OP, people would probably take you a hell of a lot more seriously if you acted with maturity. Bringing up "your mom" jokes isn't going to bring any seriousness/validity to the claims you are making:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.47619117
As for sharding, I'm assuming it's relevant to sharding of databases, just put into the context of cryptocurrency/blockchains (in terms of storage of data). If it's a legitimate discussion, while it may be somewhat spammy to create new threads to discuss, the OP of that thread is in the right provided the thread has some form of value.
If they make multiple threads to discuss the same sort of thing, then that's a different story.
These fake discussions are quite obvious to most people. I have even laid out clearly how to identify this and yet there are other like yourself who need that little extra help.https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.47619117
As for sharding, I'm assuming it's relevant to sharding of databases, just put into the context of cryptocurrency/blockchains (in terms of storage of data). If it's a legitimate discussion, while it may be somewhat spammy to create new threads to discuss, the OP of that thread is in the right provided the thread has some form of value.
If they make multiple threads to discuss the same sort of thing, then that's a different story.
Is it becoming any clearer now??
I did read the users posts, and while I do see many threads being created, I'm not certain I would call it spam. It still has inherent value. This thread, however: debatable. Listen, I'm not usually one to come to *any* spammers defence, but if a effort is made to make a thread worth value to BitcoinTalk, then I will take notice of that.
Your snarky attitude really isn't becoming of you, and it's not going to garner you any sympathy when it comes to members listening to your claims.
Also, yes, you did break a rule above posting twice in a row (not bumping). You don't have to call the other user a moron when you are clearly the user who is not reading the rules in this situation.
You are a moron. That is clear.
Those 3 accounts are colluding together to spam the same shitty icos.
Read the op again
I am not interested in your opinion on facts that are clearly observable.
Just because you are dumb enough to believe 3 accounts colluding to create fake conversations to spam icos has inherent value means nothing other than to display you need to keep your mouth shut.
Now stop replying on my thread because I stated in the OP I don't want gimps cluttering it with their dip shit comments.
@Tszunami98dumbass
As I often explain to people. When presenting observable facts there is no room for serious or not serious. There is simply the facts.
I you can not digest such information and take it seriously that means zero to me.
I lock this thread now since enough time has passed to act upon the information presented in the OP.
. This is about contrived fake conversations between those 3 to promote the same icos on the main alt board on many threads.