I consider the name "Bitcoin Cash" to be deceptive, but that's on the people behind it: I don't consider it deceptive/fraudulent for people to merely refer to that cryptocurrency as Bitcoin Cash.
This is only appropriate for every one else but to lauda it is not appropriate action?
Why?
I notice lauda keep quoting this one?
He does the same thing (actually worse) but it's okay for him to lie, deceive and fraud investors?
Then he punish other members for less? I see? How come?
The evidence is concrete against him for lying and scamming? Fraud lie deceived investors to invest in non instamine coin? Then after he dump his scam coins he admit it was instamine scam?
What is the appropriate action red trust or flag?
Let's compare..
People who say bch. Is bitcoin ? That is opinion that could mislead newbies. Could have financial gain if own more bch than btc
Scammer who lies they were on launch and can confirm no instamine even though there is clear evidence there is instamine. Scammer attack members who call it instamine coin. Pushing instamine coin. Then after dumping his bags he start telling everyone it was instamined scam coin?
Hmmm which one worse I wonder?
Opinion - intention could be to mislead (if you don't accept their case) - possible financial gain if own charge
Deliberate lie - to deceive and mislead 100% - for 100% sure bagholder.
* I don't support bch I only store BTC but the principle is fucked that scamming scum punishing others for doing worse and using theymos quote to green light him.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53948198
Theymos can you say is appropriate to red tag or flag scammer liar lauda?
I must keep asking because I want to use your words to make a flag and tag for lauda.
However if you tell me lauda does not need to abide by the same rules as the rest of the members then I can realise it would be foolish.
Scammer who argues for months in the face of irre