The more there is limit on bounties the fewer the dumper

jebul2

member

Activity: 556

Merit: 10

Quote from: xianbits on December 31, 2018, 12:23:13 AM

Quote from: coinsycrip09 on December 21, 2018, 08:32:27 PM

Quote from: xianbits on December 21, 2018, 08:20:07 PM

Quote from: Callanta787 on December 20, 2018, 11:30:01 PM

Bounty restrictions can fix few problems facing project price drop after listed on exchange,

1) if any dev want to avoid dumpers then they must limit bounty participants, the limit the participants they better ,if a bounty only request 300 participants at highest and the 300 became a dumper it won't hurt ,unlike 2000+ participants

2) devs should forget bounty when still on ICO ,allow bounties after your project finished ICO successfully and make your project is doing great before allowing bounty
This are just ideas ,if you have anything better please drop on here and let's share.

For number one, it doesn't make sense. It's still the same. Whether 300 or 1000, same thing will happen. Example, the budget is 1,500,000 tokens. 300 participants will get 5000 tokens each (not considering the rank or number of followers). 1000 participants will get 1500 tokens each but still would sum up to 1,500,000 token potential for dumping. It is still best to pay bounty hunters in fiat or eth.

well, i'm happy if the bounty hunter participant gets paid with fiat or eth.

but it will not be fair to some people, especially to investors, they will feel it will not be good. i also don't really agree with this, because the price of tokens that we will get will probably be greater than eth or fiat that is given to us.

I think it is just your opinion that investors won't be comfortable that bounty participants will be paid with ETH or fiat. I don't think it is the case. I understand that our reward could be greater if we are to be paid with the token we are promoting but looking at the trend, it is also not the case. But if you may, you can use the ETH paid to you to buy for the token you are promoting and hold. That way, we can be more confident that the price of the token can't be dumped so hard.

yes, very agree bro with your opinion because it is paid by using ETH or BTC if in my opinion it is very detrimental, it's better to pay with the tokens they promote and see further developments in the trade and we hold first.

xianbits

sr. member

Activity: 910

Merit: 257

Quote from: coinsycrip09 on December 21, 2018, 08:32:27 PM

Quote from: xianbits on December 21, 2018, 08:20:07 PM

Quote from: Callanta787 on December 20, 2018, 11:30:01 PM

Bounty restrictions can fix few problems facing project price drop after listed on exchange,

1) if any dev want to avoid dumpers then they must limit bounty participants, the limit the participants they better ,if a bounty only request 300 participants at highest and the 300 became a dumper it won't hurt ,unlike 2000+ participants

2) devs should forget bounty when still on ICO ,allow bounties after your project finished ICO successfully and make your project is doing great before allowing bounty
This are just ideas ,if you have anything better please drop on here and let's share.

For number one, it doesn't make sense. It's still the same. Whether 300 or 1000, same thing will happen. Example, the budget is 1,500,000 tokens. 300 participants will get 5000 tokens each (not considering the rank or number of followers). 1000 participants will get 1500 tokens each but still would sum up to 1,500,000 token potential for dumping. It is still best to pay bounty hunters in fiat or eth.

well, i'm happy if the bounty hunter participant gets paid with fiat or eth.

but it will not be fair to some people, especially to investors, they will feel it will not be good. i also don't really agree with this, because the price of tokens that we will get will probably be greater than eth or fiat that is given to us.

I think it is just your opinion that investors won't be comfortable that bounty participants will be paid with ETH or fiat. I don't think it is the case. I understand that our reward could be greater if we are to be paid with the token we are promoting but looking at the trend, it is also not the case. But if you may, you can use the ETH paid to you to buy for the token you are promoting and hold. That way, we can be more confident that the price of the token can't be dumped so hard.

gohan21

jr. member

Activity: 336

Merit: 1

It's normal to dump participants on bounties Because they need money on their project they promote they want to paid after promoting their business. If they pay btc or eth on every ico on project they will not dumped tokens they giving.

el_lobo

copper member

Activity: 266

Merit: 0

A limit does not want an ico operator if they operate a bounty campaign.
But to prevent a dump of the bounty participants, at least 80-90% of the bounty should be paid out in eth or btc.
For me, this is the only way to prevent a dump from hunters.

Rob768

full member

Activity: 324

Merit: 100

I think that it would be better if the number of participants will be fixed. Also the tokens of bountyhunters should be locked for some months after listing on exchanges. After that there shouldn't be any dumps

sieemma

sr. member

Activity: 980

Merit: 253

No one knows who the dumpers are. For all you know, the dumpers are the successful bounty hunters that will qualify for any bounty campaign no matter how hard they make the bounty to limit participants. If few people are to share the same amount of tokens and they decide to dump, the effect will be more dangerous than more people sharing the same amount of tokens and few deciding to dump the coins.

lrvjvt

member

Activity: 140

Merit: 17

Fast, Smart, Trustworthy

This is just an excuse. I believe that even if there are no bounty hunters, these junk projects will also fail. The root cause of their failure is their own. They promote their ICO with a scam mentality, in order to cover their darkness, they The responsibility for ICO failure was all shirked to the bounty hunter.

senin

full member

Activity: 938

Merit: 137

Quote from: qomariah95 on December 21, 2018, 01:59:00 AM

For the first point it actually really agrees, Maybe with that applied, surely bounty participants will get a lot of payments as well as what they do. But if limiting the number of participants to a certain ICO project will not be spread out to everyone. So if limiting is what will happen.

Now the activity of bounty hunters has plummeted. Many campaigns have signatures of up to ten or several dozen participants. I do not think that a small number of participants will make the ICO project a success. A few percent of tokens are allocated for generosity. That is, the number of allocated tokens will be the same for a hundred or for thousands of participants. However, one thousand participants will cope with the task of advertising the ICO project much better than one hundred. Therefore, limiting the number of participants in an ICO signature campaign is not beneficial for the ICO teams themselves.

guffie

full member

Activity: 546

Merit: 100

In my opinion, limiting the number of campaign participants is also good because it will increase competition. And some Bounty projects have implemented these regulations. And I see that the exchange of coin prices also continues to decline. And we must know that this is not only influenced by the coin-throwing bounty hunter but a large investor who holds a lot of coins.

TWW

full member

Activity: 1456

Merit: 109

we can see a number of campaigns which limit the number of bounty participants with fairly strict regulations. many of the results obtained by the bounty hunter from the campaign bear fruit, with greater rewards because participants are restricted.

grifinmch

sr. member

Activity: 756

Merit: 250

limitation of participants can be a good solution. even this would be giving profit also for the bounty hunter because their competitors are reduced and the results they get big enough. It's just that it will probably affect the amount of marketing becomes more narrow than have many participants in the bounty. But if you can anticipate price reductions then this can be applied and some of the bounties already run it.

Rrtt

member

Activity: 378

Merit: 10

Quote from: Callanta787 on December 20, 2018, 11:30:01 PM

Bounty restrictions can fix few problems facing project price drop after listed on exchange,

1) if any dev want to avoid dumpers then they must limit bounty participants, the limit the participants they better ,if a bounty only request 300 participants at highest and the 300 became a dumper it won't hurt ,unlike 2000+ participants

I think this is not favorable to a project since only a few people would promote the project and the probability of it to be successful will also be low. Locking the tokens for bounty hunters would be a good idea if dumping is the problem here but it is not in all cases that bounty hunters were the one dumping.

ansarose1

member

Activity: 784

Merit: 10

Making this type of idea is a good benefit to all. For example, if the participants are limited to a certain number of bounty hunters, there is no hustle for the project staff and project manager to manage the bounty campaign.

karagun125

member

Activity: 448

Merit: 10

I think this is beneficial. It's true that bounty campaign should limit their participants as there are many other bounties to be participated. It can fix problems and also the stakes can be distributed to participants and happy about it.

coinsycrip09

full member

Activity: 910

Merit: 100

Quote from: xianbits on December 21, 2018, 08:20:07 PM

Quote from: Callanta787 on December 20, 2018, 11:30:01 PM

Bounty restrictions can fix few problems facing project price drop after listed on exchange,

1) if any dev want to avoid dumpers then they must limit bounty participants, the limit the participants they better ,if a bounty only request 300 participants at highest and the 300 became a dumper it won't hurt ,unlike 2000+ participants

2) devs should forget bounty when still on ICO ,allow bounties after your project finished ICO successfully and make your project is doing great before allowing bounty
This are just ideas ,if you have anything better please drop on here and let's share.

For number one, it doesn't make sense. It's still the same. Whether 300 or 1000, same thing will happen. Example, the budget is 1,500,000 tokens. 300 participants will get 5000 tokens each (not considering the rank or number of followers). 1000 participants will get 1500 tokens each but still would sum up to 1,500,000 token potential for dumping. It is still best to pay bounty hunters in fiat or eth.

well, i'm happy if the bounty hunter participant gets paid with fiat or eth.

but it will not be fair to some people, especially to investors, they will feel it will not be good. i also don't really agree with this, because the price of tokens that we will get will probably be greater than eth or fiat that is given to us.

reza7777

sr. member

Activity: 1414

Merit: 255

limit number of participants, the promotion of the project will be less and for no bounty manager that limits participants joining because more participants who join will open up huge opportunities ico will succeed

xianbits

sr. member

Activity: 910

Merit: 257

Quote from: Callanta787 on December 20, 2018, 11:30:01 PM

Bounty restrictions can fix few problems facing project price drop after listed on exchange,

1) if any dev want to avoid dumpers then they must limit bounty participants, the limit the participants they better ,if a bounty only request 300 participants at highest and the 300 became a dumper it won't hurt ,unlike 2000+ participants

2) devs should forget bounty when still on ICO ,allow bounties after your project finished ICO successfully and make your project is doing great before allowing bounty
This are just ideas ,if you have anything better please drop on here and let's share.

For number one, it doesn't make sense. It's still the same. Whether 300 or 1000, same thing will happen. Example, the budget is 1,500,000 tokens. 300 participants will get 5000 tokens each (not considering the rank or number of followers). 1000 participants will get 1500 tokens each but still would sum up to 1,500,000 token potential for dumping. It is still best to pay bounty hunters in fiat or eth.

Viscore

hero member

Activity: 3178

Merit: 661

Live with peace and enjoy life!

Quote from: Dobolen on December 21, 2018, 06:46:40 PM

Give very strict rules and limit the number of participants who join the Bounty. Is a good way to anticipate if later the coin enters the stock market then the price decreases. Now there are many Bounty regulations that use KYC, it can also reduce participants who will commit fraud.

Not totally it could lessen the fraud cause people will find ways in order to be verified with the KYC as they used other identity. Actually, bounty tokens are just small percentage which couldn't fully affect the price even the participants will dump their token. It is on the investors hands who are handed a huge amount of tokens.

Dobolen

jr. member

Activity: 364

Merit: 2

Give very strict rules and limit the number of participants who join the Bounty. Is a good way to anticipate if later the coin enters the stock market then the price decreases. Now there are many Bounty regulations that use KYC, it can also reduce participants who will commit fraud.

trofim21

sr. member

Activity: 658

Merit: 252

I also believe that all rewards should be fixed, and it’s better that all Bounty projects choose highly qualified employees for a reward, you don’t need to confirm 1000 people are better to put a small amount for a reward and take a certain number of high-quality employees

superscommessebitcoin

hero member

Activity: 1176

Merit: 500

The first point is not beneficial for the ICO, as they limit not only trucks, but also themselves in advertising. Bounty hunters do not influence the price of the token that much, so I do not think it is worth changing the rules based on this initiative. The rules need to change for the better for the hunters.

Al-e_x

member

Activity: 560

Merit: 11

if bounty participants are limited, they will not give maximum results for the project. and I think. it's not a good solution. a good solution to avoid a bearish market is to stop the temporary distribution with a small allocation.

internacrypto

jr. member

Activity: 88

Merit: 1

Quote from: Callanta787 on December 20, 2018, 11:30:01 PM

Bounty restrictions can fix few problems facing project price drop after listed on exchange,

1) if any dev want to avoid dumpers then they must limit bounty participants, the limit the participants they better ,if a bounty only request 300 participants at highest and the 300 became a dumper it won't hurt ,unlike 2000+ participants

2) devs should forget bounty when still on ICO ,allow bounties after your project finished ICO successfully and make your project is doing great before allowing bounty
This are just ideas ,if you have anything better please drop on here and let's share.

come on, if bounty was limited they will get a big dump.
If the allocation is $10000 for 100 people this is probably will dump in the market.
but if $10000 for 5000 people maybe someone will be thinking if they want to sell the token

iconoclast

full member

Activity: 770

Merit: 102

Matrix Built On An Ethereum Smart Contract

Quote from: Callanta787 on December 20, 2018, 11:30:01 PM

Bounty restrictions can fix few problems facing project price drop after listed on exchange,

1) if any dev want to avoid dumpers then they must limit bounty participants, the limit the participants they better ,if a bounty only request 300 participants at highest and the 300 became a dumper it won't hurt ,unlike 2000+ participants

2) devs should forget bounty when still on ICO ,allow bounties after your project finished ICO successfully and make your project is doing great before allowing bounty
This are just ideas ,if you have anything better please drop on here and let's share.

Sorry, but you are completely clueless about who is doing the dumping. It is not bounty participants who represent 1 to 2 percent of the tokens. It is people who bought tokens at a discount in the Pre and Private sale. You see companies offering discounts as high as 90% off the ICO price and no holding period restriction on people who buy during the private sale or presale. There are people who make their money by doing nothing except buy early at huge discounts and then dump as soon as it lists.

jpnl0002

member

Activity: 308

Merit: 10

i do not think it is the idea of limitation of bounty hunters that will decrease the rate of dumps but i consider the idea of market been monitored by competent traders and using valid cryptocurrency trading pair to pump it at all time when it wants to be dumped. it is also a measure.

miropp

full member

Activity: 810

Merit: 101

Since bounty companies are now very popular and this leads to a huge stir, it is necessary to take some measures. Limit participants this is a good idea I believe. This will allow bounty hunters to get a fair reward for their work, and the project to receive quality. After all, if a person knows that for his work he will receive a good reward, he will work better.

lotfipro

full member

Activity: 434

Merit: 100

There is no doubt that these ideas are really cool. But as for me, It would be better to freeze partly bountyhunter's tokens. And give them a chance to sell their tokens later after listing.

monineklutak

sr. member

Activity: 1890

Merit: 252

I agree with that because it will also benefit participants of the bounty program because with a limited number of participants, the more results will be received by all participants, especially for campaigns that do not depend on rank and stake, for example telegram campaigns
but developers may prefer if the participants are large because more and more people will be promoting the ICO

basici

jr. member

Activity: 168

Merit: 1

I also think that you need to enter a limit on rewards because there is no need for such a larger number of participants

Abal Abal

full member

Activity: 602

Merit: 100

in fact, I think otherwise, if there are fewer bounty participants, the amount of payment from each participant will increase, and this will create a big chance of a dump. in my opinion.

Santri

full member

Activity: 1092

Merit: 101

in my opinion if want to avoid dumper, team must give little bonus to investor in ICO because fewer bonuses that investors get, dumper in market is more awake ... remember, allocation for bounty is only 0.75% -3% and that doesn't affect dumper in market.

owlman

full member

Activity: 602

Merit: 100

Quote from: Callanta787 on December 20, 2018, 11:30:01 PM

Bounty restrictions can fix few problems facing project price drop after listed on exchange,

1) if any dev want to avoid dumpers then they must limit bounty participants, the limit the participants they better ,if a bounty only request 300 participants at highest and the 300 became a dumper it won't hurt ,unlike 2000+ participants

2) devs should forget bounty when still on ICO ,allow bounties after your project finished ICO successfully and make your project is doing great before allowing bounty
This are just ideas ,if you have anything better please drop on here and let's share.

Firstly: bounty campaigns are conducted so that more people learn about the project and invest in it, respectively, how do you imagine a bounty campaign after a successful ICO Huh

Secondly: I believe that the percentage of tokens allocated to all participants in a bounty campaign is small, and we cannot influence a significant price reduction.

IgorShumilo

full member

Activity: 518

Merit: 105

I agree with the opinion of the author. But I have a slightly different position in this argument. It seems to me that it is necessary not to limit the number of participants, but to make a serious selection of the participants of the bounty program themselves. I think that a person with 1,000 to 10,000 followers on Twitter (90 percent of whom are bots) does not help the project at all. And this problem in all social networks. I think you need to choose quality people for marketing (bounty programs).
I know that now everyone who reads my post will throw rotten eggs at me, but this is my opinion and I have the right to express it.

arimamib

hero member

Activity: 1862

Merit: 574

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Quote from: ruli stylon on December 21, 2018, 01:20:51 PM

Limiting participants, the allocation of funds for prizes will also be limited. This is my experience in following prizes, when there were very few participants, the allocation of funds was also cut.
Not all bounty hunters are scapegoats in the event of a dumper. After listing on the stock exchange, prices have also been discarded by investors.

participants' boundaries can sometimes be beneficial if they provide a large allocation. and for dumping problems in the market many causes that can affect include a big bonus for investors

Warkop

sr. member

Activity: 1302

Merit: 270

Quote from: Callanta787 on December 20, 2018, 11:30:01 PM

Bounty restrictions can fix few problems facing project price drop after listed on exchange,

1) if any dev want to avoid dumpers then they must limit bounty participants, the limit the participants they better ,if a bounty only request 300 participants at highest and the 300 became a dumper it won't hurt ,unlike 2000+ participants

2) devs should forget bounty when still on ICO ,allow bounties after your project finished ICO successfully and make your project is doing great before allowing bounty
This are just ideas ,if you have anything better please drop on here and let's share.

This first idea is great for all ICO projects by limiting the number of prize seekers, but if this is a reason to avoid the dumper from the prize seeker, I think it's wrong, because if their tokens are good and good quality in trading Dumper will not affect market prices for the token itself.

ruli stylon

full member

Activity: 721

Merit: 100

Limiting participants, the allocation of funds for prizes will also be limited. This is my experience in following prizes, when there were very few participants, the allocation of funds was also cut.
Not all bounty hunters are scapegoats in the event of a dumper. After listing on the stock exchange, prices have also been discarded by investors.

jointherevolution

jr. member

Activity: 229

Merit: 3

EndChain - Complete Logistical Solution

But how much 300 bounty hunters will help? A lot? Probably not. You need numbers, even more if what you try to sell is very similar as some other product. You must tell ppl that your product, in this case token or coin, is here and what it is good for. But I have seen that this rarely happens.

gunhell16

hero member

Activity: 1666

Merit: 453

There is a total number of tokens allocated in a bounty and the project team will want solid marketing with many numbers of participants.
The more participants in the bounty the better the spread of word and advertisements.
The fewer the dumper the better? not all participants in bounty are dumpers, some are smart enough to think.
Even there will be few participants, still the number of tokens that might be dump still the same.

jackflag

sr. member

Activity: 630

Merit: 250

Glad to see you

What is the difference how many people participate in the project? The number of coins that they will receive will always be the same, it does not matter if the entire pool is received by 300 or 3000 people. What prevents these 300 people from selling 100% of their awards at once?

kaito.

member

Activity: 336

Merit: 11

mostly bounty pool reward was fixed so it didn't matter how many people will join bounty program it will the same, to prevent bounty hunter dump the coin at market DEV should buy back the coin at public ico price.
as for the bounty after ICO finished that's imposible, DEV team wouldn't want to promote project that already have many investor. bounty hunter job was to promote ICO project to get investor aware of it's project and invest in it.

Galantin

jr. member

Activity: 602

Merit: 2

Quote from: Callanta787 on December 20, 2018, 11:30:01 PM

Bounty restrictions can fix few problems facing project price drop after listed on exchange,

1) if any dev want to avoid dumpers then they must limit bounty participants, the limit the participants they better ,if a bounty only request 300 participants at highest and the 300 became a dumper it won't hurt ,unlike 2000+ participants

2) devs should forget bounty when still on ICO ,allow bounties after your project finished ICO successfully and make your project is doing great before allowing bounty
This are just ideas ,if you have anything better please drop on here and let's share.

Maybe that's enough. Maybe enough already humiliate hunters? the hunter gets 1-5% of the total volume. You understand this amount is not able to bring down the price of a coin. Let the projects change their investment policy. Together with the bonus program which often amounts to + 50% of coins, let them significantly increase prices in stages.

You constantly blame the hunters. Only the problem is not in us but in companies that do not fulfill their conditions.

harapan

sr. member

Activity: 1736

Merit: 306

I disagree, the more participants, the faster the project spreads. it will invite investors to come.
and besides, the allocation of funds for bounty campaign participants is only between 2 - 3% of the total supply. and that does not contribute to the coin dump on the market at all.

KuyaBreezy

member

Activity: 504

Merit: 10

ONe Social Network.

In reality, you are only attacking one symptom, not the disease, the problem is that the market is really low and nobody wants to risk that in two days their investments are worth nothing, it is rare that the only campaigns that have problems with dumpers are coins that in a year halt their development.

demenBTC

sr. member

Activity: 742

Merit: 251

PRIVATE FEDERATED BLOCKCHAIN

Quote from: Callanta787 on December 20, 2018, 11:30:01 PM

Bounty restrictions can fix few problems facing project price drop after listed on exchange,

1) if any dev want to avoid dumpers then they must limit bounty participants, the limit the participants they better ,if a bounty only request 300 participants at highest and the 300 became a dumper it won't hurt ,unlike 2000+ participants

2) devs should forget bounty when still on ICO ,allow bounties after your project finished ICO successfully and make your project is doing great before allowing bounty
This are just ideas ,if you have anything better please drop on here and let's share.

I think the bounty hunter is never a dumper coin, and the problem of reducing participants has no effect on the price of tokens on the market, if you see how many bounty hunters can be allocated only 1% of the allocation made from ico then you don't think so

Patrix_1

member

Activity: 364

Merit: 10

You cannot blame bounty hunters for the token dump. If the team is not doing enough marketing and do not make a bounty lock up until the third exchange, this is their fault, because they have the main responsibility for the token price and not the bounty participants.

Indrawan77

hero member

Activity: 1274

Merit: 516

It makes sense, most of the time now the bounty hunters only joined to sell after the coin hit thr market, but the developers supposed to be already allocated the fund for promotion, I think the one that contribute to the drop is the investors that target the bonus coin during the pre ICO and then will sell after the coin hit the market, I think the developers can limit the distribution per day to prevent huge dropping

libert19

hero member

Activity: 2520

Merit: 952

Agree with first point and to add, they should list there token on good exchange where liquidity is enough, so some sellers don't bring the prices down.

EscrowService28

member

Activity: 166

Merit: 12

“The World's 1st Waste to Green Energy DLT Project

Quote from: Callanta787 on December 20, 2018, 11:30:01 PM

Bounty restrictions can fix few problems facing project price drop after listed on exchange,

1) if any dev want to avoid dumpers then they must limit bounty participants, the limit the participants they better ,if a bounty only request 300 participants at highest and the 300 became a dumper it won't hurt ,unlike 2000+ participants

2) devs should forget bounty when still on ICO ,allow bounties after your project finished ICO successfully and make your project is doing great before allowing bounty
This are just ideas ,if you have anything better please drop on here and let's share.

I think you're mindset really favor on your part. Not with the project progress. Limiting bounty is good but the purpose of it is to spread it from east to west not a single point. Second, why conduct bounty after the ICO? So how the bounty helps in there? If the sales are done. Think mate!

qomariah95

full member

Activity: 1190

Merit: 100

For the first point it actually really agrees, Maybe with that applied, surely bounty participants will get a lot of payments as well as what they do. But if limiting the number of participants to a certain ICO project will not be spread out to everyone. So if limiting is what will happen.

plr

member

Activity: 1162

Merit: 24

Quote from: Callanta787 on December 20, 2018, 11:30:01 PM

Bounty restrictions can fix few problems facing project price drop after listed on exchange,

1) if any dev want to avoid dumpers then they must limit bounty participants, the limit the participants they better ,if a bounty only request 300 participants at highest and the 300 became a dumper it won't hurt ,unlike 2000+ participants

2) devs should forget bounty when still on ICO ,allow bounties after your project finished ICO successfully and make your project is doing great before allowing bounty
This are just ideas ,if you have anything better please drop on here and let's share.

I will only comment on number two of they will not allow bounty, then the ICO will not likely succeed, in the first place this is why they launch a bounty campaign, to reach as many people and investors what we mean is awareness, very very few ICO succeed without bounty hunters.

Andruha1993

jr. member

Activity: 1008

Merit: 1

I completely agree with your opinion. This would be very good if the campaigns did limit the participants. Then the bounty hunters would get more rewards and the ICO price would not go down.

shad_ow90

member

Activity: 224

Merit: 10

dApps Development Automation Platform

Quote from: Callanta787 on December 20, 2018, 11:30:01 PM

Bounty restrictions can fix few problems facing project price drop after listed on exchange,

1) if any dev want to avoid dumpers then they must limit bounty participants, the limit the participants they better ,if a bounty only request 300 participants at highest and the 300 became a dumper it won't hurt ,unlike 2000+ participants

2) devs should forget bounty when still on ICO ,allow bounties after your project finished ICO successfully and make your project is doing great before allowing bounty
This are just ideas ,if you have anything better please drop on here and let's share.

You should know one thing that amount of coins that projects use for bounty campaign is just about 3-5% total coins supply in market and it is not really affect so much. In contrast, benefits that campaigns bring to projects is so much

Bharathi13

member

Activity: 368

Merit: 25

The Standard Protocol - Solving Inflation

Quote from: Callanta787 on December 20, 2018, 11:30:01 PM

Bounty restrictions can fix few problems facing project price drop after listed on exchange,

1) if any dev want to avoid dumpers then they must limit bounty participants, the limit the participants they better ,if a bounty only request 300 participants at highest and the 300 became a dumper it won't hurt ,unlike 2000+ participants

2) devs should forget bounty when still on ICO ,allow bounties after your project finished ICO successfully and make your project is doing great before allowing bounty
This are just ideas ,if you have anything better please drop on here and let's share.

I support your both the points but bounty hunters are not the dumper for your kind information, check projects like HYPERQUANT (https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/hyperquant/) & there were so many projects which distributed bounty rewards after 1 to 3 months listing on the exchange & their values were almost 80% down. Bounty Hunters are always deceived by the projects as they get late rewards & blame for dumping which have been proven with the recent projects that investors too dump the coins/tokens on exchange. Also the total allocation for bounty campaign ranges between 0.5% to 5% which I feel doesn't affect the project.

syypro

member

Activity: 368

Merit: 10

Quote from: Callanta787 on December 20, 2018, 11:30:01 PM

Bounty restrictions can fix few problems facing project price drop after listed on exchange,

1) if any dev want to avoid dumpers then they must limit bounty participants, the limit the participants they better ,if a bounty only request 300 participants at highest and the 300 became a dumper it won't hurt ,unlike 2000+ participants

2) devs should forget bounty when still on ICO ,allow bounties after your project finished ICO successfully and make your project is doing great before allowing bounty
This are just ideas ,if you have anything better please drop on here and let's share.

Perhaps you are right, but what is the point of doing bounty? If the reward is paid to you within a year or two. Or do not pay at all. The project will not develop. I don't think bounty will dump project tokens much. The percentage is too small compared to the total number of tokens. It usually ranges from 2 to 5%

BADBITCH

jr. member

Activity: 532

Merit: 6

Quote from: Callanta787 on December 20, 2018, 11:30:01 PM

Bounty restrictions can fix few problems facing project price drop after listed on exchange,

1) if any dev want to avoid dumpers then they must limit bounty participants, the limit the participants they better ,if a bounty only request 300 participants at highest and the 300 became a dumper it won't hurt ,unlike 2000+ participants

2) devs should forget bounty when still on ICO ,allow bounties after your project finished ICO successfully and make your project is doing great before allowing bounty
This are just ideas ,if you have anything better please drop on here and let's share.

The truth is none of your options can work with crypto currency bounties because you do not understand the basic function of bounty program.

THere is a need for high volume of participants in bounty programs to enhance the global coverage of the project on all social media platforms and its entity.
Secondly, how can a project make sales on icos when there are no publicity ??

Basic solution is to increase the number and levl of tokens offered to bounty programs, that would give them value for work done, because bounty hunters dump when they end up receiving 100, 200, 50, 30 tokens

zupdawg

hero member

Activity: 672

Merit: 508

1. the fewer the bounty participants, the promotion for the project will be limited resulting to low results

2. related to the answer to number 1, bounties will help promoting the project and more people/investors will likely to help the project

batang_bitcoin

hero member

Activity: 3080

Merit: 603

1) they don't care on the limitation of participants. For real, they need it for the exposure of their project.
2) I can't understand it but many ICOs don't finish their project because of lack of budgeting and support to the project.

mummybtc

hero member

Activity: 868

Merit: 500

I am in support of your first point you highlighted, it is better the campaign managers cap the numbers of people needed for their campaign, this will allow them to pick the best people for their campaigns, and this act will definite improve post quality and discussion on this forum. The issue of dumping is subjective, it is true some people dump their tokens on the market but most is because I need money and some because they were able to register more than one accounts and some people up to 10 accounts and have nothing to lose selling at ridiculous prices

Callanta787

member

Activity: 546

Merit: 21

Bounty restrictions can fix few problems facing project price drop after listed on exchange,

1) if any dev want to avoid dumpers then they must limit bounty participants, the limit the participants they better ,if a bounty only request 300 participants at highest and the 300 became a dumper it won't hurt ,unlike 2000+ participants

2) devs should forget bounty when still on ICO ,allow bounties after your project finished ICO successfully and make your project is doing great before allowing bounty
This are just ideas ,if you have anything better please drop on here and let's share.

Topic: The more there is limit on bounties the fewer the dumper (Read 623 times)