any long article and bitcoin will become a paradigm for every individual, ...! Does the paradigm give the impression that makes someone feel like living in heaven or in hell
Of course!.. If we take as a basis the development of the paradigm proposed by Thomas Kuhn, which States that there are always groups of people (scientists), some of whom support and prove the known truth, and others are looking for something new, extraordinary. And this "new" leads to a scientific and technological revolution and a paradigm shift... 
Topic: The sun goes to hell. (Read 157 times)
any long article and bitcoin will become a paradigm for every individual, ...! Does the paradigm give the impression that makes someone feel like living in heaven or in hell
Conflict Bitcoin
You might have the impression that the old paradigms have turned into specific individuals haunting the community. The darkness becomes stronger, mastering site. Maybe that's the way it is.
Mike Hearn, Gavin Andresen, Craig Wright and Roger Ver are at the forefront of an army of corporate assholes trying Goebbels ways to shake the only thing that really is useful on the Internet. Hide behind while those that want to destroy Bitcoin “all who are not with them” and they “have to counter”. Typical, classic tactics of propaganda is to accuse the enemies in that currently doing myself. Goebbels on the radio accused the British, then Russian, then the French that at the moment committed the German army.
On the other hand, there is a relatively silent community Of bitcoin Core programmers, and they do not have to worry too much about spreading denials to rumors.
Mike and Gavin tried to make himself the top of the entire system, Director, Bitcoin, benevolent dictator, etc. As befits the main antagonist, Sauron, the Devil king Joffrey, the Joker: these antagonists had the strength and opportunity a little wider than it should be for their grade/age.
Stronger antagonists are a tradition founded by the fallen angel. Nevertheless, overcoming them, we rise to another level of strength. Corporate bitcoiners fill the void that has formed since the fall of the Gox (or the fall of Satan – to whom as) – it would be necessary to turn some drama to the rate remained volatile. It would be necessary to create villains, cancer cells,” red Communists“,” rotten capitalists“,” enemies " in General, for the sake of stimulation, of course, the appearance and heroes. Heroes who safely increase the block, close the vulnerability, etc.
This is not a game like many (and I including) originally thought. And they thought this, that John Smith, Brian Armstrong, Roger Ver, Wu Cihan and other “bigbloke” just conspired with the “good guys ” that bigbloke will play the role of “bad” guys, the exchange rate of Bitcoins will go down, despite the upcoming halving, the shadow market sharks will be procured as bastards during the first 2 quarters of 2016, dumps all the money on this global provocation, all except Antonopoulos, and... in the end the conflict will be resolved in a year and a half any working activation scaling garbage whether it's 300-Gigabyte unit or Seguit + lightning + 250 KB blocks.
Smart people who read the crypto press have been telling me for a long time that Roger Ver is a bad guy. I believed in the theory of “smart-ass” conspiracy, especially in light of the mysterious hints from Eric Voorhis style “in fact, the way to scale is not important and everything is already pre-peresano”.
But when once Roger's mining pool lost 13 bits as a result of the use of unknown, already clearly untested for the presence of bugs, unlimited software, I saw the light. After all, Roger would never, never have allowed himself to lose even a fraction of the profits.
I understand how Roger's team waited 2 weeks for the transfer of bitcoins from the chief accountant, while the rate was growing significantly, and when it became clear that it would reach another price peak, payments in dollar equivalent came and an excuse “sorry guys, I kind of flew around the planet on business, could not send coins before.” How can you not be able to send payments, flying around the planet, that nowhere there is no Internet? But handsome also saved almost a whole bitcoin on the whole team because of his “trips”. Managers Roger saving on your own staff – that can upset Bitminer? And what more can prove how much Roger and his closest associates don't like to lose money by robbing even their own authors?
And then I realized what Roger really wanted to do. Once he is ready to lose 13 Bitkov for evidence that the network needs to increase the blocks, it is definitely not working for the government, because of Hillary or network of restaurants McDonald's to lose 13 bitcoins... Questionable thing.
Unfortunately, Roger wanted to take the empty space of “Satan", at least dividing the network into 2 parts; at most – destroying Bitcoin on the vine, leaving space for their favorite altcoins.
No wonder he was able to pull off the “Unlimited/Classic/XT”operation so easily. Initially, no one was waiting to trick me. For example, through the efforts of Roger Vera was funded by many early start-UPS, he zadonatil Ross Ulbricht $160 thousand bitcoins a few years ago. In General, Roger initially had a much greater breadth of action in the field of Bitcoin than many other, even rich, holders. Had authority as Harvey dent before something happened to his face, like Satan before the exile from hell, like Professor Moriarty before Sherlock exposure, as Nixon before the “Watergate” as from the Lava after Marilyn Monroe.... Coincidence? Why do the best villains come out of those who have a little more authority and power among us? Evil is always more – 66.6% of evil against 33.3% of the goodness within us, and there is still the 0.01% to actually MBR.
Ver performed the manifestation of the will of evil, destruction, beast within the Bitcoin community. He didn't negotiate with the rest of the known personalities of the community – he does act on his own.
Need someone destructive to show the community how much it really is, and how to not only “pampit”, but also “dump”, because none of us knew how to beautifully dump the price of Bitcoin, until Mike Hearn appeared and “left” the industry, and then for about five days did not buy only an idiot.
Ver pressured Bitcoin's "Oldies" with his presence, ruining their long-term vacation. Not only that, they prihodili to fight with Althingi, the growth of “blockchain-hype”, laziness big miners playing in the casino and keep the funds in the doubtful office. They also had to deal with the alleged problem, although it manifests itself invariably in those moments when" Roger " or one of the people he bought begin an active spam attack on the network with small transactions.
By the way, one of these services, which was commissioned by Roger conducted the “blockchain test”, Coinwallet.eu-included in the list of scammers on the website badbitcoin.org ahhh! And to get to this site is not so easy, it should be noted.
"Evil spirits" come on stage to remind all of us of the meaning, so that we are strengthened. If it wasn't for us, it wouldn't be for Roger. If you don't choose a side to the conflict, you choose Roger. He desired to move either by acceding to all who played for him, or to all who oppose.
Example. Do you know why Erik Voorhees spoke in support of bigblackrod like Roger, even after scandals with the loss of 13 now and ASICBOOST?
Because the main profitable project of Voorhees is the Shapeshift website.io-engaged in anonymous exchange of a huge list of cryptocurrencies with commissions reaching. The fact that Roger has invested a lot of money in oldoini now panic all their forces, undermining a community's “indigenous” cryptocurrency best for Voorhis. Voorhees benefits from the debate about the size of the block, from articles calling for people to “temporarily switch to altcoins,” and from the growth of all sorts of centralized sects with their own "site-coins," which Voorhees can then for money, add to ShapeShift, without responsibility for their Scam component. How can he not support big blocks, attacks on Bitcoin, because he wants " good for the community!". Oh, Yes, that is, he wants to earn money, if more precisely.
We all want that, Yes! But the victory will be for those who waste more (as always, in General), and who has sufficient breadth and scope for this.
To be continued...
You might have the impression that the old paradigms have turned into specific individuals haunting the community. The darkness becomes stronger, mastering site. Maybe that's the way it is.
Mike Hearn, Gavin Andresen, Craig Wright and Roger Ver are at the forefront of an army of corporate assholes trying Goebbels ways to shake the only thing that really is useful on the Internet. Hide behind while those that want to destroy Bitcoin “all who are not with them” and they “have to counter”. Typical, classic tactics of propaganda is to accuse the enemies in that currently doing myself. Goebbels on the radio accused the British, then Russian, then the French that at the moment committed the German army.
On the other hand, there is a relatively silent community Of bitcoin Core programmers, and they do not have to worry too much about spreading denials to rumors.
Mike and Gavin tried to make himself the top of the entire system, Director, Bitcoin, benevolent dictator, etc. As befits the main antagonist, Sauron, the Devil king Joffrey, the Joker: these antagonists had the strength and opportunity a little wider than it should be for their grade/age.
Stronger antagonists are a tradition founded by the fallen angel. Nevertheless, overcoming them, we rise to another level of strength. Corporate bitcoiners fill the void that has formed since the fall of the Gox (or the fall of Satan – to whom as) – it would be necessary to turn some drama to the rate remained volatile. It would be necessary to create villains, cancer cells,” red Communists“,” rotten capitalists“,” enemies " in General, for the sake of stimulation, of course, the appearance and heroes. Heroes who safely increase the block, close the vulnerability, etc.
This is not a game like many (and I including) originally thought. And they thought this, that John Smith, Brian Armstrong, Roger Ver, Wu Cihan and other “bigbloke” just conspired with the “good guys ” that bigbloke will play the role of “bad” guys, the exchange rate of Bitcoins will go down, despite the upcoming halving, the shadow market sharks will be procured as bastards during the first 2 quarters of 2016, dumps all the money on this global provocation, all except Antonopoulos, and... in the end the conflict will be resolved in a year and a half any working activation scaling garbage whether it's 300-Gigabyte unit or Seguit + lightning + 250 KB blocks.
Smart people who read the crypto press have been telling me for a long time that Roger Ver is a bad guy. I believed in the theory of “smart-ass” conspiracy, especially in light of the mysterious hints from Eric Voorhis style “in fact, the way to scale is not important and everything is already pre-peresano”.
But when once Roger's mining pool lost 13 bits as a result of the use of unknown, already clearly untested for the presence of bugs, unlimited software, I saw the light. After all, Roger would never, never have allowed himself to lose even a fraction of the profits.
I understand how Roger's team waited 2 weeks for the transfer of bitcoins from the chief accountant, while the rate was growing significantly, and when it became clear that it would reach another price peak, payments in dollar equivalent came and an excuse “sorry guys, I kind of flew around the planet on business, could not send coins before.” How can you not be able to send payments, flying around the planet, that nowhere there is no Internet? But handsome also saved almost a whole bitcoin on the whole team because of his “trips”. Managers Roger saving on your own staff – that can upset Bitminer? And what more can prove how much Roger and his closest associates don't like to lose money by robbing even their own authors?
And then I realized what Roger really wanted to do. Once he is ready to lose 13 Bitkov for evidence that the network needs to increase the blocks, it is definitely not working for the government, because of Hillary or network of restaurants McDonald's to lose 13 bitcoins... Questionable thing.
Unfortunately, Roger wanted to take the empty space of “Satan", at least dividing the network into 2 parts; at most – destroying Bitcoin on the vine, leaving space for their favorite altcoins.
No wonder he was able to pull off the “Unlimited/Classic/XT”operation so easily. Initially, no one was waiting to trick me. For example, through the efforts of Roger Vera was funded by many early start-UPS, he zadonatil Ross Ulbricht $160 thousand bitcoins a few years ago. In General, Roger initially had a much greater breadth of action in the field of Bitcoin than many other, even rich, holders. Had authority as Harvey dent before something happened to his face, like Satan before the exile from hell, like Professor Moriarty before Sherlock exposure, as Nixon before the “Watergate” as from the Lava after Marilyn Monroe.... Coincidence? Why do the best villains come out of those who have a little more authority and power among us? Evil is always more – 66.6% of evil against 33.3% of the goodness within us, and there is still the 0.01% to actually MBR.
Ver performed the manifestation of the will of evil, destruction, beast within the Bitcoin community. He didn't negotiate with the rest of the known personalities of the community – he does act on his own.
Need someone destructive to show the community how much it really is, and how to not only “pampit”, but also “dump”, because none of us knew how to beautifully dump the price of Bitcoin, until Mike Hearn appeared and “left” the industry, and then for about five days did not buy only an idiot.
Ver pressured Bitcoin's "Oldies" with his presence, ruining their long-term vacation. Not only that, they prihodili to fight with Althingi, the growth of “blockchain-hype”, laziness big miners playing in the casino and keep the funds in the doubtful office. They also had to deal with the alleged problem, although it manifests itself invariably in those moments when" Roger " or one of the people he bought begin an active spam attack on the network with small transactions.
By the way, one of these services, which was commissioned by Roger conducted the “blockchain test”, Coinwallet.eu-included in the list of scammers on the website badbitcoin.org ahhh! And to get to this site is not so easy, it should be noted.
"Evil spirits" come on stage to remind all of us of the meaning, so that we are strengthened. If it wasn't for us, it wouldn't be for Roger. If you don't choose a side to the conflict, you choose Roger. He desired to move either by acceding to all who played for him, or to all who oppose.
Example. Do you know why Erik Voorhees spoke in support of bigblackrod like Roger, even after scandals with the loss of 13 now and ASICBOOST?
Because the main profitable project of Voorhees is the Shapeshift website.io-engaged in anonymous exchange of a huge list of cryptocurrencies with commissions reaching. The fact that Roger has invested a lot of money in oldoini now panic all their forces, undermining a community's “indigenous” cryptocurrency best for Voorhis. Voorhees benefits from the debate about the size of the block, from articles calling for people to “temporarily switch to altcoins,” and from the growth of all sorts of centralized sects with their own "site-coins," which Voorhees can then for money, add to ShapeShift, without responsibility for their Scam component. How can he not support big blocks, attacks on Bitcoin, because he wants " good for the community!". Oh, Yes, that is, he wants to earn money, if more precisely.
We all want that, Yes! But the victory will be for those who waste more (as always, in General), and who has sufficient breadth and scope for this.
To be continued...
Interconnection of art, science, esotericism and religion as a basis of Bitcoin community.
The formation of a Bitcoin depends on religion, spirituality, art and science and not on market capitalization or trading on Polonecks. Lao Tzu, Leo Tolstoy, Satoshi Nakamoto-what are they all writing about? About trading the next "futures"? No, Bitcoin.
It turns out that any book, any work of art, any religious or financial fiction is only an allegorical description of the mechanisms of human psychology. No matter how cool all the ideologies that we came up with, it still turns out the same thing – a person.
Confrontation at the level of instincts (religion).
Angels VS Demons
On the level of the heart (esoteric)
Soldiery VS Hippies
At the level of the brain (science and art)
the Pope VS Richard Dawkins (Emmanuel Kant vs. Salvador Dali)
Around we see the service to the logic of the dual, the logic of good and evil. We can be” invaded“, we can be”divided".
"Dissolution and condensation “in medieval alchemy, microcosm and macrocosm,” hell and Paradise", transcendent States through meditation, pranayama, yoga or Tantra, or maximum contraction through drunkenness and laziness.
Man writes “the Bible”over and over again. Here is take “the Lord of the Rings” Tolkien. Classic Christian world, diluted European pagan traditions (art), magic (esoteric) and life wisdom (religion). If the pagans believed demons just “spirits” that Christians have, they become enemies. Tolkien smoked a pipe and tread on the threshold of this, with an indifferent air wearing a mask of Satan to the most powerful of the “angels” in his world, Melkor, which then became the master of Sauron.
The characters are Gandalf-level acquire the skills to be messengers of the gods (symbolizing angels), elves become a display of glory, majestic and thin, and orcs are terrible, that is in man.
When the psychologist looks at the Lord of the Rings, he observes the expanses of his own nervous system, his own subconscious, “crystallized” wisdom Tolkien in understandable children and non-psychologists everyday stories of the fabulous world of the peoples of great Britain and Ireland. For him, the orcs and the elves the essence of things, and people within it that selects between these actions.
Go ahead Tolkien – all of Hollywood and his stories are imbued with the “ethic of duality.” In strong movies is the antagonist and protagonist, a demon and an angel, or a criminal and a hero. Silent about any computer games, there is at least a Thief and a thief Catcher. Even in the dirtiest town, can not do without a particularly “heroic” Stallone and especially “villainous” Snipes. Almost every cultural game of humanity can be found references to evil or good gods, or themselves, and even if the Pantheon is pagan, it is still divided into 2 or 3 conditional groups.
But guess what? Everyone who is neither a hero nor a villain always makes the final judgment.
Batman can be arrested by the people. Jesus can be hanged on the cross by the will of the people. The army of Jokers will not cope with the people. Sherlock Holmes can be a criminal in a second, and Professor Moriarty can escape punishment by the will of the people.
People used to judge, and the war is even in the movies. Like in “King Arthur: the Legend of the Sword” by guy Ritchie, where's the actual legend of the sword Maestro Richie tightened not only expensive special effects, and even politics (well, except in a very artistic, archetypal form, it becomes pleasant to the viewer).
Or in Transformers, where there are” good “and” evil " robots (as if there are good and evil toasters or kettles). Or in the Matrix, where the role of Jesus is Neo, and in the role of Satan-the machine, which "Legion“, and chief among them Smith – even encroached on his own superiors (exaggerated instinct rebel,” the Son of Satan wants his father's death" — popsoveyshy plot, at the whim of marketers and publishers neatly wrapped brothers/sisters Wachowski in the wrapper of novelty).
Hundreds and hundreds of stories reveal to us the realities of the struggle of the devil with God,where the middle is traditionally a man. People choosing, judging, spectator and critic, even if he is a complete ignoramus. The devil and God are like two Persian merchants, each of whom beckons a young couple to his colorful carpets. Where are these two going?
All this can create and strengthen in your head the illusion that the war is really being fought, and that it is necessary to participate. In fact, mankind is engaged in a psychological self-analysis. That's what the process is.
There is no war between good and evil, it is a myth. What really exists is a self – analysis of the balance between the animal and the divine in man. We should see the carpets in all the benches, in short, and do it as closely.
No one is discussing decentralization as a phenomenon. ICO, investing, trading on exchanges, profit and distribution ... very interesting, but it's all animal, Old and Evil, and where is the Divine Satoshi? We seem to have moved away from The original bitcoin ideology. Due to the fact that humanity has not grasped the meaning of the benefits of decentralization, we are now stuck in one point: in their hands, humanity has got something new, but trying to apply it in the old way. The plane was not invented for land travel, it's not a car.
It may be difficult for people to understand that decentralization is not chaos, but rather a higher form of democracy. And we don't use it almost anywhere except BitCoin and BitTorrent. It is still not in corporations, not governments, not churches. This is surprising, and because of this, we can not bring the Bitcoin network to 100% reliability – few people around the world know about it, immersed in the degraded realities of the democratic system of “change of your whole life”.
To be continued...
BTC on beer
: 37diLLeVeRrc1wHgBNxjTLfRyh6ovjk8zU
The formation of a Bitcoin depends on religion, spirituality, art and science and not on market capitalization or trading on Polonecks. Lao Tzu, Leo Tolstoy, Satoshi Nakamoto-what are they all writing about? About trading the next "futures"? No, Bitcoin.
It turns out that any book, any work of art, any religious or financial fiction is only an allegorical description of the mechanisms of human psychology. No matter how cool all the ideologies that we came up with, it still turns out the same thing – a person.
Confrontation at the level of instincts (religion).
Angels VS Demons
On the level of the heart (esoteric)
Soldiery VS Hippies
At the level of the brain (science and art)
the Pope VS Richard Dawkins (Emmanuel Kant vs. Salvador Dali)
Around we see the service to the logic of the dual, the logic of good and evil. We can be” invaded“, we can be”divided".
"Dissolution and condensation “in medieval alchemy, microcosm and macrocosm,” hell and Paradise", transcendent States through meditation, pranayama, yoga or Tantra, or maximum contraction through drunkenness and laziness.
Man writes “the Bible”over and over again. Here is take “the Lord of the Rings” Tolkien. Classic Christian world, diluted European pagan traditions (art), magic (esoteric) and life wisdom (religion). If the pagans believed demons just “spirits” that Christians have, they become enemies. Tolkien smoked a pipe and tread on the threshold of this, with an indifferent air wearing a mask of Satan to the most powerful of the “angels” in his world, Melkor, which then became the master of Sauron.
The characters are Gandalf-level acquire the skills to be messengers of the gods (symbolizing angels), elves become a display of glory, majestic and thin, and orcs are terrible, that is in man.
When the psychologist looks at the Lord of the Rings, he observes the expanses of his own nervous system, his own subconscious, “crystallized” wisdom Tolkien in understandable children and non-psychologists everyday stories of the fabulous world of the peoples of great Britain and Ireland. For him, the orcs and the elves the essence of things, and people within it that selects between these actions.
Go ahead Tolkien – all of Hollywood and his stories are imbued with the “ethic of duality.” In strong movies is the antagonist and protagonist, a demon and an angel, or a criminal and a hero. Silent about any computer games, there is at least a Thief and a thief Catcher. Even in the dirtiest town, can not do without a particularly “heroic” Stallone and especially “villainous” Snipes. Almost every cultural game of humanity can be found references to evil or good gods, or themselves, and even if the Pantheon is pagan, it is still divided into 2 or 3 conditional groups.
But guess what? Everyone who is neither a hero nor a villain always makes the final judgment.
Batman can be arrested by the people. Jesus can be hanged on the cross by the will of the people. The army of Jokers will not cope with the people. Sherlock Holmes can be a criminal in a second, and Professor Moriarty can escape punishment by the will of the people.
People used to judge, and the war is even in the movies. Like in “King Arthur: the Legend of the Sword” by guy Ritchie, where's the actual legend of the sword Maestro Richie tightened not only expensive special effects, and even politics (well, except in a very artistic, archetypal form, it becomes pleasant to the viewer).
Or in Transformers, where there are” good “and” evil " robots (as if there are good and evil toasters or kettles). Or in the Matrix, where the role of Jesus is Neo, and in the role of Satan-the machine, which "Legion“, and chief among them Smith – even encroached on his own superiors (exaggerated instinct rebel,” the Son of Satan wants his father's death" — popsoveyshy plot, at the whim of marketers and publishers neatly wrapped brothers/sisters Wachowski in the wrapper of novelty).
Hundreds and hundreds of stories reveal to us the realities of the struggle of the devil with God,where the middle is traditionally a man. People choosing, judging, spectator and critic, even if he is a complete ignoramus. The devil and God are like two Persian merchants, each of whom beckons a young couple to his colorful carpets. Where are these two going?
All this can create and strengthen in your head the illusion that the war is really being fought, and that it is necessary to participate. In fact, mankind is engaged in a psychological self-analysis. That's what the process is.
There is no war between good and evil, it is a myth. What really exists is a self – analysis of the balance between the animal and the divine in man. We should see the carpets in all the benches, in short, and do it as closely.
No one is discussing decentralization as a phenomenon. ICO, investing, trading on exchanges, profit and distribution ... very interesting, but it's all animal, Old and Evil, and where is the Divine Satoshi? We seem to have moved away from The original bitcoin ideology. Due to the fact that humanity has not grasped the meaning of the benefits of decentralization, we are now stuck in one point: in their hands, humanity has got something new, but trying to apply it in the old way. The plane was not invented for land travel, it's not a car.
It may be difficult for people to understand that decentralization is not chaos, but rather a higher form of democracy. And we don't use it almost anywhere except BitCoin and BitTorrent. It is still not in corporations, not governments, not churches. This is surprising, and because of this, we can not bring the Bitcoin network to 100% reliability – few people around the world know about it, immersed in the degraded realities of the democratic system of “change of your whole life”.
To be continued...
BTC on beer
: 37diLLeVeRrc1wHgBNxjTLfRyh6ovjk8zUJump to: