To be fair, there is a logic behind this. I guess, in some perverted way, you can indeed solve any problem by printing some money.
Let's say you want to find the Higgs Boson (random example). How could it be possible that you can do such an extraordinary accomplishment by just printing money?
Well, it's easy. First, you need brain power. And this, you have. Thousands of people all around the word are smart enough to imagine a way to detect a Higgs Boson. The problem is that it's difficult for them to convince other people (workers, engineers,...) to build a machine capable of doing that.
The solution: just print the money and give it to the smart people. They will give it to workers in order to convince them to build the machine. The workers don't know that this money has been freshly printed. Or they don't care, as long as they can give it to someone who will not care either. At the end, people accept to work for a money that has been devaluated, and I'm not sure they always realize that. Basically, the whole thing is either a fraud if you disagree with it, or an illusion if you think it's just the magic of monetary policies.
To me, it's a fraud, nothing else than money counterfeiting. It should be a crime, even when the FED does it, and even if it's smart, good intended people who benefit from it.
The process you described has a name - central planning.
It's the same economic theory that is unequivocally debunked, first by
Mises, and then by the utter failure of every centrally-planned economy.
The only reason Western governments haven't gone the route of the USSR yet is because they've been sipping the poison instead of chugging it.
All economies become partially planned if big enough.
A country cannot survive if there is no multi-year planning for lots of things, for instance food crops or energy consumption.
If you can't feed your people they will revolt and your country breaks down. It is that simple.
In reality there is a wide field of stability between completely planned and not planned at all.
The only reasonable choice in our universe is to have stability (planning/structure) on one side and chaos (unplanned/free) on the other.
That is the only way to gain flexibility while protecting the process as a whole.
And in fact all (successfull) systems in the universe follow this principle.
If a structure/system is too rigid it cannot interact with its environment (too much planning).
If a structure/system is too chaotic it cannot maintain its form and will disintegrate (no planning/complete freedom).
This is just the nature of our universe and we need to find a balance between these factors.