Topic: There are more sides to the story (Read 158 times)

There is no one called the government, the government is said to be the people or citizens itself whom are represented by the office for which they occupy to ensure that the peoples concerns are made known and done if possible. It would be important to also note that, the occupant of that office is a human entity who has his or her own ideas as well coupled with the ideas of those that precedes and work with him to influence his will and the will of the people.

Having this in mind, it's only natural to assume that, when the people's will isn't done or upheld, it is the entity's will and that of those that has tides with the entity that is been done using the authority of the office and as such, they stand liable to there action in that regard but being in that office creates a lot of issue making a case against them. As all that is done would be redirected to there office.

Of course there is.  We have ideas when men invented language and paper.  God taught them how to write, but god doesn't care what they write.   Right?

 

badecker seems to be on his 'court' rant by using court buzzwords and freeman court games. without understanding a single thing.

but badecker also uses his god 'papers' when his conspiracy and court rants fail him.
and so breaking an oath under god only results in punishment of feeding 10 people
they are not making an oath under court rules. their promise is not to a judge. its to a bible

yep oaths of office are not done in a courtroom, and the requested witness to the oath is not a court judge
so while badecker thinks a oath of office is a court based oath. its not.


anyway sticking with the topic
seems the representatives of government can make new rules personally and collectively. but the push the blame/responsibility to a empty entity they represent. and if anyone tried to hold a representative in office accountable those representatives have many loopholes.

however if you want a new law. dont push it to the entity. push it to the representatives, they may ignore it and say its not their responsibility. but atleast you will get an answer.

its like if you are religious, but homeless.
praying to god wont get you shelter. instead going to the church and praying to the representative(priest, vicar, pastor) to find you shelter.will result in them giving you shelter 'in gods name'

badecker wants people to believe the only way to get action is to seek the empty entity and demand the empty entity makes an appearance..
badecker does not know how the real world works

so if you want change. speak to the representatives as they have the power and office and ability to do the changes. even if they dont want to admit it.

Actually, they were educated by God, teaching them what to write. There is actually a way to tell that this is so.

---

That's right. But the Constitution says that people who use it to hold constitutional office, don't have any effect in such an office, until they take an Oath of Office, to uphold the dictates required and mandated by the Constitution. So, it is the Constitution acting within those people. However, if the people don't follow the dictates of the Constitution after they have taken the Oath, they have perjured themselves.

This falls right in line with Trump and those who are impeaching him. If Trump didn't follow his OoO, he perjured himself, and should be impeached. However, if Congress is impeaching Trump when he didn't break his OoO, then Congress should be impeached... but at least recalled, maybe for treason.

constitution is just paper
and now badecker has to admit the cant use the constitution as it cant do anything.. in his reality

Uneducated people wrote that on paper - useful for only burning, remember?  If you are curious about how god works, stop believing everything you read. 

Note what God does... Proverbs 3:33,34:

See what happens when you don't believe in the true god?   Your mind makes you forget what you wrote just minutes earlier.  :/

your thinking only the accuser can prove
your thinking only the victim can accuse

you failed twice

Your duplicity is readily visible to all. Didn't I say, above,

People can use many things for that. Regarding the Bible, if a person is sincere and humble, and sincerely asks the questions of God, God will lead him to the truth in the Bible. 1 Timothy 2:1-4:

badecker thinks he can escape a murder charge by simply stating the dead cant talk....
sooo funny how naive badecker is

again freeman script isnt common law

It can also be used by fools to quote debunked mysticism. 

Actually, you don't get it.

Government doesn't make a claim against anyone. As you indicated in a post above, government doesn't have a mind or an opinion. Government is just some paperwork. Paperwork can't do anything except burn.

Since it isn't government making the claim, I have the right to question my accuser on the stand. I'll be glad to pay any damage to him/her, that my accuser can prove was done by me.

THE INDICTMENT
My accuser = the claimant = THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
The accused = Me = The guy who calls for my accuser to take the oath/affirmation, get on the stand, and speak "viva voce" into the record the injury I did to him/her. I have the right to face my accuser and question him/her. I accept nothing more or less than my accuser, as the law says.

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is paperwork.

But you are coming close to seeing the light? Or are you simply playing games as usual, franky1?

your trial tactic is not common law. you spout out freeman cult script that pretend but are nowhere near common law

your issue is you dont get it.
when the government makes a claim against you. its done so by one of its representatives
YOUR the one looking for an independant entity named government

representatives can make claims on behalf of other entities
its how murder cases get handled because the dead person cant file a claim himself.. as he is dead.
its how people in coma have a representative to decide on the coma patients final wishes
its how lawyers work,. they represent their clients.

when you pretend that you want to speak to a human called "the government" your not realising that in their courtroom. which their claim is filed. their policy is to allow representatives.
even if you filed your own claim (independent or as a counter claim) its not then 'your court' as the building and court policy is still that of government.

you filing a claim does not make it your special territory. as its still filed in THEIR court
you do not create a new country when filing a claim.
their policies are that defendants or claimants can be represented. and that people that are not the victim can file claim against you. EG the police, witnesses
yep if you murder someone. a representative/relative/witness can file a claim that you done it.

you can cry all you like that you want to speak to, and only to your victim direct. but your just making yourself look stupid

You have it, franky1... at least the start of it.

The rest of it revolves around the fact that, if I took government or a member of government to court in trial by jury, the jury could easily award me the winnings that I asked for. And much more if I did it via common law trial.

But you don't like that, do you. Yet, it happens all the time with people in the USA. Even happens in the UK.

the problems with government. is not government. because there is no single mind/opinion called government.

its a group so squabbling representatives fighting each other to try to get their own individual opinions heard.

take one representative, his constituents(citizens) might want more freedoms to open businesses of different types previous not allowed. accept payments from customers/tourists in different formats/currencies

but on the other side is another representative that doesnt want the nation to go global which would ruin the national identity.

through the etiquettes and policies formed by former representatives the debate will always sway in favour of the national interest rather than the individual citizens

and so citizens cant accept dollars/bitcoin/any barter at their own cashiers desk and instead for national interest customers/tourists have to swap out their own currency for the currency they are visiting/buying from at national currency exchange services.

many think that these solidified and formal etiquettes and policies created years ago are what is deemed as 'the government' but when you drill down and realise that its just a bunch of representatives and representatives before them. you can then start to form a plan on how to change 'government' mind. by not targetting 'government' but instead spamming the representatives(all of them) individually

Probably people feel more safe if they took some things for granted. It gives them feeling of confidence. It is sad but every single person is not prepared to decide for themselves. They actually want government to take their decisions. Government is not guilty if they make wrong decision. Majority of people elected them. So there is a question: Does every single person should be given opportunity to vote? If there is more people that cant decide is bad or good.

It is ironic how people with power see the world and demonstrates the authority given to them. Gone are the days when I hear power are given only to those who be little themselves as at now, it’s either appointed or seized as related to politics. Today, the people often cry out of every policy formed because of how one sided the issue is been looked out. It’s always considered subjectively rather than objectively. For this reasons, I say this “There are more sides to the story than it’s been considered”.

Of recent, it’s been Indian and now, the Nigerian government that seems to have taken the forefront of the fight against bitcoin and cryptocurrencies. Its sad how well they observe and how little they see. While in high school, I was thought how the government comprises of three basic arms for which, policies and regulations are formed, amended, regulated and enforced with all arms working hand-in-hand to ensure stability amongst others and also, the fundamental human rights and how the rights of an individual is absolute so long as it doesn’t affect or restrict the activities of someone else and this includes investments. There is a biblical saying that goes ‘’when you give/good, do it in such a way that the right hand won’t know”. You can imagine the same body doing a thing and yet the other hand isn’t aware of it, Nigeria has extended this saying to doing evil. Evil in such a that, a part of government through its leader can confer on itself absolute authority to take decisions that could affect the country on a national base and possibly lead to a revolution for which second class citizens which comprises the most population of the country would be the most people affected.
It’s been a moment of uplifting for Nigeria in the late months of the pandemic during its first phase and thereafter, where its citizens searched for other means of investments and maximizing ROI. They(we) were met with a bullrun which helped to promote and propel the Bitcoin and cryptocurrency awareness and investment with individuals growing crypto smart with Nigeria as an African nation being listed as one of the top investors in cryptos and now, the government has chosen to not regulate but place a hold on progress of its citizens. How do they do this, by pretending not to see the other side to the story. The sides to the story;

* SCAM ORIENTED: In my trying to understand humans as to why they behave in certain ways, I got to understand that everything is subject to critic and we often choose not to accept the truth before our eyes if it doesn’t benefit us directly and as such, it makes less meaning. It could only be deduced or believed that, they aren’t crypto investors or has a side to it that won’t be available to the second class citizens but then being irritated by the rough looks of a sponge and forgetting the fact that, it makes a good scrub isn’t the way to go. Cryptocurrency can do more than being used for scams so, why use scam as a major base. After all, it’s always advocated that investors in cryptocurrency in the country and around the world must exercise caution.
http://sec.gov.ng/public-notice-on-investments-in-cryptocurrencies-and-other-virtual-or-digital-currencies/
http://sec.gov.ng/public-notice-on-investments-in-cryptocurrencies-and-other-virtual-or-digital-currencies/
IF the level of caution in the above links doesn’t ring a bell then I wonder what will and I guess similar policies are avail to citizens of other nations as well then, why not go smart on your investments.
So, why would a government be reckless in policy formulation because of some uninvestigated investments of some world’s citizen and as such, limit the rights to utilization of what is avail to easy life?

* REVOLUTIONARY: Its only normal for a better way of getting things done replace the old. Why get so scared of virtual currency especially when it offers a liberty to the government and I don’t mean just Nigeria but nations of the world in this regard. All they tend to see is what it takes from the government and are completely blind on what it offers. Having eyes so big and yet sees nothing! The world has been so consigned with fighting, so focused on the war that they don’t seem to realize when to stop and see to utilizing what it offers and the much attention that could be drawn from the government. All they see is how much control they would lose, if the people are empowered.


* IT’S A BEST WAY TO TRANSACT: Speed is good but accuracy is better. This is what Bitcoin has got checked; they know this but yet undermine its importance. Of what best way would it be to uniting the world as a global market than cryptocurrency. It meets the requirements of universality as it isn’t tied to a single nation and its value doesn’t depreciate across borders, its relatively constant everywhere and could serve if approved. That someone could get to someone or something done at the other end of the globe to meet up with emergencies with little procedure sounds like an advantage to me.

* IT DIVERTS ATTENTION FROM THE GOVERNMENT: Many nations of the world today especially the populous nations and the third world countries has unemployment problems and this is a major problem to the growth of an economy as, unemployment is reflected in production which in turn affects the standard of living in nations facing this problem. Its often a view point of many college and high school students to graduate and secure a paid job with the government coupled with their limited resources. Cryptocurrencies has got this too in check as it empowers but youth and adult investors alike and in turn, turn diverts there attentions from the government hence, more wealth is brought in to invest in other field of business which could be taxed thereby, increasing productivity, creating more jobs and aids economic growth but, it’s a chance government has refused to see or take.

There a lot to be said on this note but, I’ll limit it to that and to your contributions for a good read.

COUNTRIES WHERE CRYPTOCURRENCY IS OUTLAWED
Algeria, Bolivia, Morocco, Nepal, Pakistan, and Vietnam
COUNTRIES THAT ALLOW MINIMAL PARTICIPACTION
Bangladesh, Iran, Thailand, Lithuania, Lesotho, China, and Colombia


It’s old and unethical but, it sometimes works. It’s a simple strategy to them, “control the food/resources and in turn you control the people" and they do all this under the cover of the law. A big fowl play!

This is why they tend to focus on one side of the story to as to deny the bitcoin revolution on old ways of doing things. It’s been the barter system, the cowries, manila, gold, fiat for Africa at most and now, it’s time for bitcoin. But then, its progress because Bitcoin isn’t completely erasing the fiat out of the picture just as fiat didn’t completely erased gold. So they accuse bitcoin to be used for scamming as though, scam started with it or is only untraceable when done with cryptos. If that be the case(the scamming conspiracy), why not government of nations teach it to its citizens and not only rely on declarations. Instead, what we see is a display of power given to them by the people and they stay immune under the cover of the rule of law and display their tyranny towards the people without consultation. In India, its prison, In Nigeria its blocking of bank accounts with crypto history either prior or present. How sensible is that? Its still a work in progress as several senators and crypto investors aren’t in unity on the matter. We hope for the best resolution but then, "Ban isn’t Regulation”.

Long live Bitcoin and Cryptocurrencies.