Topic: the secret doctrine (Read 957 times)
I tried finding more info on Destinys of the World but didn't really see much. No facebook page. where are the rest of the volumes? what is that organization all about? I know more about ISIS after reading the Atlantic arcticle
The biggest secret doctrine is one that is right out in the open, one that certain people in and behind the government have hidden by focusing our attention elsewhere. This secret doctrine could be called the secret of the common law. Here's what it says basically.
If government ever takes you to court for anything, and you stand as a man or woman not represented but rather present, if your accuser doesn't get on the stand under oath or affirmation so that you can question him/her/it about the harm or damage of property you supposedly did to him/her/it, you win. Case dismissed. But you have to press your rights in the proper way.
What will happen in your case? If your accuser is stylized on the complaint as something like THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA or THE STATE OF XXXXXX, they can't get on the stand so that you can question them. They are paperwork. They can't swear or affirm. They don't have a voice-box or a brain so that you can question them and get answers back. And, it is standard law that the plaintiff must appear - appear means take the stand under oath or affirmation.
http://voidjudgments.com/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HOkAHRzuiOA&list=PLHrkQxgz0mg6kUBciD-HIvTXByqjcIZ-D
If you are accused of something by one of them, do the above if you run out of options. Watch them try to twist out of it. Then you will know that it is truth.
If government ever takes you to court for anything, and you stand as a man or woman not represented but rather present, if your accuser doesn't get on the stand under oath or affirmation so that you can question him/her/it about the harm or damage of property you supposedly did to him/her/it, you win. Case dismissed. But you have to press your rights in the proper way.
What will happen in your case? If your accuser is stylized on the complaint as something like THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA or THE STATE OF XXXXXX, they can't get on the stand so that you can question them. They are paperwork. They can't swear or affirm. They don't have a voice-box or a brain so that you can question them and get answers back. And, it is standard law that the plaintiff must appear - appear means take the stand under oath or affirmation.
http://voidjudgments.com/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HOkAHRzuiOA&list=PLHrkQxgz0mg6kUBciD-HIvTXByqjcIZ-D
If you are accused of something by one of them, do the above if you run out of options. Watch them try to twist out of it. Then you will know that it is truth.
the conclusion of part two is very well described in this book:
http://www.amazon.com/Envoys-Mankind-Declaration-Principles-Governance/dp/0874748208
note the publisher of it.
http://www.amazon.com/Envoys-Mankind-Declaration-Principles-Governance/dp/0874748208
note the publisher of it.
It sometimes mix science and theories. Dark/white worlds are not a scientific fact. Interesting nonetheless.
Ok I've watched only the first ~3 mins of the first video but I get the general picture.
My question is, what is the point of this 'secret doctrine'? How is it different from anything else?
Everything humans do serve only to increase their 'knowledge'. Knowledge can thereby be considered a constant without needing to speculate on whether it is finite or infinite.
For the sake of contrast, if we assign 'knowledge' an all-encompassing letter, say variable 'a', then it becomes clear that humans have not once stepped 'outside of the box', that with everything that they've achieved so far, they're still on the exact spot they started at. The only thing that has 'evolved' is the illusion that they are 'better' now compared to 10,000 years ago.
My question is, what is the point of this 'secret doctrine'? How is it different from anything else?
Everything humans do serve only to increase their 'knowledge'. Knowledge can thereby be considered a constant without needing to speculate on whether it is finite or infinite.
For the sake of contrast, if we assign 'knowledge' an all-encompassing letter, say variable 'a', then it becomes clear that humans have not once stepped 'outside of the box', that with everything that they've achieved so far, they're still on the exact spot they started at. The only thing that has 'evolved' is the illusion that they are 'better' now compared to 10,000 years ago.
Posted after 3 min watching the video but I am still watching :
The accent is a bit annoying at first.
They could teach that at school
Ok I've watched only the first ~3 mins of the first video but I get the general picture.
My question is, what is the point of this 'secret doctrine'? How is it different from anything else?
Everything humans do serve only to increase their 'knowledge'. Knowledge can thereby be considered a constant without needing to speculate on whether it is finite or infinite.
For the sake of contrast, if we assign 'knowledge' an all-encompassing letter, say variable 'a', then it becomes clear that humans have not once stepped 'outside of the box', that with everything that they've achieved so far, they're still on the exact spot they started at. The only thing that has 'evolved' is the illusion that they are 'better' now compared to 10,000 years ago.
My question is, what is the point of this 'secret doctrine'? How is it different from anything else?
Everything humans do serve only to increase their 'knowledge'. Knowledge can thereby be considered a constant without needing to speculate on whether it is finite or infinite.
For the sake of contrast, if we assign 'knowledge' an all-encompassing letter, say variable 'a', then it becomes clear that humans have not once stepped 'outside of the box', that with everything that they've achieved so far, they're still on the exact spot they started at. The only thing that has 'evolved' is the illusion that they are 'better' now compared to 10,000 years ago.
Nothing new. We are small in this enormous space and yet people are still self centered and think they matter. Not long ago somebody here was arguing that there's no proof earth is older than 6000 years...
I can't... facebook was always injecting stuff in my pc that my fw was always rejecting... with youtube, it's suspicious bugs on the closing of my browser... so what is it about?
Jump to: