Topic: The Democrats Have no Credible Candidate Yet (Read 469 times)
^^^ But the important question is, How many idiots in the crowd will try to get the not-free stuff the stage-jokers are offering as free.
How many puppets can you put on the same stage, offering "free" stuff.
Last night Democratic debate (as usual) was all about attacking Trump. Whoever attacks the President most gets the prize. I would like to see Dems focused 100% on their primaries and just leave Trump alone, but it seems they can't help themselves.
Democrats' Latest Bright Ideas.
Democrats' Latest Bright Idea
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3BmOGGd-Ivw
https://www.youtube.com/user/MarkDice/videos
Democrats' Latest Bright Idea
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3BmOGGd-Ivw
https://www.youtube.com/user/MarkDice/videos
Today The Democrat party has announced who they are supporting for their candidate for president in the 2020 race.
It is now verified that Trump is a fraud and a traitor to the United States and everything we once stood for. Many of his 2016 supporters (such as myself) suspected he might be but now we know for sure.
I think that Trump could easily be beaten. Gabard would mop the floor with his fake hair. But...
The goal is to get Yael Kushner in eventually. The Donald is just a stepping stone, but he's still the guy that both the RNC and the DNC will be instructed by their bosses to seat as president. The DNC will comply by running another unelectable, but as a safety it will be some kiddie diddler who the Zionists who own the country have dirt on and could live with should the impossible happen. My guess is that it will be Biden.
I lost a lot of sleep in 2016. But not this time. Trump is going to have it easily in 2020. I pity those who still believe in polls. The only poll that matters is the Patriotic Americans who comes out well ahead of schedule in every Trump's rally. They will do the same in election day.
I don't believe democrat don't have a credible candidate,it depends on the speech of each of the nominies and the third speech to try to convince the electorate,that matters
Credible as far as the way they live their lives is one thing. Credible as far as strength to beat Trump doesn't exist.
Trump rating is reducing and the American public are not happy with him especially the way he talks to women I. Public and his international relationship with some countries is not that smooth
Women's lib is really "women's lip." Talk to women the way they ask to be talked to by the example of the way they say what they say.
The former us vice President during the Obama administration is a good candidate , because during Obama era,he was outstanding and also he played a key role during his administration
He's unhealthy. He is physically weak. That's besides the foolish Dem programs he supports.
Good and speech that tried to convince your electorate is the main antidote,to convince people and the laudable programs you can put in place for the electorate
Credible as far as the way they live their lives is one thing. Credible as far as strength to beat Trump doesn't exist.
Trump rating is reducing and the American public are not happy with him especially the way he talks to women I. Public and his international relationship with some countries is not that smooth
Women's lib is really "women's lip." Talk to women the way they ask to be talked to by the example of the way they say what they say.
The former us vice President during the Obama administration is a good candidate , because during Obama era,he was outstanding and also he played a key role during his administration
He's unhealthy. He is physically weak. That's besides the foolish Dem programs he supports.
Good and speech that tried to convince your electorate is the main antidote,to convince people and the laudable programs you can put in place for the electorate
That's right. That's the way to win. That's how Trump won when a large popular majority was against him the first time.
He knows this, and is fighting hard - often behind the scenes - to do it this way again.
Trump should have it easier this time. Why? Because the quiet majority understands the benefits he is giving the country. But more importantly, God is recognizing the benefits.
I don't believe democrat don't have a credible candidate,it depends on the speech of each of the nominies and the third speech to try to convince the electorate,that matters
Trump rating is reducing and the American public are not happy with him especially the way he talks to women I. Public and his international relationship with some countries is not that smooth
The former us vice President during the Obama administration is a good candidate , because during Obama era,he was outstanding and also he played a key role during his administration
Good and speech that tried to convince your electorate is the main antidote,to convince people and the laudable programs you can put in place for the electorate
Trump rating is reducing and the American public are not happy with him especially the way he talks to women I. Public and his international relationship with some countries is not that smooth
The former us vice President during the Obama administration is a good candidate , because during Obama era,he was outstanding and also he played a key role during his administration
Good and speech that tried to convince your electorate is the main antidote,to convince people and the laudable programs you can put in place for the electorate
^^^ ... and a Hillary heart. 
Good idea! And since this monster will of course be transgendera, the upper chest section from ...?
Wait. Since demcrats are believers in feeding off the public tit, and since this is a Frank-N-Dem, can it have six or ten tits?
And maybe two or three heads. They could always be arguing with each other.
Frank-N-Dem
Mwahahahahahahaha.
^^^ ... and a Hillary heart.
Good idea! And since this monster will of course be transgendera, the upper chest section from ...?
Wait. Since demcrats are believers in feeding off the public tit, and since this is a Frank-N-Dem, can it have six or ten tits?
And maybe two or three heads. They could always be arguing with each other.
^^^ ... and a Hillary heart.
.....
I think Trump would make Biden look pretty bad in the debates, but I don't see him doing that to Bernie. Bernie just needs a VP running mate that will attract whatever voter base he's missing. My choice would be Tulsi Gabbard -- I think that's an unstoppable ticket. Buttigieg would also be acceptable -- guy is super sharp. Its lame to say it but his last name is kind of a mess; thats why he'll never be president. Reminds me of Paul Tsongas, that was probably the last least attractive name for a candidate. Yes, I do believe people are that stupid. Voters, anyway.
For now, we're stuck with Biden as the Dem challenger unless he fucks up badly somewhere between now and the primary.....
I think Trump would make Biden look pretty bad in the debates, but I don't see him doing that to Bernie. Bernie just needs a VP running mate that will attract whatever voter base he's missing. My choice would be Tulsi Gabbard -- I think that's an unstoppable ticket. Buttigieg would also be acceptable -- guy is super sharp. Its lame to say it but his last name is kind of a mess; thats why he'll never be president. Reminds me of Paul Tsongas, that was probably the last least attractive name for a candidate. Yes, I do believe people are that stupid. Voters, anyway.
For now, we're stuck with Biden as the Dem challenger unless he fucks up badly somewhere between now and the primary.....
You don't suppose some science types could maybe put together a Frank-N-Dem from all these half wits?
Maybe a Bernie arm, and a Biden arm, a Williamson head, a Buttigieg butt, a couple of legs from ... hmm...
Now that logical people have seen the good that Trump is doing, many of them are going from Democrat to Republican. It will be harder than ever for someone to face Trump off. That being said...
Ex-Clinton aide: Hillary will run again in 2020
I mean, she probably is all the Dems have at this stage of the game... if she doesn't get sick and die from the pressure of the campaign.
Ex-Clinton aide: Hillary will run again in 2020
Quote from: https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/416164-ex-clinton-aide-hillary-will-run-again-in-2020
Penn, a frequent contributor to The Hill, co-wrote a Sunday op-ed for The Wall Street Journal with Andrew Stein, a former Democratic Manhattan borough president and president of the New York City Council.
"True to her name, Mrs. Clinton will fight this out until the last dog dies," the pair wrote. "She won't let a little thing like two stunning defeats stand in the way of her claim to the White House."
They said Clinton will not allow her "humiliating loss" to President Trumpduring the 2016 presidential race end her political career.
"You can expect her to run for president once again," they predicted. "Maybe not at first, when the legions of Senate Democrats make their announcements, but definitely by the time the primaries are in full swing."
She has two years to review what went wrong during her last campaign bid and make a strategy, they wrote.
"She has decisively to win those Iowa caucus-goers who have never warmed up to her," they wrote. "They will see her now as strong, partisan, left-leaning and all-Democrat—the one with the guts, experience and steely-eyed determination to defeat Mr. Trump."
"True to her name, Mrs. Clinton will fight this out until the last dog dies," the pair wrote. "She won't let a little thing like two stunning defeats stand in the way of her claim to the White House."
They said Clinton will not allow her "humiliating loss" to President Trumpduring the 2016 presidential race end her political career.
"You can expect her to run for president once again," they predicted. "Maybe not at first, when the legions of Senate Democrats make their announcements, but definitely by the time the primaries are in full swing."
She has two years to review what went wrong during her last campaign bid and make a strategy, they wrote.
"She has decisively to win those Iowa caucus-goers who have never warmed up to her," they wrote. "They will see her now as strong, partisan, left-leaning and all-Democrat—the one with the guts, experience and steely-eyed determination to defeat Mr. Trump."
I mean, she probably is all the Dems have at this stage of the game... if she doesn't get sick and die from the pressure of the campaign.
Have you ever seen a bigger hypocrite and a pathological liar than this :
When Obama won
But when it was him
How is it so hard to accept that he's an opportunist!?!
When Obama won
But when it was him
How is it so hard to accept that he's an opportunist!?!
This is a great post and collection of Trump tweets though hardly surprising. Speaking of popular vote, Hillary won the popular vote by the widest margin of a candidate who still lost the election. It's really not gonna take much to beat Trump next time around.
I think Trump would make Biden look pretty bad in the debates, but I don't see him doing that to Bernie. Bernie just needs a VP running mate that will attract whatever voter base he's missing. My choice would be Tulsi Gabbard -- I think that's an unstoppable ticket. Buttigieg would also be acceptable -- guy is super sharp. Its lame to say it but his last name is kind of a mess; thats why he'll never be president. Reminds me of Paul Tsongas, that was probably the last least attractive name for a candidate. Yes, I do believe people are that stupid. Voters, anyway.
For now, we're stuck with Biden as the Dem challenger unless he fucks up badly somewhere between now and the primary.
CNN, by some chance has been able to turn this back on Trump -- check here --> https://www.cnn.com/2019/08/30/politics/joe-biden-donald-trump-truth-2020-campaign/index.html
Ok, I don't like Trump.
But this is pure bullshit.
Biden says shit everyday and it's somehow Trump's fault?
What?
For god's sake you don't have to invent things to shoot at the guy so stop with that xD
Biden has made another horrible gaffe, he's now made up a war star relating to Afghanistan and used it on the campaign trail. People picked up on the fact that it wasn't true, and that he had made it up.
CNN, by some chance has been able to turn this back on Trump -- check here --> https://www.cnn.com/2019/08/30/politics/joe-biden-donald-trump-truth-2020-campaign/index.html
You can check here to find the full story on what Biden said. --> https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/as-he-campaigns-for-president-joe-biden-tells-a-moving-but-false-war-story/2019/08/29/b5159676-c9aa-11e9-a1fe-ca46e8d573c0_story.html
CNN, by some chance has been able to turn this back on Trump -- check here --> https://www.cnn.com/2019/08/30/politics/joe-biden-donald-trump-truth-2020-campaign/index.html
You can check here to find the full story on what Biden said. --> https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/as-he-campaigns-for-president-joe-biden-tells-a-moving-but-false-war-story/2019/08/29/b5159676-c9aa-11e9-a1fe-ca46e8d573c0_story.html
....
How is it so hard to accept that he's an opportunist!?!
How is it so hard to accept that he's an opportunist!?!
What's an opportunist? Someone who picks apples from a tree when there are apples to pick?
No, an opportunist here would be someone claiming apples are evil and dangerous for health when their neighboor are selling apples and he's selling pears, but saying apples are delicious and make you live longer when he has apples to sell.
Amazing how Trumptards swallow whatever their god emperor order them to.
Democrats are like the people that went down with the Titanic, except for one thing. Democrats can get off and walk away, but they would rather go down.
....
How is it so hard to accept that he's an opportunist!?!
How is it so hard to accept that he's an opportunist!?!
What's an opportunist? Someone who picks apples from a tree when there are apples to pick?
No, an opportunist here would be someone claiming apples are evil and dangerous for health when their neighboor are selling apples and he's selling pears, but saying apples are delicious and make you live longer when he has apples to sell.
Amazing how Trumptards swallow whatever their god emperor order them to.
....
How is it so hard to accept that he's an opportunist!?!
How is it so hard to accept that he's an opportunist!?!
What's an opportunist? Someone who picks apples from a tree when there are apples to pick?
It will be a landslide. But for the Democrats. Unless and until the dems are fool enough to nominate a overconfident person like Hillary, Trump doesn't stand a chance to win.
Remember, even with so much campaign and so called "silent majority", trump lost the popular vote, and won by swinging the three states with a mere of around 11000 votes.
I don't think blue will repeat the same mistake it did in 2016.
Remember, even with so much campaign and so called "silent majority", trump lost the popular vote, and won by swinging the three states with a mere of around 11000 votes.
I don't think blue will repeat the same mistake it did in 2016.
Despite having basically all mainstream media against him, celebrities claiming that they will leave the country if he wins, scaring people that United States will become some fascist state and all that hysteria, he still won.
Now everyone saw that no such thing happened, no celebrities moved, and everything is ok, democrats will have much harder job , people wont be so easily scared like last time. Therefore Trump will win more easily this time.
It will be a landslide. But for the Democrats. Unless and until the dems are fool enough to nominate a overconfident person like Hillary, Trump doesn't stand a chance to win.
Remember, even with so much campaign and so called "silent majority", trump lost the popular vote, and won by swinging the three states with a mere of around 11000 votes.
I don't think blue will repeat the same mistake it did in 2016.
Remember, even with so much campaign and so called "silent majority", trump lost the popular vote, and won by swinging the three states with a mere of around 11000 votes.
I don't think blue will repeat the same mistake it did in 2016.
Hillary got the 3million popular vote from California alone where illegals are allowed to vote. Where all sorts of voting malpractices goes on. That is not a good way to win. And don't forget the recent report about how Google shifted as much as 10million votes to Hillary. Neither should you forget the espionage against Trump's campaign.
If you don't see Trump winning in a landslide, you're simply not paying attentions. Try and attend one of Trump rallies near you and get enlightened. America is 100% behind the president for this 2020 election. Patriotic Americans, I'm not talking about the lost souls and those who are here to destroy the USA.
Google did what? Lmao.
And yeah, when your candidate loses then you shout "illegal". Do you remember when trump tweeted about Obama that Obama is president elect even though he lost the popular vote? (Although after that, Obama won the popular vote as well lmao). So then, trump forgot about "illegal" votes?
Now that he won due to the electorate system, he is gonna validate it as the best system.
Now, don't forget that majority of the youth voters lean blue. And add the new number of young voters who are gonna vote for the first time this election.
Even Hillary's rallies had massive crowds. Guess what? She lost.
Have you ever seen a bigger hypocrite and a pathological liar than this :
When Obama won
But when it was him
How is it so hard to accept that he's an opportunist!?!
It will be a landslide. But for the Democrats. Unless and until the dems are fool enough to nominate a overconfident person like Hillary, Trump doesn't stand a chance to win.
Remember, even with so much campaign and so called "silent majority", trump lost the popular vote, and won by swinging the three states with a mere of around 11000 votes.
I don't think blue will repeat the same mistake it did in 2016.
Remember, even with so much campaign and so called "silent majority", trump lost the popular vote, and won by swinging the three states with a mere of around 11000 votes.
I don't think blue will repeat the same mistake it did in 2016.
Hillary got the 3million popular vote from California alone where illegals are allowed to vote. Where all sorts of voting malpractices goes on. That is not a good way to win. And don't forget the recent report about how Google shifted as much as 10million votes to Hillary. Neither should you forget the espionage against Trump's campaign.
If you don't see Trump winning in a landslide, you're simply not paying attentions. Try and attend one of Trump rallies near you and get enlightened. America is 100% behind the president for this 2020 election. Patriotic Americans, I'm not talking about the lost souls and those who are here to destroy the USA.
If there's a recession, any of them would at least have a chance.
Even absent a recession, I think Buttigieg or Sanders would have pretty high probabilities of winning. Buttigieg is really good at coming across as stable, which a ton of people have been missing with Trump, but he also comes across as honest, and he doesn't have much baggage. Sanders has a lot of credibility and passion, and he eats into a big chunk of Trump's base, though his policies may be too far left for the wider electorate.
No matter what you want to accomplish, overconfidence is one of the biggest mistakes you can make. That's how Hillary Clinton lost. Paths exist for anyone in the race to win against Trump, or for Trump to win against anyone, even if some paths are pretty unlikely.
Even absent a recession, I think Buttigieg or Sanders would have pretty high probabilities of winning. Buttigieg is really good at coming across as stable, which a ton of people have been missing with Trump, but he also comes across as honest, and he doesn't have much baggage. Sanders has a lot of credibility and passion, and he eats into a big chunk of Trump's base, though his policies may be too far left for the wider electorate.
No matter what you want to accomplish, overconfidence is one of the biggest mistakes you can make. That's how Hillary Clinton lost. Paths exist for anyone in the race to win against Trump, or for Trump to win against anyone, even if some paths are pretty unlikely.
My GF is closely blood related to Buttigeg and I have met a lot of his immediate family from where he is originally from but he is way too far left for us..
It's a shame but we aren't about to support him because we know him..
Trump is too far left for me too but is easily the lesser of evils so Trump 2020 for sure..
Buttigeg is a queer and flaunts it to his advantage with the libtards posting trash about transexual rights etc.. Gross..
Sanders is a flippin commie - enough said..
Ateast Trump got us some decent scotus judges and hopefully gets another one soon from RBG retiring or whatever..
I want someone stronger on the 2nd amendment than Trump though..
Trump is a centrist really but America is pretty centrist and I think Trump has done decent to keep our centrist country strong, but I am not centrist, i'm more anncap, but the USA isn't just going to go straight libertarian/anncap and we need to keep up our huge military or be destroyed at the first sign of weakness so I have to compromise my views for what's best for the current America..
We can never be small government libertarian isolationist because they would come attack us as soon as we let our guard down guaranteed..
IMO what we need is to keep the huge military because it is our only option to stay alive now, but they can leave us the F alone with their laws and cut the heck out of all welfare programs..
I like the dog eat dog darwinism the strong survive philosophy but good luck getting people to agree to let poor people starve to death and die on the streets now that we have fed baithed and housed them like babies for so long..
We are just too far gone already in that aspect to completely reverse it immediately..
That's the problem with democrat candidates now, a lot of them simply went way too left for an average American to even think about giving them a vote. You have to be a bit more towards centre in order to get enough voters, leaning too much on either side is simply not good.
If United States backs down and goes more for isolationism, don't have any doubts whether China or Russia will try to have more influence around the world.With all it's flaws, United States are light years away when compared to those 2 countries, so i would rather have them as the only true superpower.If you don't believe me, ask people in eastern Europe that lived behind iron courtain for 45 years how was it there for them. Even eastern part of Germany still feels the effects of having soviets as bosses.
It will be a landslide. But for the Democrats. Unless and until the dems are fool enough to nominate a overconfident person like Hillary, Trump doesn't stand a chance to win.
Remember, even with so much campaign and so called "silent majority", trump lost the popular vote, and won by swinging the three states with a mere of around 11000 votes.
I don't think blue will repeat the same mistake it did in 2016.
Remember, even with so much campaign and so called "silent majority", trump lost the popular vote, and won by swinging the three states with a mere of around 11000 votes.
I don't think blue will repeat the same mistake it did in 2016.
If there's a recession, any of them would at least have a chance.
Even absent a recession, I think Buttigieg or Sanders would have pretty high probabilities of winning. Buttigieg is really good at coming across as stable, which a ton of people have been missing with Trump, but he also comes across as honest, and he doesn't have much baggage. Sanders has a lot of credibility and passion, and he eats into a big chunk of Trump's base, though his policies may be too far left for the wider electorate.
No matter what you want to accomplish, overconfidence is one of the biggest mistakes you can make. That's how Hillary Clinton lost. Paths exist for anyone in the race to win against Trump, or for Trump to win against anyone, even if some paths are pretty unlikely.
Even absent a recession, I think Buttigieg or Sanders would have pretty high probabilities of winning. Buttigieg is really good at coming across as stable, which a ton of people have been missing with Trump, but he also comes across as honest, and he doesn't have much baggage. Sanders has a lot of credibility and passion, and he eats into a big chunk of Trump's base, though his policies may be too far left for the wider electorate.
No matter what you want to accomplish, overconfidence is one of the biggest mistakes you can make. That's how Hillary Clinton lost. Paths exist for anyone in the race to win against Trump, or for Trump to win against anyone, even if some paths are pretty unlikely.
My GF is closely blood related to Buttigeg and I have met a lot of his immediate family from where he is originally from but he is way too far left for us..
It's a shame but we aren't about to support him because we know him..
Trump is too far left for me too but is easily the lesser of evils so Trump 2020 for sure..
Buttigeg is a queer and flaunts it to his advantage with the libtards posting trash about transexual rights etc.. Gross..
Sanders is a flippin commie - enough said..
Ateast Trump got us some decent scotus judges and hopefully gets another one soon from RBG retiring or whatever..
I want someone stronger on the 2nd amendment than Trump though..
Trump is a centrist really but America is pretty centrist and I think Trump has done decent to keep our centrist country strong, but I am not centrist, i'm more anncap, but the USA isn't just going to go straight libertarian/anncap and we need to keep up our huge military or be destroyed at the first sign of weakness so I have to compromise my views for what's best for the current America..
We can never be small government libertarian isolationist because they would come attack us as soon as we let our guard down guaranteed..
IMO what we need is to keep the huge military because it is our only option to stay alive now, but they can leave us the F alone with their laws and cut the heck out of all welfare programs..
I like the dog eat dog darwinism the strong survive philosophy but good luck getting people to agree to let poor people starve to death and die on the streets now that we have fed baithed and housed them like babies for so long..
We are just too far gone already in that aspect to completely reverse it immediately..
I think the only Candidate on the Democratic side that has a chance to win the presidency is Biden, he's the only one that can light up moderates (and enough of the base) to be able to win the office. But with that said, I think picking him after picking Clinton a year before is a slap in the face to the progressive side of the party that wants to give someone 'new' a chance in the party.
They're done with the cabal of people handpicked by the elites, they want a progressive. But I doubt any of the progressives have a chance anyway.
They're done with the cabal of people handpicked by the elites, they want a progressive. But I doubt any of the progressives have a chance anyway.
I have watched all the Democratic Candidates with keen interest, trying to figure out if there is any serious contender who's capable of taking on Trump. Sadly, I have seen none. Not even close! All I see are confused set of crazy loons who doesn't even know what they are vying for. Some are so out of touch that they choose to go to Mexico to organize rallies. 
Everyone of them focusing on Trump even though they haven't got close to winning their own party primary, let alone coming face to face with Trump.
Are we looking at the biggest Presidential election landslide in the history of America? Who do you think is capable of taking of Trump, it doesn't matter the party? Because it seems Trump conquers everything and anything that stands in his way.
Everyone of them focusing on Trump even though they haven't got close to winning their own party primary, let alone coming face to face with Trump.
Are we looking at the biggest Presidential election landslide in the history of America? Who do you think is capable of taking of Trump, it doesn't matter the party? Because it seems Trump conquers everything and anything that stands in his way.
I believe that there is a reason why they seem crazy.
Assume for a second that they are believing and operating from a perspective not American, but "world wide Socialist progressive."
That would be quite different than a perspective rooted in American towns, factories, schools, and people.
But then it all makes perfect sense, doesn't it?
If there's a recession, any of them would at least have a chance.
Even absent a recession, I think Buttigieg or Sanders would have pretty high probabilities of winning. Buttigieg is really good at coming across as stable, which a ton of people have been missing with Trump, but he also comes across as honest, and he doesn't have much baggage. Sanders has a lot of credibility and passion, and he eats into a big chunk of Trump's base, though his policies may be too far left for the wider electorate.
No matter what you want to accomplish, overconfidence is one of the biggest mistakes you can make. That's how Hillary Clinton lost. Paths exist for anyone in the race to win against Trump, or for Trump to win against anyone, even if some paths are pretty unlikely.
Even absent a recession, I think Buttigieg or Sanders would have pretty high probabilities of winning. Buttigieg is really good at coming across as stable, which a ton of people have been missing with Trump, but he also comes across as honest, and he doesn't have much baggage. Sanders has a lot of credibility and passion, and he eats into a big chunk of Trump's base, though his policies may be too far left for the wider electorate.
No matter what you want to accomplish, overconfidence is one of the biggest mistakes you can make. That's how Hillary Clinton lost. Paths exist for anyone in the race to win against Trump, or for Trump to win against anyone, even if some paths are pretty unlikely.
Bernie Sanders lost any credibility in my eyes when he supported Hillary after she beat him in the presidential nomination race. I didn't agree with him, but at least i respected his beliefs.
First democratic party screwed and derailed Bernie with various false claims.After Hillary won nomination, he decided to support her, despite the fact that he is fighting against people like her his whole political career. So he basically threw all of his ideals under the bus, for god knows what reason, so all he is talking now doesn't have any weight. If they didn't let him go against Trump when he actually had some chance of winning, no hell they will let him go now. Democratic party would rather have someone like Biden, no matter how bad as candidate he is.
Bernie is simply using presidential candidacy to make some quick millions. He knew for sure he doesn't have any chance of ever becoming the president of the United States. He's never had any credibility, only appears to be credible in the eyes of people who don't know him.
If there's a recession, any of them would at least have a chance.
Even absent a recession, I think Buttigieg or Sanders would have pretty high probabilities of winning. Buttigieg is really good at coming across as stable, which a ton of people have been missing with Trump, but he also comes across as honest, and he doesn't have much baggage. Sanders has a lot of credibility and passion, and he eats into a big chunk of Trump's base, though his policies may be too far left for the wider electorate.
No matter what you want to accomplish, overconfidence is one of the biggest mistakes you can make. That's how Hillary Clinton lost. Paths exist for anyone in the race to win against Trump, or for Trump to win against anyone, even if some paths are pretty unlikely.
Even absent a recession, I think Buttigieg or Sanders would have pretty high probabilities of winning. Buttigieg is really good at coming across as stable, which a ton of people have been missing with Trump, but he also comes across as honest, and he doesn't have much baggage. Sanders has a lot of credibility and passion, and he eats into a big chunk of Trump's base, though his policies may be too far left for the wider electorate.
No matter what you want to accomplish, overconfidence is one of the biggest mistakes you can make. That's how Hillary Clinton lost. Paths exist for anyone in the race to win against Trump, or for Trump to win against anyone, even if some paths are pretty unlikely.
Bernie Sanders lost any credibility in my eyes when he supported Hillary after she beat him in the presidential nomination race. I didn't agree with him, but at least i respected his beliefs.
First democratic party screwed and derailed Bernie with various false claims.After Hillary won nomination, he decided to support her, despite the fact that he is fighting against people like her his whole political career. So he basically threw all of his ideals under the bus, for god knows what reason, so all he is talking now doesn't have any weight. If they didn't let him go against Trump when he actually had some chance of winning, no hell they will let him go now. Democratic party would rather have someone like Biden, no matter how bad as candidate he is.
If there's a recession, any of them would at least have a chance.
Even absent a recession, I think Buttigieg or Sanders would have pretty high probabilities of winning. Buttigieg is really good at coming across as stable, which a ton of people have been missing with Trump, but he also comes across as honest, and he doesn't have much baggage. Sanders has a lot of credibility and passion, and he eats into a big chunk of Trump's base, though his policies may be too far left for the wider electorate.
No matter what you want to accomplish, overconfidence is one of the biggest mistakes you can make. That's how Hillary Clinton lost. Paths exist for anyone in the race to win against Trump, or for Trump to win against anyone, even if some paths are pretty unlikely.
Even absent a recession, I think Buttigieg or Sanders would have pretty high probabilities of winning. Buttigieg is really good at coming across as stable, which a ton of people have been missing with Trump, but he also comes across as honest, and he doesn't have much baggage. Sanders has a lot of credibility and passion, and he eats into a big chunk of Trump's base, though his policies may be too far left for the wider electorate.
No matter what you want to accomplish, overconfidence is one of the biggest mistakes you can make. That's how Hillary Clinton lost. Paths exist for anyone in the race to win against Trump, or for Trump to win against anyone, even if some paths are pretty unlikely.
I have watched all the Democratic Candidates with keen interest, trying to figure out if there is any serious contender who's capable of taking on Trump. Sadly, I have seen none. Not even close! All I see are confused set of crazy loons who doesn't even know what they are vying for. Some are so out of touch that they choose to go to Mexico to organize rallies.
Everyone of them focusing on Trump even though they haven't got close to winning their own party primary, let alone coming face to face with Trump.
Are we looking at the biggest Presidential election landslide in the history of America? Who do you think is capable of taking of Trump, it doesn't matter the party? Because it seems Trump conquers everything and anything that stands in his way.
I initially thought that Joe Biden would have been a great frontrunner who would be able to challenge Trump but it seems that even if he did win in the end, I am afraid that he wouldn't pose a great risk to Trump re-election into the white house. Bernie Sanders is however gathering steam just like he did during the last election, he has the ability to draw in the youth. Everyone of them focusing on Trump even though they haven't got close to winning their own party primary, let alone coming face to face with Trump.
Are we looking at the biggest Presidential election landslide in the history of America? Who do you think is capable of taking of Trump, it doesn't matter the party? Because it seems Trump conquers everything and anything that stands in his way.
You know the saying "If you’re not a socialist before you’re twenty-five, you have no heart; if you are a socialist after twenty-five, you have no head." That explains his popularity among idealistic youth that are prone to pipe dreams like new green deal.
I have watched all the Democratic Candidates with keen interest, trying to figure out if there is any serious contender who's capable of taking on Trump. Sadly, I have seen none. Not even close! All I see are confused set of crazy loons who doesn't even know what they are vying for. Some are so out of touch that they choose to go to Mexico to organize rallies.
Everyone of them focusing on Trump even though they haven't got close to winning their own party primary, let alone coming face to face with Trump.
Are we looking at the biggest Presidential election landslide in the history of America? Who do you think is capable of taking of Trump, it doesn't matter the party? Because it seems Trump conquers everything and anything that stands in his way.
I initially thought that Joe Biden would have been a great frontrunner who would be able to challenge Trump but it seems that even if he did win in the end, I am afraid that he wouldn't pose a great risk to Trump re-election into the white house. Bernie Sanders is however gathering steam just like he did during the last election, he has the ability to draw in the youth. Everyone of them focusing on Trump even though they haven't got close to winning their own party primary, let alone coming face to face with Trump.
Are we looking at the biggest Presidential election landslide in the history of America? Who do you think is capable of taking of Trump, it doesn't matter the party? Because it seems Trump conquers everything and anything that stands in his way.
I have watched all the Democratic Candidates with keen interest, trying to figure out if there is any serious contender who's capable of taking on Trump. Sadly, I have seen none. Not even close! All I see are confused set of crazy loons who doesn't even know what they are vying for. Some are so out of touch that they choose to go to Mexico to organize rallies.
Everyone of them focusing on Trump even though they haven't got close to winning their own party primary, let alone coming face to face with Trump.
Are we looking at the biggest Presidential election landslide in the history of America? Who do you think is capable of taking of Trump, it doesn't matter the party? Because it seems Trump conquers everything and anything that stands in his way.
Everyone of them focusing on Trump even though they haven't got close to winning their own party primary, let alone coming face to face with Trump.
Are we looking at the biggest Presidential election landslide in the history of America? Who do you think is capable of taking of Trump, it doesn't matter the party? Because it seems Trump conquers everything and anything that stands in his way.
That is true, i watched those debates, and i also didn't see anyone who can endanger Trump. What i noticed though is that other candidates were mostly attacking Biden, and that makes me to believe that other candidates are more afraid of him than the others.
Regarding the biggest landslide victory, i don't think that is realistic even if we count only modern presidential elections, let alone if we go back to 19th and early 20th century.Richard Nixon had very strong win in 1972, and i don't think that Trump will be capable of beating that, or even come close.But what i think he is capable of is repeating Obama result in 2008, and even beating that.
I have watched all the Democratic Candidates with keen interest, trying to figure out if there is any serious contender who's capable of taking on Trump. Sadly, I have seen none. Not even close! All I see are confused set of crazy loons who doesn't even know what they are vying for. Some are so out of touch that they choose to go to Mexico to organize rallies.
Everyone of them focusing on Trump even though they haven't got close to winning their own party primary, let alone coming face to face with Trump.
Are we looking at the biggest Presidential election landslide in the history of America? Who do you think is capable of taking of Trump, it doesn't matter the party? Because it seems Trump conquers everything and anything that stands in his way.
Everyone of them focusing on Trump even though they haven't got close to winning their own party primary, let alone coming face to face with Trump.
Are we looking at the biggest Presidential election landslide in the history of America? Who do you think is capable of taking of Trump, it doesn't matter the party? Because it seems Trump conquers everything and anything that stands in his way.
Jump to: