain that this method is going to work for you, because you are playing against a system that you don't fully understand and you are not the one that built it plus it wasn't built to favor you.

A major gambling factor is luck. No matter the game you are playing, live sports or casino games, luck plays a big role. Someone else knows this method, has used it, and it didn't work. Someone else did, and it worked. That goes to show that your luck comes before your strategy in gambling. So let's keep that in mind. It's okay to try new strategies, try someone's idea, it might just fall into place for you. But know that your luck comes before your strategy, always.

I've tried running this game before but I was so unlucky to hit a consecutive losing streak and I lost my whole balance. After that, I did not play Limbo again as I was so scared that it might happen again.
The PDF is long so I just read some parts of it since I already understand how the game works. This is still an algorithm-based strategy and if the algorithm won't go your way then it could regret in the future. Imagine increasing the amount you bet by x1000 and the automated feature kept on working losing everything. That's going to be a big regret. Let's also consider how weak a gambler could be when he sees the profits. He might not even continue what is written there.
Let's not forget, that the one who claimed he did hit that amount could be at the right time only but it doesn't mean it will happen to us too.

I did read the image but I couldn't find anything what gives u a edge over a normal betting since there is none.

You mentioned a strategy with an 8.14x multiplier and a 271% increase on each win, aiming for 3-6 consecutive hits with a solid stop-on-win rule. The fact that you specify a range of 3-6 consecutive hits before stopping indicates a lack of consistency in the strategy, suggesting that decisions are based more on intuition and luck rather than a structured approach.

But allright, lets say you stop on 4 times consecutive hits and increase your bet by 271% on each win.

Win 1:

Bet size: 0,10$ * 8,14 = 0,814$

Win 2:

Bet size: 0,10$ * 3,71 = 0,37$
0,37$ * 8,14 = 3,02$

Win 3:

Bet size 0,37$ * 3,71 = 1,38$
1,38$ * 8,14 = 5,12$

Win 4:
Bet size 1,38$ * 3,71 = 5,12$
5,12$ * 8,14 = 41,71$

This means that if you start with €0.10, you could make a profit of around €44 after 4 consecutive wins, assuming it happens on the first try. But let's break this down further. Since the chance of hitting 4 wins in a row is about 1 in 4,386 attempts, there will be multiple possible outcomes over these 4,386 attempts. Let me summarize them for you

Losing instant : 4,386 * 87,71%= 3847 times
Single win : 4,386 * 12,29% = 539 times
Double win : 4,386 * 1,51% = 66 times
Triple win : 4,386 * 0,18% = 8 times
Quadruple win : 4,386 * 0,02% = 1 time.


Expected losses and winnings.

Loss before 1st win = 3847 times * 0,10$ = 384,70$
Win on 1st attempt = 0,10$ * 7,14 * 539 times = 384,85$

Loss after 1st win(losing on 2nd bet) = 473 times * 0,37$ = 175,48$
Win after 1st win (winning on 2nd bet) = 0,37$ * 7,14 * 66 times = 174,83$

Loss after 2nd win (losing on 3rd bet) = 58 times * 1,376$ = 79,81$
Win after 2nd win(winning on 3rd bet) = 1,38$ * 7,14 * 8 times = 78,60$

I can continue this and everytime the expect loss will be nearly same as the winnings. Some rounding differences, but you get the point.

Additionally, I haven’t factored in the house edge, which would decrease the chances of winning. So, the numbers I’ve stated are actually more positive than the reality because the calculation assumes 8.14x multiplier actually happens 1 in 4,386 attempts.

However, one factor I haven't taken into account is cashbacks/rakebacks, which can increase your EV. But in no scenario is a casino game truly beatable

The reason you are winning is that you hit the right streak of luck, but in the long run, the casino's edge will catch up. You mention a strategy with a 271% increase in bet size after each win, which results in a high standard deviation, meaning your outcomes will fluctuate significantly and be more volatile. While you may experience substantial wins, you are also exposed to the risk of significant losses.

Also, you being an official or promoter of an online casino leaves a bad taste in my mouth. The title is pure clickbait, designed to lure people into gambling under the illusion that they can make a profit—like they've discovered the next life hack to beat the system

Playing more in the casino means you are exposed to more house edge which is not profitable in the long run.

Yes, you can have a good run with this strategy sometimes but it’s not consistent since it’s still based on luck whether you will hit high multiplier earlier or not. But general in RNG based gambling is you need to play the shortest as possible in able to avoid the house edge.

The longer you play means you will experience already the house edge.

You just put a square peck in a square hole and that's exactly how it is about games that are dominantly luck based. It doesn't only may not work the next day but it's something that doesn't work for everyone.

A strategy that works for X may not work for Y. It's preferable to stick to our strategies that are giving us some considerable positive outcomes, even 3x wins out of 5x we gamble. In as much as we're not in a constant losing position then it's not a bad strategy than borrowing a strange strategy proposed to be somewhat consistent when we all aware that there's no consistently winning strategy except you just got lucky for a period.

 I like this betting method, but It looks really hard to get those consecutive wins, I mean, if we try to get x10 5 consecutive times, we will get a lot of x10 4 consecutive times, and we will lose those big profit on the way.

From my point of view and experience is better to directly chase the big multiplier than chasing the consecutive wins, but the fun fact is how odds are the same, there are the same odds of getting 3 consecutive x10 than hittihng x1000

Not once did I say that this was some sort of unbeatable strategy or one that should be used religiously lol, if you guys read the document you would see its explaining how there is instances where this is a huge part of the game. Where numbers can hit back to back and yield very high results.


Stating the obvious here^ you obviously did not read anything in the post.

Anyone claiming they can beat the casino with games that have a house edge should be considered unreliable.

If you look at the statistics, games like Limbo and Dice have a built-in house edge of around 1%, meaning that for every $100 wagered, you will lose an average of $1.

You can profit in the short run if variance is in your favor, and certain strategies may help you take advantage of this. However, a few consecutive losses can quickly deplete your entire balance, and in the long run, the house edge ensures that variance will work against you.

I gave the x4 multi increase by 222% a try and did end up making $50 from it, but then tried to run it a 2nd time and lost $30, so while the strategy can work, it does not always work so anyone who might try, keep that in mind and only gamble with what you can afford to lose.

It's hard to read the pdf you have posted and you should enlarge the images so people can actually read the strategies.

Doubt on everything what people said about they found secret recipe to success on their betting and other things said about sure profit to get when they use this strategy since there's actually nothing like that exist. Its crazy that if there's really a successful strategy that can generate those profit they say does people who knows it would really share that? For sure not right?

So they are just trying to exaggerate everything and want to caught curious people to try what they are saying. For sure gambling is all about luck and mixed up with good discipline then also proper planning if they have this provably they can take some profits from bets  made if they are winning.

Another strategy as a variation of the Martingale strategy. However, this is accompanied by some scientific evidence, which I certainly am not going to read. Because a document of unknown origin can be written by anyone, which means it may contain pseudoscientific information. An authoritative document is an article published on Arxiv.org.
And of course, the pictures prove absolutely nothing. Now anyone can generate mountains of different images and even generate videos where they win a million dollars for each spin. You just have to play without fooling yourself with pseudo-strategies. Of course, this is a purely subjective opinion, which I do not impose on anyone. Everyone plays the way they want to.

That's the thing, it's all about luck and so we all know that Lady Luck is not going to smile on us every time. And it's all about the timing, and I do not think that there is certain strategies here.

It's good that he had so called unlock the potential from small bets, and for sure you are all aware that there are a lot of slot competitions and there are hitting massive multiplier like x4000 or higher. But do they found the secrets? I doubt that, they for sure are going to admit that they got lucky that time.

So, you’re an official rep of Goated.com casino, right?

Thanks for sharing the strategy, but honestly, I doubt it’s a consistently winning one. Games like this are purely luck-based, so what works today might not work in the long run. I appreciate the effort you put into listing all of this, but to be real, I didn’t bother reading it all, you know, I still stick to my own principles when it comes to luck-based gambling.

---