Author

Topic: There is no Constitutional requirement to obey Unconstitutional, Covid, laws. (Read 135 times)

legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 1368
Good thing we have these guys to protect our freedoms.



Well, thanks for showing us who your freedom fighters are. But they are right! With the lockdowns/shutdowns, and people spending a whole lot more time at home, we can expect a new baby-boom starting about 7 months from now.

It's just goofy to think that all those new babies will die with/from Coronavirus.

Cool
legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 1368
~snip~

The authorities are being very cunning. I think the introduction of such measures is aimed at provoking distrust between friends, neighbors and relatives. In my opinion, this practice is aimed at the fragmentation of people, which is required to prevent crowding at meetings.

P.S. If everyone distrusts each other, there will be no riot.

They are after a whole bunch of things that are difficult to see. But a couple of them are:
1. Money from a new vaccine;
2. A vaccine that will further destroy herd immunity so they can make more vaccines for other new diseases;
3. Cover up the fact that the fiat money system is collapsing;
4. Take the people's eyes off their evil shenanigans in many areas other than money and vaccines - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/the-end-of-the-world-as-we-know-it-the-fall-of-the-cabal-5245619.

And who knows what else?

If you are a Bible believer, we are in the end times shown in the Revelation. More than likely the evil done over the last hundred years has called Satan up from the abyss. While he has to come up to go to his destruction, we sheeple are going to be hurt until he does go.

The wonderful point is that Jesus is coming to take care of Satan.

Cool
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 2039
~snip~

The authorities are being very cunning. I think the introduction of such measures is aimed at provoking distrust between friends, neighbors and relatives. In my opinion, this practice is aimed at the fragmentation of people, which is required to prevent crowding at meetings.

P.S. If everyone distrusts each other, there will be no riot.
legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 1368
Okay. So sometimes it is good that people don't know how to sue government for attempting to make them do unconstitutional things. The snitches get theirs anyway.


900 Lockdown-"Snitches" Fear Violent Reprisals After Names, Addresses Published Online



Arguably the best single piece of reporting ever published by the now-defunct Splinter News was a piece resulting from a FOIA request on immigration 'snitches' - people who report the undocumented to ICE or other federal immigration authorities. Splinter found a surprising pattern of people trying to have family members - more often than not their in-laws - deported.

Now, the Independent reports that hundreds of Missouri residents have had their personal details shared online after the publication of a document that recorded reports made by people tattling on lockdown violators.

Some individuals - who asked to remain anonymous despite being named in a public Facebook group as lockdown snitches - reportedly told the Independent that they are seriously concerned about facing consequences for 'snitching' on coronavirus rulebreakers in St Louis County. The people who were ratted on included mostly small business owners who were reported for flouting lockdown laws - ie (in many cases) simply trying to survive - by patrons, competitors and, of course, the haters.

The names and addresses of the 900 'snitches' were released totally legally - via an FOIA request (any jailhouse snitch will tell you to beware the fact that there will always be a record of cooperation for constitutional reasons). They were then rounded up and posted in the Facebook group with the explicit intent of 'naming and shaming' them.

"I'm not only worried about COVID, I'm worried about someone showing up at my door, showing up at my workplace or me getting fired for doing what is right," said a woman named Patricia, who was named as one of the 'snitches'.

"When there is something that happens next time, I'm not going to feel safe or protected enough to call the local authorities."

[...]

"We're in a society where doing what's right doesn't always get rewarded," added Patricia. "We have to be extra careful because we don't have the strength to fight this."


Cool
legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 1368
Google "Constitution and Amendments, Cornell." Read the explaantions of the various Amendments and the Constitution.

People are allowed to do almost anything that they want. If they adhere to lockdowns and shutdowns, it's because they want to.

It's natural for people to do the easy thing first. So, shutdowns and lockdowns will be adhered to because they are easy. But when the people don't want to adhere to lockdowns and shutdowns any longer, because they don't like living without their freedom, they will start taking the law enforcement officers to court, along with the LEO commanders, and even the governors of their States.

If the governors don't change, we will start to see recall petitions floating around.

What I have seen so far is that the judges have sided with the people and what the law says... that there is no Constitutional requirement that people obey lockdowns and shutdown.

The point is that it is up to the people... jointly or individually.

Cool
Jump to: