the coins grows as the return with the work of manage from the developer as future user to gains with the differences as gains with the relatives as collecting earning with the decision as displacing unit of possession as exchanging use of monetary with the finance currency of the altcoin schemes of colateration.
Topic: The difference between altcoin developers! (Read 153 times)
this is one of the reasons why i like Litecoin.
i see the developers being actively involved with the coin, and obviously they also have invested in it. and when you have your money invested in something you will do everything in your power to improve that thing.
i see the developers being actively involved with the coin, and obviously they also have invested in it. and when you have your money invested in something you will do everything in your power to improve that thing.
Full disclosure: I created the $1MM SegWit bounty. Now that Bitcoin has activated SegWit, this bounty is no longer needed. That's all! ??
[....]
Well, I wouldn't risk a $200MM (at that time) currency with a risky upgrade if I didn't believe in it myself.
[....]
Well, I wouldn't risk a $200MM (at that time) currency with a risky upgrade if I didn't believe in it myself.
Litecoin never had any ICO, it never had any premine, Charlie Lee never had any advantage over others to get more coins. he either mined them like others or bought them like others
how many other altcoin developers can say the same thing?
how many of them even care about their own project to "buy it"?
this is what we need in altcoin scene. developers who care about their own project at least. not more ICOs, more premines and more developers who look for a way to make more money fast.
Jump to: