Topic: The PCR test is creating Covid cases rather than finding them... (Read 292 times)

^^^ Kinda interesting detail you have there Tash. But make it even simpler...

In the wee grades of elementary school, we all learn spelling. Making words out of the alphabet, and making sentences out of those words, is called spelling. If you spell a word wrong in those wee grade levels, you are casting the spell wrong. If a person you cast the spell "to" doesn't recognize intuitively your incorrect spelling, the spell might give him a totally incorrect understanding. And an incorrect understanding might produce an incorrect result.

Be sure that you spell your words correctly so that everybody involved knows exactly what kind of a spell you are casting. And to think that they executed the witches at Salem for casting spells. We are ALL Harry Potters a little... if we can spell.

So, modern schooling teaches witchcraft to all the kids... especially if the school doesn't teach God and the Bible along with the spelling.

Covid-19 Tests Are Cancerous - This Is No Joke
https://rense.com/general96/covid-19-test.php

It's easily possible that the PCR is creating the Covid disease, kinda the way that tvbcof says in an above post. But what I meant was a little different. I meant that the PCR was creating cases, whether or not they have even one virus in them.

Since you can multiply anything with the PCR test, if your choice is a strand of Covid RNA, you will multiply that strand in the PCR, for any person who has/had that strand of RNA in his body at the time of testing. In other words, if the PCR happened to grab the last strand of that particular RNA in swab of the person's body, the multiplication of it in the test, will show that he is a case, even if he doesn't have even one more piece of that strand in his whole body.

Possible, that the PCR test is creating Covid cases instead of just simply finding it. its sad reality we really can't tell how it happened exactly but I also heard it somewhere that they speculating that it is one way how covid spread i don't know but maybe.. maybe... because there are healthy people who has no sickness at all and when they do PCR test the result was Positive how does it happend?.. it's not really reliable as some study it, so we better be careful.

Didn't you see all the nano sized "pokeys" sticking out the sides of the micro sized thread? Of course not. Nano is too small to be seen at that limited magnification.

Please stop trying to use common sense, okay?

watch the video and see the size of the tweezers.
https://i2.wp.com/www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Screen-Shot-2021-04-05-at-1.44.58-PM.png

this is not "nano" size fabric strand.. its micro size
common sense shows this by looking at the reference width of tweezers and then looking at the fabric thickness

also look he has it dipped in water.
yes you can make fabric move in water to avoid showing hands moving it

seems a guy just rubbed his mask/swab against some black fabric and is recording .. pretty much pocket lint
he put on his swab/mask

try to use common sense

https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/new-reports-black-string-like-objects-masks-swabs-danger-or-conspiracy-theory/

maybe you dont reaiise this but nano tech can mean many things.. but those many things are limited
and robots/radio signals and stuff isnt it

so you pulling up a video talking about nanotech 5G robots changing human dna.. is you showing you cant use common sense and cant do research on facts

maybe try quoting science and not 'amateurs'

then once you know what is factually possible vs impossible.. you will then 'know if these things are hoaxes'

Nanotechnology is nothing new and is not some sort of a 'conspiracy theory'.  Pick up any scientism rag  such as New Scientist and you'll find tons of stories about this sort of thing.  Moncef Slaoui has been heavy into this kind of technology for decades and a vocal advocate for it.  Suddenly he was plunked in to head up 'operation warpspeed'.  To look and see if there is anything interesting to be seen with the swabs is a common sense thing to do, and especially since nobody who has a career in any scientific field will touch it since it would be career suicide.  Masks similar.

https://www.technocracy.news/operation-warp-speed-head-and-gates-foundation-are-pushing-bioelectronics-and-vaccine-patches/

so because its not a cotton Q0tip an idiot thinks the swab is a nanotech 5G antenna..
..
ok tvbcof has officially jumped off the cliff of reality and fell into the sea of insanity

common sense and intelligence can see that its hoax/conspiracy/fantasy. but thank you tvbcof for admitting that you have no common sense or intelligence when you say you "have no to know if these things are hoaxes"

Here is a kind of an interesting amateur analysis of one of the test swabs that 'they' rub around in the area close to the brain:

  https://www.bitchute.com/video/t1LFQ6frXVEG/

Another similar exploration on a mask also showed a very similar black thing with very similar reactions to the environment.

I have no way to know if these things are hoaxes, but also no real reason to believe that the various analyses are related to one another.  Even if they are not, copy-cat hoaxes actually are a thing.  Anyway, these are interesting observations to match against other observations.

i already said they 'search for' E S and N protein sequences

the human sequence if found would nullify the test.
finding human sequence would never result in a covid positive test.

what you dont realise is:
DNA has 4 'chemicals'
adenine, cytosine, guanine, thymine

RNA has 4 'chemicals'
adenine, cytosine, guanine, uracil

the thing is.. to amplify human DNA they need to first split dna into single stranded dna (ssdna)
this is a process in of itself thats different to DSrna splitting
 and then add the 4 chemicals of dna to then  to bind to the sing strands to then create 2 pairs of dna

if they put in the RNA chemicals into DNA mix. the ssDNA wont do anything as there is no thymine in it to create a complete DNA.. thus amplification does not happen

..
same goes for RNA. to amplify RNA they need to put RNA chemicals into the mix which creates double stranded RNA(dsRNA)
which they then split into 2 RNA of opposites. this is a process in of itself thats different to DNA splitting
and then add more RNA chemicals to create 2 pairs of dsrna.

putting DNA chemicals into an RNA sample wont amplify RNA as its missing the uracil

..
please do try to learn how things are done and the processes involved. heck even try to learn the common sense differences between RNA and DNA


maybe ill make it simple.. adding RNA reagents to a DNA sample
                                       G T A C G T A C  add chemical  G T A C G T A C
G T A C G T A C              /                                               |  |    |  |  |    |
|  |  | |  |  | |  |                                              C A    G C A    G    
C A T G C A T G              \                                                  
                                       C A T G C A T G   add chemical  C A T G C A T G
                                                                                      |     |  |  |    |  |
                                                                                      G    A C G   A  C

as you can see the amplification fails as it did not create 2 strands of dna. as pieces are missing

maybe ill make it simple.. adding DNA reagents to a RNA sample
                                                                          G U A C G U A C  add chemical  G T A C G T A C
                                            G U A C G U A C          /                                          |  |    |  |  |    |
G U A C G U A C add chemical |  |  | |  |  | |  |                                          C A    G C A    G    
                                            C A    G C A    G          \                                                  
                                                                                 fail
..
so as you can see. trying to amplify human DNA wont amplify viral RNA..
                            trying to amplify viral RNA wont amplify human DNA
using DNA amplification on RNA causes more issues.

..
there are other processes in place that separate RNA from DNA before amplification. as a double check .. things like chloroform and RNase agents. which bind and clump to DNA but dont bind to RNA. using things like rnase laced magnetic particles they can extract the DNA clump without removing the RNA stuff

..
then they look at the RNA left over and amplify it using the RNA agents. and then look for the E S  N proteins identified as sars-cov-2

..i think this is as basic lay-man as i can make it. if you still dont understand or unwilling to learn. then stop wasting another year in ignorance and find another subject to talk about

Says the ignorant franky1, who can't seem to back up much of anything he says, while BADecker backs up almost everything... like the OP, for example.

says the ignorant badecker.
he would rather explain his thoughts as random causes than find out the actual cause.

yep when badecker cant understand anything. he always blames it on governments or god

Actually, random is completely it.

For some strange reason people think that "random" means "accidental" or "spontaneity." Nothing has ever been proven to have come about through spontaneity. Everything comes about for a reason, by cause and effect. What this means is that "random" has another meaning. What is that meaning? "Random" simply means that people are too ignorant and incapable to find out what the causes and effects really are. "Random" means that people are ignorant.

Now you are not as ignorant as you were before you read this. And thanks for prompting me to explain my above post that you quoted.

So random isn't it, our luck is on our side, how lucky we are as a family. I think we're blessed.

chunks or complete chromosome 8..
sections or full sequence..
either way. positive for it=covid negative by default(test is void/classed as fail)

again.. positive for small sequence of chromosome8 = test result never being covid positive

covid positive is not the measure of the 'chunk' of chromosome8.. its the measure of E S N proteins of the virus.
E S and N protein sequences are not chromosome8(or chunks of chromosome8)

chromosome8 chunk sequence as you refer to it. is a separate thing. used as a counter-test to void a test if it shows as positive for the chromosome8 chunk

.. i would explain more but you cant even grasp the basics.

showing positive for a section of chromosome8 means something went wrong.

lets word it another way..
a straight man making love wants to make sure he is making love with a woman. if he finds a scrotum sack(Chromosone8) then he stops and leaves and doesnt complete the sexual act. he classes it as a failed test and does not say its positive 'for woman'
if he doesnt find a scrotum sack. he then continues to look and checks for breasts(e) clitorus(s) and a vagina(n)..
and then he amplifies his exploration
if it takes him 35 attempts to recognised breasts/clit/vagina. then he give up
if he can recognise breasts clit and vagina without many attempts then he is positive that its a woman

a amplification to test for covid will never occur if sections of chromosome8 are there. thus it will not find covid.

get it yet?

We're not talking about Chromosme 8 as a complete Chromosome necessarily. What we are talking about is the fact that one of the sequences in the PCR test, is exactly the same as a sequence within Chromosome 8.

What does a swab have?
1. Possibly some complete Chromosomes 8;
2. Possibly some parts or chunks of Chromosome 8;
3. A bunch of other stuff.

When they get a positive comparison, what is that comparison of? At least some of the time, the segment of Chromosome 8 that matches the segment the PCR uses to test. You get a false positive.

However, if you don't like the video, that's okay. Dr. Andrew Kaufman knows what he is talking about. More than you? Nobody knows this for a fact. But he sure writes and explains better.

no its not..
the PCR test looks for different things.
maybe you should try to learn first and post seconds

the E S N proteins are not chromosome 8
chromosome 8 is used as the opposite of a covid positive test
if chromosome 8 shows up the test will never be covid positive

Of course, that's why. I'm not going to contradict you on this one.

I see, that's why My mom got positive and got obviously sick, while me and my siblings test negative because of how random it is that we luckily got negative results. Whoooosh 1/6 members in our household only got positive, I guess you're right? 

Thank you for saying it clearly. All you are saying is that the sequence that the PCR is looking for is a sequence in that is in SARS-CoV-2. And that is exactly the point behind the Chromosome 8 point. The sequence is the same one in SARS-CoV-2 as is in Chromosome 8.

If the test is rejected when a complete Chromosome 8 is found, great. Nobody looks for a complete Chromosome 8. So, no tests are rejected on that account.

Nobody knows that if a sequence that matches, is matching a broken, partial Chromosome 8, or a SARS-CoV-2 virus sequence.

In fact, nobody knows that a broken, partial Chromosome 8 isn't what the SARS-CoV-2 virus really is.

The whole PCR test is not only useless for finding the SARS-CoV-2 virus. It's actually, potentially at least, a dangerous lie.

a "segment/short-sequence of DNA that is the same as a segment/short-sequence that is in Chromosome 8" being positive in the test .. would result in being declared as a test failure in regards to covid.

it will never be used to show a covid positive result

the covid positive result is based on finding the E S and N protein sequence of sars-cov-2. not the human stuff

emphasis: the human chromosome 8 is not any of those

try to learn how the covid tests work. not how your conspiracy sites say
..
as for you and jetcash's illogic of  'dead one'.. viruses have no heartbeat or pulse or moving parts..
thats not how viruses work
viruses are not bacteria

try to learn some basic biology

The PCR checks for a segment/short-sequence of DNA that is the same as a segment/short-sequence that is in Chromosome 8. Nobody checks a swab for the complete Chromosome 8, and then dismisses the test when they find it. In addition, if there is a small piece of Chromosome 8 that has broken off the whole Chromosome 8, there is no way to tell for sure. In addition to that, if the segment/short-sequence is exactly the size of the one being tested for, how does anybody know that it is not from the test itself?

And on top of that, look at the Jet Cash post directly above this one to see that, even if there was a virus, nobody knows if it is not simply a dead one being expelled by the body.

The failure of the PCR test is so profound that it's amazing that anybody in his right mind uses it at all.

Mucus is part of the body's front line defences, so it doesn't make sense to imply a person is infected, when out innate immune system has trapped a virus, and is disposing of it.  Positive results can also be derived from virus particles resulting from dead viruses killed by apoptosis.
It would be much better if they could develop some form of breathaliser that checked for viable viruses.  That will never happen, as it would show the reality in the spreading of viruses via aerosols.

if the test shows up chromosome 8. then its instantly classed as covid negative/test failure
not one single test that shows positive for chromosome 8 has ever been classed as covid positive

thats because the chromosome8 aspect of the test is used as a excluder

..
lets try to teach you in another way

imagine there is a population of 100000 humans and 50 cows
first they identify the humans . and then tell the human to go away..
next they look at what left(the cows) and then study the cows to work out which breed of cow exist in the field

having 'human positive' does not mean 'jersey cow positive'

again if the test shows human positive. then its automatically deems as covid negative. because what they are testing is not a virus isolate
...
what you need to remember is that PCR is not just the amplification and count process. it also has a process before it to separate and refine the sample to remove certain things they dont want/need to test for
(remember last year when you asked if this separation process included centrifuges.. (i hope this reminds you) yes the pre-count process of separating and isolating the virus using many things including centrifuge)

if a amplification and count final process shows human rna.. the test is stopped and treated as a failure and thus covid negative

again for emphasise and to not have to write more post to correct you
a human chromosome positive test is a covid negative result. you will never have a covid positive result if the test is positive for chromosome8

i truly hope you now realise your opinion of how tests work is wrong. i truly hope you now move on with your life and realise your influencers lied.and you ignorantly believed their lies.
i truly hope that now you have been corrected you can stop repeating lies, and spend your time more wisely on things that actually matter and have actual facts backing them up.

in short stop repeating our conspiracy site influencers lies

In many of the tests, all they are doing is comparing a strand that is naturally found inside chromosome 8, with a sample they have taken from a person. This sample has all kinds of human tissue in it, including the exact chromosome 8 strand that they are looking for already. Everybody has this strand within himself, naturally.

If chromosme 8 doesn't show up, it's simply because the swab didn't pick up that section of cells from the test subject. But if it DOES show up... it's there in everybody already. EVERYBODY or EVERY BODY.

Why are they taking a strand of chromosome 8 that they got from who knows where, and comparing it with the same chunk of chromosome 8 that we all have? The only reason why everybody in the world is not Covid positive through the PCR test, is that the tester didn't get a chunk of the person's flesh stuck to the swab when he tested him. That's they only reason why the person is negative.

chromosome 8 is never amplified or tested for as a 'covid positive' parameter.
it ill never cause a positive result
quite the opposite. if chromosome 8 does show up.. its treated as a negative/failed test

its used as a exclusion identifier .. meaning they separate out and ignore the stuff that has chromosome 8 and they only amplifiy and test the stuff that has a identifier of the envelope (E), nucleocapsid (N), and spike (S) proteins of the virus

yes they have isolated the virus and identified the envelope (E), nucleocapsid (N), and spike (S) proteins
they know its not human dna/rna as they have already done stuff know the difference

D.Ike is not presenting any evidence he is just rebranding old debunked myths from last year

you are a true idiot if you think. when kaufman got debunked. you simply had to wait around for someone new to say the exact same as kaufman for you to think its not debunked because .. new person is not kaufman

you are not realising its the story said that has been debunked. you foolishly think its just the person. and only requires a new person to say the same story to validate the story

try to realise that it has been a year now and your just repeating a debunked story.. trying to make it true by just changing the narrator..
sorry thats not how facts work

Most of the things you say about Covid, have been debunked long before you say them.

the human sequence that france uses is for the separation part not the inclusion part
you have already been debunked about this last year..
is your memory that bad??

The PCR test is creating Covid cases rather than finding them... and the medical knows it.

The segment of RNA that the test searches for, is found throughout the bodies if every human being in the world, naturally, in all their cells.

The whole PCR test is being used in a fraudulent way. It's a lie. It's a scam. The more the tests, the more the cases, because what they are testing for is a sequence that is part of every body, with or without the Covid virus.

BIG STORY - PLEASE SHARE: 'Virus' test revelations with David Icke and Andrew Kaufman

https://www.bitchute.com/video/4bwTCk5pOiup/