Is it opposites day? 
Topic: the hallowed ground of the sacred/ascended satoshi (Read 1055 times)
Good Satoshi, theymos made a funny. Is it opposites day?
Is it opposites day? 
Is this an early april fools joke?
Satoshis postings here are very nostalgia and important. I read almost all of them and its soo on intresting how things worked out
which is why they should be preserved as is.
and then a forked version for comments, and reply
BTCI hereby formally propose it time to Fork satoshi's meme-chain, for both posterity and currencyBTC
satoshi 1.0 to remain pristine for all eternity
satoshi 2.0 to open to all comers, and detrancendentalize him/her/it
I deleted it because the post was strictly a necro bump, and had no real relevance to the thread itself.
Edit:
Banned for trolling
.
Edit:
How dare you question our lord Satoshi's importance! When He returns, you will surely be punished for your heresy.
Banned for trolling
.To funny
How dare you question our lord Satoshi's importance! When He returns, you will surely be punished for your heresy.
yeh nah satoshi will disappear in a puff of logic as I gaze upon him seated on his throne
...actually...come to think of it he already has disappeared in a puff of logic
I deleted it because the post was strictly a necro bump, and had no real relevance to the thread itself.
Edit:
Banned for trolling.
Edit:
How dare you question our lord Satoshi's importance! When He returns, you will surely be punished for your heresy.
Banned for trolling
.
How dare you question our lord Satoshi's importance! When He returns, you will surely be punished for your heresy.
ok so i looked up satoshi as user, and it was kinda cool to see his threads/replys
i decided to reply in one, and realise this sorta sully's the historical record...and I felt kinda hard to explain, like it was a bit sacrilegious/profaneing holy ground vibe.
then some mod/ mod bot deleted it and i was informed by PM
i accept the importance of the Historical records and the policy of making new contemporaneous threads.
However, the fact I felt the vibe of treading on hallowed ground, and that it was deleted, is in a way dangerous, it leads to a cult of satoshi, which is not the way to go.
I think a historical version of satoshi should be made but let people comment in particularly his threads as a means to combat a "religion/cult" of Satoshi developing.
It must be more like a museum and living record, as well as having a historical record, which you could easily create.
There is enough "mystery around satoshi" as it is
and BTCtalk, has a kind of priesthood going replete with symbols eg.
it has the special platinum membership coins...
I'm just not sure its in the best interests of the community to fuel the fire.
Anyway I think you can have the best of both worlds, a backed up no mod historical version and a typed in reply version, that this would be a good idea to let people reply in those threads of the live version....to avoid the cult of satoshi developing
i decided to reply in one, and realise this sorta sully's the historical record...and I felt kinda hard to explain, like it was a bit sacrilegious/profaneing holy ground vibe.
then some mod/ mod bot deleted it and i was informed by PM
i accept the importance of the Historical records and the policy of making new contemporaneous threads.
However, the fact I felt the vibe of treading on hallowed ground, and that it was deleted, is in a way dangerous, it leads to a cult of satoshi, which is not the way to go.
I think a historical version of satoshi should be made but let people comment in particularly his threads as a means to combat a "religion/cult" of Satoshi developing.
It must be more like a museum and living record, as well as having a historical record, which you could easily create.
There is enough "mystery around satoshi" as it is
and BTCtalk, has a kind of priesthood going replete with symbols eg.
it has the special platinum membership coins...
I'm just not sure its in the best interests of the community to fuel the fire.
Anyway I think you can have the best of both worlds, a backed up no mod historical version and a typed in reply version, that this would be a good idea to let people reply in those threads of the live version....to avoid the cult of satoshi developing
You must have more faith in Satoshi. Long may Lord Nakamoto give us our daily Bitcoin. He who forks the chain maliciously shall suffer the wrath. But all is forgiven by the merciful Satoshi when the client is patched and order restored in the realm.
Actually what is the link to Satoshi's username with post history? I'd like to go through and read some of the original posts.
search for satoshi in users to dredge up his posts
ok so i looked up satoshi as user, and it was kinda cool to see his threads/replys
i decided to reply in one, and realise this sorta sully's the historical record...and I felt kinda hard to explain, like it was a bit sacrilegious/profaneing holy ground vibe.
then some mod/ mod bot deleted it and i was informed by PM
i accept the importance of the Historical records and the policy of making new contemporaneous threads.
However, the fact I felt the vibe of treading on hallowed ground, and that it was deleted, is in a way dangerous, it leads to a cult of satoshi, which is not the way to go.
I think a historical version of satoshi should be made but let people comment in particularly his threads as a means to combat a "religion/cult" of Satoshi developing.
It must be more like a museum and living record, as well as having a historical record, which you could easily create.
There is enough "mystery around satoshi" as it is
and BTCtalk, has a kind of priesthood going replete with symbols eg.
it has the special platinum membership coins...
I'm just not sure its in the best interests of the community to fuel the fire.
Anyway I think you can have the best of both worlds, a backed up no mod historical version and a typed in reply version, that this would be a good idea to let people reply in those threads of the live version....to avoid the cult of satoshi developing
i decided to reply in one, and realise this sorta sully's the historical record...and I felt kinda hard to explain, like it was a bit sacrilegious/profaneing holy ground vibe.
then some mod/ mod bot deleted it and i was informed by PM
i accept the importance of the Historical records and the policy of making new contemporaneous threads.
However, the fact I felt the vibe of treading on hallowed ground, and that it was deleted, is in a way dangerous, it leads to a cult of satoshi, which is not the way to go.
I think a historical version of satoshi should be made but let people comment in particularly his threads as a means to combat a "religion/cult" of Satoshi developing.
It must be more like a museum and living record, as well as having a historical record, which you could easily create.
There is enough "mystery around satoshi" as it is
and BTCtalk, has a kind of priesthood going replete with symbols eg.
it has the special platinum membership coins...
I'm just not sure its in the best interests of the community to fuel the fire.
Anyway I think you can have the best of both worlds, a backed up no mod historical version and a typed in reply version, that this would be a good idea to let people reply in those threads of the live version....to avoid the cult of satoshi developing
You must have more faith in Satoshi. Long may Lord Nakamoto give us our daily Bitcoin. He who forks the chain maliciously shall suffer the wrath. But all is forgiven by the merciful Satoshi when the client is patched and order restored in the realm.
Actually what is the link to Satoshi's username with post history? I'd like to go through and read some of the original posts.
I agree, they're there for context - A unique glimpse into the daily mundane, procedural discussion that led to the implementation of the Bitcoin protocol as we know it.
It's not nostalgia, it's context for developers who build on top.
It's not nostalgia, it's context for developers who build on top.
Satoshis postings here are very nostalgia and important. I read almost all of them and its soo on intresting how things worked out
Just don't post in long dead threads, regardless of who started them or posted in them. Basic courtesy, not a cult.
I accept your advice and view in general....
but maybe their needs to be a separate satoshi area, to demystify it all
Just don't post in long dead threads, regardless of who started them or posted in them. Basic courtesy, not a cult.
ok so i looked up satoshi as user, and it was kinda cool to see his threads/replys
i decided to reply in one, and realise this sorta sully's the historical record...and I felt kinda hard to explain, like it was a bit sacrilegious/profaneing holy ground vibe.
then some mod/ mod bot deleted it and i was informed by PM
i accept the importance of the Historical records and the policy of making new contemporaneous threads.
However, the fact I felt the vibe of treading on hallowed ground, and that it was deleted, is in a way dangerous, it leads to a cult of satoshi, which is not the way to go.
I think a historical version of satoshi should be made but let people comment in particularly his threads as a means to combat a "religion/cult" of Satoshi developing.
It must be more like a museum and living record, as well as having a historical record, which you could easily create.
There is enough "mystery around satoshi" as it is
and BTCtalk, has a kind of priesthood going replete with symbols eg.
it has the special platinum membership coins...
I'm just not sure its in the best interests of the community to fuel the fire.
Anyway I think you can have the best of both worlds, a backed up no mod historical version and a typed in reply version, that this would be a good idea to let people reply in those threads of the live version....to avoid the cult of satoshi developing
i decided to reply in one, and realise this sorta sully's the historical record...and I felt kinda hard to explain, like it was a bit sacrilegious/profaneing holy ground vibe.
then some mod/ mod bot deleted it and i was informed by PM
i accept the importance of the Historical records and the policy of making new contemporaneous threads.
However, the fact I felt the vibe of treading on hallowed ground, and that it was deleted, is in a way dangerous, it leads to a cult of satoshi, which is not the way to go.
I think a historical version of satoshi should be made but let people comment in particularly his threads as a means to combat a "religion/cult" of Satoshi developing.
It must be more like a museum and living record, as well as having a historical record, which you could easily create.
There is enough "mystery around satoshi" as it is
and BTCtalk, has a kind of priesthood going replete with symbols eg.
it has the special platinum membership coins...
I'm just not sure its in the best interests of the community to fuel the fire.
Anyway I think you can have the best of both worlds, a backed up no mod historical version and a typed in reply version, that this would be a good idea to let people reply in those threads of the live version....to avoid the cult of satoshi developing
Jump to: