Do you have any sources, or is this just a theory?
It seems to me like the simpler explanation is that bitcoin has established itself as an investment vehicle that has been producing ludicrous profits for anyone that has bought and held for any decent length of time. As bitcoin has become more widely known, accepted, and accessible, more and more people have been piling into it, causing the price to increase.
Simpler is always better, yes, everything else being equal, but (as I'll explain below), it's not.
The major facts are not really in dispute: rising inequality, large debt loads, low consumer price inflation, high asset values (stocks, real estate) and stagnant incomes for the bottom majority in the West.
My weaving of the facts into a theory is based on my study of 500 years of the modern Western system. I had to come up with it, since mainstream economics and commentators are not about to uncover what is essentially a deceptive global system, even though I rely heavily on the clues they provide, one piece at a time. The study is careful and detailed, and I've made sure theory is compatible with observable facts in every way. I have posted many detailed views of this study -- you should find them under my profile.
I would love to have your simple explanation be correct, but, if there were nothing else at work, what Jamie Dimon just said would be true: that governments are just not going to hand over their power over money to a decentralized system. Not Beijing, not Brussels/Frankfurt/Tokyo/London, and even less Washington, who is the biggest beneficiary of the 'exorbitant privilege' of the dollar.
Currently, it looks like Beijing doesn't want Bitcoin (even though that could be a false flag, will see,) but the Western elites want it.