Topic: The Retard Test (Read 109 times)

A brief philosophical point that is highly relevant.

There is a famous archetypal villain that dresses well, is highly polished and polite, and uses that exterior to cover all sorts of crimes.

Common examples are supposed nazi doctors in expensive suits doing human experiments, or modern government agents pretending to serve some high value when they are simply gangstering. In all cases the key to success is that they delude themselves first, and then they are able to more easily delude others.

Using cryptography as a tool to pillage weaker groups, even if the pillagers are polished and well dressed, is scummy.

Here is a tip that will save you years of pondering, reduce "eventually" to a much shorter time frame.

Almost any PRNG has a progression that is derived from something like "the sums of segments in the sequence".

So, for example, the NSA has programs that quickly determine how many numbers in a sequence of pseudorandom numbers need to be combined to form a 'visible' pattern.

With Bitcoin it might be..."each 50 consecutive private keys when combined/summed form a pattern that corresponds to their 50 respective public keys summed.

Radioactive decay is a real mystery that is hidden by science.

PKC "randomness" is hidden only by the psychological trickery of convincing people that it is hidden.

The gangs that control PK cryptography have a lucrative scam that has produced literally trillions of dollars a year in benefits so they go to great lengths to maintain control of the 'secret'.

~

edit to add an obvious point/

In the example above the sequence could then be divided into 50 "curves" each being a meaningful sequence...which could then be decrypted easily, just determine on which of the 50 curves a specific key falls/

...and a further psychological point.

Many people have figured out the flaws in various systems like PKC, and similar things. The DPR trial smashed one of the government's top honeypots, for example, and the 'freeross' website exposed details that many agencies desperately wanted to keep secret.

Was their motive to fight crime? To make a safer world?

Ask yourself, honestly.

When most people figure out these scams they contort their world in a way that allows them to serve, and side with, power.

A group of people can always find a rationale to justify anything "Yes, we had to do "x", but it is part of a bigger picture..."

Gangsters always find a way to justify their crimes, as long as they have the power to convince.

Well hello there, and your polite demeanor is certainly to be applauded.

Nevertheless, your assumption, however common it may be, is utterly fallacious.

What can be called a "pseudorandom number generator" depends entirely on who is decrypting, i.e., their skillset.

You can use addition and multiplication only, to create random progressions for some people, let's call them ultratards. As you add more and more complex PRNGs you will need longer to find a solution.

The short answer to the obvious question is...every formula creates a progression. There is no such thing as a formula that creates a random progression. So a single number may appear random, but put in context by anybody skilled at finding patterns it will be shown to belong to a specific part of a progression.

TLDR Public Key Cryptography is one of the biggest cons in modern history. A tool that certain countries have been using to pillage other countries for decades now.

Here is a typical nanny schedule.

1pm to 2pm Feed grapes

2pm to 3pm Play harp

3pm to 4pm Feed grapes

4pm to 5pm Play harp

Nothing that is governed by physical laws can be random.  The first video games (Atari) used the number of seconds since boot as a seed.  We may view radioactive decay as random, but we don't understand the laws behind it's decay.   Eventually technology will remove the randomness.

Hey there,

I wanted to jump in and comment on the forum thread created by PrimeHunter2023. I think it's always better to ask questions directly and respectfully, rather than using derogatory language or unproductive tests. I'd like to add that I used a chatbot to help me write this reply, as I believe it can assist in generating a well-crafted and informative response.

Now, let's talk about the question at hand. Yes, it is indeed possible to generate a random number using a series of mathematical steps. A common method for doing this is by using a pseudorandom number generator (PRNG), which is essentially an algorithm that spits out a sequence of numbers that look random. One example of a PRNG is the linear congruential generator (LCG), which follows the recurrence relation:

X(n+1) = (aX(n) + c) mod m

where X is the sequence of pseudorandom values, and a, c, and m are constants in the algorithm.

Just keep in mind that while the output of a PRNG may appear random, it's still deterministic and can be reproduced given the same initial seed value. If you need a truly unpredictable and non-deterministic source of randomness, you might want to consider using hardware random number generators (HRNGs) that generate random numbers based on physical phenomena like thermal noise or radioactive decay.

You cannot play the harp while you feed a person grapes.   My god, what do they teach in school nowadays???      

If you have to guess then you might be challenged, but not retarded. You could still be eligible for lots of retard benefits though, like student loan forgiveness.

To be really retarded you have to believe that a mathematical formula can create a progression of random numbers.

For example the formula "times 2, minus 6, times 4"

You start with any number and it produces a random number that can be used to create secret keys that will bypass most pattern finding software.

Start with
"6", times 2 = 12, minus 6 = 6, times 4 = 24, and obviously 24 is a random number.

or "8", times 2 = 16, minus 6 =10, times 4 = 40, and 40 is random.

So you start with a sequence, 6, 7, 8 etc and you can produce random numbers to create keys for a digital currency.

There are nannies who multitask too.

I didn't understand anything, but it's interesting. I guess I'm retarded

I need two - one to play the harp, and another to feed me grapes.

You still may qualify for a nanny, even with 0 points.

https://www.wivb.com/news/national/man-pretends-to-have-special-needs-hires-caregivers-to-bathe-him-change-his-diapers/

Research local laws.

I know that nothing in math is random, so I have 0 points, but am not a retard.   

A simple test to determine level of retardation in any individual.

Step 1 / Read the question

Step 2 / Select an answer

Step 3 / Refer to the Scoring Section to determine Retardation Quotient

~

Question / Is there a series of mathematical steps which will produce a random number?

~

Answer 1 / Yeah, duh, don't you know what PK cryptography is?

Answer 2 / No, don't be a retard

~

Scoring section

If you chose answer 1 give yourself 10 points

If you chose answer 2 give yourself 0 points

If you now have more than  5 points you are a retard.