I’m far from an epidemiologist so I’m not going to go too deep into it but I declined to take the vaccine. I am not old & I am in decent health. I actually had COVID & it wasn’t too bad. I will not be taking an experimental/new vaccine.
I have seen lots of reports of blood clots, people dying from the vaccine.
I will not put it in my body.
Topic: The Covid shots may lead to a weak immune system - AIDS (Read 78 times)
I completely agree with your post right here I havent done the shots when the virus was at its peak to me it seems worthlees, good point though! 
https://www.voiceforscienceandsolidarity.org/scientific-blog/vss-scientific-updates-during-pandemic-times-16
By expert Geert Vanden Bossche
1. AIDS-Like"Chronic Covid" is Taking Over Europe, Australia and NZ
“Chronic Covid is a situation where the vaccinated cannot develop natural immunity, cannot quickly clear infections, and remain ill and infectious for extended period of time. Such repeat infections progressively damage their immunity to the point of not being able to clear Covid at all. That would lead to people being chronically infected, infecting others, and overwhelmed with toxic Covid viral proteins,while remaining immuno-suppressed.”
By expert Geert Vanden Bossche
1. AIDS-Like"Chronic Covid" is Taking Over Europe, Australia and NZ
“Chronic Covid is a situation where the vaccinated cannot develop natural immunity, cannot quickly clear infections, and remain ill and infectious for extended period of time. Such repeat infections progressively damage their immunity to the point of not being able to clear Covid at all. That would lead to people being chronically infected, infecting others, and overwhelmed with toxic Covid viral proteins,while remaining immuno-suppressed.”
This guy explain more.
"However, the ratio of binding to neutralizing antibodies after vaccination was greater than that after natural infection and, at the monoclonal level, we found that the majority of vaccine-induced antibodies did not have neutralizing activity."
"This is not good. Now we know why the stabs target very high antibody titers -- several times that of natural infection, and the doses were not adjusted down.
I had wondered about that: It makes exactly no sense to target wildly-higher titers than natural infection with a vaccine, yet all of the shots do exactly that. The question was why and now we have the answer: A large percentage of the antibodies produced are not neutralizing, so to get enough that are they cranked up the dose.
This is dangerous -- very dangerous -- because the non-neutralizing antibodies can enhance infection. What we don't know, because we didn't take the time, is whether the decay is linear in both sorts or whether one decays first. But again, this is data we did not have before we mass-stabbed people -- and unfortunately it explains why dosing was set where it was and that fact, and the potential bad side of all those non-neutralizing antibodies, which could lead to SEVERE ADE and kill you down the road was never discussed nor explained by any of the manufacturers."
"However, the ratio of binding to neutralizing antibodies after vaccination was greater than that after natural infection and, at the monoclonal level, we found that the majority of vaccine-induced antibodies did not have neutralizing activity."
"This is not good. Now we know why the stabs target very high antibody titers -- several times that of natural infection, and the doses were not adjusted down.
I had wondered about that: It makes exactly no sense to target wildly-higher titers than natural infection with a vaccine, yet all of the shots do exactly that. The question was why and now we have the answer: A large percentage of the antibodies produced are not neutralizing, so to get enough that are they cranked up the dose.
This is dangerous -- very dangerous -- because the non-neutralizing antibodies can enhance infection. What we don't know, because we didn't take the time, is whether the decay is linear in both sorts or whether one decays first. But again, this is data we did not have before we mass-stabbed people -- and unfortunately it explains why dosing was set where it was and that fact, and the potential bad side of all those non-neutralizing antibodies, which could lead to SEVERE ADE and kill you down the road was never discussed nor explained by any of the manufacturers."
Robert Malone said recently he have seen evidence for T-cell damage. AIDS. Anyone have more information?
These studies should have been done before injecting people.
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.03.07.21253098v2
1. You take the shot.
2. You get both protective (good) and non-protective (neutral) or possibly enhancing (very bad), antibodies.
3. The protective antibodies are enough to prevent you from getting seriously sick or dying. We all cheer, and all appears to be well in the world. The results look good -- for a while.
4. Over time the antibody titer wanes. Now you don't have enough neutralizing antibodies but still have some of the bad ones.
Jump to: