Topic: The Current Situation for Chinese Projects, Future Vision and Real-World Usage (Read 301 times)
September 13, 2017, 01:22:22 PM
as crypto currency schemes of business with the finance is still of new in ages with the current times,
those as confines with the customs of barre with information exchange policy in prc
that to requires of more as the deeper evaluation as further to helps with the chance on buyer/partisan from prc to enter field with the
better preference as ready to spends of the proper/fair limit of risks on exchange as appealing the wider chance on outsider advantage
to connect with access to the concrete release of message from the estate of the executant.
that above mention to followed with the anxiety of the partisan with the different field of business as having of shifts on level of expertise.
as those with the accounting, art and different customs of issue of manage with the chance on working of business.
that the established business feels of worry as the new business on crypto to overlap the use of chance to helps as the manage of arrange with the
colaboratives as aiming of good goals of returns with the profit on consequence as the release of risks with the exchange.
the ban to helps as securing the estate position with the rank on business to stands as dominating scenes of business in prc country.
September 12, 2017, 03:23:48 PM
I don't consider this should be seen as a FUD message/ question, but more a realistic analysis question regarding a companies' initial vision and future real-world usage.
So current situation seems to be same for all Chinese projects - Abide by Gov request to offer ICO refund, Chinese cannot participate from here.
From the Chinese project companies' current perspective, we will abide, follow process, issue refund offer, yet project message all is good, from here we carry on, project continues.
What I am questioning, wondering, is, lets say Waltonchain for example. The future vision being every clothes retailer, warehouse etc. will implement their protocol.
If at this early stage all Chinese are being removed from the picture, do these companies believe their vision of all Chinese companies in the future of being able to implement their product? Obviously there is the rest of the world, and if strong, undeniable benefit in real-world usage, will achieve success.
But the huge market population of China must be questionable for future real-world usage of these individual projects?
Do they believe it will come to use in future and be allowable for the huge Chinese population?
My own feeling on this is that I think the real-world benefit for people, economy etc.. (monetary and business efficiency benefit for above mentioned Waltonchain), is just too strong to be denied, and could only by seen as extremely foolish if even to consider to deny.
Is it that right now Govs are just trying to get a handle on, remove the scam element and loosely set a surrounding structure?.
My own take, and I could be completely off-the-mark, is now about creating a pathway for the strong, true future world projects to walk, to get the show on the road and get these undeniable beneficial forces triggered into action.
Of course, anything could happen, will happen, I just wondered what other peoples' take is on current situation and how they think the future may play out.
So current situation seems to be same for all Chinese projects - Abide by Gov request to offer ICO refund, Chinese cannot participate from here.
From the Chinese project companies' current perspective, we will abide, follow process, issue refund offer, yet project message all is good, from here we carry on, project continues.
What I am questioning, wondering, is, lets say Waltonchain for example. The future vision being every clothes retailer, warehouse etc. will implement their protocol.
If at this early stage all Chinese are being removed from the picture, do these companies believe their vision of all Chinese companies in the future of being able to implement their product? Obviously there is the rest of the world, and if strong, undeniable benefit in real-world usage, will achieve success.
But the huge market population of China must be questionable for future real-world usage of these individual projects?
Do they believe it will come to use in future and be allowable for the huge Chinese population?
My own feeling on this is that I think the real-world benefit for people, economy etc.. (monetary and business efficiency benefit for above mentioned Waltonchain), is just too strong to be denied, and could only by seen as extremely foolish if even to consider to deny.
Is it that right now Govs are just trying to get a handle on, remove the scam element and loosely set a surrounding structure?.
My own take, and I could be completely off-the-mark, is now about creating a pathway for the strong, true future world projects to walk, to get the show on the road and get these undeniable beneficial forces triggered into action.
Of course, anything could happen, will happen, I just wondered what other peoples' take is on current situation and how they think the future may play out.
Jump to: