Author

Topic: The idea of justice in the forum. Ranking and grading system. Inspire Admins (Read 130 times)

member
Activity: 1022
Merit: 69
The merit system is a great innovation here, and it seems to be working well. The only thing that needs to be changed is that members need to stop posting about it to try to earn merits.

I do not deny that this is not the case.

On the contrary. I have never seen such a system before. And it's a great plus, because it's probably better than the majority.

This is a very good solution, but I have written this thread because it can always be improved. Who does not develop this rolls up.

Greeting
newbie
Activity: 100
Merit: 0
I think this question belongs to the "Meta" branch of this forum, since the question cannot be solved by Beginners nor help them in fact.
legendary
Activity: 2688
Merit: 2444
https://JetCash.com
The merit system is a great innovation here, and it seems to be working well. The only thing that needs to be changed is that members need to stop posting about it to try to earn merits.
hero member
Activity: 1834
Merit: 759
It's a little too complicated in my opinion. This is a forum at the end of the day, and in my opinion should be kept as lightweight as possible.

Also, what is it exactly that your system is trying to achieve? Trust was introduced to make trading safer, and merit was introduced to reduce the spam problem. What problem does this proposal solve?
member
Activity: 1022
Merit: 69
Quoting my post in my native language sub-forum.
Inspiration for admins in the forum ?
Or maybe additionally (by the way) a new ico with a really big brand and a massacre community, which is bitcointalk ? = EASY WIN ?
Don't you think so?

Idea:

I think you could do something on a blockchain :-) For example:

All actions - actions - reactions of users on the forum - are stored in the blockchain. Each user can Rate and this rating is not displayed to anyone.
Later, e.g. once a week the computer system counts and uses an appropriate algorithm based on proportions and relationships such as:
How many reactions did the fasting arouse?
How many answers per hour/day?
What is the engagement in the thread?
How much has been given in the subject matter of the author how many others, what is the ratio between the dependencies of these people (whether they know each other or not, what are their ranks - e.g. preferably when NEVER before have they become CONFIRMED (to avoid "cronyism") and between such users who have the appropriate STAGE and lack of multi-accounts (including proxy, vpn and many other patents - KYC ;- hah))?

etc, etc

Alternatively, only at the very end of the human factor (trusted people who could sometimes react to something / correct / change) .

I think it was good to do such a system, but it would be good to think about it ;-
And by the way, the great project and the new ICO.
Well, gentlemen with such a potential and opportunity - lets do it
Jump to: