^^^ As the CDC admits that they don't have an isolated Covid virus, your faith is gradually being shown to be misplaced.
your conspiracy sites limited context of the whole understanding of the CDC report is the flaw.
their opinion is 'thats what it says'
but if you read what the report is actually about and its purpose. you will understand.
its about understanding the context of topic and not phishing for selective wording which you dont understand
maybe if you read the whole document from the CDC and not just auto-hump a conspiracy sites summary. you might learn something
Maybe if you would start reading the facts:
1. The CDC admits they haven't isolated the virus;
2. The CDC admits they don't have a report form someone else that shows the virus was isolated;
3. Other people state the same thing, that there is no report showing isolation;
4. All you can do is blab rather than coming up with, and explaining proper, uncontaminated isolation in a report;
5. Nobody else is willing to show an isolation report that has proper isolation...
... just maybe you would start to realize that Covid is all a hoax.
Find one yet?
i guesd you still didnt read the report
one part..performance test
Performance of the CDC 2019-nCoV Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel has only been established in upper and lower respiratory specimens (such as nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal swabs, sputum, lower respiratory tract aspirates, bronchoalveolar lavage, and nasopharyngeal wash/aspirate or nasal aspirate).
another part. the limit of detection (the quality control test)
tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/μL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen
if you cannot read the report to understand and know what the report is saying. then please dont pretend you know what it says
especially if your source is a summary from a conspiracy site
Well i'll be a ... I'll think of something later.
franky1 is actually starting to explain a report.
All it means,
franky1, is that they are making comparisons against something that is not quite the DNA of an actual virus. There is no reference to the isolation report that shows that the RNA is from a specimen that was virus isolated. The specimen could be anything. As has been shown by Dr. Kaufman and others, the virus RNA/DNA matches a segment of Chromosome 8 in all our cells.
The place in an above post where you talk about removing all the human material from the specimen, doesn't leave only the virus. Rather, it leaves all kinds of viruses and bacteria and who-knows-what else. Since the virus purportedly contains strands of DNA/RNA that are already found in Chromosme 8, removing all human presence would actually remove the virus, itself. Why? You can't tell the difference between virus DNA and Chromosome 8 DNA. There isn't any difference that we are smart enough to detect at the current stage of science.
In other words, the whole report referred to is simply circular blab that really has no meaning as far as medical application. On the outside it looks good. But it doesn't really say anything. There still isn't any isolated virus. Anybody can talk. This report isn't the isolation report. Let's see an isolation report.
What I mean is, you can say the virus was isolated. I might say it wasn't. But you know it was isolated because you know the location of a report that shows isolation was done properly, and the spot in the report. This is very unkind of you to not show us the report and the isolation spot. Are we supposed to travel over the entire earth, looking at all reports, until we find the right one, to find out that you are telling the truth?
