Topic: The new syria policy (Read 463 times)

Or against which of those factions will russians lose blood treasure and "bandweight"? Rather than make russian greater, make syria great? For a warm port? LoL. The core problem is overpopulation exponentially growing backed by the jihad ideologies in all the area...

Secondly the narrative that the west would have used syria as a spring board to attack russia is a little irrealistic. How to control them? They merge emerge and split faster than altchains:).

At least it's more or less flat...

a good arm mercheant will say all of them! And a good debt merchant will add but more for the victor as long as he guarantee the debt of the loser:).

The battles for the roads to makkah, a classic. How long will the russians stay is the only real question... the others are there to stay (and die).

Question: who are the russians officials who have the most to lose in this sunny and hot endeavor? They have to be watched carefully... they could be tempted to double (and more) down with the years going.

Palmwars, one of the oldest sport... it's played over generations over the sand...

There are too many warring factions in Syria. There is a Turkish backed militant group in the North-central part, and there is a Kurdish-led group in the North-east and the North-west. To add to the confusion, a new rebel group was formed a few months back in the South-east. So which of these factions enjoy the support from the Americans?

I think it's quite very hot... and getting hotter. But it could all be faked. The ultimate conspiracy like koreas. Pretend to be divided while ready to be reunited. Division has advantages.

What fascinates me is the hadj:



From an outsider with very low understanding of the dynamic and history of it, i can only see the great work and seriousness whit which the saudis take this...

What is the punsihement for rape in maqqah?

But to comeback to assad, the baathists aren't theocratic it's a mix of personnality cuit based on support from minority group to oppress and exploit majority group. I am sure the iranians mullahs despise assad.

Again look at nasralah and the mullahs and compare with assad.

The problem with assad is the heriditary component.

Anyway what ever the breeding rate...

What happen to desert rabbits when the water source is finish?

It is all part of the grand Sunni vs Shiite cold war around the globe. Syria is a Sunni majority country, ruled by a Shiite (Alawite) ruler. The Sunni nations such as Saudi Arabia and Qatar (along with their allies such as the United States and the United Kingdom) want to replace the Shiite dominated Ba'ath party rule with a Sunni Salafist dictatorship. But Assad and his allies (Hezbollah, Iran, Russia.etc) don't want that to happen.

And as early as this war coalition of countries of the West, Russia, Turkey and other countries, participates. Interesting me, why did they climb in the internal affairs of Syria? Probably all have the benefit there. People peaceful very it is sorry.

Something interesting that i never read anywhere... on the other hand the road to damascus is quite an old story.

So to go back who are the idiots who didn't elmininate assad the father when he took power? I guess it's the kissinger? I mean everyone believed that by putting dictators accross the middle east that they could build a demographic time bomb while looting the locals throigh the dictators?


You forgot the main ones... russia, iran, hezbollahs and the arabs...

Of course a large part of the population support assad, all the others have been captured, killed and flee...

Remember what assad father did.... he killed one city, like every good soviet had do to.

Anyway it wil' not possible to chnage the fact that russia again allied itself with the worst of mankind believing to annoy the empire... poor pikers, they still don't understand mercantilism.

A hundred years ago, Syria was around 30% Christian, and back then the Alawites were around 20% of the population. The remainder was divided in to Kurds, Sunni Arabs, Ismailis, Yazidis, Druze.etc. Sunni Arabs became a majority just due to the high birth rates. So you don't need to complain about minorities dictating the terms in Syria.

It is wrong to label the Syrian civil war as a three-way fight between the Sunnis, Shias and the Kurds. There are other players as well, such as the Assyrian and Armenian Christians, and the Druze. Also, a large part of the Sunni population support Bashar al Assad.

Which one?

I don't find the post but there was someone saying that syrian christian support assad... of course assad is allawite, as a small minority in the dictatorship they need henchmen, christian as another minority group was perfect for this task... aka to fill the rank of the admin. It's such a classic of a minority dictatorship, find small other minority group and play them against thr majority... of course when the dicatorship collapses... there are consequences to have sided with the tyran.

Continuing on the subject i am very curious how putin men will solve the struggle... for them they have experience with soviet dictatorship and a population reduced however they have defknitely taken side in the oldest war... then in the area there are a lot of crazies, already before the civil war to overthrow the son of the dictator that i don't see how and what the russians realistically hope to achieve.

And syria is officially at war with israel...

Frankly, this russian victory and siding with the tyran will blow back so much... it would have been way easier to let the west take of the assad crew and concentrate on making russia great... again the chinese are right! Let the barbarian settle their differences and know that no interference with china will be allowed.

Russia attention get diverted to propping stupid dictator, while chinese progress...

yea i didnt like that policy man..

So apprently it's time for the jihadist armies to go to jana aka trump remove any support, right?

What will happen to the sunnis? As shias have won...

Now the kurds. As much as i get fodling the jihadists i don't get folding the kurds. Ok it angers turkey... but turkey is in the jihadis sunni camp.

It illustrate the problem of too many allies... specially when going with savages.

For example allies of soviet union don't mess with allies of soviet union. When soviet union tell that a republic will be splitted a republic will be splitted.

Is there too much autonomy and pursuit of individual state interest of fake allies of usa? Turkey should be split and those kurds get their homeland including syria, irak, iran and turkey.

It could be a regional concept of usa...

But again it ask questions...

Why waste ressources with all this shit? Do kurds deserved to be helped yes. But what's the cost.

It would be nice if china russia and america agreed to create a kurdish homeland. If those 3 agree... good luck opposing.

Once and for all the mess in this area could be solved... how long will it continue? If on'y they were demographically reducing i wouldn't care... but they all expand exponential'y and bring their barbarians ways further and further... they will reach xian soon .

There is always the option of reducing the population... a turkey, irak, syrian and iran with a 1 million population comibined will do way less troubles... and guarantee a few years of calm...........