Limite le sujet pourrait plutôt trouver sa place dans la section "Bitcoin et la loi"..
La question de fonds: dévoiler les IPs de connexion et les PMs de Satoshi constituerait-il une
violation des règles fondatrices du forum (en plus des dispositions éventuellement pénales en matière de protection des correspondances) ou, cette divulgation pourrait-elle rentrer dans le cadre d'une forme de "crypto-archéologie" (fondée sur les mêmes règles qui permettent d'explorer une tombe ancienne, sans se rendre coupable de violation de sépulture)
Vous avez 3 ans.
Un message du jour qui évoque les PM et les adresses IP de connexion de Satoshi détenues par Theymos (traduction sommaire des échanges plus bas)
Following my
What if? Satoshi Nakamoto's identity was public information thread. Despite the conspiracy theories going on in the replies a user pointed out something interesting. That theymos is considering releasing the personal messages of Satoshi.
theymos posted this:
I'll probably release Satoshi's PMs and logged IPs addresses in ~8 years. This'd probably be of great historical interest. (Though he always used Tor, as far as I can tell.)
He posted that back in 2013. 8 years from then would be 2021. However I'm a little concerned about exposing personal information just because Satoshi is the one to have created the forum and Bitcoin. His personal data should be handled the exact same as any other user.
Theymos in the past has said that our data is safe from information requests unless he has reason to believe you are scamming or breaking the law. I'm pretty sure I've read that theymos has rejected several subpoenas because he didn't think there was sufficient reason to do so. Taking this into consideration why is theymos willing to release personal messages and logged IPs. Even if he used Tor to connect over the forum his data shouldn't be released. Sure its interesting information but he should not be treated any different.
As you can probably tell from this thread and my what if thread I'm very against exposing any sort of personal data unless there's a good enough reason. I don't think that historic significance to the cryptocurrency world would be a good enough reason to expose his personal data.
I don't read PMs for fun. Very very rarely, I need to read PMs for technical, administrative, or legal reasons, but I try to avoid this as much as possible. I don't want to spy on anyone's personal business.
obviously lol, i bet the first thing theymos did when he became admin was to read satoshi's pms.
I've never read Satoshi's PMs.
There is nothing to say they didn't subpoena the records of the shroomery
They did.
theymos hadn't read Satoshi's PM's up until this quote and he said that he doesn't like to spy on peoples personal business. I don't think Satoshi should be treated any differently. Even if the information was of historic value and would be interesting to view.
* * *
Je ne lis pas les MP pour m'amuser. Très rarement, j'ai besoin de lire les MP pour des raisons techniques, administratives ou juridiques, mais j'essaie d'éviter cela autant que possible. Je ne veux pas espionner les affaires personnelles de qui que ce soit.
Évidemment lol, je parie que la première chose qu'il a faite quand il est devenu admin a été de lire les PM de Satoshi.
Je n'ai jamais lu les PM de Satoshi.
theymos n'a jamais lu les PM de Satoshi jusqu'à cette citation et il a dit qu'il n'aimait pas espionner les affaires personnelles des gens. Je ne pense pas que Satoshi devrait être traité différemment. Même si l'information avait une valeur historique et qu'il serait intéressant de la consulter.
