Author

Topic: The Truth about Satoshi? (Read 1485 times)

legendary
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570
Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending
September 11, 2011, 08:42:11 AM
#15
Satoshi is an Anagram of "I host SA". The hoster of SA is lowtax, who owns SA. Is it possible that somethingawful was behind bitcoins too? I mean it'd make sense given their far reach due to the masonic forces that control them.

Any thoughts on this?

onesalt is an anagram for "Let SA on".

Case dismissed.

"Case Dismissed" is an anagram for "Ed Misses a Disc".

Case reopened.
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
daytrader/superhero
September 02, 2011, 11:47:37 PM
#14
  He claimed he was Satoshi on these forums.

did he say he fights dinosaurs? if not, it wasnt him.

also, you sound like a dick, and arent even remotely believable.

thanks though.
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
September 02, 2011, 11:33:38 PM
#13
A guy came to Tinychan and Minichan back in spring 2010 telling us about bitcoins.  He claimed he was Satoshi on these forums.  I was new to bitcoins and didn't realize that was the name of the founder of bitcoins.  But maybe it was him.  He did say not to tell people this.
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
Firstbits.com/1fg4i :)
September 02, 2011, 10:34:14 PM
#12
Nah, Satoshi is Skynet, it needs an anonymous plausibly deniable way to buy all the ore and shit to build all those shiny toys
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
daytrader/superhero
September 02, 2011, 10:23:36 PM
#11
i heard satoshi is actually robot from the future sent to save us from skynet...i saw it on this documentary called "Terminator 2"

...also he fights dinosaurs.


legendary
Activity: 1022
Merit: 1001
September 02, 2011, 10:14:57 PM
#10

No, the value of ixcoin is a myth. Satoshi is a symbol.

lol...ok troll...  Roll Eyes

hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 500
September 02, 2011, 09:53:05 PM
#9
Bruce is clearly the fall guy so that lowtax can get away with it all while bruce ends up in jail for massive fraud and his own pedophilia charges.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
September 02, 2011, 09:49:28 PM
#8
Wow, you know that you are right. Your theory sounds completely plausible, and completely eradicates the validity of all evidence concerning Bruce's fraudulent activities.

You can be sure that this was one big conspiracy, drawn up over many years by the Grand Master Richard Kyanka, and that Bruce was set up from the offset.

member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
September 02, 2011, 09:48:34 PM
#7
satoshi is a myth

No, the value of ixcoin is a myth. Satoshi is a symbol.
legendary
Activity: 1022
Merit: 1001
September 02, 2011, 09:46:40 PM
#6
satoshi is a myth
sr. member
Activity: 360
Merit: 250
September 02, 2011, 09:40:48 PM
#5
Satoshi is an Anagram of "I host SA". The hoster of SA is lowtax, who owns SA. Is it possible that somethingawful was behind bitcoins too? I mean it'd make sense given their far reach due to the masonic forces that control them.

Any thoughts on this?

onesalt is an anagram for "Let SA on".

Case dismissed.
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
Only a curious passer-by / FirstBits: 13zsc1
September 02, 2011, 09:21:02 PM
#4
Who cares?
donator
Activity: 392
Merit: 252
September 02, 2011, 09:20:32 PM
#3
Satoshi is an Anagram of "I host SA". The hoster of SA is lowtax, who owns SA. Is it possible that somethingawful was behind bitcoins too? I mean it'd make sense given their far reach due to the masonic forces that control them.

Any thoughts on this?

Yeah, AstroZeneca just found a new client.

Wow. the puzzle has been solved.
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
September 02, 2011, 09:11:05 PM
#2
Satoshi is an Anagram of "I host SA". The hoster of SA is lowtax, who owns SA. Is it possible that somethingawful was behind bitcoins too? I mean it'd make sense given their far reach due to the masonic forces that control them.

Any thoughts on this?

Yeah, AstroZeneca just found a new client.
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 500
September 02, 2011, 09:10:25 PM
#1
Satoshi is an Anagram of "I host SA". The hoster of SA is lowtax, who owns SA. Is it possible that somethingawful was behind bitcoins too? I mean it'd make sense given their far reach due to the masonic forces that control them.

Any thoughts on this?
Jump to: